"I don't believe Trump can run in 2028 nor should he even attempt to do so. However..."

Who didn't see it coming?

34, all you do is repost shyte takes on Twitter. How do you explain the MAGA cave-in last night? Is it Speaker Johnson's fault? President Musk was crying on his platform yesterday that giving the RFK Stadium property to Washington DC meant building a new stadium. lol your boy Chuck Schumer greenlight the deal by unanimous consent. Unanimous Consent. Nothing gets passed in the Senate by Unanimous Consent. aww poor DOGE-y.

chazzed said:

---

"I don't believe Trump can run in 2028 nor should he even attempt to do so. However..."

Who didn't see it coming?

---

Are you really so obtuse you don't see the larger point which was largely tongue in cheek. Never mind. you are.

philly1121 said:

---

BearGoggles said:

---

philly1121 said:

---

bear2034 said:

---

philly1121 said:

---

bear2034 said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

philly1121 said:

---

yeah i was gonna ask you that. well, i was gonna ask you, 88, 34, Goggles and Poorly Edited. Do you agree with Steve Bannon that Trump is eligible to run in 2028?

---

There won't be any elections in 2028, it says so in the Project 2025 booklet, page 15.

---

This is correct.

---

hah. page 15 rails about socialism.

I guess I'm looking for a yes or no as to Bannon's view.

---

I don't remember Bannon saying anything about 2028.

---

You missed it? He was speaking to the Young Republicans in New York. His quote:

"Donald John Trump is going to raise his hand on the King James Bible and take the oath of office, his third victory and his second term. And the viceroy Mike Davis tells me, since it doesn't actually say consecutive, that, I don't know, maybe we do it again in '28. Are you guys down for that? Trump '28?"

Are you down for that 34?

---

I don't believe Trump can run in 2028 nor should he even attempt to do so. However, he might consider trying what actually Obama did - find a brain dead stand in to run (like Joe Biden) and then control the stand in from behind the scenes like the wizard of oz. It work for Obama once (but failed with Kamala) so I suppose it could happen again.

I will bet you $1,000 (donated to the charity of the winner's choice) that Trump will not run in 2028. Agreed?

---

Maybe he can say that, since Elon Musk is the actual president now, he can run again in 2028?

---

Don't think that will work. Is Trump a dictator or a dupe to Elon - pick one.

Do we have a bet? You didn't answer that.

Put money on what Trump does? I'm not a fool. As I'm sure you've donated to his campaign, Im glad im not in that category. Hopefully someday he will open up Mar a Lago to his less well heeled supporters.

philly1121 said:

---

Put money on what Trump does? I'm not a fool. As I'm sure you've donated to his campaign, Im glad im not in that category. Hopefully someday he will open up Mar a Lago to his less well heeled supporters.

---

Your foolishness is evidenced (most recently) by your assertion that I donated to Trump. The things you are "sure" of are wrong . . . so maybe re-evaluate your approach?

You're now just spouting nonsense. You claim Trump will run in 2028, but you're not willing to put your money where your mouth is. I can't tell if you believe it our are just poop posting. Either way, you're wrong.

Did you donate to Harris/Biden? If so, how are you feeling about that expenditure?

philly1121 said:

---

BearGoggles said:

---

philly1121 said:

---

Put money on what Trump does? I'm not a fool. As I'm sure you've donated to his campaign, Im glad im not in that category. Hopefully someday he will open up Mar a Lago to his less well heeled supporters.

---

Your foolishness is evidenced (most recently) by your assertion that I donated to Trump. The things you are "sure" of are wrong . . . so maybe re-evaluate your approach?

You're now just spouting nonsense. You claim Trump will run in 2028, but you're not willing to put your money where your mouth is. I can't tell if you believe it our are just poop posting. Either way, you're wrong.

Did you donate to Harris/Biden? If so, how are you feeling about that expenditure?

---

I know you're confused alot but, you meant Harris/Walz right? No I didn't donate. I donated to Biden/Harris in 2020. Money well spent. I didn't donate to the Harris campaign. I did donate to Jim Costa and Adam Grey House campaigns. Also to Jon Tester and Debbie Mucarsel.

---

I was referring to the alternate presidential candidates, not the VP. I'm having a hard time believing your apparent claim that you donated to Biden in 2020 but for some reason didn't donate to Biden or Harris in 2024. Given your politics, what reason did you have for not donating to either Biden or Harris in 2024? Or did you donate to Biden?

