With a GOP Congress…

7,971 Views | 200 Replies | Last: 6 days ago by bear2034
philly1121
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

President Trump never endorsed Project 2025.
Movie, I know you're post-truth but I didn't think you would be disingenuous. Trump purposefully tried to distance himself from the project but his former staff is all over the Project. Did you not know that there is a list of prospects for his second administration included in the Initiative?

Johnny McEntee. Ring a bell? Trump's personal aide. Super loyal guy. Senior advisor to Project 2025.

Russell Vought. I've mentioned him before. Policy Advisor to the RNC. He founded Center for Renewal of America.

Paul Dans. Former Director of OPMB under Trump.

Kevin Roberts. Obviously. This guy is president of the Heritage Foundation. Wants to "institutionalize" Trumpism.

Don't be disingenuous movielover. Don't have shame.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

McMormick beats Casey in PA.

D's win in MI and WI.

D's lead by a couple in Zona.

D leads by a hair in NV.

It might well end up 53-47. Very unlikely to be more for R's than 54-46.

McCormick wins PA and flips senate seat.

In AZ, the Dem senate candidate had more votes than Trump at one point. Not sure if this is still the case.
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

President Trump never endorsed Project 2025.


https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-project-2025-steve-bannon-election-b2642968.html
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
philly1121 said:

movielover said:

President Trump never endorsed Project 2025.
Movie, I know you're post-truth but I didn't think you would be disingenuous. Trump purposefully tried to distance himself from the project but his former staff is all over the Project. Did you not know that there is a list of prospects for his second administration included in the Initiative?

Johnny McEntee. Ring a bell? Trump's personal aide. Super loyal guy. Senior advisor to Project 2025.

Russell Vought. I've mentioned him before. Policy Advisor to the RNC. He founded Center for Renewal of America.

Paul Dans. Former Director of OPMB under Trump.

Kevin Roberts. Obviously. This guy is president of the Heritage Foundation. Wants to "institutionalize" Trumpism.

Don't be disingenuous movielover. Don't have shame.

Don't worry philly, you won't even feel it when it happens. Like a colonoscopy, you'll only feel it afterwards with a smile on your face.
philly1121
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Now there is a man, who is happy with his vote! Finally.

003 and movielover - take notice.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

President Trump never endorsed Project 2025.

Maybe philly is undocumented?
BearGoggles
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

BearGoggles said:

SBGold said:

oski003 said:

movielover said:




As an attorney herself, SBGold was a major proponent of increasing the amount of judges on the Supreme Court.
Still am, not was

VOTE BLUE
How many judges do you think Trump should add?
Let's wait 4 years.

What's interesting is that 2-3 may be ready to retire during this term

VOTE BLUE
And of course, that's the problem. Your preference for more judges is based purely on your desire to obtain political power. Yet you claim that Trump is the authoritarian norm breaker.

philly1121
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nah, I am, as they say, documented. I'm holdin. lol

But, I'm Mexican so, you know, I could be on the list. But I've bought the popcorn to see everyone else detained. Hopefully I'll be able to see it. ya nevah kno
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nice!

philly1121
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mira eso! Eso es clasico. Dios proteja nuestro lider naranjo. Deportar a todos los inmigrantes ahora!
BearGoggles
How long do you want to ignore this user?
philly1121 said:

movielover said:

President Trump never endorsed Project 2025.
Movie, I know you're post-truth but I didn't think you would be disingenuous. Trump purposefully tried to distance himself from the project but his former staff is all over the Project. Did you not know that there is a list of prospects for his second administration included in the Initiative?

Johnny McEntee. Ring a bell? Trump's personal aide. Super loyal guy. Senior advisor to Project 2025.

Russell Vought. I've mentioned him before. Policy Advisor to the RNC. He founded Center for Renewal of America.

Paul Dans. Former Director of OPMB under Trump.

Kevin Roberts. Obviously. This guy is president of the Heritage Foundation. Wants to "institutionalize" Trumpism.

Don't be disingenuous movielover. Don't have shame.
You are just perpetuating the Kamala Project 2025 lie. The views of a candidate's current or former advisors/supporters are not imputed to the candidate, particularly when the candidate has repeatedly and specifically said those are not his views.

By your logic, Kamala/Biden are socialists since they have the support of Bernie Sanders. By your logic, Kamala/Biden support terrorists, since some of their supporters also support Hamas/Hezbollah. By your logic, Kamala is responsible and deemed to agree with every written policy proposal of her far left supporters (e.g., abortion to the date of birth).

There is a laundry list of people supporting Kamala and/or in her inner circle with views that are outside of the mainstream

Your position (that Trump's "distancing" is irrelevant) is particularly laughable when you consider that Kamala tried to distance herself from her own positions (fracking, BLM crime, amnesty for illegals, trans rights for prisoners). You believe Kamala's largely unexplained distancing from her own prior positions, but give no credence to Trump's stated rejection of a third party's position.

Really, this is just a stupid, partisan strawman argument. You don't like it when Trump lies (which he does), but then you respond by lying. It totally discredits you.

tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
philly1121 said:

Mira eso! Eso es clasico. Dios proteja nuestro lider naranjo. Deportar a todos los inmigrantes ahora!
No todos inmigrantes, solamente inmigrantes ilegales y especialmente criminales.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Deportar inmigrantes ilegales.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

movielover said:

Liberals and MSM won't even tell you who's committing most of the Asian Hate crimes.
do you think they don't happen?

