oski003 said:bearister said:
The kicker only has 16 accusers; Trump has at least 25, but the kicker is young and has time to pad those stats.
Huh? What has he been accused of, besides not being liberal?
DiabloWags said:oski003 said:bearister said:
The kicker only has 16 accusers; Trump has at least 25, but the kicker is young and has time to pad those stats.
Huh? What has he been accused of, besides not being liberal?
Here, let me help you again since you appear to be oblivious not only about Top-Tier gasoline.
Justin Tucker allegations, explained: What to know about sexual misconduct accusations against Ravens kicker | Sporting News
DiabloWags said:
Cool story bro.
I think you need glasses.
But feel free to "spin" how ignorant you are like you always do.
Lmfao.
Justin Tucker
. . . do you guys think Tucker plays for the "Super Bowl losing team?" Last I checked he's not the Chiefs kicker.DiabloWags said:
Cool story bro.
I think you need glasses.
But feel free to "spin" how ignorant you are like you always do.
Lmfao.
Justin Tucker
BREAKING: President Trump suspended all security clearances and contracts with Covington and Burling
— Jack Poso 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) February 28, 2025
Guess who else works there now: pic.twitter.com/wgiuvvKDBH
oski003 said:DiabloWags said:
Cool story bro.
I think you need glasses.
But feel free to "spin" how ignorant you are like you always do.
Lmfao.
Justin Tucker
That's still not Tucker. Your arrogance makes you behave stupidly.
Going into the severe weather and hurricane season, this cannot be good.
— Al Roker (@alroker) February 27, 2025
The Commerce Department has laid off hundreds of NOAA employees, many with specialized skills who work at one of the world's top climate science and weather forecasting agencies.
Why it matters: The… pic.twitter.com/l8mMUxHlNz
DiabloWags said:oski003 said:DiabloWags said:
Cool story bro.
I think you need glasses.
But feel free to "spin" how ignorant you are like you always do.
Lmfao.
Justin Tucker
That's still not Tucker. Your arrogance makes you behave stupidly.
You are the first to reply to every one of my posts.
What does that make you?
The reply section for these types of tweets are gold.sycasey said:
Will there be a frantic re-hiring before or after some bad storm tracking results from this?
bear2034 said:The reply section for these types of tweets are gold.sycasey said:
Will there be a frantic re-hiring before or after some bad storm tracking results from this?
Project 2025 talked about gutting the National Weather Service so that they merely do data collection. Weather forecasts would go to the private sector. This has been Accuweather's wet dream for the last 10-15 years. Be prepared for subscription weather forecasts.sycasey said:bear2034 said:The reply section for these types of tweets are gold.sycasey said:
Will there be a frantic re-hiring before or after some bad storm tracking results from this?
It will be even funnier when people in this country get no warning about tornadoes and hurricanes!
BearGoggles said:Do you realize how absurd you are? What is the point of this post? Serious assertion? Unsuccessful attempt at humor? Trolling? Attention seeking because your mommy didn't hug you? Totally bizarre.bearister said:
Musk/Vance will get rid of Trump under the 25th Amendment the minute he refuses continue in his role as the good dog.
bearister said:
The kicker only has 16 accusers; Trump has at least 25, but the kicker is young and has time to pad those stats.
Except for the kicker that was pictured in Trump's office is actually Harrison Butker.DiabloWags said:bearister said:
The kicker only has 16 accusers; Trump has at least 25, but the kicker is young and has time to pad those stats.
Yup.
That would be JUSTIN TUCKER, the kicker for the Baltimore Ravens.
The Baltimore Banner reported that 16 massage therapists at eight spas have claimed Tucker engaged in inappropriate sexual behavior during spa sessions from 2012-16.
