concordtom said:

---

oski003 said:

---

AunBear89 said:

---

You sure seem very obsessed with people having anal sex.



Not that there's anything wrong with that. You do you.

---

And ConcordTom is apparently obsessed with rape. ConcordTom can do ConcordTom.

Fyi, I am just rather perplexed at the downplaying here of a congressional staffer filming anal sex in congressional hearing chambers as if it is not a big deal. I am baffled how he somehow normalized this and thinks condemning this act is homophobia. It is comical the labels the left will throw on things to normalize and excuse their own bad behavior.

---

It's as if you grew up in a monastery.
Yo, it's 2023.
Catch up.

Of course it's wrong to have sex in public, in the Capitol.

Lemma ask you this - on the history of Capitol Hill, guess how many time people have engaged in sex acts?

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

oski003 said:

---

AunBear89 said:

---

You sure seem very obsessed with people having anal sex.



Not that there's anything wrong with that. You do you.

---

And ConcordTom is apparently obsessed with rape. ConcordTom can do ConcordTom.

Fyi, I am just rather perplexed at the downplaying here of a congressional staffer filming anal sex in congressional hearing chambers as if it is not a big deal. I am baffled how he somehow normalized this and thinks condemning this act is homophobia. It is comical the labels the left will throw on things to normalize and excuse their own bad behavior.

---

It's as if you grew up in a monastery.
Yo, it's 2023.
Catch up.

Of course it's wrong to have sex in public, in the Capitol.

Lemma ask you this - on the history of Capitol Hill, guess how many time people have engaged in sex acts?

---

27

---

AunBear89 said:

---

That's not all she beats. But 003 doesn't have any problem with anything she does because she has an "R" after her name.

In the land of simple minded conservatives, IOIYAR!

---

AunBear89 said:

---

Try to keep up, Junior. The issue is: we've never seen your panties in an equal twist over what she has done.

That's called "hypocritical."

I usually charge for private tutoring, but I am in the holiday spirit so this lesson was free.

---

bearister said:

---

"That's awful how her boyfriend touched her boob at a musical."
Awful for whom?
..but what about OTPHJ?

---

BearlyCareAnymore said:

---

oski003 said:

---

AunBear89 said:

---

That's not all she beats. But 003 doesn't have any problem with anything she does because she has an "R" after her name.

In the land of simple minded conservatives, IOIYAR!

---

Have you ever seen me defend Lauren Boebert like ConcordTom is defending filming anal sex in congressional hearing rooms? You guys are making up arguments because you are wrong.

---

Why is the fact that it was anal as opposed to any other sex act so important to you?

---

BearlyCareAnymore said:

---

oski003 said:

---

BearlyCareAnymore said:

---

oski003 said:

---

AunBear89 said:

---

That's not all she beats. But 003 doesn't have any problem with anything she does because she has an "R" after her name.

In the land of simple minded conservatives, IOIYAR!

---

Have you ever seen me defend Lauren Boebert like ConcordTom is defending filming anal sex in congressional hearing rooms? You guys are making up arguments because you are wrong.

---

Why is the fact that it was anal as opposed to any other sex act so important to you?

---

Already answered. Thanks.

---

You haven't on this thread and I'm not going to search out every thread you post about anal sex.

---

BearlyCareAnymore said:

---

oski003 said:

---

BearlyCareAnymore said:

---

oski003 said:

---

BearlyCareAnymore said:

---

oski003 said:

---

AunBear89 said:

---

That's not all she beats. But 003 doesn't have any problem with anything she does because she has an "R" after her name.

In the land of simple minded conservatives, IOIYAR!

---

Have you ever seen me defend Lauren Boebert like ConcordTom is defending filming anal sex in congressional hearing rooms? You guys are making up arguments because you are wrong.

---

Why is the fact that it was anal as opposed to any other sex act so important to you?

---

Already answered. Thanks.

---

You haven't on this thread and I'm not going to search out every thread you post about anal sex.