My kid is part Asian, and has been the recipient of hate crimes by WHITE students. Serious enough to be reported to the police hate crimes.

VOTE
PEACE

They happen, and white males aren't the primary culprits.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Presidente Trumpo specifically said he didn't even read Project 2025.
philly1121
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here yee, here yee! BearGoggles didn't get the memo. lol

By my logic. Hmm let's see. Is there a Project Israel Overthrow 2024 that I missed reading? Oh wait, Project Hezbollah Awakening 2025 that I missed in paperback edition? Dammit, why didn't she, Biden or their advisors write any of this down!!

Wait, I saw somewhere that Kamala was releasing Post Birth Abortion 2025. I gotta get that.

Once again emotion, anger, victimization are on full show here. Your "strawman" argument is embecilic. Do you even know what that means? lol

Trump distanced himself from it as a political necessity. An exigency. And now, because your guy won, yes WON, you're now running away from the very thing that got him elected. I simply do not understand your logic. You think, with your ridiculous "current advisors are not imputed to the candidate", that Trump is not going to integrate policy and personnel of Project 2025 into his administration? If you do, then I'd ask for my money back purchasing those Trump NFTs. You got sold out, sir.

And if "current advisors not imputed to the candidate" is acceptable for Trump, why wouldn't it be for Harris? May I remind you that Harris lost. So her views, positions and associations are now irrelevant.
philly1121
How long do you want to ignore this user?
lmao that's your excuse? Well its not surprising since he barely reads anything.

Are you gonna go to Ghost Town Brewing when Trump cleans up West Oakland? Perhaps you and I can pregame there?
philly1121
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

philly1121 said:

Mira eso! Eso es clasico. Dios proteja nuestro lider naranjo. Deportar a todos los inmigrantes ahora!
No todos inmigrantes, solamente inmigrantes ilegales y especialmente criminales.
Pero, cmo vas a distinguir lo legal de lo ilegal? Necesitas a la polica, verdad?

<switches to english>

That's going to be the rub. How to do it. But Project 2025 has the blueprint for that too.
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
philly1121 said:

tequila4kapp said:

philly1121 said:

Mira eso! Eso es clasico. Dios proteja nuestro lider naranjo. Deportar a todos los inmigrantes ahora!
No todos inmigrantes, solamente inmigrantes ilegales y especialmente criminales.
Pero, cmo vas a distinguir lo legal de lo ilegal? Necesitas a la polica, verdad?

<switches to english>

That's going to be the rub. How to do it. But Project 2025 has the blueprint for that too.
My Spanish is way way too rusty for that one. Had to go to the translator, and appreciate you going back to English.
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
philly1121 said:

lmao that's your excuse? Well its not surprising since he barely reads anything.

Are you gonna go to Ghost Town Brewing when Trump cleans up West Oakland? Perhaps you and I can pregame there?

My opinion…Trump isn't ideological enough to care about a whole document / plan like that. He's a narcissist, transactional and strikes me as someone who irrationally has to win. Will some things from the document get promoted? Yes, if they fit that model. Zero chance he tries to adopt it more holistically.
philly1121
How long do you want to ignore this user?
On that we agree. Which is why I don't consider him a Republican. But with the people he puts in, whether in stages via actual legislation or executive order, it will get in there. With control of all three branches, vacillating will not happen. This will get done inside of two years. He won't risk going past midterms.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you want to add to the narcissist list, add Obama, Harris, Biden, Hunter Biden, Jill, HRC, BC, McCain, Romney, Comey, Pelosi, McConnell, and many others.

Except of this group, El Trumpo is one of the few to be highly successful in the private sector, and in two vastly differently fields.
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Most of Trump's staff quits or will be fired . Policy doesn't interest him. The Republican Party doesn't interest him. Governing doesn't interest him

Narcissism, lies and vendettas will rule not some wonky s$it he'll never read. Vance otoh would be the Manchurian Czndidate for this
philly1121
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Roevember, did you ever respond to my post in the other thread? The bulletproof mug. The NFTs. The gold shoes. Those have got to be collectors items now.

Harris is vanquished. Why you keep posting stuff from Rick Wilson and The Lincoln Project are beyond me. But if I must respond, I will say that, no, I did not contribute to TLP. Nor did I contribute to Harris. The only races I contributed to were Tester and Allred for Senate. And Costa, Salas and Gray for House races. Costa may be ok. Salas and Gray may go down. Is Steve Schmidt still part of TLP?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GOP Senate at 53 seats.
BearGoggles
How long do you want to ignore this user?
philly1121 said:

Here yee, here yee! BearGoggles didn't get the memo. lol

By my logic. Hmm let's see. Is there a Project Israel Overthrow 2024 that I missed reading? Oh wait, Project Hezbollah Awakening 2025 that I missed in paperback edition? Dammit, why didn't she, Biden or their advisors write any of this down!!

Wait, I saw somewhere that Kamala was releasing Post Birth Abortion 2025. I gotta get that.

