Vote for Trump

3,023 Views | 78 Replies | Last: 13 days ago by Big C
BearGoggles
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 11:49a, 11/4/24
sycasey said:
BearGoggles said:
She's an incredibly weak candidate.
So far it doesn't seem that way.

She's 50-50 with Trump who is a terribly flawed candidate. Her campaign has been a disaster by any traditional metric (i.e., she can't formulate a cogent argument and has dodged any venue that isn't completely friendly). She's an awful retail politician. She couldn't get a single vote in the 2020 primary.

Please feel free to make your case as to why she's an average or better candidate. Note that 'she's not Trump" is not an answer to that question.
Reply Quote
3
chazzed
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 11:54a, 11/4/24
sycasey said:
chazzed said:
sycasey said:
BearGoggles said:
bearister said:
I have this stupid personal rule:

I don't like my presidents giving hand jobs and blow jobs to microphones.



*The two cows on the right behind the guy in green thought it was hysterical.
Indeed. You want your president giving hand jobs and blow jobs to Willie Brown in exchange for career advancement.

Her husband has confirmed this by the way.

No one except weird online right-wingers cares about this.
In terms of percentage, there are a lot of weird online right-wingers in this forum. Right, BG?
In Off-Topic? Yes.

Or at least they have the highest posting volume.
Right. I assume that everybody knows the difference between a forum and a message board, but I worked in the message board space when they were the thing.
Reply Quote
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearGoggles • 11:58a, 11/4/24
BearGoggles said:
sycasey said:
BearGoggles said:
She's an incredibly weak candidate.
So far it doesn't seem that way.

She's 50-50 with Trump who is a terribly flawed candidate. Her campaign has been a disaster by any traditional metric (i.e., she can't formulate a cogent argument and has dodged any venue that isn't completely friendly). She's an awful retail politician. She couldn't get a single vote in the 2020 primary.

Please feel free to make your case as to why she's an average or better candidate. Note that 'she's not Trump" is not an answer to that question.
She came in with a big deficit dug by Biden and has fought the election to an effective draw within a few months.
Reply Quote
1
Eastern Oregon Bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Big C • 12:20p, 11/4/24
Big C said:
Johnfox said:
Harris and Walz are going to put the country in a more worse spot than now.

Trump will take us to new heights.

#TRUMP2024

I have long been an undecided voter, but a less worse spot, new heights, less taxes and less inflation is rather compelling. Gonna stare long and hard at my ballot tomorrow, before I finally decide (well, I guess I have until just before 8 PM on Tuesday.).

As a Pennsylvania resident, I guess my vote actually counts, so if anybody else has any input for me or the thousands of other voters in the Keystone State who I influence, maybe use this classic thread to help us figure things out.
I voted last week. I figure I that I cancelled Minot's votes in National, State and a number of local elections.
Reply Quote
bearister
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:25p, 11/4/24
OFFICIAL THREAD INTERMISSION QUESTION:

Why do they continually photoshop tRump's Ken doll size fist?

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Reply Quote
bear2034
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 2:50p, 11/4/24
SBGold said:
bear2034 said:
SBGold said:

Donation link to support here:

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/ads-gs-dd-kdhtjwsearch-august2024?refcode=om2024_ads_gs_240721_hvfphrase_dd_us_all_campaign&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA_qG5BhDTARIsAA0UHSKAdCiVKjTR8acYjz3N7BNwOOzYhxSzLyLT5NsVZUxRnEPd5560NuQaArXkEALw_wcB

This is the ActBlue link the Trump assassin used, right?
what assassin?
You know, the guy the media doesn't talk about anymore.
Reply Quote
2
BearGoggles
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 3:57p, 11/4/24
sycasey said:
BearGoggles said:
sycasey said:
BearGoggles said:
She's an incredibly weak candidate.
So far it doesn't seem that way.

She's 50-50 with Trump who is a terribly flawed candidate. Her campaign has been a disaster by any traditional metric (i.e., she can't formulate a cogent argument and has dodged any venue that isn't completely friendly). She's an awful retail politician. She couldn't get a single vote in the 2020 primary.

Please feel free to make your case as to why she's an average or better candidate. Note that 'she's not Trump" is not an answer to that question.
She came in with a big deficit dug by Biden and has fought the election to an effective draw within a few months.
This is really not hard yet you can't bring yourself to admit any fact harmful to your tribe, no matter how obvious.