---

You don't have to keep up if you don't want to. Your ignorance of prior posts from multiple posters explains your interjection.

---

Fine with me. Your answer tells me it is relevant to you. It isn't relevant unless your homophobic. I have all the info I need. Stumbled here accidentally. Won't make that mistake again.

---

BearlyCareAnymore said:

---

oski003 said:

---

AunBear89 said:

---

That's not all she beats. But 003 doesn't have any problem with anything she does because she has an "R" after her name.

In the land of simple minded conservatives, IOIYAR!

---

Have you ever seen me defend Lauren Boebert like ConcordTom is defending filming anal sex in congressional hearing rooms? You guys are making up arguments because you are wrong.

---

Why is the fact that it was anal as opposed to any other sex act so important to you?

---

BearlyCareAnymore said:

---

oski003 said:

---

AunBear89 said:

---

Try to keep up, Junior. The issue is: we've never seen your panties in an equal twist over what she has done.

That's called "hypocritical."

I usually charge for private tutoring, but I am in the holiday spirit so this lesson was free.

---

That's awful how her boyfriend touched her boob at a musical. I don't approve of her behavior. It is also awful how ConcordTom feels filming anal sex in a congressional hearing room is normal behavior and speaking out against it is homophobic. I don't recall anyone calling folks who spoke out against Boebert's ****ty behavior as being prudish. Thanks.

---

I don't think speaking out against filming sex in a congressional hearing room is homophobic and no one else does either. The guy got fired rightly so. I don't see that anyone took two seconds to defend the person. So we have a story about a congressional staffer who happened to be a democrat filmed himself having sex in a congressional hearing room. He got fired and no one defended him. And you want to attribute that to democrats. You know what, people do bad things.

A Republican congressperson defrauded people, lied hilariously, misused funds, and Republicans took a year to take action on that.

What makes one wonder about homophobia is the constant typing of the qualifier "anal" in the description as if it has anything to do with anything. If this was hetero sex, would you be typing "filmed himself getting oral sex, than receiving, then moving on to some missionary then finishing up with anal"? Don't think so. The using "anal" as a qualifier is a tell.

---

BearlyCareAnymore said:

---

oski003 said:

---

BearlyCareAnymore said:

---

oski003 said:

---

AunBear89 said:

---

That's not all she beats. But 003 doesn't have any problem with anything she does because she has an "R" after her name.

In the land of simple minded conservatives, IOIYAR!

---

Have you ever seen me defend Lauren Boebert like ConcordTom is defending filming anal sex in congressional hearing rooms? You guys are making up arguments because you are wrong.

---

Why is the fact that it was anal as opposed to any other sex act so important to you?

---

Already answered. Thanks.

---

You haven't on this thread and I'm not going to search out every thread you post about anal sex.

---

bear2034 said:

---

Ridin with Biden
Democrats ride in the Capitol.

---

concordtom said:

---

BearlyCareAnymore said:

---

oski003 said:

---

AunBear89 said:

---

Try to keep up, Junior. The issue is: we've never seen your panties in an equal twist over what she has done.

That's called "hypocritical."

I usually charge for private tutoring, but I am in the holiday spirit so this lesson was free.

---

That's awful how her boyfriend touched her boob at a musical. I don't approve of her behavior. It is also awful how ConcordTom feels filming anal sex in a congressional hearing room is normal behavior and speaking out against it is homophobic. I don't recall anyone calling folks who spoke out against Boebert's ****ty behavior as being prudish. Thanks.

---

I don't think speaking out against filming sex in a congressional hearing room is homophobic and no one else does either. The guy got fired rightly so. I don't see that anyone took two seconds to defend the person. So we have a story about a congressional staffer who happened to be a democrat filmed himself having sex in a congressional hearing room. He got fired and no one defended him. And you want to attribute that to democrats. You know what, people do bad things.

A Republican congressperson defrauded people, lied hilariously, misused funds, and Republicans took a year to take action on that.