And since we're doing fact checking here, I recall that you were the one insisting that was "no evidence" Joe Biden did anything wrong when it came to his family's grifting.

Turns out there's pictures that prove Joe lied when claiming he had nothing to do with Hunter's business dealings. Conveniently, the Biden admin delayed the release of these until after the election. At some point, you'll decide to take a red pill, though I'm sure not yet.

https://nypost.com/2024/12/27/us-news/feds-finally-release-photos-showing-then-vp-biden-meeting-son-hunters-china-biz-partners-days-before-he-leaves-office/

BearGoggles said:

---

philly1121 said:

---

BearGoggles said:

---

philly1121 said:

---

Put money on what Trump does? I'm not a fool. As I'm sure you've donated to his campaign, Im glad im not in that category. Hopefully someday he will open up Mar a Lago to his less well heeled supporters.

---

Your foolishness is evidenced (most recently) by your assertion that I donated to Trump. The things you are "sure" of are wrong . . . so maybe re-evaluate your approach?

You're now just spouting nonsense. You claim Trump will run in 2028, but you're not willing to put your money where your mouth is. I can't tell if you believe it our are just poop posting. Either way, you're wrong.

Did you donate to Harris/Biden? If so, how are you feeling about that expenditure?

---

I know you're confused alot but, you meant Harris/Walz right? No I didn't donate. I donated to Biden/Harris in 2020. Money well spent. I didn't donate to the Harris campaign. I did donate to Jim Costa and Adam Grey House campaigns. Also to Jon Tester and Debbie Mucarsel.

---

I was referring to the alternate presidential candidates, not the VP. I'm having a hard time believing your apparent claim that you donated to Biden in 2020 but for some reason didn't donate to Biden or Harris in 2024. Given your politics, what reason did you have for not donating to either Biden or Harris in 2024? Or did you donate to Biden?

And since we're doing fact checking here, I recall that you were the one insisting that was "no evidence" Joe Biden did anything wrong when it came to his family's grifting.

Turns out there's pictures that prove Joe lied when claiming he had nothing to do with Hunter's business dealings. Conveniently, the Biden admin delayed the release of these until after the election. At some point, you'll decide to take a red pill, though I'm sure not yet.

https://nypost.com/2024/12/27/us-news/feds-finally-release-photos-showing-then-vp-biden-meeting-son-hunters-china-biz-partners-days-before-he-leaves-office/

---

Quite simply because I didn't like Harris. Loved Walz. Not Harris. But I did vote for her. And I forgot Colin Allred. I donated to him as well.

As far as those pictures go - from those pictures - what evidence is there of wrongdoing? And how is Joe Biden responsible or how is it even possible that Joe Biden could delay the release of those photos? Because in the real world, there would be zero way, none, that he could possibly do that. Any FOIA request done years ago could have uncovered these photos. But, as it so happens, it was the Trump, right wing, Stephen Miller led group, America First Legal, that finally had the bright idea of submitted the request. And then try and make a big deal about it. Sound familiar, everyone? Yeah. yawn

In fact, these meetings have been known about for years. 11 years - that he was in China in 2013. It offers nothing new as to what he was doing there and why. It does not reverse any of Hunter Biden's testimony to Congress. He acknowledged that Joe Biden met with these individuals but has always asserted that no business was discussed. And if you recall in the Congressional testimony from Devon Archer, Hunter's business associate, Hunter wasn't selling access to his father. He was offering the allusion of access to his father and that Hunter could influence policy. He couldn't. In short, and as always, this is a nothing burger.

I fail to see why you continue on this fishing expedition. This has been argued and argued on this forum and in the halls of Washington. It makes you look bad that you keep up with these theories as if they were true, when, in reality, they only served the purpose of smearing Biden. And on that, its job done. Its only you that keeps believing this bs. You have 22 days to try and prove something and give it to James Comer. But I think the House has more important matters to attend to. Mainly, will they be able to certify the election and, if not, can they do it by 1/20. Otherwise, Chuck takes over.

philly1121 said:

---

BearGoggles said:

---

philly1121 said:

---

BearGoggles said:

---

philly1121 said:

---

Put money on what Trump does? I'm not a fool. As I'm sure you've donated to his campaign, Im glad im not in that category. Hopefully someday he will open up Mar a Lago to his less well heeled supporters.

