RFK jr considering Aaron Rogers as running mate

19,565 Views | 248 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Strykur
GMP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

GMP said:


I saw a tweet suggesting Rodgers' statement was likely AI-generated.


Oh, don't worry. Unlike these other guys, I don't debate with melted brains.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

pingpong2 said:

The good news is that A A Ron is a Cal dropout, not a Cal grad, so at least he's not sullying the good name of the degree.

Speaking of Cal grads, the senate staffer who filmed himself getting banged at the Capitol was voted Cal alumnus of the year in 2023 by your fellow alumni.

2023 Cal Alumni of the Year | Bear Insider
You were called on the first time you posted this lie. You owe the real 2023 Cal Alumni of the Year, John C. Mather Ph.D. '74, an apology.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GMP said:

bear2034 said:

GMP said:


I saw a tweet suggesting Rodgers' statement was likely AI-generated.


Oh, don't worry. Unlike these other guys, I don't debate with melted brains.

Quote:

Thinking about this a bit more, it's almost certainly AI created.

The fact he (likely) needed AI to write this is pretty bad. He's a strange guy.

So you respond to your own post and debate yourself instead?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

bear2034 said:

pingpong2 said:

The good news is that A A Ron is a Cal dropout, not a Cal grad, so at least he's not sullying the good name of the degree.

Speaking of Cal grads, the senate staffer who filmed himself getting banged at the Capitol was voted Cal alumnus of the year in 2023 by your fellow alumni.

2023 Cal Alumni of the Year | Bear Insider
You were called on the first time you posted this lie. You owe the real 2023 Cal Alumni of the Year, John C. Mather Ph.D. '74, an apology.

So it was John Mather and not the Capitol Erection guy after all?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?


What is it about Jake Tapper that makes him appear trustworthy to the cult members? Is it that look of being constipated when the glasses come off?
GMP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

GMP said:

bear2034 said:

GMP said:


I saw a tweet suggesting Rodgers' statement was likely AI-generated.


Oh, don't worry. Unlike these other guys, I don't debate with melted brains.

Quote:

Thinking about this a bit more, it's almost certainly AI created.

The fact he (likely) needed AI to write this is pretty bad. He's a strange guy.

So you respond to your own post and debate yourself instead?


Oh for sure. You're an idiot. I'm not.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GMP said:

bear2034 said:

GMP said:

bear2034 said:

GMP said:


I saw a tweet suggesting Rodgers' statement was likely AI-generated.


Oh, don't worry. Unlike these other guys, I don't debate with melted brains.

Quote:

Thinking about this a bit more, it's almost certainly AI created.

The fact he (likely) needed AI to write this is pretty bad. He's a strange guy.

So you respond to your own post and debate yourself instead?

Oh for sure. You're an idiot. I'm not.


Did you use ChatGPT to come up with that response?
GMP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

GMP said:

bear2034 said:

GMP said:

bear2034 said:

GMP said:


I saw a tweet suggesting Rodgers' statement was likely AI-generated.


Oh, don't worry. Unlike these other guys, I don't debate with melted brains.

Quote:

Thinking about this a bit more, it's almost certainly AI created.

The fact he (likely) needed AI to write this is pretty bad. He's a strange guy.

So you respond to your own post and debate yourself instead?

Oh for sure. You're an idiot. I'm not.


Did you use ChatGPT to come up with that response?


Run it though that AI check and tell me what it says.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GMP said:

bear2034 said:

GMP said:

bear2034 said:

GMP said:

bear2034 said:

GMP said:


I saw a tweet suggesting Rodgers' statement was likely AI-generated.


Oh, don't worry. Unlike these other guys, I don't debate with melted brains.

Quote:

Thinking about this a bit more, it's almost certainly AI created.

The fact he (likely) needed AI to write this is pretty bad. He's a strange guy.

So you respond to your own post and debate yourself instead?

Oh for sure. You're an idiot. I'm not.


Did you use ChatGPT to come up with that response?

Run it though that AI check and tell me what it says.

The AI check said Aaron Rodgers is your daddy.
GMP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

GMP said:

bear2034 said:

GMP said:

bear2034 said:

GMP said:

bear2034 said:

GMP said:


I saw a tweet suggesting Rodgers' statement was likely AI-generated.


Oh, don't worry. Unlike these other guys, I don't debate with melted brains.

Quote:

Thinking about this a bit more, it's almost certainly AI created.

The fact he (likely) needed AI to write this is pretty bad. He's a strange guy.