What makes one wonder about homophobia is the constant typing of the qualifier "anal" in the description as if it has anything to do with anything. If this was hetero sex, would you be typing "filmed himself getting oral sex, than receiving, then moving on to some missionary then finishing up with anal"? Don't think so. The using "anal" as a qualifier is a tell.

---

Hahaha. Good post.
What if Matt Gaetz was caught giving some super hot chick the high hard one and the same circumstance, and he even did her in the anus. Would 003 and Hanky et al be focused on the fact that poop comes out of that hole?

No.

In other words, you nailed it!

And I loved that you gave an example for other bad things people do. In the scope of bad things, filming sex in Congress is more laughable as stupid than upsetting.

Nobody gives a crap about this person!!

---

bearister said:

---

The Daily Mail identified the other party:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

BearlyCareAnymore said:

---

oski003 said:

---

AunBear89 said:

---

Try to keep up, Junior. The issue is: we've never seen your panties in an equal twist over what she has done.

That's called "hypocritical."

I usually charge for private tutoring, but I am in the holiday spirit so this lesson was free.

---

That's awful how her boyfriend touched her boob at a musical. I don't approve of her behavior. It is also awful how ConcordTom feels filming anal sex in a congressional hearing room is normal behavior and speaking out against it is homophobic. I don't recall anyone calling folks who spoke out against Boebert's ****ty behavior as being prudish. Thanks.

---

I don't think speaking out against filming sex in a congressional hearing room is homophobic and no one else does either. The guy got fired rightly so. I don't see that anyone took two seconds to defend the person. So we have a story about a congressional staffer who happened to be a democrat filmed himself having sex in a congressional hearing room. He got fired and no one defended him. And you want to attribute that to democrats. You know what, people do bad things.

A Republican congressperson defrauded people, lied hilariously, misused funds, and Republicans took a year to take action on that.

What makes one wonder about homophobia is the constant typing of the qualifier "anal" in the description as if it has anything to do with anything. If this was hetero sex, would you be typing "filmed himself getting oral sex, than receiving, then moving on to some missionary then finishing up with anal"? Don't think so. The using "anal" as a qualifier is a tell.

---

Hahaha. Good post.
What if Matt Gaetz was caught giving some super hot chick the high hard one and the same circumstance, and he even did her in the anus. Would 003 and Hanky et al be focused on the fact that poop comes out of that hole?

No.

In other words, you nailed it!

And I loved that you gave an example for other bad things people do. In the scope of bad things, filming sex in Congress is more laughable as stupid than upsetting.

Nobody gives a crap about this person!!

---

Yes, the anus is designed to hold and expel feces. If Matt Gaetz was filming himself having anal sex in a congressional hearing room, I'd expect him to be fired, the media to actually report it, and nobody here should be normalizing it

---

oski003 said:

---

bearister said:

---

"That's awful how her boyfriend touched her boob at a musical."
Awful for whom?
..but what about OTPHJ?

---

The families there who witnessed it, especially those with children who saw it.

---

pic.twitter.com/QCQytkZMFQ

— The Right To Bear Memes (@grandoldmemes) December 23, 2023

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

BearlyCareAnymore said:

---

oski003 said:

---

AunBear89 said:

---

Try to keep up, Junior. The issue is: we've never seen your panties in an equal twist over what she has done.

That's called "hypocritical."

I usually charge for private tutoring, but I am in the holiday spirit so this lesson was free.

---

That's awful how her boyfriend touched her boob at a musical. I don't approve of her behavior. It is also awful how ConcordTom feels filming anal sex in a congressional hearing room is normal behavior and speaking out against it is homophobic. I don't recall anyone calling folks who spoke out against Boebert's ****ty behavior as being prudish. Thanks.

---

I don't think speaking out against filming sex in a congressional hearing room is homophobic and no one else does either. The guy got fired rightly so. I don't see that anyone took two seconds to defend the person. So we have a story about a congressional staffer who happened to be a democrat filmed himself having sex in a congressional hearing room. He got fired and no one defended him. And you want to attribute that to democrats. You know what, people do bad things.