Justin Tucker allegations: Ravens GM talks about claims against kicker | Fox News
First of all, its a given that Trump says a lot of crazy and often false/wildly embellished things. Often he's just posturing/negotiating or trolling. Sometimes his narcissism compels him to say stupid things.sycasey said:You basically just did the thing I described above. You said that Trump doesn't really mean it when he says he wants a third term. In other words, don't believe him when he says the obviously bad thing. Just trolling!BearGoggles said:This is conspiracy theory nonsense.sycasey said:It's simple! We're not supposed to believe him when it's an obviously bad thing. Otherwise you should believe him entirely! Got it?Eastern Oregon Bear said:Hey, if Trump says he'd like to stay in office past his constitutional limit, why shouldn't we believe he will act upon it? Words have meaning, even for Trump.BearGoggles said:The question I have is do purportedly educated people actually believe this? Or are they just demagoguing? I don't know which is worse, but either way is bad.tequila4kapp said:
That is such a skewed view of things.
The deep state was an resistance movement against the first Trump administration. HRC, BIden, Harris others have openly discussed Resisting and continuing to fight. They and political opponents used lawfare to prevent Trump from being President in 2025. The agencies of government have been manipulated to advance the political interests of a party (or perhaps both but we don't know it yet). It is entirely foreseeable and appropriate that all of that is dealt with. That is not (just) retribution, it is cleansing our government of inappropriate people for their positions.
On top of that the government is a bloated heap of waste. It is appropriate for the Executive to try to right size and refocus government spending (Clinton and Obama tried the same thing).
It is a legitimate problem that a party can cherry pick to find a political hack US District Judge and that judge can halt the Executive branch. This cuts both ways. The only talk of impeachment I've seen is for judges who have an obvious political bias/conflict of interest and who have issued the most egregious injunctions. Even so, we know those judges won't be removed by not a single D Senator will vote for it.
I personally find the talk of Trump staying in office beyond this term patently absurd. Lump it right in there with Fascist and Existential Threat To Democracy. It is just lazy TDS fearmongering that falls on deaf ears outside a certain segment of the D party. There is no way this is happening.
Lawfare and activist judges (who are cherry picked) is bad. Both sides have done it. But the judicial resistance to Trump has been unprecedented. The recent TROs (including the one stayed by Justice Roberts last night) have been patently absurd and unlawful.
Biden's orders were challenged, but there is no comparable example of multiple judges issuing TROs within days (sometimes hours) of executive actions. One judge received a TRO request at 11:00 pm. and issued a TRO the following morning - before the Government even had a chance to respond.
The supreme court is about to come down hard on this. And that was part of Trump's plan.
First of all, Trump is trolling all the liberals by saying this type of thing. He knows they (and you) will overreact - in fact he's counting on it. It reminds me of Lucy and the football. You know what is going to happen, but Charlie Brown (the liberals) fall for it every time. It is funny (and odd) that you are so easily manipulated, both by Trump and the dems who lead the overreaction.
Beyond that, if Trump did try to run, he would be shut down immediately, He's not eligible to be on a state ballot and most (if not all) states would not list him. It is not different than a US born citizen or person under 35 attempting to run - they can't. And even if he was listed on ballots and somehow won the election (which is a fantasy), then he would not be inaugurated. Full stop.
Then you argue that the laws would not allow it. I actually agree with that, he would almost certainly be blocked. But that doesn't mean he doesn't want to try. I believe him when he says that.
Not sure who you are arguing with here. I'm not spun up about Trump's statements. I'm criticizing the line of argument that says "you shouldn't believe him, unless he's saying a thing I like." Either you believe he means what he says or you don't.BearGoggles said:First of all, its a given that Trump says a lot of crazy and often false/wildly embellished things. Often he's just posturing/negotiating or trolling. Sometimes his narcissism compels him to say stupid things.sycasey said:You basically just did the thing I described above. You said that Trump doesn't really mean it when he says he wants a third term. In other words, don't believe him when he says the obviously bad thing. Just trolling!BearGoggles said:This is conspiracy theory nonsense.sycasey said:It's simple! We're not supposed to believe him when it's an obviously bad thing. Otherwise you should believe him entirely! Got it?Eastern Oregon Bear said:Hey, if Trump says he'd like to stay in office past his constitutional limit, why shouldn't we believe he will act upon it? Words have meaning, even for Trump.BearGoggles said:The question I have is do purportedly educated people actually believe this? Or are they just demagoguing? I don't know which is worse, but either way is bad.tequila4kapp said:
That is such a skewed view of things.
