This guy is a known charlatan. This is what happens when people don't spend time actually vetting their sources you end up spouting insane nonsense.Cal88 said:BarcaBear said:not going to ask where you conjured that claim out of, because its a tiresome antivaxx trope. more complete? lol covid has a high rate of mutation, so high that there were many strains going around, and immunity from another infection varied according to the strain, if you were lucky you could get a few weeks out of it, but if you kept informed you would have known that when he said that immunization claim you could literally get reinfected within days of fighting off one infection. right now, its around 24-48 hours before you get reinfected.Cal88 said:okaydo said:
Rodgers told reporters he was "immunized."As I’m on the record saying in the past, what happened in Sandy Hook was an absolute tragedy. I am not and have never been of the opinion that the events did not take place. Again, I hope that we learn from this and other tragedies to identify the signs that will allow us to…
— Aaron Rodgers (@AaronRodgers12) March 14, 2024
If he already has had covid, he would have indeed been immunized. The immunization from prior infection is more complete, effective and longer-lasting than that from the mRNA vaccine.
In any case, for his age group and fitness level, the mRNA vaccine does not present a very favorable risk-benefit profile. In that sense, his decision was rational and well-informed.
his decision was galactically irrational and completely misinformed.
neither you nor he has any knowledge of all the research and tracking of the strains.
its easily accessible data, btw. but lets be real, he doesn't spend his spare time reading peer reviewed published scientific research. he's too busy hiding in dark rooms for 4 days trying to magically push out toxins while getting high off of sacred indigenous plant medicines so he can pretend to be enlightened.
Here is a citation confirming this (in French, but English autotranslation/CC available). At the 4:00 mark, prof. Raoult states that natural infection is up to 10 times more protective than the vaccine, as observed among the thousands of patients he has seen as head of the foremost state-run hospital in southern France:
From what I understand, one main reason immunization from an infection is more complete is that the vaccine only acts on a narrow spectrum of the immune system.
As well there is a significant time lag between the formulation of the strains chosen for a given vaccine and its administration, which involves some guesswork. The success of a flu vaccine for instance depends on scientists guessing in summertime which flu strains are going to be most widely spread several months later during the winter flu season. This random element accounts for a lot of the variability in the effectiveness of the flu vaccine from season to season.