The Official Russiagate Was BS Thread

20,424 Views | 124 Replies | Last: 12 hrs ago by PAC-10-BEAR
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:52p, 7/20/25

Sounds believable.
Reply Quote
2
chazzed
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:14p, 7/20/25
It may've already been posted, but this is manufactured to distract from the Epstein crisis. The scores of posts by our recently-returned Russian friend will not change that obvious reality. It's as plain as the nose on your face.
Reply Quote
3
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to chazzed • 8:20p, 7/20/25
chazzed said:
It may've already been posted, but this is manufactured to distract from the Epstein crisis. The scores of posts by our recently-returned Russian friend will not change that obvious reality. It's as plain as the nose on your face.

Call your senator (Adam Schiff and the other guy) immediately and make your voice heard! lol.
Reply Quote
4
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to chazzed • 6:21a, 7/21/25
chazzed said:
It may've already been posted, but this is manufactured to distract from the Epstein crisis. The scores of posts by our recently-returned Russian friend will not change that obvious reality. It's as plain as the nose on your face.


Yes the timing of this is a bit suspicious.
Reply Quote
3
bearister
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:54a, 7/21/25
The Tulsi Gabbard play, clearly scripted by Trump, in addition to creating a diversion from the Epstein files heat, is a pure and simple attempt to rewrite history and scrub the ole legacy a bit:

"Throughout the 20th century, many dictators engaged in rewriting history as a means of solidifying their power, justifying their actions, and controlling the population.

Here are some prominent examples:

Joseph Stalin (Soviet Union): History was routinely rewritten under Stalin's rule, particularly to portray his enemies, like Trotsky, as traitors to the Revolution, notes Medium states. He even went to the extent of doctoring photographs to remove purged individuals from historical images. The official narrative also shifted from emphasizing the role of the working class to highlighting the importance of "great men" like Stalin, drawing comparisons to past despots such as Peter the Great and Ivan the Terrible.

Adolf Hitler (Nazi Germany): Hitler's regime promoted an ideology of racial purity and Aryan supremacy, rewriting history to justify these beliefs and demonize Jews and other minority groups. This involved rejecting areas of science dominated by Jewish scientists, such as theoretical physics, in favor of an "Aryan physics".

Mao Zedong (China): During the Cultural Revolution, Mao's regime used propaganda to revise history, promoting an idealized image of Mao as a revolutionary from childhood, according to Listverse. Textbooks and other materials were utilized to indoctrinate the populace with the Party's version of history and to erase any narratives that challenged their authority or the "socialism with Chinese characteristics" ideology.
Kim Il-sung (North Korea): The Kim dynasty built a cult of personality around Kim Il-sung, fabricating myths about his birth and leadership during the fight against Japanese colonial rule. This included constructing monuments and museums dedicated to fabricated victories, according to the New Statesman.

Nicolae Ceauescu (Romania): Ceauescu crafted a narrative of his childhood that emphasized rural poverty and hardship, portraying himself as a self-made leader rooted in the Romanian working class. This was taught in schools and presented in state media, designed to foster unity and suppress dissent.

These are just a few examples, and the practice of rewriting history is not limited to these regimes.

Dictators often manipulate historical narratives to create a mythology around their own rise to power, legitimize their authority, silence opposition, and instill nationalistic fervor among their populations."
AI Overview
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:50p, 7/21/25


First posted in 2018 by the Epoch Times.
Reply Quote
3
bearister
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:40p, 7/21/25
Gabbard's Russian interference claims directly contradict what other Trump officials have said | CNN Politics
https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/22/politics/tulsi-gabbard-russia-trump-obama-analysis
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Reply Quote
4
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:24a, 7/22/25

Reply Quote
3
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:08a, 7/23/25

Russia hacked the election is what we were repeatedly told.
Reply Quote
3
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:12p, 7/23/25

Oh my.
Reply Quote
2
bearister
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 1:20p, 7/23/25
Comey's press conference on the eve of the 2016 Election about HRC emails tipped the election in favor of Trump. Trump knows it, most people know it and I'm pretty sure even you know it.


