The Official Russiagate Was BS Thread

7,871 Views | 79 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by Cal88
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

So give me a linked source for this. Thanks.


Here is some of it.

https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-2022-midterm-elections-business-elections-presidential-elections-5468774d18e8c46f81b55e9260b13e93
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

bearister said:

oski003 said:



It is kind of funny that the FBI is wiretapping everyone in Trump's orbit, and the best they can do is find out that one time Russian folks were trying to give Trump's team information on how Russia was illegally funding the DNC.


1. Please provide citation with link for support of FBI wiretapping of tRump associate (other than convicted felon Manafort and Carter Page); and

2. Please provide citation with link for support of Russia funding the DNC.

Thank you.


1) We learned that in the final days of the 2016 presidential race, when the Clinton campaign came up with the Steele dossier a collection of sensational and unsupported allegations about Trump and Russia the FBI used the dossier to win approval to wiretap Carter Page, a low-level former Trump campaign adviser. Then we learned that also in 2016, the FBI used a confidential informant, a professor named Stefan Halper, to spy on Page and George Papadopoulos, another low-level Trump adviser.

Then we learned that in 2016, the FBI sent an undercover agent a woman who used the alias Azra Turk to secretly record conversations with Papadopoulos.

In a court filing Friday, Durham reported that in July 2016, a tech executive named Rodney Joffe (he is unnamed in the court papers, but his name has been widely reported) worked with the Clinton campaign's law firm to "mine internet data," some of it "non-public and/or proprietary" that means secret to search for information that could be used to claim a Trump-Russia connection. Among the secret data that was "exploited," according to Durham, was internet traffic from Trump Tower, from Donald Trump's Central Park West apartment building and after Trump was elected the executive office of the president of the United States, or EOP.

Joffe's company, Durham says, "had come to access and maintain dedicated servers for the EOP as part of a sensitive arrangement" a government contract to provide tech services. They then "exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP's [internet] traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump."

After that, the Clinton team went to the CIA to try to get the nation's spy agency interested in the anti-Trump effort. That mirrored earlier Clinton approaches to the FBI, when Clinton operatives tried to interest agents in what is known as the "Alfa Bank" story, which was a phony allegation that there were all sorts of suspicious connections between a Russian bank and the Trump campaign.

The bigger goal of all of it, Durham says, was "to establish 'an inference' and 'narrative' tying then-candidate Trump to Russia." So there was a two-track operation going on: While the FBI was doing spying of its own, the Clinton team was spying, too, and trying to get the FBI and CIA involved. It was all part of a larger plan to push the "narrative" of Trump-Russia collusion.

How did it end? You'll remember that a special counsel, Robert Mueller, using all the resources and powers of federal law enforcement, searched for collusion for years and could never establish that it happened, much less that any Trump campaign figures might have been involved.

The new revelation is confirmation for some of the Republicans who uncovered the early clues of the spying operation. "Democrat-paid operatives illegally hacked their political opponents' communications during a presidential campaign and then did it again to a sitting president and the White House staff," said Devin Nunes, who as House Intelligence Committee chairman investigated the spying allegations. He just left Congress and is now CEO of the new Trump social media venture.

2) I am not sure why you are asking this. Some Russian duped someone in Trump's team that they had this info and then apparently didn't. That was the premise of this HUGE smoking gun meeting you are referring to.

Stop! We all know that Trump was guilty of all this and more. Everybody knows it! It is known. Just like we all know there is a pee tape. The thing is, his fans don't care. So if you want to make the argument that you don't care, because "Screw it!", then fine, but be honest. Democracy and civility and learnedness might be overrated anyway.
Lets Go Brandon 3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Stop! We all know that Trump was guilty of all this and more. Everybody knows it! It is known. Just like we all know there is a pee tape.
What's funny is that I know you don't take this forum terribly seriously, but I know that you genuinely believe everything above.
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

oski003 said:

bearister said:

oski003 said:

1) We learned that in the final days of the 2016 presidential race, when the Clinton campaign came up with the Steele dossier a collection of sensational and unsupported allegations about Trump and Russia the FBI used the dossier to win approval to wiretap Carter Page, a low-level former Trump campaign adviser. Then we learned that also in 2016, the FBI used a confidential informant, a professor named Stefan Halper, to spy on Page and George Papadopoulos, another low-level Trump adviser.


Then we learned that in 2016, the FBI sent an undercover agent a woman who used the alias Azra Turk to secretly record conversations with Papadopoulos.