If the dems had a competent and likeable candidate running against Trump, they'd be winning 55%-45% (maybe more).

If the republicans had a competent and likeable candidate running against Harris, they'd be winning 55%-45% (maybe more).

In a battle of two bad choices, its 50-50. That doesn't make Harris a strong candidate. Only a weak candidate would be 50-50 with Trump.
Reply Quote
4
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearGoggles • 4:39p, 11/4/24
BearGoggles said:
sycasey said:
BearGoggles said:
sycasey said:
BearGoggles said:
She's an incredibly weak candidate.
So far it doesn't seem that way.

She's 50-50 with Trump who is a terribly flawed candidate. Her campaign has been a disaster by any traditional metric (i.e., she can't formulate a cogent argument and has dodged any venue that isn't completely friendly). She's an awful retail politician. She couldn't get a single vote in the 2020 primary.

Please feel free to make your case as to why she's an average or better candidate. Note that 'she's not Trump" is not an answer to that question.
She came in with a big deficit dug by Biden and has fought the election to an effective draw within a few months.
This is really not hard yet you can't bring yourself to admit any fact harmful to your tribe, no matter how obvious.

If the dems had a competent and likeable candidate running against Trump, they'd be winning 55%-45% (maybe more).

If the republicans had a competent and likeable candidate running against Harris, they'd be winning 55%-45% (maybe more).

In a battle of two bad choices, its 50-50. That doesn't make Harris a strong candidate. Only a weak candidate would be 50-50 with Trump.
We'll see what the results are.
Reply Quote
BearGoggles
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 5:04p, 11/4/24
sycasey said:
BearGoggles said:
sycasey said:
BearGoggles said:
sycasey said:
BearGoggles said:
She's an incredibly weak candidate.
So far it doesn't seem that way.

She's 50-50 with Trump who is a terribly flawed candidate. Her campaign has been a disaster by any traditional metric (i.e., she can't formulate a cogent argument and has dodged any venue that isn't completely friendly). She's an awful retail politician. She couldn't get a single vote in the 2020 primary.

Please feel free to make your case as to why she's an average or better candidate. Note that 'she's not Trump" is not an answer to that question.
She came in with a big deficit dug by Biden and has fought the election to an effective draw within a few months.
This is really not hard yet you can't bring yourself to admit any fact harmful to your tribe, no matter how obvious.

If the dems had a competent and likeable candidate running against Trump, they'd be winning 55%-45% (maybe more).

If the republicans had a competent and likeable candidate running against Harris, they'd be winning 55%-45% (maybe more).

In a battle of two bad choices, its 50-50. That doesn't make Harris a strong candidate. Only a weak candidate would be 50-50 with Trump.
We'll see what the results are.
The results won't change the fact that she's a bad candidate. Amazing you refuse to admit the obvious.




Reply Quote
4
1 edit
bear2034
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearGoggles • 5:18p, 11/4/24
BearGoggles said:
sycasey said:
BearGoggles said:
sycasey said:
BearGoggles said:
sycasey said:
BearGoggles said:
She's an incredibly weak candidate.
So far it doesn't seem that way.

She's 50-50 with Trump who is a terribly flawed candidate. Her campaign has been a disaster by any traditional metric (i.e., she can't formulate a cogent argument and has dodged any venue that isn't completely friendly). She's an awful retail politician. She couldn't get a single vote in the 2020 primary.

Please feel free to make your case as to why she's an average or better candidate. Note that 'she's not Trump" is not an answer to that question.
She came in with a big deficit dug by Biden and has fought the election to an effective draw within a few months.
This is really not hard yet you can't bring yourself to admit any fact harmful to your tribe, no matter how obvious.

If the dems had a competent and likeable candidate running against Trump, they'd be winning 55%-45% (maybe more).

If the republicans had a competent and likeable candidate running against Harris, they'd be winning 55%-45% (maybe more).

In a battle of two bad choices, its 50-50. That doesn't make Harris a strong candidate. Only a weak candidate would be 50-50 with Trump.
We'll see what the results are.
The results won't change the fact that she's a bad candidate. Amazing you refuse to admit the obvious.


