The Official Russiagate Was BS Thread

16,453 Views | 119 Replies | Last: 7 days ago by bear2034
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Sounds believable.
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It may've already been posted, but this is manufactured to distract from the Epstein crisis. The scores of posts by our recently-returned Russian friend will not change that obvious reality. It's as plain as the nose on your face.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chazzed said:

It may've already been posted, but this is manufactured to distract from the Epstein crisis. The scores of posts by our recently-returned Russian friend will not change that obvious reality. It's as plain as the nose on your face.

Call your senator (Adam Schiff and the other guy) immediately and make your voice heard! lol.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chazzed said:

It may've already been posted, but this is manufactured to distract from the Epstein crisis. The scores of posts by our recently-returned Russian friend will not change that obvious reality. It's as plain as the nose on your face.


Yes the timing of this is a bit suspicious.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Tulsi Gabbard play, clearly scripted by Trump, in addition to creating a diversion from the Epstein files heat, is a pure and simple attempt to rewrite history and scrub the ole legacy a bit:

"Throughout the 20th century, many dictators engaged in rewriting history as a means of solidifying their power, justifying their actions, and controlling the population.

Here are some prominent examples:

Joseph Stalin (Soviet Union): History was routinely rewritten under Stalin's rule, particularly to portray his enemies, like Trotsky, as traitors to the Revolution, notes Medium states. He even went to the extent of doctoring photographs to remove purged individuals from historical images. The official narrative also shifted from emphasizing the role of the working class to highlighting the importance of "great men" like Stalin, drawing comparisons to past despots such as Peter the Great and Ivan the Terrible.

Adolf Hitler (Nazi Germany): Hitler's regime promoted an ideology of racial purity and Aryan supremacy, rewriting history to justify these beliefs and demonize Jews and other minority groups. This involved rejecting areas of science dominated by Jewish scientists, such as theoretical physics, in favor of an "Aryan physics".

Mao Zedong (China): During the Cultural Revolution, Mao's regime used propaganda to revise history, promoting an idealized image of Mao as a revolutionary from childhood, according to Listverse. Textbooks and other materials were utilized to indoctrinate the populace with the Party's version of history and to erase any narratives that challenged their authority or the "socialism with Chinese characteristics" ideology.
Kim Il-sung (North Korea): The Kim dynasty built a cult of personality around Kim Il-sung, fabricating myths about his birth and leadership during the fight against Japanese colonial rule. This included constructing monuments and museums dedicated to fabricated victories, according to the New Statesman.

Nicolae Ceauescu (Romania): Ceauescu crafted a narrative of his childhood that emphasized rural poverty and hardship, portraying himself as a self-made leader rooted in the Romanian working class. This was taught in schools and presented in state media, designed to foster unity and suppress dissent.

These are just a few examples, and the practice of rewriting history is not limited to these regimes.

Dictators often manipulate historical narratives to create a mythology around their own rise to power, legitimize their authority, silence opposition, and instill nationalistic fervor among their populations."
AI Overview
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?


First posted in 2018 by the Epoch Times.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gabbard's Russian interference claims directly contradict what other Trump officials have said | CNN Politics
https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/22/politics/tulsi-gabbard-russia-trump-obama-analysis
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Russia hacked the election is what we were repeatedly told.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Oh my.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Comey's press conference on the eve of the 2016 Election about HRC emails tipped the election in favor of Trump. Trump knows it, most people know it and I'm pretty sure even you know it.


Trump was so thankful that he licked him and whispered dirty.


*The election would have gone to Hillary had Comey discussed the Trump Campaign/Russian connection instead of her emails.They didn't do it because Comey is a Republican and…. they thought Hillary was going to beat him anyway.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Comey's press conference on the eve of the 2016 Election about HRC emails tipped the election in favor of Trump. Trump knows it, most people know it and I'm pretty sure even you know it.

The reason why Hillary lost is because voters knew she was crooked.

tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
People did not like HRC. She was putrid at retail politics. She lost the election because she couldn't be troubled to visit a couple of upper midwest states.

She refused to personally speak to her crowd on election night. That was one of the most low class moves of all time and is exhibit A to the probable validity of the Russian intelligence (DNC emails) about her unstable mental state.
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I saw the Obama response again. Upon re-reading it more carefully, notice how it is a non-denial denial.


"Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response," Obama spokesman Patrick Rodenbush said in a statement. "But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one."
"These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction," Obama's spokesman continued. "Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes."
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.