Once again emotion, anger, victimization are on full show here. Your "strawman" argument is embecilic. Do you even know what that means? lol

Trump distanced himself from it as a political necessity. An exigency. And now, because your guy won, yes WON, you're now running away from the very thing that got him elected. I simply do not understand your logic. You think, with your ridiculous "current advisors are not imputed to the candidate", that Trump is not going to integrate policy and personnel of Project 2025 into his administration? If you do, then I'd ask for my money back purchasing those Trump NFTs. You got sold out, sir.

And if "current advisors not imputed to the candidate" is acceptable for Trump, why wouldn't it be for Harris? May I remind you that Harris lost. So her views, positions and associations are now irrelevant.
If you think Project 2025 got trump elected, you have worse TDS and denial than I imagined.

I agree that emotion, anger, victimization are on full show here. By you. Look at the vitriol you are posting in this thread. The lack of self awareness is impressive.

philly1121
How long do you want to ignore this user?
My candidate wasn't crying victim for 4 years. You remind me of William F. Buckley when he ran for mayor of New York in 65. He finished 3rd but before that he said even if he won he would demand a recount. Lmao

For Repubs to sling mud at libs by calling them snowflakes, you sure turned out to be delicate swan. Even in victory. I'm lol'ing
philly1121
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

GOP Senate at 53 seats.


Thanks for the play by play. Yes. Things not looking good for the resistance. Just means no excuses now for you.
LunchTime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

LunchTime said:

AunBear89 said:

Four more years of:

President Trump:
* Promised to cut the deficit but added $8 trillion to it.
* Promised to build a wall; completed only 458 miles out of 2,000, mostly repairs.
* Promised Mexico would pay for the wall; they didn't.
* Promised a new healthcare plan; it never existed.
* Promised a middle-class tax cut; primarily cut taxes for the rich, leaving the middle class to bear the burden.
* Promised not to play golf; made 250 visits to his own golf clubs, costing taxpayers $150 million.
* Promised to increase economic growth by 4%; didn't achieve it, President Biden did.
* Promised an infrastructure plan; had none, President Biden signed a massive one.
* Promised to hire "the best people"; fired 3/4 of them, then labeled them the worst.
* Promised to reduce prescription drug prices; didn't happen, President Biden did.
* Promised to win the trade war with China; it cost about a quarter million jobs.
* Promised corporate tax cuts would benefit workers; corporations used the money to buy back stocks instead.
* Promised to revive the coal industry; more coal jobs were lost during his presidency.
* Promised to drain the swamp; He was the swamp, January 6th insurrection and his Fake Electors conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election proves it.
* Promised to release his tax return, didn't.



The only group Democrats made progress with is white men and women (+1 and +2%) and people with a Bachelor's... They maintained the margin for people who have graduate degrees.

The only increase for Democrats was rich white people.

Democrats lost ground with every single other demographic. Literally.

Just think about what party you are backing, and what demographics you think you are fighting. Democrats can gaslight all they want, but the policies they are pushing are only bringing over rich white people.

Maybe... Just spit balling, to win, look at why all those people switched to Trump. It's not ignorance, it's not bigotry (unless minorities are the new white supremacists)... It's because Democrats have abandoned their platform in favor of extreme progressivism.


Out of curiosity, what do you think should be in the new Democratic platform that was not before?
I believe Democrats lost for two reasons.

People are less safe.

People have less money, while the rich got richer.


1. Safety is an absolute responsibility of the government. Democrats gave away this issue by siding with criminals, often directly.

The claim that criminals are victims is insane. victims of criminals are victims. And turning this issue upside down disproportionately impacts the groups Democrats lost so much ground with.

California is a great place to see this. Prop 36, Pamala Price, Gascon. Californian's, in progressive cities and a pretty strong blue state dont just see statistics. They aren't buying the Philly style gaslighting about how crime is actually not bad at all.

Look. I have been victimized more by crime since the "defund" movement than I have my entire life, and its not even close. When my kid was about 2 months old, a homeless man grabbed him out of my stroller and I had to literally FIGHT him to get my kid back. I am not billy bad ass, and a lot of people could get their kid back in that situation, but why do I have to fight someone over keeping my kid in my control to go to first Friday? Police couldnt arrest him because he had gone into an "encampment" and are prevented from entering encampments without warrants. I had a knife pulled on me on BART and thankfully only stabbed someone else in the throat. I have had to buy 15 new mailboxes because they break the lock to take mail. My car has had windows replaced 7 times. My wheels were ripped off. That all pales compared to my two year old having a gun put to his head because someone wanted my nannys phone. In a county where the DA drops enhancements for murdered toddlers (actual plural, sadly). Not only is there potential of being a much worse outcome, but the opportunity for justice is near zero.

I grew up in Oakland. In the 1980s. I have been the victim of crimes. But the frequency of being victimized, the brazenness of doing it in daytime with witnesses taking pictures, and no consequences is not solved by "akshually, crime is down" gaslighting. No its not. Its down from a couple years ago, but up massively from before these policies. And California democrats voted to undo some of it...


2. Economy, stupid.

Inflation being down from the highs is not a win. Housing prices, if you take into account a 5% down and mortgage rates, since the 1960s, has been about the same percentage of the median income. When Biden exploded the economy, houses, for the first time in generations, actually became unaffordable. Not just sticker shock, but percentage of income needed to pay the mortgage.