This is a little spooky.
Reply Quote
2
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bear2034 • 5:23p, 11/4/24
bear2034 said:
BearGoggles said:
sycasey said:
BearGoggles said:
sycasey said:
BearGoggles said:
sycasey said:
BearGoggles said:
She's an incredibly weak candidate.
So far it doesn't seem that way.

She's 50-50 with Trump who is a terribly flawed candidate. Her campaign has been a disaster by any traditional metric (i.e., she can't formulate a cogent argument and has dodged any venue that isn't completely friendly). She's an awful retail politician. She couldn't get a single vote in the 2020 primary.

Please feel free to make your case as to why she's an average or better candidate. Note that 'she's not Trump" is not an answer to that question.
She came in with a big deficit dug by Biden and has fought the election to an effective draw within a few months.
This is really not hard yet you can't bring yourself to admit any fact harmful to your tribe, no matter how obvious.

If the dems had a competent and likeable candidate running against Trump, they'd be winning 55%-45% (maybe more).

If the republicans had a competent and likeable candidate running against Harris, they'd be winning 55%-45% (maybe more).

In a battle of two bad choices, its 50-50. That doesn't make Harris a strong candidate. Only a weak candidate would be 50-50 with Trump.
We'll see what the results are.
The results won't change the fact that she's a bad candidate. Amazing you refuse to admit the obvious.


This is a little spooky
Whatever, didn't watch. Was too busy watching clips of Orange talking about Palmer's member, dancing with Noem, loving on Hitler, is C'Ville PR address, protecting women whether they like it or not, the 4 Seasons Giuliani time press conference, the hiring of Scaramucci, Sean Spicey, loving on Hitler's loser generals, crowds bailing from the NC rallies, and kissing Putin's ring.


VOTE BLUE
<FROM OT MODERATOR - SOLICITATIONS ARE NOT ALLOWED>
Reply Quote
4
Edited by Staff
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearGoggles • 5:40p, 11/4/24
BearGoggles said:
sycasey said:
BearGoggles said:
sycasey said:
BearGoggles said:
sycasey said:
BearGoggles said:
She's an incredibly weak candidate.
So far it doesn't seem that way.

She's 50-50 with Trump who is a terribly flawed candidate. Her campaign has been a disaster by any traditional metric (i.e., she can't formulate a cogent argument and has dodged any venue that isn't completely friendly). She's an awful retail politician. She couldn't get a single vote in the 2020 primary.

Please feel free to make your case as to why she's an average or better candidate. Note that 'she's not Trump" is not an answer to that question.
She came in with a big deficit dug by Biden and has fought the election to an effective draw within a few months.
This is really not hard yet you can't bring yourself to admit any fact harmful to your tribe, no matter how obvious.

If the dems had a competent and likeable candidate running against Trump, they'd be winning 55%-45% (maybe more).

If the republicans had a competent and likeable candidate running against Harris, they'd be winning 55%-45% (maybe more).

In a battle of two bad choices, its 50-50. That doesn't make Harris a strong candidate. Only a weak candidate would be 50-50 with Trump.
We'll see what the results are.
The results won't change the fact that she's a bad candidate. Amazing you refuse to admit the obvious.





Congratulations, you have just discovered a thing called a "stump speech."
Reply Quote
3
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Johnfox • 5:45p, 11/4/24
Johnfox said:
I think you will definitely be voting red and turning california red for the first time!


What drugs are you on boy?
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
Reply Quote
2
bearister
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 5:55p, 11/4/24
SBGold said:

We learn very early on in Berkeley to not get high on your own supply



"Now by this time I'm plenty high
You know when your mouth a-getting dry…..You're plenty high."




*Featuring a guitar duel with Elvin Bishop
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Reply Quote
1
2 edits
bear2034
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:08p, 11/4/24

Kamala could not have done a 2 hour interview with Joe Rogan.
Reply Quote
2
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bear2034 • 11:25p, 11/4/24
bear2034 said:

Kamala could not have done a 2 hour interview with Joe Rogan.
We've seen those Trump ralllies. No stays and he ends up and dancing and fellating mics.

Disinformation coming from the foreign adversaries and being spread by BI MAGAts, no thanks

[url=https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/04/politics/fake-georgia-voting-video-russian-disinformation/index.html][/url]https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/04/politics/fake-georgia-voting-video-russian-disinformation/index.html

It's part of the MAGAt playbook, intel agencies doing a lot of warning about this.

Don't buy into disinformation.