So you respond to your own post and debate yourself instead?

Oh for sure. You're an idiot. I'm not.


Did you use ChatGPT to come up with that response?

Run it though that AI check and tell me what it says.

The AI check said Aaron Rodgers is your daddy.


Man, I know that didn't come from AI because it was weak as hell. That's all your brain.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GMP said:

bear2034 said:

GMP said:

bear2034 said:

GMP said:

bear2034 said:

GMP said:

bear2034 said:

GMP said:


I saw a tweet suggesting Rodgers' statement was likely AI-generated.


Oh, don't worry. Unlike these other guys, I don't debate with melted brains.

Quote:

Thinking about this a bit more, it's almost certainly AI created.

The fact he (likely) needed AI to write this is pretty bad. He's a strange guy.

So you respond to your own post and debate yourself instead?

Oh for sure. You're an idiot. I'm not.


Did you use ChatGPT to come up with that response?

Run it though that AI check and tell me what it says.

The AI check said Aaron Rodgers is your daddy.

Man, I know that didn't come from AI because it was weak as hell. That's all your brain.
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:



What is it about Jake Tapper that makes him appear trustworthy to the cult members? Is it that look of being constipated when the glasses come off?


I always laugh when cult members project their psychosis on others. They think we care about Biden the way they worship Trump or care about Jake Tapper or Jimmy Kimmel the way they follow Tucker Carlson all the way to Russia to kiss Putin's ass.

It isn't likely true because "Jake Tapper" reported it. It is likely true because Aaron Rodgers likely said it. It is consistent with other things Rodgers has said and other conspiracies he has promoted like 9/11. Especially given the time frame purported, which was before Alex Jones admitted he was just conning gullible people like you to get rich.

Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

bear2034 said:

pingpong2 said:

The good news is that A A Ron is a Cal dropout, not a Cal grad, so at least he's not sullying the good name of the degree.

Speaking of Cal grads, the senate staffer who filmed himself getting banged at the Capitol was voted Cal alumnus of the year in 2023 by your fellow alumni.

2023 Cal Alumni of the Year | Bear Insider
You were called on the first time you posted this lie. You owe the real 2023 Cal Alumni of the Year, John C. Mather Ph.D. '74, an apology.

So it was John Mather and not the Capitol Erection guy after all?
Here's the list of people awarded Cal Alumni of the Year. See for yourself.

Cal Alumni of the Year
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
okaydo said:



I saw this clip and thought Kevin Wildes basically nailed it on Rodgers: "Probably not." This is another ploy for attention.


bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:


I saw this clip and thought Kevin Wildes basically nailed it on Rodgers: "Probably not." This is another ploy for attention.

What is a Kevin Wildes? Obviously, it's working. AR is living rent free in Kevin's dome.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:



I always laugh when cult members project their psychosis on others. They think we care about Biden the way they worship Trump or care about Jake Tapper or Jimmy Kimmel the way they follow Tucker Carlson all the way to Russia to kiss Putin's ass.

It isn't likely true because "Jake Tapper" reported it. It is likely true because Aaron Rodgers likely said it. It is consistent with other things Rodgers has said and other conspiracies he has promoted like 9/11. Especially given the time frame purported, which was before Alex Jones admitted he was just conning gullible people like you to get rich.


The difference is, you have the luxury of saying AR "likely said it" but CNN does not. Instead, they had someone claim they heard something ten years ago and then cite an anonymous source.
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

sycasey said:


I saw this clip and thought Kevin Wildes basically nailed it on Rodgers: "Probably not." This is another ploy for attention.

What is a Kevin Wildes? Obviously, it's working. AR is living rent free in Kevin's dome.

What is so awesome about Aaron is that he has a job that pays him like $50 million. He has so many people depending on him. There are thousands of fans who have already made plans with their lives based on him.

And he's keeping them in the dark to live rent free in their heads.

He could end this story in a few seconds with a tweet. But he'd rather not....because he likes living rent-free.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I love it when a guy takes a lot of measures to put people's attention on him and then when others complain about having to talk about his antics all the time, his fans retort with: "LOL living rent-free in your heads."

Solid logic, 10 out of 10.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?


bear2033 said:

What is it about Jake Tapper that makes him appear trustworthy to the cult members? Is it that look of being constipated when the glasses come off?


You mean like how Tucker Carlson looks like a dog trying to understand a magic trick?