In a court filing Friday, Durham reported that in July 2016, a tech executive named Rodney Joffe (he is unnamed in the court papers, but his name has been widely reported) worked with the Clinton campaign's law firm to "mine internet data," some of it "non-public and/or proprietary" that means secret to search for information that could be used to claim a Trump-Russia connection. Among the secret data that was "exploited," according to Durham, was internet traffic from Trump Tower, from Donald Trump's Central Park West apartment building and after Trump was elected the executive office of the president of the United States, or EOP.

Joffe's company, Durham says, "had come to access and maintain dedicated servers for the EOP as part of a sensitive arrangement" a government contract to provide tech services. They then "exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP's [internet] traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump."

After that, the Clinton team went to the CIA to try to get the nation's spy agency interested in the anti-Trump effort. That mirrored earlier Clinton approaches to the FBI, when Clinton operatives tried to interest agents in what is known as the "Alfa Bank" story, which was a phony allegation that there were all sorts of suspicious connections between a Russian bank and the Trump campaign.

The bigger goal of all of it, Durham says, was "to establish 'an inference' and 'narrative' tying then-candidate Trump to Russia." So there was a two-track operation going on: While the FBI was doing spying of its own, the Clinton team was spying, too, and trying to get the FBI and CIA involved. It was all part of a larger plan to push the "narrative" of Trump-Russia collusion.

How did it end? You'll remember that a special counsel, Robert Mueller, using all the resources and powers of federal law enforcement, searched for collusion for years and could never establish that it happened, much less that any Trump campaign figures might have been involved.

The new revelation is confirmation for some of the Republicans who uncovered the early clues of the spying operation. "Democrat-paid operatives illegally hacked their political opponents' communications during a presidential campaign and then did it again to a sitting president and the White House staff," said Devin Nunes, who as House Intelligence Committee chairman investigated the spying allegations. He just left Congress and is now CEO of the new Trump social media venture.

2) I am not sure why you are asking this. Some Russian duped someone in Trump's team that they had this info and then apparently didn't. That was the premise of this HUGE smoking gun meeting you are referring to.
Stop! We all know that Trump was guilty of all this and more. Everybody knows it! It is known. Just like we all know there is a pee tape. The thing is, his fans don't care. So if you want to make the argument that you don't care, because "Screw it!", then fine, but be honest. Democracy and civility and learnedness might be overrated anyway.
"We all know that Trump was guilty of all this and more."
The "All this" phrase refers to the preceding post, which was completely about things done to Trump. He can't be guilty of things done to him. Which begs the question, exactly what do you believe Trump was guilty of?

"Just like we all know there is a pee tape"
If the tape exists where is it? Who possesses it? Why hasn't it been released yet?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just wanted to make sure this got logged in the official thread record:

Judge tosses Donald Trump's Russia probe lawsuit against Hillary Clinton, FBI | PBS NewsHour


https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/judge-tosses-donald-trumps-russia-probe-lawsuit-against-hillary-clinton-fbi


UK judge dismisses Trump's lawsuit over dossier containing 'shocking and scandalous claims' | PBS NewsHour


https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/uk-judge-dismisses-trumps-lawsuit-over-dossier-containing-shocking-and-scandalous-claims

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Just wanted to make sure this got logged in the official thread record:

Judge tosses Donald Trump's Russia probe lawsuit against Hillary Clinton, FBI | PBS NewsHour


https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/judge-tosses-donald-trumps-russia-probe-lawsuit-against-hillary-clinton-fbi


UK judge dismisses Trump's lawsuit over dossier containing 'shocking and scandalous claims' | PBS NewsHour


https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/uk-judge-dismisses-trumps-lawsuit-over-dossier-containing-shocking-and-scandalous-claims


Just another example of how Trump taking advantage of the fact that our legal system doesn't do nearly enough to discourage these sorts of frivolous lawsuits. His lawyers should face sanctions and ethics investigation for filing this garbage and the defendants should be able to sue for having been forced to defend against these fictional claims.

Anyone who thinks Trump is a "victim" of the legal system is either disingenuous or uninformed as to which side of the abuse he is on. Any lawyer who represents him ends up in jail, bankrupt, disbarred or, if they are lucky, just resenting associating themselves with this buffoon.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

bearister said:

Just wanted to make sure this got logged in the official thread record:

Judge tosses Donald Trump's Russia probe lawsuit against Hillary Clinton, FBI | PBS NewsHour


https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/judge-tosses-donald-trumps-russia-probe-lawsuit-against-hillary-clinton-fbi


UK judge dismisses Trump's lawsuit over dossier containing 'shocking and scandalous claims' | PBS NewsHour


https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/uk-judge-dismisses-trumps-lawsuit-over-dossier-containing-shocking-and-scandalous-claims


Just another example of how Trump taking advantage of the fact that our legal system doesn't do nearly enough to discourage these sorts of frivolous lawsuits. His lawyers should face sanctions and ethics investigation for filing this garbage and the defendants should be able to sue for having been forced to defend against these fictional claims.