VOTE BLUE
<FROM OT MODERATOR - SOLICITATIONS ARE NOT ALLOWED>
[url=https://secure.actblue.com/donate/ads-gs-dd-kdhsearch-july2024?refcode=om2024_ads_gs_240721_hvfphrase_dd_us_all_campaign&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA_qG5BhDTARIsAA0UHSII9WVa0nJOkQ4xIXcmQeiqkSX8yQUdAla1MhaWG3nvXYwT38FMpQ8aAgt9EALw_wcB][/url]
Reply Quote
3
Edited by Staff
BearGoggles
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:52p, 11/4/24
Discuss amongst yourselves


Reply Quote
2
chazzed
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:12a, 11/5/24

Reply Quote
3
bear2034
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BearGoggles • 1:47a, 11/5/24
BearGoggles said:
Discuss amongst yourselves



Trump's campaign brought non-Republicans into the MAGA movement like Musk, RFK Jr, and Tulsi and he included them in his ad.

Kamala distanced herself from the current president Joe Biden and left him out of her ad completely.
Reply Quote
3
bear2034
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to chazzed • 1:50a, 11/5/24
John Oliver: The Democrats have let down their Muslim constituents but if you use your imagination, Trump is going to be worse so vote for the Democrats again!
Reply Quote
2
bear2034
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:13a, 11/5/24
Reply Quote
1
oski003
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 6:22a, 11/5/24
DiabloWags said:
Johnfox said:
I think you will definitely be voting red and turning california red for the first time!


What drugs are you on boy?


Being under 80 years old doesn't make you a boy.
Reply Quote
2
BearGoggles
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bear2034 • 9:52a, 11/5/24
bear2034 said:
BearGoggles said:
Discuss amongst yourselves



Trump's campaign brought non-Republicans into the MAGA movement like Musk, RFK Jr, and Tulsi and he included them in his ad.

Kamala distanced herself from the current president Joe Biden and left him out of her ad completely.

The biggest difference, in my opinion, is that Trump did not narrate his own video, let others do the talking, and his video was (for a change) more about the American people than about him. Kamala's video was mostly her talking about herself, what "she would do", etc., with a bit of negativity thrown in.

And for the record, I didn't think Kamala's video was poorly done. Just a very different approach and tone.
Reply Quote
2
bear2034
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Johnfox • 1:49p, 11/5/24
Johnfox said:
you want more taxes?
does he pay any taxes?
Reply Quote
2
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Johnfox • 2:10p, 11/5/24
Johnfox said:
you want more taxes?

You and the 6 morons that "starred" this post must have flunked Econ. 1
What the hell do you think a TARIFF is?


"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
Reply Quote
5
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 3:35p, 11/5/24
DiabloWags said:
Johnfox said:
you want more taxes?

You and the 6 morons that "starred" this post must have flunked Econ. 1
What the hell do you think a TARIFF is?


Wags against 2034 is not fair fight. Down goes 2034 again.

VOTE BLUE

Roll On Big BLUE
Reply Quote
4
bear2034
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:05p, 11/5/24
Reply Quote
1
Johnfox
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 7:07p, 11/5/24
I'm smoking that cam ward pack
Reply Quote
1
Johnfox
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to bear2034 • 7:08p, 11/5/24
Well, you want to let all the illegal immigrants in and drive inflation through the roofs. Get ready to have 40 dollar in n out burgers
Reply Quote
2
Johnfox
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to DiabloWags • 7:10p, 11/5/24
Interesting word choice. Might want to tone it down a little buddy
Reply Quote
3
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Johnfox • 7:39p, 11/5/24
Johnfox said:
Interesting word choice. Might want to tone it down a little buddy

You're clearly not the sharpest tool in the shed.

Trump Tariff Proposed May Cost Americans $78B In Spending: Study - Benzinga
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
DiabloWags
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Johnfox • 7:42p, 11/5/24
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
Reply Quote
2
bear2034
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Johnfox • 8:01p, 11/5/24
Johnfox said:
I'm smoking that cam ward pack
I'm eating a grilled cheese sandwich.
Reply Quote
2
Johnfox
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:12a, 11/6/24
y'all are really quiet now
Reply Quote
2
Big C
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Johnfox • 10:51p, 11/6/24

I'm eating crow.
Reply Quote
2
Page 2 of 3 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.