The deep state was an resistance movement against the first Trump administration. HRC, BIden, Harris others have openly discussed Resisting and continuing to fight. They and political opponents used lawfare to prevent Trump from being President in 2025. The agencies of government have been manipulated to advance the political interests of a party (or perhaps both but we don't know it yet). It is entirely foreseeable and appropriate that all of that is dealt with. That is not (just) retribution, it is cleansing our government of inappropriate people for their positions.
On top of that the government is a bloated heap of waste. It is appropriate for the Executive to try to right size and refocus government spending (Clinton and Obama tried the same thing).
It is a legitimate problem that a party can cherry pick to find a political hack US District Judge and that judge can halt the Executive branch. This cuts both ways. The only talk of impeachment I've seen is for judges who have an obvious political bias/conflict of interest and who have issued the most egregious injunctions. Even so, we know those judges won't be removed by not a single D Senator will vote for it.
I personally find the talk of Trump staying in office beyond this term patently absurd. Lump it right in there with Fascist and Existential Threat To Democracy. It is just lazy TDS fearmongering that falls on deaf ears outside a certain segment of the D party. There is no way this is happening.
Lawfare and activist judges (who are cherry picked) is bad. Both sides have done it. But the judicial resistance to Trump has been unprecedented. The recent TROs (including the one stayed by Justice Roberts last night) have been patently absurd and unlawful.
Biden's orders were challenged, but there is no comparable example of multiple judges issuing TROs within days (sometimes hours) of executive actions. One judge received a TRO request at 11:00 pm. and issued a TRO the following morning - before the Government even had a chance to respond.
The supreme court is about to come down hard on this. And that was part of Trump's plan.
First of all, Trump is trolling all the liberals by saying this type of thing. He knows they (and you) will overreact - in fact he's counting on it. It reminds me of Lucy and the football. You know what is going to happen, but Charlie Brown (the liberals) fall for it every time. It is funny (and odd) that you are so easily manipulated, both by Trump and the dems who lead the overreaction.
Beyond that, if Trump did try to run, he would be shut down immediately, He's not eligible to be on a state ballot and most (if not all) states would not list him. It is not different than a US born citizen or person under 35 attempting to run - they can't. And even if he was listed on ballots and somehow won the election (which is a fantasy), then he would not be inaugurated. Full stop.
Then you argue that the laws would not allow it. I actually agree with that, he would almost certainly be blocked. But that doesn't mean he doesn't want to try. I believe him when he says that.
The question is how do rationale people, in good faith, sort through these things? The dems strategy has been to react - and most often overreact - to every idiotic thing he says. How did that work out? Chicken little syndrome.
In terms of the third term, it really doesn't matter what Trump says or intends. It will not happen for the reasons stated - which you apparently agree with. So why get spun up about this? He's playing you like a fiddle and you seem to be enjoying it, which is very odd.
You and other liberals are Charlie Brown (or Don Quixote, if you prefer). Meanwhile, the constant overreactions result in a loss of credibility - if everything is terrible or outrageous, then nothing really is. You're being tuned out by swing voters, particularly because of the absurd fascism/Nazi/dictator claims which people generally reject.
Trump is picking issues where he has strong voter approval (border, DOGE, trans sports) and the dems can't help themselves to oppose him for no good reason.