Tucker got duped again.
Another gullible loser.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/mar/16/pranksters-dupe-tucker-carlson-kate-middleton
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
WalterSobchak
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

calumnus said:



I always laugh when cult members project their psychosis on others. They think we care about Biden the way they worship Trump or care about Jake Tapper or Jimmy Kimmel the way they follow Tucker Carlson all the way to Russia to kiss Putin's ass.

It isn't likely true because "Jake Tapper" reported it. It is likely true because Aaron Rodgers likely said it. It is consistent with other things Rodgers has said and other conspiracies he has promoted like 9/11. Especially given the time frame purported, which was before Alex Jones admitted he was just conning gullible people like you to get rich.


The difference is, you have the luxury of saying AR "likely said it" but CNN does not. Instead, they had someone claim they heard something ten years ago and then cite an anonymous source.



Anonymous source or just more BS disinformation from you? Still waiting for AR to file. Should be a slam-dunk case, right?

Quote:

CNN knows of two people with whom Rodgers has enthusiastically shared these stories, including with Pamela Brown, one of the journalists writing this piece.

Brown was covering the Kentucky Derby for CNN in 2013 when she was introduced to Rodgers, then with the Green Bay Packers, at a post-Derby party. Hearing that she was a journalist with CNN, Rodgers immediately began attacking the news media for covering up important stories. Rodgers brought up the tragic killing of 20 children and 6 adults by a gunman at Sandy Hook Elementary School, claiming it was actually a government inside job and the media was intentionally ignoring it.




https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/13/politics/aaron-rodgers-sandy-hook-conspiracy-theories/index.html
Please give to Cal Legends at https://calegends.com/calegendsdonate/donate-football/ and encourage everyone you know who loves Cal sports to do it too.

To be in the Top 1% of all NIL collectives we only need around 10% of alumni to give $300 per year. Please help spread the word. "If we don't broaden this base we're dead." - Sebastabear

Thanks for reading my sig! Please consider copying or adapting it and using it on all of your posts too. Go Bears!
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm getting a better understanding about why Rodgers is estranged from the rest of his family.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
okaydo said:

bear2034 said:

sycasey said:


I saw this clip and thought Kevin Wildes basically nailed it on Rodgers: "Probably not." This is another ploy for attention.

What is a Kevin Wildes? Obviously, it's working. AR is living rent free in Kevin's dome.

What is so awesome about Aaron is that he has a job that pays him like $50 million. He has so many people depending on him. There are thousands of fans who have already made plans with their lives based on him.

And he's keeping them in the dark to live rent free in their heads.

He could end this story in a few seconds with a tweet. But he'd rather not....because he likes living rent-free.

Why is AR required to respond to something so ridiculous? And did you not just post his tweet earlier?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:


You mean like how Tucker Carlson looks like a dog trying to understand a magic trick?

You know Tucker makes you moist, even when it's hot and dry in Antioch.
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AR met this reporter at a Kentucky Derby party. He was probably just trying to f$ck her. Any CNN reporter would do it for a juicy quote.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WalterSobchak said:

bear2034 said:



The difference is, you have the luxury of saying AR "likely said it" but CNN does not. Instead, they had someone claim they heard something ten years ago and then cite an anonymous source.

Anonymous source or just more BS disinformation from you? Still waiting for AR to file. Should be a slam-dunk case, right?



https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/13/politics/aaron-rodgers-sandy-hook-conspiracy-theories/index.html

Dear Walter,

You will have to read the entire article you just posted to find this gem:
Quote:

CNN has spoken to another person with a similar story. This person, to whom CNN has granted anonymity so as to avoid harassment, recalled that several years ago, Rodgers claimed, "Sandy Hook never happened…All those children never existed. They were all actors."

You're welcome.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anarchistbear said:

AR met this reporter at a Kentucky Derby party. He was probably just trying to f$ck her. Any CNN reporter would do it for a juicy quote.

AR should sue CNN like Jimmy Kimmel threatened to sue AR.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

I love it when a guy takes a lot of measures to put people's attention on him and then when others complain about having to talk about his antics all the time, his fans retort with: "LOL living rent-free in your heads."

Solid logic, 10 out of 10.


Aaron Rodgers wore a helmet decal in honor of the victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting back in 2012. If he "took this measure to put people's attention on him", why didn't the right people notice?
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

okaydo said:

bear2034 said:

sycasey said:


I saw this clip and thought Kevin Wildes basically nailed it on Rodgers: "Probably not." This is another ploy for attention.

What is a Kevin Wildes? Obviously, it's working. AR is living rent free in Kevin's dome.