Trump was so thankful that he licked him and whispered dirty.


*The election would have gone to Hillary had Comey discussed the Trump Campaign/Russian connection instead of her emails.They didn't do it because Comey is a Republican and…. they thought Hillary was going to beat him anyway.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Reply Quote
3
1 edit
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bearister • 1:33p, 7/23/25
bearister said:
Comey's press conference on the eve of the 2016 Election about HRC emails tipped the election in favor of Trump. Trump knows it, most people know it and I'm pretty sure even you know it.

The reason why Hillary lost is because voters knew she was crooked.

Reply Quote
2
1 edit
tequila4kapp
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bearister • 4:46p, 7/23/25
People did not like HRC. She was putrid at retail politics. She lost the election because she couldn't be troubled to visit a couple of upper midwest states.

She refused to personally speak to her crowd on election night. That was one of the most low class moves of all time and is exhibit A to the probable validity of the Russian intelligence (DNC emails) about her unstable mental state.
Reply Quote
1
tequila4kapp
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:17p, 7/23/25
I saw the Obama response again. Upon re-reading it more carefully, notice how it is a non-denial denial.


"Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response," Obama spokesman Patrick Rodenbush said in a statement. "But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one."
"These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction," Obama's spokesman continued. "Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes."
Reply Quote
2
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:08a, 7/24/25
Reply Quote
3
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:35p, 7/24/25
Reply Quote
3
ACC Bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 8:06p, 8/27/25
PAC-10-BEAR said:

PAC-10-BEAR, welcome to Bear Insider.

Reply Quote
4
Aunburdened
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 1:33p, 10/7/25
Reply Quote
3
Aunburdened
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:17p, 11/20/25


Quote:
Former Special Counsel John Durham, former National Security Adviser John Bolton, former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and former CIA Director Gina Haspel dismissed or buried evidence that cast doubt on a foundational document of the Russigate hoax the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) prepared in the waning days of the Obama administration.