We're arguing about the bolded statement which I believe is a false choice - empirically sometimes he means what he says and sometimes he doesn't. A thinking person tries to filter that, like you would do with any other politician. The Bushes/Obama/Clinton/Biden certainly said things that were not true or were aspirational.sycasey said:Not sure who you are arguing with here. I'm not spun up about Trump's statements. I'm criticizing the line of argument that says "you shouldn't believe him, unless he's saying a thing I like." Either you believe he means what he says or you don't.BearGoggles said:First of all, its a given that Trump says a lot of crazy and often false/wildly embellished things. Often he's just posturing/negotiating or trolling. Sometimes his narcissism compels him to say stupid things.sycasey said:You basically just did the thing I described above. You said that Trump doesn't really mean it when he says he wants a third term. In other words, don't believe him when he says the obviously bad thing. Just trolling!BearGoggles said:This is conspiracy theory nonsense.sycasey said:It's simple! We're not supposed to believe him when it's an obviously bad thing. Otherwise you should believe him entirely! Got it?Eastern Oregon Bear said:Hey, if Trump says he'd like to stay in office past his constitutional limit, why shouldn't we believe he will act upon it? Words have meaning, even for Trump.BearGoggles said:The question I have is do purportedly educated people actually believe this? Or are they just demagoguing? I don't know which is worse, but either way is bad.tequila4kapp said:
That is such a skewed view of things.
The deep state was an resistance movement against the first Trump administration. HRC, BIden, Harris others have openly discussed Resisting and continuing to fight. They and political opponents used lawfare to prevent Trump from being President in 2025. The agencies of government have been manipulated to advance the political interests of a party (or perhaps both but we don't know it yet). It is entirely foreseeable and appropriate that all of that is dealt with. That is not (just) retribution, it is cleansing our government of inappropriate people for their positions.
On top of that the government is a bloated heap of waste. It is appropriate for the Executive to try to right size and refocus government spending (Clinton and Obama tried the same thing).
It is a legitimate problem that a party can cherry pick to find a political hack US District Judge and that judge can halt the Executive branch. This cuts both ways. The only talk of impeachment I've seen is for judges who have an obvious political bias/conflict of interest and who have issued the most egregious injunctions. Even so, we know those judges won't be removed by not a single D Senator will vote for it.
I personally find the talk of Trump staying in office beyond this term patently absurd. Lump it right in there with Fascist and Existential Threat To Democracy. It is just lazy TDS fearmongering that falls on deaf ears outside a certain segment of the D party. There is no way this is happening.
Lawfare and activist judges (who are cherry picked) is bad. Both sides have done it. But the judicial resistance to Trump has been unprecedented. The recent TROs (including the one stayed by Justice Roberts last night) have been patently absurd and unlawful.
Biden's orders were challenged, but there is no comparable example of multiple judges issuing TROs within days (sometimes hours) of executive actions. One judge received a TRO request at 11:00 pm. and issued a TRO the following morning - before the Government even had a chance to respond.
The supreme court is about to come down hard on this. And that was part of Trump's plan.
First of all, Trump is trolling all the liberals by saying this type of thing. He knows they (and you) will overreact - in fact he's counting on it. It reminds me of Lucy and the football. You know what is going to happen, but Charlie Brown (the liberals) fall for it every time. It is funny (and odd) that you are so easily manipulated, both by Trump and the dems who lead the overreaction.
Beyond that, if Trump did try to run, he would be shut down immediately, He's not eligible to be on a state ballot and most (if not all) states would not list him. It is not different than a US born citizen or person under 35 attempting to run - they can't. And even if he was listed on ballots and somehow won the election (which is a fantasy), then he would not be inaugurated. Full stop.
Then you argue that the laws would not allow it. I actually agree with that, he would almost certainly be blocked. But that doesn't mean he doesn't want to try. I believe him when he says that.
The question is how do rationale people, in good faith, sort through these things? The dems strategy has been to react - and most often overreact - to every idiotic thing he says. How did that work out? Chicken little syndrome.
In terms of the third term, it really doesn't matter what Trump says or intends. It will not happen for the reasons stated - which you apparently agree with. So why get spun up about this? He's playing you like a fiddle and you seem to be enjoying it, which is very odd.
You and other liberals are Charlie Brown (or Don Quixote, if you prefer). Meanwhile, the constant overreactions result in a loss of credibility - if everything is terrible or outrageous, then nothing really is. You're being tuned out by swing voters, particularly because of the absurd fascism/Nazi/dictator claims which people generally reject.
Trump is picking issues where he has strong voter approval (border, DOGE, trans sports) and the dems can't help themselves to oppose him for no good reason.