A Republican congressperson defrauded people, lied hilariously, misused funds, and Republicans took a year to take action on that.

What makes one wonder about homophobia is the constant typing of the qualifier "anal" in the description as if it has anything to do with anything. If this was hetero sex, would you be typing "filmed himself getting oral sex, than receiving, then moving on to some missionary then finishing up with anal"? Don't think so. The using "anal" as a qualifier is a tell.

---

Hahaha. Good post.
What if Matt Gaetz was caught giving some super hot chick the high hard one and the same circumstance, and he even did her in the anus. Would 003 and Hanky et al be focused on the fact that poop comes out of that hole?

No.

In other words, you nailed it!

And I loved that you gave an example for other bad things people do. In the scope of bad things, filming sex in Congress is more laughable as stupid than upsetting.

Nobody gives a crap about this person!!

---

Yes, the anus is designed to hold and expel feces. If Matt Gaetz was filming himself having anal sex in a congressional hearing room, I'd expect him to be fired, the media to actually report it, and nobody here should be normalizing it

---

My point was, whether he did her in the front or the back would not matter to you. If in the back you might cringe a bit more but you wouldn't be railing on about it.

We see you.

---

You sure are excellent at making assumptions. If it was a straight democrat filming anal sex with a woman in a congressional hearing room and you normalizing it, we would have much of the same conversation except for the baseless accusations that I am homophobic.

---

concordtom said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

BearlyCareAnymore said:

---

oski003 said:

---

AunBear89 said:

---

Try to keep up, Junior. The issue is: we've never seen your panties in an equal twist over what she has done.

That's called "hypocritical."

I usually charge for private tutoring, but I am in the holiday spirit so this lesson was free.

---

That's awful how her boyfriend touched her boob at a musical. I don't approve of her behavior. It is also awful how ConcordTom feels filming anal sex in a congressional hearing room is normal behavior and speaking out against it is homophobic. I don't recall anyone calling folks who spoke out against Boebert's ****ty behavior as being prudish. Thanks.

---

I don't think speaking out against filming sex in a congressional hearing room is homophobic and no one else does either. The guy got fired rightly so. I don't see that anyone took two seconds to defend the person. So we have a story about a congressional staffer who happened to be a democrat filmed himself having sex in a congressional hearing room. He got fired and no one defended him. And you want to attribute that to democrats. You know what, people do bad things.

A Republican congressperson defrauded people, lied hilariously, misused funds, and Republicans took a year to take action on that.

What makes one wonder about homophobia is the constant typing of the qualifier "anal" in the description as if it has anything to do with anything. If this was hetero sex, would you be typing "filmed himself getting oral sex, than receiving, then moving on to some missionary then finishing up with anal"? Don't think so. The using "anal" as a qualifier is a tell.

---

Hahaha. Good post.
What if Matt Gaetz was caught giving some super hot chick the high hard one and the same circumstance, and he even did her in the anus. Would 003 and Hanky et al be focused on the fact that poop comes out of that hole?

No.

In other words, you nailed it!

And I loved that you gave an example for other bad things people do. In the scope of bad things, filming sex in Congress is more laughable as stupid than upsetting.

Nobody gives a crap about this person!!

---

Yes, the anus is designed to hold and expel feces. If Matt Gaetz was filming himself having anal sex in a congressional hearing room, I'd expect him to be fired, the media to actually report it, and nobody here should be normalizing it

---

My point was, whether he did her in the front or the back would not matter to you. If in the back you might cringe a bit more but you wouldn't be railing on about it.

We see you.

---

You sure are excellent at making assumptions. If it was a straight democrat filming anal sex with a woman in a congressional hearing room and you normalizing it, we would have much of the same conversation except for the baseless accusations that I am homophobic.

---

I never normalized it.
It doesn't happen regularly.
It's just not that big of a deal.

If you are denying homophobia, I'll accept that. It means you accept gay marriage, too, and won't mock or condemn gays publicly, yes?

---