oski003 said:
DiabloWags said:
Unit2Sucks said:
DiabloWags said:
Unit 2, I'm not really surprised.
I even wagered that he'd "back out" of it . . . even though he himself defined the bet's terms.
And no apology or admission that he backed out.
Sad really.

Yes he both complains that I goaded him into a net and that I didn't respond fast enough after he accepted the bet.
We can all see who the liar is.
Agreed.
All he had to do is apologize to you. But I guess he's not capable of doing so.
It's comical that he claimed that he was "goaded" into a simple bet; one in which he defined the terms.
It's sad that his posting name is the mascot of this fine University, but cant make good on his word.
Makes you seriously question anything that he's ever posted here.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wtrf.com/ohio/ohio-police-say-candy-bar-tested-postive-for-meth-fentanyl/amp/
My original point holds true, regardless of the fact that I ended up not taking the bet. Have a wonderful day. Enjoy your Porsche.
Let's suspend disbelief for a second and assume that this isn't a right wing sicko perpetrating a false flag operation.
This has literally nothing to do with the original fear-mongering by right wing media, as amplified in your pre-halloween posts. No one ever claimed that there would be individual bad actors tampering with individual pieces of candy. That has always been a risk with halloween - and there have been numerous instances of it throughout history. There is nothing unique about it being fentanyl, except for the fact that it may have been inspired by all of the disingenuous fear-mongering.
This started because people claimed that we should be very concerned of candy colored fentanyl streaming in over the border. The purpose of the drugs being candy-colored is to appeal to younger consumers (think teenagers). There was no connection between that and halloween candy and there is no connection between that and the incident 003 linked to. Zilch, zip, nada.
The other fear-mongering was around the cartel smuggling fentanyl in through candy boxes - we saw the whoppers box at LAX filled with small pills. Again - there was never any connection between that and halloween and there is no connection between that and the incident 003 linked. Zilch, zip, nada.
Accepting halloween candy from strangers has always included an assumption of risk around bad actors tampering with and including poison. Here's an
example from Ohio in 2021 but if you look around there are even more disturbing examples.
Just like with caravans and other election-year fear-mongering we've seen the last few years from the GOP, the entire candy-colored fentanyl scare was a right wing psyop. There was never any risk in relation to the underlying facts (drugs are smuggled in lots of ways, including in candy boxes, and some drugs are colorful in order to appeal to young adults and adolescents). This is nothing new and 2022 did not present a heightened risk.
003 is just proving how incredibly disingenuous he is and making excuses for the fact that he once again fell prey to an obvious right wing misinformation campaign.