tequila4kapp said:
I guess we could almost justify invading the country to capture Maduro for the purpose of bringing him to legal justice under an existing indictment. That gets us over our skis a good bit but there is precedence (Noriega). But what about this business that we will be running the country for a while and all the talk of oil? This is pretty transparently the worst of the stuff that was said about Bush and Iraq (regime change for oil) by the supposed no foreign war / no regime change President.
I am going to call this a failure by Trump. At an absolute minimum you have to spend some time communicating, explaining and presenting evidence to the US population making the case that a nation is a bad actor before you put our soldiers in harms way. If we have a vital national interest at play...explain it.
It is one thing to use the narco-terrorist rationale to blow up drug boats on their way to a shore (read: thin but...okay). But that same rational to do regime change? Ugh.
Or maybe there is more at play, yet to be revealed?
I want to credit @willchamberlain for this point -- which I RP'd -- but add a bit of substance.
— Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) January 3, 2026
Osama Bin Laden was indicted in the SDNY first in 1998, and later in a series of Superseding Indictments between 1999 and 2001.
There was a warrant for his arrest and he was on theā¦