What is so awesome about Aaron is that he has a job that pays him like $50 million. He has so many people depending on him. There are thousands of fans who have already made plans with their lives based on him.

And he's keeping them in the dark to live rent free in their heads.

He could end this story in a few seconds with a tweet. But he'd rather not....because he likes living rent-free.

Why is AR required to respond to something so ridiculous? And did you not just post his tweet earlier?

The New York Jets and its fans didn't view losing their QB for another season to be "ridiculous."

What tweet did he post earlier? He has mentioned nothing about RFK, but he liked one of his tweets the day after The New York Times report.

Again, if he wanted to end this story 96 hours ago. 72 hours ago. 48 hours ago. 24 hours ago. He could. Easily.

He chose not to, but he did respond to the Sandy Hook story....
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

Anarchistbear said:

AR met this reporter at a Kentucky Derby party. He was probably just trying to f$ck her. Any CNN reporter would do it for a juicy quote.

AR should sue CNN like Jimmy Kimmel threatened to sue AR.

AR isn't going to sue because 1) he didn't contradict CNN's Pamela Brown and 2) his statement was carefully worded as to try to move on from this story while not rejecting its premise.

He knows that he made this story a "thing," he would lose.

okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

sycasey said:

I love it when a guy takes a lot of measures to put people's attention on him and then when others complain about having to talk about his antics all the time, his fans retort with: "LOL living rent-free in your heads."

Solid logic, 10 out of 10.


Aaron Rodgers wore a helmet decal in honor of the victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting back in 2012. If he "took this measure to put people's attention on him", why didn't the right people notice?

Wow, so he honored the Sandy Hook victims he allegedly thinks were killed by the government.
philly1121
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aaron is all ego. Self importance. Its why he gets knocked for seemingly wanting an MVP award more than a Super Bowl. As long as he feels he's done his personal best and its recognized by the League - that's all that matters.

His "theories" - and I shudder to call them his theories because he gets them from Mike Lindell, Breitbart, Newsmax, OAN or some other "news" source - are really fringe. His views on sunscreen, 9/11, covid, and now this - are the work of buffoons. The fact that he can go on Rogan or McAfee, sit back and say, "have you heard of this...?". And he will go unchallenged because that's not how it works on those shows. The theories are then discussed as if they have some merit and then they take off.

To believe any of it is to be a mark. Easily manipulated and not prone to fact check because why would they? They love their beliefs confirmed. And Aaron absolutely loves that.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
okaydo said:

bear2034 said:

sycasey said:

I love it when a guy takes a lot of measures to put people's attention on him and then when others complain about having to talk about his antics all the time, his fans retort with: "LOL living rent-free in your heads."

Solid logic, 10 out of 10.


Aaron Rodgers wore a helmet decal in honor of the victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting back in 2012. If he "took this measure to put people's attention on him", why didn't the right people notice?

Wow, so he honored the Sandy Hook victims he allegedly thinks were killed by the government.

According to your blue anon sources, S.H.E.S. stood for something else?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
okaydo said:

bear2034 said:

Anarchistbear said:

AR met this reporter at a Kentucky Derby party. He was probably just trying to f$ck her. Any CNN reporter would do it for a juicy quote.

AR should sue CNN like Jimmy Kimmel threatened to sue AR.

AR isn't going to sue because 1) he didn't contradict CNN's Pamela Brown and 2) his statement was carefully worded as to try to move on from this story while not rejecting its premise.

He knows that he made this story a "thing," he would lose.

Uh, hello, CNN made this story a "thing" after something Pamela supposedly "heard" over ten years ago.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
philly1121 said:

Aaron is all ego. Self importance. Its why he gets knocked for seemingly wanting an MVP award more than a Super Bowl. As long as he feels he's done his personal best and its recognized by the League - that's all that matters.

His "theories" - and I shudder to call them his theories because he gets them from Mike Lindell, Breitbart, Newsmax, OAN or some other "news" source - are really fringe. His views on sunscreen, 9/11, covid, and now this - are the work of buffoons. The fact that he can go on Rogan or McAfee, sit back and say, "have you heard of this...?". And he will go unchallenged because that's not how it works on those shows. The theories are then discussed as if they have some merit and then they take off.

To believe any of it is to be a mark. Easily manipulated and not prone to fact check because why would they? They love their beliefs confirmed. And Aaron absolutely loves that.

Bro, this is gold. You should post more in OT. You know what they say, projection is how they confess their sins.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.