Official Trump / Vance Administration Thread

378,432 Views | 4696 Replies | Last: 4 hrs ago by Cal88
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:



"I have met some very bad people, none as bad as Trump," Epstein wrote in 2017 to former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers. "Not one decent cell in his body."


Now you believe everything Epstein said? Classic.

The pedophile called the rapist philanderer a bad guy. But he's from your neighborhood, so you defend him.
Interesting.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Because Donald Trump dropped a dime on him w the FBI.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cal83dls79 said:

BearlySane88 said:

concordtom said:



"I have met some very bad people, none as bad as Trump," Epstein wrote in 2017 to former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers. "Not one decent cell in his body."


Now you believe everything Epstein said? Classic.
But he said it right? So I'm curious whey he would think that. One scum calling out another scumbag. Not like it hasn't happened before.


Because he was pissed at Trump for working with the authorities and for kicking him out of Mar A Lago. A salty enemy will say terrible things.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:




THIS IS HOW YOU MAGA!
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AMERICA FIRST!

"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:




Are you against stopping narco traffic? Are you against weakening the ties of organized crime in the US? Why do you have a problem with this? Or do you have a problem with this?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

AMERICA FIRST!

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:




Are you against stopping narco traffic? Are you against weakening the ties of organized crime in the US? Why do you have a problem with this? Or do you have a problem with this?


Since when did Donald Trump run on a platform of regime change?
Didn't he campaign on being a "Peace President"?
Stopping endless war?

Sounds like more lies from President Cheeto.




"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:




Are you against stopping narco traffic? Are you against weakening the ties of organized crime in the US? Why do you have a problem with this? Or do you have a problem with this?

Mostly I am just sharing news about the administration in a thread dedicated to that. If you want to know my opinion, I think this looks like the start of a regime-change war . . . ironically, by the guy who was touted up and down as the "anti-war candidate" during his campaign.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:




Are you against stopping narco traffic? Are you against weakening the ties of organized crime in the US? Why do you have a problem with this? Or do you have a problem with this?


Since when did Donald Trump run on a platform of regime change?
Didn't he campaign on being a "Peace President"?
Stopping endless war?

Sounds like more lies from President Cheeto.







To be clear, I'm not fully in support of this. I can see both sides and would prefer we stay out of ongoing global conflicts. That being said, it would be stupid to think the US could entirely shut off from the world and not have to get involved from time to time. Do I agree with it, no. Is it reality, yes.

Trump recognizing opposition leader Juan Guaid as interim president in 2019 wasn't a clue to you?

America First:
Slowing the inflow of fentanyl
Preventing Russia/China more access to oil reserves
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

BearlySane88 said:

sycasey said:




Are you against stopping narco traffic? Are you against weakening the ties of organized crime in the US? Why do you have a problem with this? Or do you have a problem with this?

Mostly I am just sharing news about the administration in a thread dedicated to that. If you want to know my opinion, I think this looks like the start of a regime-change war . . . ironically, by the guy who was touted up and down as the "anti-war candidate" during his campaign.


I was curious, thanks for sharing. Read my post above. Largely, I agree with you
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:



America First:
Slowing the inflow of fentanyl
Preventing Russia/China more access to oil reserves



With that logic, you might as well add Brazil since they give China access to soybeans and oil.



"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:



America First:
Slowing the inflow of fentanyl
Preventing Russia/China more access to oil reserves



With that logic, you might as well add Brazil since they give China access to soybeans and oil.




You did see me say I wasn't really for this, right?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?

The fallout from the manipulative editing has resulted in the director general and the top news editor both resigning in disgrace.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:


The fallout from the manipulative editing has resulted in the director general and the top news editor both resigning in disgrace.
Fortunately, the British vote in the 2024 US Presidential election was pretty miniscule.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:


The fallout from the manipulative editing has resulted in the director general and the top news editor both resigning in disgrace.

It's about time we cracked down on lies and deception!
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BTW, POTUS just opened up more Alaska lands to oil exploration/ use.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another Payday coming. FAFO.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Another Payday coming. FAFO.

No one should pay Trump anything. Make him sue and let a jury decide. Most people hate him, and the number of suckers figuring his act out is growing daily. Plus, he has a reputation that you basically can't injure.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Stay safe.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

movielover said:

Another Payday coming. FAFO.