---

Your foolishness is evidenced (most recently) by your assertion that I donated to Trump. The things you are "sure" of are wrong . . . so maybe re-evaluate your approach?

You're now just spouting nonsense. You claim Trump will run in 2028, but you're not willing to put your money where your mouth is. I can't tell if you believe it our are just poop posting. Either way, you're wrong.

Did you donate to Harris/Biden? If so, how are you feeling about that expenditure?

---

I know you're confused alot but, you meant Harris/Walz right? No I didn't donate. I donated to Biden/Harris in 2020. Money well spent. I didn't donate to the Harris campaign. I did donate to Jim Costa and Adam Grey House campaigns. Also to Jon Tester and Debbie Mucarsel.

---

I was referring to the alternate presidential candidates, not the VP. I'm having a hard time believing your apparent claim that you donated to Biden in 2020 but for some reason didn't donate to Biden or Harris in 2024. Given your politics, what reason did you have for not donating to either Biden or Harris in 2024? Or did you donate to Biden?

And since we're doing fact checking here, I recall that you were the one insisting that was "no evidence" Joe Biden did anything wrong when it came to his family's grifting.

Turns out there's pictures that prove Joe lied when claiming he had nothing to do with Hunter's business dealings. Conveniently, the Biden admin delayed the release of these until after the election. At some point, you'll decide to take a red pill, though I'm sure not yet.

https://nypost.com/2024/12/27/us-news/feds-finally-release-photos-showing-then-vp-biden-meeting-son-hunters-china-biz-partners-days-before-he-leaves-office/

---

Quite simply because I didn't like Harris. Loved Walz. Not Harris. But I did vote for her. And I forgot Colin Allred. I donated to him as well.

As far as those pictures go - from those pictures - what evidence is there of wrongdoing? And how is Joe Biden responsible or how is it even possible that Joe Biden could delay the release of those photos? Because in the real world, there would be zero way, none, that he could possibly do that. Any FOIA request done years ago could have uncovered these photos. But, as it so happens, it was the Trump, right wing, Stephen Miller led group, America First Legal, that finally had the bright idea of submitted the request. And then try and make a big deal about it. Sound familiar, everyone? Yeah. yawn

In fact, these meetings have been known about for years. 11 years - that he was in China in 2013. It offers nothing new as to what he was doing there and why. It does not reverse any of Hunter Biden's testimony to Congress. He acknowledged that Joe Biden met with these individuals but has always asserted that no business was discussed. And if you recall in the Congressional testimony from Devon Archer, Hunter's business associate, Hunter wasn't selling access to his father. He was offering the allusion of access to his father and that Hunter could influence policy. He couldn't. In short, and as always, this is a nothing burger.

I fail to see why you continue on this fishing expedition. This has been argued and argued on this forum and in the halls of Washington. It makes you look bad that you keep up with these theories as if they were true, when, in reality, they only served the purpose of smearing Biden. And on that, its job done. Its only you that keeps believing this bs. You have 22 days to try and prove something and give it to James Comer. But I think the House has more important matters to attend to. Mainly, will they be able to certify the election and, if not, can they do it by 1/20. Otherwise, Chuck takes over.

---

• If the pictures are no big deal, then why did Biden fight their release until after the election? The article specifically reports he did. In fact, the fact there was frivolous FOIA litigation confirms the government fought their release.
• You claim not to understand how Joe Biden, the president of the USA, could direct a federal agency not to release embarrassing photos? Are you really that obtuse?
• Joe specifically denied that he met with Hunter's business associates and the pictures prove he lied.
• "Hunter wasn't selling access to his father. He was offering the allusion of access" is quite the hill to die on. Maybe read that back to yourself and then take a look in the mirror.
• Its funny you rely on the testimony of Archer. He also testified that Joe participated in Hunter/Archer's business meetings, which again exposes Joe's lying.
• You still have clearly stated if you donated to to Joe Bidens 2024 election.

When the site's owner--and Trump's right-hand man--retweets disinformation like this, it's impossible to argue with the assertion made by the author of the article posted by bearister.

From @kdrum on Elon and the LA fires: “Elon Musk is the new emperor of misinformation — every single thing on this list he shared is misleading or flat-out wrong.” https://t.co/JeN9gSc5xA pic.twitter.com/Vg2WXvi6nL

— The Tennessee Holler (@TheTNHoller) January 9, 2025