sycasey said:BearlySane88 said:sycasey said:BearlySane88 said:bearister said:BearlySane88 said:
Yall do love erasing history and tearing down statues so not surprising that's what you'd want.
You are projecting like MAGAs like to do. Your MAGA team is winning the History Erasure contest by a wide margin:
"The Trump administration is attempting to erase or minimize the history and contributions of non-white people, women, and the LGBTQ+ community from federal government resources and public spaces.
The administration has stated these actions are intended to "restore truth and sanity" to American history and focus on national pride, rather than what it considers "divisive ideology".
Examples of actions cited by critics include:
Removal of online resources and data: Thousands of government web pages and datasets related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, public health, climate change, and specific histories of Black, Latino, and women service members were removed or modified across federal agencies, including the Department of Defense and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Changes to National Parks and monuments: The administration directed the National Park Service to review and remove signage, exhibits, and educational materials deemed to "disparage" the U.S. or its historical figures. This included removing a photo of an enslaved man's "scourged back" from Fort Pulaski National Monument and an exhibit on Indigenous history and racism at Muir Woods.
Renaming of natural landmarks: An executive order targeted place names, such as changing the name of Denali in Alaska back to Mount McKinley, which critics argue erases Indigenous history and connections to the land.
Influence on cultural institutions: The Smithsonian Institution's museums were reportedly instructed to focus on "American greatness" and avoid content on the negative aspects of U.S. history, such as the full realities of slavery.
Efforts to reshape historical narratives in education: The administration pushed for changes in school curricula to align with a narrative that emphasizes a "glorified" American history, while downplaying or removing discussions of slavery, segregation, and discrimination.
The administration's allies defend these executive actions as necessary to correct what they view as a skewed, left-wing interpretation of history. Historians and advocacy groups, such as the Organization of American Historians and the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, have called these actions an "assault" on historical institutions and an attempt to rewrite the public record. Some of the data and information removed from government websites was later restored, often after public outcry or legal challenges."
AI Overview
*All of the above actions will be undone when Trump leaves Washington D.C. in disgrace.
Renaming back to their original names. Putting history back in place after it was removed by dems.
Please tell me who was tearing down statues and erasing history because it sure as hell wasn't republicans
https://www.britannica.com/procon/historic-statue-removal-debate
In the case of McKinley you can make this argument, but the rest are just removing exhibits that point to some of the negative aspects of American history, like treatment of slaves and Native American tribes.
My argument is that dems like to try and erase history and you're proving my point.
Are you arguing that it's okay to remove history you deem negative?
. . . no? That was not what I argued at all.
" but the rest are just removing exhibits that point to some of the negative aspects of American history, like treatment of slaves and Native American tribes."
This certainly reads like you are justifying removing history that is negative


