(all are from Jan of inauguration year to September of election year, which is the most recent month available) Under trump prices changed 7%. Under Obama they changed 10% in the first four years, and 5% in the second four. Biden was 21%

Inflation being "normal" in the last quarter is a nice way to gaslight you into thinking that you didnt just get ****ed. Imagine if Trump started burning twice as much coal every year for 3 years, and then JUST settled in for the 4th year, and telling climate activists that coal consumption is actually not growing.

But thats not all... Democrats turned their back on Americans and then told them it was the strongest economy ever.

From the peak of pre-covid employment, American born workers have LOST 873k jobs. Foreign born workers have gained 3.744m jobs. Literally more than every job Biden "created" were not filled by Americans.

But its not JUST that all the job creation went to foreign born workers. Because of TERRIBLE border policy, foreign born labor has a HIGHER unemployment rate now...

For real income, Obama's first four were a loss of 1.8%. His second four were a gain of 11%. Trumps was a 7% gain. Biden is about .5% for far

And who got that? SOMEHOW, share of the .1% stabilized under Obama, shrank under Trump, exploded under Biden. Blame Trump, but his tax cuts drove the share of taxes paid by the 1% to the highest levels levels we've seen. Quite a magic trick to give tax breaks to the rich while getting them to pay more.


And they tell you their policies arent just working, its that you are too stupid to recognize how great things are. The gaslighting is so deep, most of the people parroting have no idea people are having a harder time. They dismiss those people as believing right wing conspiracies. "The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears." They sit on TV, on the stump, in this thread and tell you to believe them, not what you see. They obfuscate evidence and make you believe that looking at it is bad.

The reason "Lets Go Brandon" became such a wide reaching meme is because the entire apparatus is so hamfistingly obvious in their gaslighting that that the crowd chanting "**** Joe Biden" actually saying "Lets Go Brandon" is too perfect an example of their methods.


Drop the divisive identity politics, and embrace governance. You can keep the social policy. If people are prospering they wont care. But Democrats SERIOUSLY ****ed up the bread part of of placating the populous.




The problem is Democrats have policies people like that they attack trump for. Like tariffs on China. But they give that point to Trump for some reason, instead of owning it an the impact it will have, saying "Yeah, no ****, us too."

Its just too obvious if you have any intellectual honesty at all. Take the politics out (and I am 100% sure you will by saying Trumps economy was Obamas, Obamas was Obamas, Bidens was Trumps, etc) and you will agree the numbers are dog***** But for some reason you take the path of gaslighting that they arent instead of telling people "yeah, that is dog****, we agree"
LunchTime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
philly1121 said:

movielover said:

GOP Senate at 53 seats.


Thanks for the play by play. Yes. Things not looking good for the resistance. Just means no excuses now for you.
Thankfully only two seats will be seriously in range of flipping in 2026.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LunchTime said:

sycasey said:

LunchTime said:

AunBear89 said:

Four more years of:

President Trump:
* Promised to cut the deficit but added $8 trillion to it.
* Promised to build a wall; completed only 458 miles out of 2,000, mostly repairs.
* Promised Mexico would pay for the wall; they didn't.
* Promised a new healthcare plan; it never existed.
* Promised a middle-class tax cut; primarily cut taxes for the rich, leaving the middle class to bear the burden.
* Promised not to play golf; made 250 visits to his own golf clubs, costing taxpayers $150 million.
* Promised to increase economic growth by 4%; didn't achieve it, President Biden did.
* Promised an infrastructure plan; had none, President Biden signed a massive one.
* Promised to hire "the best people"; fired 3/4 of them, then labeled them the worst.
* Promised to reduce prescription drug prices; didn't happen, President Biden did.
* Promised to win the trade war with China; it cost about a quarter million jobs.
* Promised corporate tax cuts would benefit workers; corporations used the money to buy back stocks instead.
* Promised to revive the coal industry; more coal jobs were lost during his presidency.
* Promised to drain the swamp; He was the swamp, January 6th insurrection and his Fake Electors conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election proves it.
* Promised to release his tax return, didn't.



The only group Democrats made progress with is white men and women (+1 and +2%) and people with a Bachelor's... They maintained the margin for people who have graduate degrees.

The only increase for Democrats was rich white people.

Democrats lost ground with every single other demographic. Literally.

Just think about what party you are backing, and what demographics you think you are fighting. Democrats can gaslight all they want, but the policies they are pushing are only bringing over rich white people.

Maybe... Just spit balling, to win, look at why all those people switched to Trump. It's not ignorance, it's not bigotry (unless minorities are the new white supremacists)... It's because Democrats have abandoned their platform in favor of extreme progressivism.


Out of curiosity, what do you think should be in the new Democratic platform that was not before?
I believe Democrats lost for two reasons.

People are less safe.

People have less money, while the rich got richer.


1. Safety is an absolute responsibility of the government. Democrats gave away this issue by siding with criminals, often directly.

The claim that criminals are victims is insane. victims of criminals are victims. And turning this issue upside down disproportionately impacts the groups Democrats lost so much ground with.