No one should pay Trump anything. Make him sue and let a jury decide.

movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Epstein was a Democrat, right?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

BTW, POTUS just opened up more Alaska lands to oil exploration/ use.


Doesn't matter.
The key question is will anyone wind up bidding on the leases.
They didn't the last time around.

"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Epstein was a Democrat, right?

movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The man who dropped a dime on him.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is why he wouldn't have the required support of the military to go full totalitarian. He only has some of them….and the number is dropping daily.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

This is why he wouldn't have the required support of the military to go full totalitarian. He only has some of them….and the number is dropping daily.

Trump also simply has never had enough popular support to pull off full totalitarianism. The guys who do that come into office with like 90% approval, so they can actually crush the remaining 10%. It's pretty hard to do it when you're consistently sub-50%.
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

bearister said:

This is why he wouldn't have the required support of the military to go full totalitarian. He only has some of them….and the number is dropping daily.

Trump also simply has never had enough popular support to pull off full totalitarianism. The guys who do that come into office with like 90% approval, so they can actually crush the remaining 10%. It's pretty hard to do it when you're consistently sub-50%.

You know that guy Hitler that you guys are always trying to tie Trump to? He never even won a majority of votes in Germany. He had to be appointed chancellor by the president. But by all means BI libs, continue to throw out your unsupported theories. They provide great chuckles.

Trump was never a threat to do a hostile takeover of the country with the military. That was just a fever dream by the TDS crowd.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

bearister said:

This is why he wouldn't have the required support of the military to go full totalitarian. He only has some of them….and the number is dropping daily.

Trump also simply has never had enough popular support to pull off full totalitarianism. The guys who do that come into office with like 90% approval, so they can actually crush the remaining 10%. It's pretty hard to do it when you're consistently sub-50%.

You know that guy Hitler that you guys are always trying to tie Trump to? He never even won a majority of votes in Germany. He had to be appointed chancellor by the president. But by all means BI libs, continue to throw out your unsupported theories. They provide great chuckles.

Trump was never a threat to do a hostile takeover of the country with the military. That was just a fever dream by the TDS crowd.

What are you talking about? When is the last time I compared Trump to Hitler? I think you might be further confused by your pet assumption that "sycasey = all BI liberals."
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

bearister said:

This is why he wouldn't have the required support of the military to go full totalitarian. He only has some of them….and the number is dropping daily.

Trump also simply has never had enough popular support to pull off full totalitarianism. The guys who do that come into office with like 90% approval, so they can actually crush the remaining 10%. It's pretty hard to do it when you're consistently sub-50%.

You know that guy Hitler that you guys are always trying to tie Trump to? He never even won a majority of votes in Germany. He had to be appointed chancellor by the president. But by all means BI libs, continue to throw out your unsupported theories. They provide great chuckles.

Trump was never a threat to do a hostile takeover of the country with the military. That was just a fever dream by the TDS crowd.

What are you talking about? When is the last time I compared Trump to Hitler? I think you might be further confused by your pet assumption that "sycasey = all BI liberals."


Trump never won a majority of votes to be President. Just saying.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

bearister said:

This is why he wouldn't have the required support of the military to go full totalitarian. He only has some of them….and the number is dropping daily.

Trump also simply has never had enough popular support to pull off full totalitarianism. The guys who do that come into office with like 90% approval, so they can actually crush the remaining 10%. It's pretty hard to do it when you're consistently sub-50%.


Are you talking about Obama?

- Lied to us about Obamacare, then disastrous rollout, 1/7th of the economy
- Used bureaucratic trickery to get it passed
- droning weddings
- turned the FBI and DOJ into partisan outfits
- started the fad of not passing a regular budget
- ran guns to Mexico
- set us back racially decades with his idiotic comments about fresh law enforcement activities (one example, Cambridge). " I don't know all the facts" ... yet ... "it's clear the police acted stupidly" ... and then suggesting he could be shot in the White House.

Didn't Obama typically start his official workday around noon? At least glad that... how did his lapdog press describe him in his last few months ... feckless?

What did he accomplish is eight years?
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:



This is an interesting one. From the oath at my son's swearing in:

"I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice."

How the heck does an enlisted person figure that out? If someone is on a base you probably get yourself over to the legal office, but I can imagine that wouldn't be super easy move to make. And if a service member is deployed it could be even harder because there likely isn't a legal attache around.
First Page Last Page
Page 129 of 135
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.