I believe he generally means it. Sure, some of what he says will be impossible for various reasons. But he probably still means it when he says he wants something.
oski003 said:Except for the kicker that was pictured in Trump's office is actually Harrison Butker.DiabloWags said:bearister said:
The kicker only has 16 accusers; Trump has at least 25, but the kicker is young and has time to pad those stats.
Yup.
That would be JUSTIN TUCKER, the kicker for the Baltimore Ravens.
The Baltimore Banner reported that 16 massage therapists at eight spas have claimed Tucker engaged in inappropriate sexual behavior during spa sessions from 2012-16.
Justin Tucker allegations: Ravens GM talks about claims against kicker | Fox News
DiabloWags said:oski003 said:Except for the kicker that was pictured in Trump's office is actually Harrison Butker.DiabloWags said:bearister said:
The kicker only has 16 accusers; Trump has at least 25, but the kicker is young and has time to pad those stats.
Yup.
That would be JUSTIN TUCKER, the kicker for the Baltimore Ravens.
The Baltimore Banner reported that 16 massage therapists at eight spas have claimed Tucker engaged in inappropriate sexual behavior during spa sessions from 2012-16.
Justin Tucker allegations: Ravens GM talks about claims against kicker | Fox News
Your reading comprehension continues to be EXTREMELY POOR.
Bearister was clearly talking about Justin Tucker and his 16 accusers vs 26 for Trump.
For some bizarre reason, you still haven't figured this out yet.
We were never talking about Harrison Butker.
And YES, the photos that I've been posting have been photos of JUSTIN TUCKER.
Did you really graduate from CAL?
🇺🇸🇺🇦 Fox News just said Zelensky and his team "begged" to stay, but Trump was adamant. pic.twitter.com/5hZ6SNGuvl
— Lord Bebo (@MyLordBebo) February 28, 2025
It was a shameful display by an American President and will only embolden Russia and China. One has to wonder in a world full of threats will our "allies" work with us given our behavior towards Ukraine and Europe? I can see Europe turning toward China who will fill the vacuum created by the United States. Isolationism has never worked out for the World or the United States and neither has cowardice.movielover said:🇺🇸🇺🇦 Fox News just said Zelensky and his team "begged" to stay, but Trump was adamant. pic.twitter.com/5hZ6SNGuvl
— Lord Bebo (@MyLordBebo) February 28, 2025
Trump is too much of a coward to say a bad thing to Putin, yet he dares lecture Zelensky?
— Adam Kinzinger (Slava Ukraini) 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇮🇱 (@AdamKinzinger) February 28, 2025
Russia is on the verge of collapse and Trump/Vance are desperate to save them pic.twitter.com/YuTNyAess2
bear2034 said:
Adam Kinzinger was preemptively pardoned by Joe Biden in his last day of office.
BearNIt said:It was a shameful display by an American President and will only embolden Russia and China. One has to wonder in a world full of threats will our "allies" work with us given our behavior towards Ukraine and Europe? I can see Europe turning toward China who will fill the vacuum created by the United States. Isolationism has never worked out for the World or the United States and neither has cowardice.movielover said:🇺🇸🇺🇦 Fox News just said Zelensky and his team "begged" to stay, but Trump was adamant. pic.twitter.com/5hZ6SNGuvl
— Lord Bebo (@MyLordBebo) February 28, 2025
He really does.Johnfox said:
Trump deserves to go 98 yards with the talliban
But we know what crimes they were charged with and they've all spent time in prison, with many of them serving sentences that aren't proportionate to what they've actually committed.DiabloWags said:And your guy pardoned people that assaulted and injured 140 police officers on J6.bear2034 said:
Adam Kinzinger was preemptively pardoned by Joe Biden in his last day of office.
So much for the "Law & Order" party.
Hypocrite much???
tequila4kapp said:
Zelensky has lost the war and doesn't like it, and is understandably upset. He decided to let it come out in public in front of the media, acting like an asshat. He picked the wrong administration to take the wrong tone with.