California is a great place to see this. Prop 36, Pamala Price, Gascon. Californian's, in progressive cities and a pretty strong blue state dont just see statistics. They aren't buying the Philly style gaslighting about how crime is actually not bad at all.

Look. I have been victimized more by crime since the "defund" movement than I have my entire life, and its not even close. When my kid was about 2 months old, a homeless man grabbed him out of my stroller and I had to literally FIGHT him to get my kid back. I am not billy bad ass, and a lot of people could get their kid back in that situation, but why do I have to fight someone over keeping my kid in my control to go to first Friday? Police couldnt arrest him because he had gone into an "encampment" and are prevented from entering encampments without warrants. I had a knife pulled on me on BART and thankfully only stabbed someone else in the throat. I have had to buy 15 new mailboxes because they break the lock to take mail. My car has had windows replaced 7 times. My wheels were ripped off. That all pales compared to my two year old having a gun put to his head because someone wanted my nannys phone. In a county where the DA drops enhancements for murdered toddlers (actual plural, sadly). Not only is there potential of being a much worse outcome, but the opportunity for justice is near zero.

I grew up in Oakland. In the 1980s. I have been the victim of crimes. But the frequency of being victimized, the brazenness of doing it in daytime with witnesses taking pictures, and no consequences is not solved by "akshually, crime is down" gaslighting. No its not. Its down from a couple years ago, but up massively from before these policies. And California democrats voted to undo some of it...


2. Economy, stupid.

Inflation being down from the highs is not a win. Housing prices, if you take into account a 5% down and mortgage rates, since the 1960s, has been about the same percentage of the median income. When Biden exploded the economy, houses, for the first time in generations, actually became unaffordable. Not just sticker shock, but percentage of income needed to pay the mortgage.

(all are from Jan of inauguration year to September of election year, which is the most recent month available) Under trump prices changed 7%. Under Obama they changed 10% in the first four years, and 5% in the second four. Biden was 21%

Inflation being "normal" in the last quarter is a nice way to gaslight you into thinking that you didnt just get ****ed. Imagine if Trump started burning twice as much coal every year for 3 years, and then JUST settled in for the 4th year, and telling climate activists that coal consumption is actually not growing.

But thats not all... Democrats turned their back on Americans and then told them it was the strongest economy ever.

From the peak of pre-covid employment, American born workers have LOST 873k jobs. Foreign born workers have gained 3.744m jobs. Literally more than every job Biden "created" were not filled by Americans.

But its not JUST that all the job creation went to foreign born workers. Because of TERRIBLE border policy, foreign born labor has a HIGHER unemployment rate now...

For real income, Obama's first four were a loss of 1.8%. His second four were a gain of 11%. Trumps was a 7% gain. Biden is about .5% for far

And who got that? SOMEHOW, share of the .1% stabilized under Obama, shrank under Trump, exploded under Biden. Blame Trump, but his tax cuts drove the share of taxes paid by the 1% to the highest levels levels we've seen. Quite a magic trick to give tax breaks to the rich while getting them to pay more.


And they tell you their policies arent just working, its that you are too stupid to recognize how great things are. The gaslighting is so deep, most of the people parroting have no idea people are having a harder time. They dismiss those people as believing right wing conspiracies. "The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears." They sit on TV, on the stump, in this thread and tell you to believe them, not what you see. They obfuscate evidence and make you believe that looking at it is bad.

The reason "Lets Go Brandon" became such a wide reaching meme is because the entire apparatus is so hamfistingly obvious in their gaslighting that that the crowd chanting "**** Joe Biden" actually saying "Lets Go Brandon" is too perfect an example of their methods.


Drop the divisive identity politics, and embrace governance. You can keep the social policy. If people are prospering they wont care. But Democrats SERIOUSLY ****ed up the bread part of of placating the populous.




The problem is Democrats have policies people like that they attack trump for. Like tariffs on China. But they give that point to Trump for some reason, instead of owning it an the impact it will have, saying "Yeah, no ****, us too."

Its just too obvious if you have any intellectual honesty at all. Take the politics out (and I am 100% sure you will by saying Trumps economy was Obamas, Obamas was Obamas, Bidens was Trumps, etc) and you will agree the numbers are dog***** But for some reason you take the path of gaslighting that they arent instead of telling people "yeah, that is dog****, we agree"


Good post.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LunchTime said:

sycasey said:

LunchTime said:

AunBear89 said:

Four more years of:

President Trump:
* Promised to cut the deficit but added $8 trillion to it.
* Promised to build a wall; completed only 458 miles out of 2,000, mostly repairs.
* Promised Mexico would pay for the wall; they didn't.
* Promised a new healthcare plan; it never existed.
* Promised a middle-class tax cut; primarily cut taxes for the rich, leaving the middle class to bear the burden.
* Promised not to play golf; made 250 visits to his own golf clubs, costing taxpayers $150 million.
* Promised to increase economic growth by 4%; didn't achieve it, President Biden did.
* Promised an infrastructure plan; had none, President Biden signed a massive one.
* Promised to hire "the best people"; fired 3/4 of them, then labeled them the worst.
* Promised to reduce prescription drug prices; didn't happen, President Biden did.
* Promised to win the trade war with China; it cost about a quarter million jobs.
* Promised corporate tax cuts would benefit workers; corporations used the money to buy back stocks instead.
* Promised to revive the coal industry; more coal jobs were lost during his presidency.
* Promised to drain the swamp; He was the swamp, January 6th insurrection and his Fake Electors conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election proves it.
* Promised to release his tax return, didn't.