Anyone who thinks Trump is a "victim" of the legal system is either disingenuous or uninformed as to which side of the abuse he is on. Any lawyer who represents him ends up in jail, bankrupt, disbarred or, if they are lucky, just resenting associating themselves with this buffoon.


1) The judge was a Karen

2) Defense said the lawsuit should be thrown out because the report was never meant to be made public and was published by BuzzFeed without the permission of Steele or Orbis. It also said the claim was filed too late.

Karen agreed, concluding Trump had "chosen to allow many years to elapse - without any attempt to vindicate his reputation in this jurisdiction - since he was first made aware of the dossier" in January 2017.

This specific lawsuit doesn't appear baseless. It was just thrown out by a Karen.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

bearister said:

Just wanted to make sure this got logged in the official thread record:

Judge tosses Donald Trump's Russia probe lawsuit against Hillary Clinton, FBI | PBS NewsHour


https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/judge-tosses-donald-trumps-russia-probe-lawsuit-against-hillary-clinton-fbi


UK judge dismisses Trump's lawsuit over dossier containing 'shocking and scandalous claims' | PBS NewsHour


https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/uk-judge-dismisses-trumps-lawsuit-over-dossier-containing-shocking-and-scandalous-claims


Just another example of how Trump taking advantage of the fact that our legal system doesn't do nearly enough to discourage these sorts of frivolous lawsuits. His lawyers should face sanctions and ethics investigation for filing this garbage and the defendants should be able to sue for having been forced to defend against these fictional claims.

Anyone who thinks Trump is a "victim" of the legal system is either disingenuous or uninformed as to which side of the abuse he is on. Any lawyer who represents him ends up in jail, bankrupt, disbarred or, if they are lucky, just resenting associating themselves with this buffoon.


Judge sanctions Trump, Habba nearly $1 million for 'completely frivolous' Clinton suit - POLITICO


https://www.politico.com/news/2023/01/19/judge-sanctions-trump-habba-clinton-00078700

"A Florida-based federal judge has ordered nearly $1 million in sanctions against Donald Trump and his attorney Alina Habba, calling the former president a "mastermind of strategic abuse of the judicial process."

In a blistering 46-page order, U.S. District Court Judge Donald Middlebrooks said Trump's sprawling lawsuit against Hillary Clinton and dozens of former Justice Department and FBI officials was an almost cartoonish abuse of the legal system."
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Genocide Joe said:

Quote:

Stop! We all know that Trump was guilty of all this and more. Everybody knows it! It is known. Just like we all know there is a pee tape.
What's funny is that I know you don't take this forum terribly seriously, but I know that you genuinely believe everything above.

Yup* and yup!

And yup again: That is funny!



* I do reserve the right to get serious here from time to time. You will know when I do, even if others might not.
Lets Go Brandon 4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Apparently, it was even more bull**** than we thought.



Short version:


Link to paywall article:
https://public.substack.com/p/cia-had-foreign-allies-spy-on-trump

Longer version:
https://www.youtube.com/live/ZSRszPj1WKA


bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Democrats and the Deep State paid a foreign government to falsify information and then lied to the courts to spy on Trump and get him impeached? Don't they have better things to do with their time?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

Big C said:

oski003 said:

bearister said:

oski003 said:

1) We learned that in the final days of the 2016 presidential race, when the Clinton campaign came up with the Steele dossier a collection of sensational and unsupported allegations about Trump and Russia the FBI used the dossier to win approval to wiretap Carter Page, a low-level former Trump campaign adviser. Then we learned that also in 2016, the FBI used a confidential informant, a professor named Stefan Halper, to spy on Page and George Papadopoulos, another low-level Trump adviser.


Then we learned that in 2016, the FBI sent an undercover agent a woman who used the alias Azra Turk to secretly record conversations with Papadopoulos.