Reply Quote
3
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:41p, 11/29/25
[ol]
  • Hillary Clinton: As the 2016 Democratic candidate, she allegedly funded the "Russia Collusion" dossier through her campaign, which was used to justify FISA surveillance on Trump associates. Her deletion of 33,000 emails after a congressional subpoena demonstrated a flagrant disregard for legal obligations and transparency, while simultaneously pushing unsubstantiated collusion narratives against her opponent.
  • James Comey: As FBI Director, Comey drafted an exoneration letter for Clinton before interviewing key witnesses, then leaked memos to spur a special counsel appointment. His unprecedented press conference on the Clinton investigation and subsequent actions regarding the Trump investigation revealed a pattern of decisions that consistently benefited Clinton while damaging Trump, raising serious questions about his impartiality.
  • Andrew McCabe: Acting FBI Director, McCabe allegedly ordered a "stand down" on the Clinton Foundation probe, with his wife receiving $700,000 from Clinton allies for her political campaign. While overseeing investigations touching both candidates, he failed to recuse himself despite this glaring conflict of interest, and later admitted to authorizing leaks to the media to shape the narrative.
  • Peter Strzok: An FBI agent with a text message trail revealing anti-Trump bias, Strzok altered "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless" in Clinton's investigation. As the lead agent on both the Clinton email and Trump-Russia investigations, his documented promise to "stop" Trump from becoming president severely compromised the integrity of both investigations.
  • Lisa Page: FBI attorney and Strzok's mistress, Page texted about stopping Trump while part of the Russia investigation team. Her extensive communications with Strzok revealed not only personal impropriety but also a concerning level of political motivation driving investigative decisions, including discussions of an "insurance policy" against Trump's presidency.
  • Bruce Ohr: A DOJ official, Ohr connected Christopher Steele with the FBI even after Steele was fired, with his wife working for Fusion GPS. This undisclosed back-channel allowed disgraced sources to continue feeding information into investigations, circumventing official protocols and hiding crucial conflicts of interest from oversight bodies.
  • Nellie Ohr: Worked for Fusion GPS on anti-Trump research while her husband was at DOJ, creating a clear conflict. Her application for a ham radio license during this period suggests an attempt to create covert communications channels, while her research specifically targeted Trump family members, indicating the political nature of her work.
  • Christopher Steele: Former MI6 agent, Steele authored the unverified dossier, paid by Clinton's campaign. Despite being terminated as an FBI source for leaking to the media and admitting in court that his information was unverified, his work continued to be presented as credible to FISA courts through Bruce Ohr's back-channel.
  • Glenn Simpson: Founder of Fusion GPS, hired to research Trump, Simpson's role in dossier creation was crucial. He strategically placed dossier information with media outlets while simultaneously feeding it to the FBI, creating the false impression of multiple sources corroborating the same information when in reality it all stemmed from a single politically-funded source.
  • Sally Yates: Acting AG, Yates warned the White House about Flynn, part of efforts to undermine Trump, and was fired for insubordination. Her role in approving FISA applications based on the unverified dossier and her subsequent actions regarding the transition demonstrate a concerning politicization of her position.
  • Loretta Lynch: As AG during Clinton's email probe, Lynch's secret tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton raises impartiality questions. Her refusal to recuse herself entirely from the Clinton investigation despite this clear conflict, and her pressure on Comey to refer to the investigation as a "matter" rather than an investigation, reveal improper political considerations.
  • John Brennan: CIA Director, Brennan briefed Obama on alleged collusion and later admitted to spying on Trump's campaign. As evidence shows, he allegedly insisted on including the Steele dossier in intelligence assessments despite objections about its reliability, elevating politically-funded opposition research to the status of intelligence product.
  • James Clapper: DNI, Clapper lied to Congress about surveillance and signed Russia interference assessments. He admitted to leaking information about the dossier briefing to CNN, creating the "news hook" needed to legitimize reporting on the dossier's unsubstantiated claims, effectively weaponizing classified intelligence for political purposes.
  • Susan Rice: National Security Advisor, Rice unmasked Trump associates and emailed herself memos, suggesting cover-up efforts. Her unusual January 20, 2017 email documenting a meeting about the Russia investigation "by the book" appears designed to create an exculpatory record, while her unmasking activities targeted political opponents.
  • Samantha Power: U.S. Ambassador to the UN, Power requested numerous unmaskings, claiming ignorance. The unprecedented volume of unmasking requests under her name (over 260 in 2016) far exceeded normal diplomatic requirements, suggesting a coordinated effort to gather intelligence on the incoming administration.
  • Evelyn Farkas: Former Obama official, Farkas admitted on TV to passing Russia info to media, now a CNN commentator. Her concerning public admission about urging colleagues to preserve and disseminate information about Trump before the Obama administration ended revealed the political motivation behind intelligence activities.
  • Jake Sullivan: Clinton campaign official, Sullivan pushed the Russia narrative, now Biden's NSA. He promoted the false Alpha Bank server story that was later debunked, demonstrating how campaign messaging strategies evolved into law enforcement and intelligence operations with lasting consequences.
  • Michael Sussmann: Perkins Coie attorney, Sussmann provided anti-Trump info to FBI, acquitted of lying but the damage was done. His approach to the FBI while concealing that he represented the Clinton campaign allowed partisan opposition research to be presented as neutral security concerns, manipulating law enforcement resources.
  • Kevin Clinesmith: FBI attorney, Clinesmith altered an email for Carter Page's FISA, pleaded guilty, affecting the legal basis for surveillance. His deliberate falsification of evidence to make Page appear as a foreign agent rather than a CIA asset represents one of the clearest examples of misconduct designed to sustain surveillance on Trump associates.
  • Joseph Pientka: FBI agent, Pientka interviewed Flynn and allegedly withheld exculpatory info, impacting legal proceedings. The original 302 form from his interview with Flynn mysteriously disappeared, raising serious questions about evidence tampering and the integrity of the prosecution.
    • [/ol]
    Reply Quote
    2
     
    ×
    subscribe Verify your student status
    See Subscription Benefits
    Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.