The only group Democrats made progress with is white men and women (+1 and +2%) and people with a Bachelor's... They maintained the margin for people who have graduate degrees.

The only increase for Democrats was rich white people.

Democrats lost ground with every single other demographic. Literally.

Just think about what party you are backing, and what demographics you think you are fighting. Democrats can gaslight all they want, but the policies they are pushing are only bringing over rich white people.

Maybe... Just spit balling, to win, look at why all those people switched to Trump. It's not ignorance, it's not bigotry (unless minorities are the new white supremacists)... It's because Democrats have abandoned their platform in favor of extreme progressivism.


Out of curiosity, what do you think should be in the new Democratic platform that was not before?
I believe Democrats lost for two reasons.

People are less safe.

People have less money, while the rich got richer.


1. Safety is an absolute responsibility of the government. Democrats gave away this issue by siding with criminals, often directly.

The claim that criminals are victims is insane. victims of criminals are victims. And turning this issue upside down disproportionately impacts the groups Democrats lost so much ground with.

California is a great place to see this. Prop 36, Pamala Price, Gascon. Californian's, in progressive cities and a pretty strong blue state dont just see statistics. They aren't buying the Philly style gaslighting about how crime is actually not bad at all.

Look. I have been victimized more by crime since the "defund" movement than I have my entire life, and its not even close. When my kid was about 2 months old, a homeless man grabbed him out of my stroller and I had to literally FIGHT him to get my kid back. I am not billy bad ass, and a lot of people could get their kid back in that situation, but why do I have to fight someone over keeping my kid in my control to go to first Friday? Police couldnt arrest him because he had gone into an "encampment" and are prevented from entering encampments without warrants. I had a knife pulled on me on BART and thankfully only stabbed someone else in the throat. I have had to buy 15 new mailboxes because they break the lock to take mail. My car has had windows replaced 7 times. My wheels were ripped off. That all pales compared to my two year old having a gun put to his head because someone wanted my nannys phone. In a county where the DA drops enhancements for murdered toddlers (actual plural, sadly). Not only is there potential of being a much worse outcome, but the opportunity for justice is near zero.

I grew up in Oakland. In the 1980s. I have been the victim of crimes. But the frequency of being victimized, the brazenness of doing it in daytime with witnesses taking pictures, and no consequences is not solved by "akshually, crime is down" gaslighting. No its not. Its down from a couple years ago, but up massively from before these policies. And California democrats voted to undo some of it...


2. Economy, stupid.

Inflation being down from the highs is not a win. Housing prices, if you take into account a 5% down and mortgage rates, since the 1960s, has been about the same percentage of the median income. When Biden exploded the economy, houses, for the first time in generations, actually became unaffordable. Not just sticker shock, but percentage of income needed to pay the mortgage.

(all are from Jan of inauguration year to September of election year, which is the most recent month available) Under trump prices changed 7%. Under Obama they changed 10% in the first four years, and 5% in the second four. Biden was 21%

Inflation being "normal" in the last quarter is a nice way to gaslight you into thinking that you didnt just get ****ed. Imagine if Trump started burning twice as much coal every year for 3 years, and then JUST settled in for the 4th year, and telling climate activists that coal consumption is actually not growing.

But thats not all... Democrats turned their back on Americans and then told them it was the strongest economy ever.

From the peak of pre-covid employment, American born workers have LOST 873k jobs. Foreign born workers have gained 3.744m jobs. Literally more than every job Biden "created" were not filled by Americans.

But its not JUST that all the job creation went to foreign born workers. Because of TERRIBLE border policy, foreign born labor has a HIGHER unemployment rate now...

For real income, Obama's first four were a loss of 1.8%. His second four were a gain of 11%. Trumps was a 7% gain. Biden is about .5% for far

And who got that? SOMEHOW, share of the .1% stabilized under Obama, shrank under Trump, exploded under Biden. Blame Trump, but his tax cuts drove the share of taxes paid by the 1% to the highest levels levels we've seen. Quite a magic trick to give tax breaks to the rich while getting them to pay more.


And they tell you their policies arent just working, its that you are too stupid to recognize how great things are. The gaslighting is so deep, most of the people parroting have no idea people are having a harder time. They dismiss those people as believing right wing conspiracies. "The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears." They sit on TV, on the stump, in this thread and tell you to believe them, not what you see. They obfuscate evidence and make you believe that looking at it is bad.

The reason "Lets Go Brandon" became such a wide reaching meme is because the entire apparatus is so hamfistingly obvious in their gaslighting that that the crowd chanting "**** Joe Biden" actually saying "Lets Go Brandon" is too perfect an example of their methods.


Drop the divisive identity politics, and embrace governance. You can keep the social policy. If people are prospering they wont care. But Democrats SERIOUSLY ****ed up the bread part of of placating the populous.