In a court filing Friday, Durham reported that in July 2016, a tech executive named Rodney Joffe (he is unnamed in the court papers, but his name has been widely reported) worked with the Clinton campaign's law firm to "mine internet data," some of it "non-public and/or proprietary" that means secret to search for information that could be used to claim a Trump-Russia connection. Among the secret data that was "exploited," according to Durham, was internet traffic from Trump Tower, from Donald Trump's Central Park West apartment building and after Trump was elected the executive office of the president of the United States, or EOP.

Joffe's company, Durham says, "had come to access and maintain dedicated servers for the EOP as part of a sensitive arrangement" a government contract to provide tech services. They then "exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP's [internet] traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump."

After that, the Clinton team went to the CIA to try to get the nation's spy agency interested in the anti-Trump effort. That mirrored earlier Clinton approaches to the FBI, when Clinton operatives tried to interest agents in what is known as the "Alfa Bank" story, which was a phony allegation that there were all sorts of suspicious connections between a Russian bank and the Trump campaign.

The bigger goal of all of it, Durham says, was "to establish 'an inference' and 'narrative' tying then-candidate Trump to Russia." So there was a two-track operation going on: While the FBI was doing spying of its own, the Clinton team was spying, too, and trying to get the FBI and CIA involved. It was all part of a larger plan to push the "narrative" of Trump-Russia collusion.

How did it end? You'll remember that a special counsel, Robert Mueller, using all the resources and powers of federal law enforcement, searched for collusion for years and could never establish that it happened, much less that any Trump campaign figures might have been involved.

The new revelation is confirmation for some of the Republicans who uncovered the early clues of the spying operation. "Democrat-paid operatives illegally hacked their political opponents' communications during a presidential campaign and then did it again to a sitting president and the White House staff," said Devin Nunes, who as House Intelligence Committee chairman investigated the spying allegations. He just left Congress and is now CEO of the new Trump social media venture.

2) I am not sure why you are asking this. Some Russian duped someone in Trump's team that they had this info and then apparently didn't. That was the premise of this HUGE smoking gun meeting you are referring to.
Stop! We all know that Trump was guilty of all this and more. Everybody knows it! It is known. Just like we all know there is a pee tape. The thing is, his fans don't care. So if you want to make the argument that you don't care, because "Screw it!", then fine, but be honest. Democracy and civility and learnedness might be overrated anyway.
"We all know that Trump was guilty of all this and more."
The "All this" phrase refers to the preceding post, which was completely about things done to Trump. He can't be guilty of things done to him. Which begs the question, exactly what do you believe Trump was guilty of?

"Just like we all know there is a pee tape"
If the tape exists where is it? Who possesses it? Why hasn't it been released yet?


They're just taking the piss.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Probability that there is a pee tape out there, somewhere: 94.7%.

Probability that the tape will surface before Election Day: 48.3%

Fingers crossed: The pee tape going public might just account for Trump's support in the swing states to drop by 1-2%... and that could be enough to change the tide!
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hoax Quiz

How many of these hoaxes do you still believe are true?

Russia Collusion Hoax

Steele Dossier hooker story

Russia paying bounties on US soldiers in Afghanistan

Trump called Neo-Nazis "Fine people."

Trump suggested drinking/injecting bleach to fight COVID

Trump overfed koi fish in Japan

Trump cleared protestors with tear gas for a bible photo op

Hunter's laptop was Russian disinformation.

Elections were fair because no court found major fraud.

January 6th was an "insurrection" to overthrow the government

Trump tried to grab the steering wheel of The Beast

Border Patrol Agents whipped illegal border crossers

Trump stored nuclear secrets at Mar-a-Lago

Governor Whitmer kidnapping plot

Trump mocked a reporter's disability

Government spending to subsidize green products reduces "inflation."

Trump invited Nick Fuentes to dinner at Mar-a-Lago

Twittergate was a dud. We learned nothing new or worrisome.

Twitter doesn't shadow ban.

Twitter hate speech got worse under Musk

Derek Chauvin killed George Floyd

NATO Funding Hoax

Trump vowed there would be a "bloodbath" if he's not re-elected.

Russia Hoaxes broken out

1. Russia collusion hoax (the original)

2. Russian bounties on American soldiers hoax

3. Hunter laptop was Russian disinfo hoax

4. Trump responsible for Navalny's death hoax

5. Trump invited Russia to attack a NATO country that doesn't pay its bills hoax

6. FBI informant for the Biden bribes is a Russian spy (probable hoax)

7. Putin blew up his own pipeline hoax.

8. NEW: Trump is romantically attracted to Putin.

9. Russia is behind the anti-vax movement (Peter Hotez)

10. Alfa Bank hoax

11. Hamilton 68 Hoax

12. Embassy sonic weapon hoax

13. Navalny died of a blood clot

14. Russia is losing in Ukraine
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nice copy and paste job on that RNC email. Goood little MAGAt!
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

Nice copy and paste job on that RNC email. Goood little MAGAt!


If you first start with the assumption that the Democrats lie about everything, then the information filtering becomes easier.
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Riiiiiight. Republicans NEVER lie.




You are an even bigger fu$&ing moron than movielover or 003. Impressive.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

Riiiiiight. Republicans NEVER lie.

You are an even bigger fu$&ing moron than movielover or 003. Impressive.

Why do Democrats lie all the time?
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

Riiiiiight. Republicans NEVER lie.




You are an even bigger fu$&ing moron than movielover or 003. Impressive.

Wow, that's quite a claim to make!
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

AunBear89 said:

Riiiiiight. Republicans NEVER lie.




You are an even bigger fu$&ing moron than movielover or 003. Impressive.

Wow, that's quite a claim!


It is. It is. Top moron is either movielover or Bearforce. 003 plays stupid games and thinks he is clever. But he is not a moron of their level.
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Big C said:

AunBear89 said:

Riiiiiight. Republicans NEVER lie.




You are an even bigger fu$&ing moron than movielover or 003. Impressive.

Wow, that's quite a claim!


It is. It is. Top moron is either movielover or Bearforce. 003 plays stupid games and thinks he is clever. But he is not a moron of their level.


Upon further reflection, I think I agree with you. He IS a moron, just not to their level.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Big C said:

AunBear89 said:

Riiiiiight. Republicans NEVER lie.




You are an even bigger fu$&ing moron than movielover or 003. Impressive.

Wow, that's quite a claim!

It is. It is. Top moron is either movielover or Bearforce. 003 plays stupid games and thinks he is clever. But he is not a moron of their level.
movielover, Bearforce, 003?

Legends.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good of Matt Taibbi to admit Russiagate was real
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Good of Matt Taibbi to admit Russiagate was real


Yes, the Russiagate hoax was real and may have singlehandedly destroyed trust in "mainstream news" in this country forever.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Because Matt Taibbi says conflicting things at different times is a reflection on him
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Like what?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

British Court Reveals Paul Ryan Was the First One to Receive a Copy of Steele Dossier Back in 2016 and He Hid This For Years

Kash Patel: Remember in 2016, let's rewind the tape. It was Russia collusion, Russia collusion, Russia collusion. Then Speaker Paul Ryan enlisted me and Devin Nunez to investigate the Russia collusion.

Nobody knew what the Steele dossier was in 2016. They had already gone to the federal court and unlawfully surveilled Donald Trump with it. But we didn't find out until after we completed our investigation in 2018, was that the speaker, Paul Ryan, who charged us with investigating Russiagate, was the first guy to ever get a copy of the Steele dossier in 2016.

He never told us. He still never admitted it. It finally was admitted in a British court where Christopher Steele was being sued. Just think about it, we could have asked, Where did you get it? Who did you get it from? How was it paid for? All of these secrets could have come out under this man's very investigation, but he rigged it from the beginning.

bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
132 Days Til No Joe said:



The overwhelming majority of information that is classified is to protect political security, NOT national security."

- Julian Assange
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
131 Days Til No Joe said:



In 2016, the CIA claimed Trump was a Russian agent.

In 2020, the CIA claimed Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation.

2024?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Scoop: Mueller team's book to reveal inside story of Trump-Russia investigation


https://www.axios.com/2024/07/11/mueller-trump-russia-prosecutors-book-interference

*Could prove more interesting than Billy Barr Sinister's summary.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Scoop: Mueller team's book to reveal inside story of Trump-Russia investigation


https://www.axios.com/2024/07/11/mueller-trump-russia-prosecutors-book-interference

*Could prove more interesting than Billy Barr Sinister's summary.
They're going to write a whole book about how they were intimidated and not up to the task of the time? And then after months of work they let themselves just get rolled by lies from Trump's Attorney General in one day.

I don't know who is going to buy that book but I know I change the channel every time I see Andrew Weissmann on the tv.
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Diplomacy? Horrors! We want bloodshed, destruction, and billions of magically disappearing American aid.
Carthage Russia must be destroyed.

bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

The company behind the largest IT outage in the world, Crowdstrike, also lied and claimed Russia hacked the DNC. Whatever the reasons they have for the outage, they are not to be trusted.
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.