The problem is Democrats have policies people like that they attack trump for. Like tariffs on China. But they give that point to Trump for some reason, instead of owning it an the impact it will have, saying "Yeah, no ****, us too."

Its just too obvious if you have any intellectual honesty at all. Take the politics out (and I am 100% sure you will by saying Trumps economy was Obamas, Obamas was Obamas, Bidens was Trumps, etc) and you will agree the numbers are dog***** But for some reason you take the path of gaslighting that they arent instead of telling people "yeah, that is dog****, we agree"
Fair points, but my question was not about what the mistakes of the Democrats were during Biden's term. It was about what the platform should be going forward.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
philly1121 said:

movielover said:

GOP Senate at 53 seats.


Thanks for the play by play. Yes. Things not looking good for the resistance. Just means no excuses now for you.


Will you join the Progressive brownshirts rioting and violence - that the MSM goons will say is "mostly peaceful"?
philly1121
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LunchTime said:

sycasey said:

LunchTime said:

AunBear89 said:

Four more years of:

President Trump:
* Promised to cut the deficit but added $8 trillion to it.
* Promised to build a wall; completed only 458 miles out of 2,000, mostly repairs.
* Promised Mexico would pay for the wall; they didn't.
* Promised a new healthcare plan; it never existed.
* Promised a middle-class tax cut; primarily cut taxes for the rich, leaving the middle class to bear the burden.
* Promised not to play golf; made 250 visits to his own golf clubs, costing taxpayers $150 million.
* Promised to increase economic growth by 4%; didn't achieve it, President Biden did.
* Promised an infrastructure plan; had none, President Biden signed a massive one.
* Promised to hire "the best people"; fired 3/4 of them, then labeled them the worst.
* Promised to reduce prescription drug prices; didn't happen, President Biden did.
* Promised to win the trade war with China; it cost about a quarter million jobs.
* Promised corporate tax cuts would benefit workers; corporations used the money to buy back stocks instead.
* Promised to revive the coal industry; more coal jobs were lost during his presidency.
* Promised to drain the swamp; He was the swamp, January 6th insurrection and his Fake Electors conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election proves it.
* Promised to release his tax return, didn't.



The only group Democrats made progress with is white men and women (+1 and +2%) and people with a Bachelor's... They maintained the margin for people who have graduate degrees.

The only increase for Democrats was rich white people.

Democrats lost ground with every single other demographic. Literally.

Just think about what party you are backing, and what demographics you think you are fighting. Democrats can gaslight all they want, but the policies they are pushing are only bringing over rich white people.

Maybe... Just spit balling, to win, look at why all those people switched to Trump. It's not ignorance, it's not bigotry (unless minorities are the new white supremacists)... It's because Democrats have abandoned their platform in favor of extreme progressivism.


Out of curiosity, what do you think should be in the new Democratic platform that was not before?
I believe Democrats lost for two reasons.

People are less safe.

People have less money, while the rich got richer.


1. Safety is an absolute responsibility of the government. Democrats gave away this issue by siding with criminals, often directly.

The claim that criminals are victims is insane. victims of criminals are victims. And turning this issue upside down disproportionately impacts the groups Democrats lost so much ground with.

California is a great place to see this. Prop 36, Pamala Price, Gascon. Californian's, in progressive cities and a pretty strong blue state dont just see statistics. They aren't buying the Philly style gaslighting about how crime is actually not bad at all.

Look. I have been victimized more by crime since the "defund" movement than I have my entire life, and its not even close. When my kid was about 2 months old, a homeless man grabbed him out of my stroller and I had to literally FIGHT him to get my kid back. I am not billy bad ass, and a lot of people could get their kid back in that situation, but why do I have to fight someone over keeping my kid in my control to go to first Friday? Police couldnt arrest him because he had gone into an "encampment" and are prevented from entering encampments without warrants. I had a knife pulled on me on BART and thankfully only stabbed someone else in the throat. I have had to buy 15 new mailboxes because they break the lock to take mail. My car has had windows replaced 7 times. My wheels were ripped off. That all pales compared to my two year old having a gun put to his head because someone wanted my nannys phone. In a county where the DA drops enhancements for murdered toddlers (actual plural, sadly). Not only is there potential of being a much worse outcome, but the opportunity for justice is near zero.

I grew up in Oakland. In the 1980s. I have been the victim of crimes. But the frequency of being victimized, the brazenness of doing it in daytime with witnesses taking pictures, and no consequences is not solved by "akshually, crime is down" gaslighting. No its not. Its down from a couple years ago, but up massively from before these policies. And California democrats voted to undo some of it...


2. Economy, stupid.

Inflation being down from the highs is not a win. Housing prices, if you take into account a 5% down and mortgage rates, since the 1960s, has been about the same percentage of the median income. When Biden exploded the economy, houses, for the first time in generations, actually became unaffordable. Not just sticker shock, but percentage of income needed to pay the mortgage.

(all are from Jan of inauguration year to September of election year, which is the most recent month available) Under trump prices changed 7%. Under Obama they changed 10% in the first four years, and 5% in the second four. Biden was 21%

Inflation being "normal" in the last quarter is a nice way to gaslight you into thinking that you didnt just get ****ed. Imagine if Trump started burning twice as much coal every year for 3 years, and then JUST settled in for the 4th year, and telling climate activists that coal consumption is actually not growing.

But thats not all... Democrats turned their back on Americans and then told them it was the strongest economy ever.

From the peak of pre-covid employment, American born workers have LOST 873k jobs. Foreign born workers have gained 3.744m jobs. Literally more than every job Biden "created" were not filled by Americans.

But its not JUST that all the job creation went to foreign born workers. Because of TERRIBLE border policy, foreign born labor has a HIGHER unemployment rate now...

For real income, Obama's first four were a loss of 1.8%. His second four were a gain of 11%. Trumps was a 7% gain. Biden is about .5% for far

And who got that? SOMEHOW, share of the .1% stabilized under Obama, shrank under Trump, exploded under Biden. Blame Trump, but his tax cuts drove the share of taxes paid by the 1% to the highest levels levels we've seen. Quite a magic trick to give tax breaks to the rich while getting them to pay more.


And they tell you their policies arent just working, its that you are too stupid to recognize how great things are. The gaslighting is so deep, most of the people parroting have no idea people are having a harder time. They dismiss those people as believing right wing conspiracies. "The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears." They sit on TV, on the stump, in this thread and tell you to believe them, not what you see. They obfuscate evidence and make you believe that looking at it is bad.

The reason "Lets Go Brandon" became such a wide reaching meme is because the entire apparatus is so hamfistingly obvious in their gaslighting that that the crowd chanting "**** Joe Biden" actually saying "Lets Go Brandon" is too perfect an example of their methods.


Drop the divisive identity politics, and embrace governance. You can keep the social policy. If people are prospering they wont care. But Democrats SERIOUSLY ****ed up the bread part of of placating the populous.




The problem is Democrats have policies people like that they attack trump for. Like tariffs on China. But they give that point to Trump for some reason, instead of owning it an the impact it will have, saying "Yeah, no ****, us too."

Its just too obvious if you have any intellectual honesty at all. Take the politics out (and I am 100% sure you will by saying Trumps economy was Obamas, Obamas was Obamas, Bidens was Trumps, etc) and you will agree the numbers are dog***** But for some reason you take the path of gaslighting that they arent instead of telling people "yeah, that is dog****, we agree"
1. "Safety is the responsibility of government"

I'm sorrry. Did you just become a Democrat? Because I thought all you MAGA people wanted to dismantle the government. The federal government. The bureaucracy. This must include the policing appartus doesn't it? It has to.

As to emphasize my point about Post Truth, it is emotion that now drives decisions. Not facts. Gascon's loss has to do with perception. I am keenly aware of his policies as my family lives all over LA - East Los, Whittier, Montebello, Alhambra. It is not gaslighting to present facts. But it is perception and emotion that drive the narratives now. And certainly all the smash and grab shoplifting that has been going on in LA has had a dramatic impact. That coupled with Gasgon's decision to not seek the death penalty, barring prosecutors from parole hearings and barring his office from seeking enhancement charges to criminal cases were perceived as weak. Would it pain you to read that according to LAPD, burglaries are down in LA in 2024. Down from 2023 and further down from 2022. But, fair play. The people have spoken.

It is of course quite serious that you have been victimized. You and your family.

It is not intellectual dishonesty that I did not hide after this election loss. I've actually been quite open about it. But where I am coming across as sarcastic, others like you, 2034, 003 and others are coming across as disengenuous about what comes next. Dems fumbled. On that we agree. I think that the frame for this loss was established during the Dem primaries of 2016 when Bernie Sanders was punted by the Dem Establishment. So went that loss, so went the white working and middle class. Of course I know Dems need to course correct. But where I am freely open about it, you and others now strike a different tune. "oh, that's not what we're gonna do". "project 2025 is a memo, Nothing more", "Trump never read Project 2025". Now THAT is gaslighting.

I wrote this in another thread that I would buy stock in private prison construction. Want to know why? Because Trump's election sent CoreCivic and GeoGroup stock soaring. These two companies are the ones that expanded their operations into detention centers for undocs. CoreCivic stock surged 29% on Wednesday and GeoGroup climbed up by 42%. Am I lying? It is not gaslighting to suggest that these detention centers are coming. Or that private prisons will now be built. The market doesn't lie. Now, I'm assuming you're for that since you voted for Trump. But don't run away from it. Don't bullsh*t the board that this isn't what you wanted. That is insulting to everyone's intelligence including your own.

I acknowledge the loss. I acknowledge perception is more impactful than facts. That's the way things are. That's why Harris got wiped out and that's why there should be nothing stopping Project 2025. Its not gaslighting. Its not intellectual dishonesty. Its facts. And I say, don't run from it.
philly1121
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

philly1121 said:

movielover said:

GOP Senate at 53 seats.


Thanks for the play by play. Yes. Things not looking good for the resistance. Just means no excuses now for you.


Will you join the Progressive brownshirts rioting and violence - that the MSM goons will say is "mostly peaceful"?
No, the brownshirts are your area movielover. You know, the Proud Boys. Enrique Tarrio. They'll soon be out of prison. Pardoned for the illegal Jan 6 garden party. Will you be joining me at Ghost Town for brews? Perhaps we can get shocky away from buccees?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.