Trump Admin Official Says Alcohol Drinking Can Be Healthy Sometimes - Newsweek https://www.newsweek.com/alcohol-new-dietary-guidelines-trump-admin-dr-oz-11323686




*I think Trump is trying to save Jim Beam and the wine and beer industries.

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

BREAKING: The Trump Administration announces the 2025-2030 Dietary Guidelines for Americans, putting REAL FOOD back at the center of health. 🇺🇸https://t.co/tkGF01onpm pic.twitter.com/1zTLSKdE7R

— The White House (@WhiteHouse) January 7, 2026

RFK Jr. officially inverted the food pyramid. We've been duped all these years.

---

Move some of that Argentinian beef

Bwahahahahahahaaaaa....

Insiders spill on Stephen Miller's daily yelling meltdowns https://www.thedailybeast.com/insiders-spill-on-stephen-millers-daily-yelling-meltdowns/

Do you think he suffers from throbbing headaches?

All we have to do is nuke the filibuster, pass the SAVE Act, implement voter ID, secure elections, deport the illegals, and arrest the treasonous Democrats.

We do this, and 99% of the problems in this nation are solved immediately.

— Clandestine (@WarClandestine) January 8, 2026

But the Republicans in Congress are useless.

Clueless, or the UniParty?

"President Trump's proposal yesterday to increase the Pentagon's budget to $1.5 trillion for 2027 would push defense spending to its highest levels since the end of the Cold War, Axios' Colin Demarest writes.

Why it matters: Trump is betting on Cold War-scale spending to build a "dream military" for a new era of great-power competition.

Trump's proposal easily clears previous defense budgets by hundreds of billions of dollars, a move that will likely satisfy congressional hawks.

It would be the largest Pentagon budget as a share of GDP since 1990, the year after the Berlin Wall fell.

Last month, Congress passed a $900 billion defense bill for this fiscal year.

Zoom in: The blueprint if it's even that detailed coincides with two brand-name initiatives now underway:

Golden Dome, a hemispheric missile shield.

Golden Fleet, a revamping of warships (including one named after Trump) and the yards that build them."
Axios

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

All we have to do is nuke the filibuster, pass the SAVE Act, implement voter ID, secure elections, deport the illegals, and arrest the treasonous Democrats.

We do this, and 99% of the problems in this nation are solved immediately.

— Clandestine (@WarClandestine) January 8, 2026

But the Republicans in Congress are useless.

---

You guys sound a lot like left-wingers in the first year of Biden. Just sayin'.

More from the Peace Candidate.

🚨BREAKING: Trump Announces LAND STRIKES On MEXICO soon.

pic.twitter.com/NthIgrz0lC

— Spencer Hakimian (@SpencerHakimian) January 9, 2026

Hell yes. This should have been done ages ago.

He said land strikes, not 'land strikes in Mexico'.

sycasey said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

But the Republicans in Congress are useless.

---

You guys sound a lot like left-wingers in the first year of Biden. Just sayin'.

---

I'm sorry but what were left wingers saying in the first year of Biden?

movielover said:

---

He said land strikes, not 'land strikes in Mexico'.

---

If they're against Mexican cartels, where else would it happen?

sycasey said:

---

movielover said:

---

He said land strikes, not 'land strikes in Mexico'.

---

If they're against Mexican cartels, where else would it happen?

---

Wherever the Mexican cartels are.

I think the point is it's not against Mexico, it's against the Mexican cartels.

BearlySane88 said:

---

I think the point is it's not against Mexico, it's against the Mexican cartels.

---

What I posted said "on Mexico" not "against Mexico." This would be on Mexico's land, would it not?

sycasey said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

I think the point is it's not against Mexico, it's against the Mexican cartels.

---

What I posted said "on Mexico" not "against Mexico." This would be on Mexico's land, would it not?

---

I have found that some people suffer from very poor reading comprehension.
Studies have shown that 54% of Americans have reading comprehension BELOW the 6th grade level.

Sad really.

Half of Americans read at 6th grade level or below and it's crushing North Denver Tribune.com

49 Adult Literacy Statistics and Facts for 2026 | National University

Perfect landing spots:

Gulf of California (Sea of Cortez): Home to 244 islands, islets, and coastal areas designated as a UNESCO World Heritage site, known for unique biodiversity

DiabloWags said:

---

sycasey said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

I think the point is it's not against Mexico, it's against the Mexican cartels.

---

What I posted said "on Mexico" not "against Mexico." This would be on Mexico's land, would it not?

---

I have found that some people suffer from very poor reading comprehension.
Studies have shown that 54% of Americans have reading comprehension BELOW the 6th grade level.

Sad really.

Half of Americans read at 6th grade level or below and it's crushing North Denver Tribune.com

49 Adult Literacy Statistics and Facts for 2026 | National University

---

I find that some people are more interested in zingers than contributing meaningful information on this board. Please do better to engage in a genuine honest discussion.

sycasey said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

I think the point is it's not against Mexico, it's against the Mexican cartels.

---

What I posted said "on Mexico" not "against Mexico." This would be on Mexico's land, would it not?

---

Please read linked article on the extent of Mexican cartels' global operations.

https://insightcrime.org/news/analysis/mexico-cartels-connections-abroad/

oski003 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

I think the point is it's not against Mexico, it's against the Mexican cartels.

---

What I posted said "on Mexico" not "against Mexico." This would be on Mexico's land, would it not?

---

Please read linked article on the extent of Mexican cartels' global operations.

https://insightcrime.org/news/analysis/mexico-cartels-connections-abroad/

---

is there an update? This is from 2012.

oski003 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

I think the point is it's not against Mexico, it's against the Mexican cartels.

---

What I posted said "on Mexico" not "against Mexico." This would be on Mexico's land, would it not?

---

Please read linked article on the extent of Mexican cartels' global operations.

https://insightcrime.org/news/analysis/mexico-cartels-connections-abroad/

---

Yes, I'm sure this is what Trump meant.

But not against Mexico. Unless you're confirming that the Mexican government is in bed with the cartels.

Which they are.

Also no where in the video does he say land strikes ON Mexico. He says against the cartels

DiabloWags said:

---

sycasey said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

I think the point is it's not against Mexico, it's against the Mexican cartels.

---

What I posted said "on Mexico" not "against Mexico." This would be on Mexico's land, would it not?

---

I have found that some people suffer from very poor reading comprehension.
Studies have shown that 54% of Americans have reading comprehension BELOW the 6th grade level.

Sad really.

Half of Americans read at 6th grade level or below and it's crushing North Denver Tribune.com

49 Adult Literacy Statistics and Facts for 2026 | National University

---

"Let's make this a better place while I continue with the personal attacks blah blah blah."

BearlySane88 said:

---

But not against Mexico. Unless you're confirming that the Mexican government is in bed with the cartels.

Which they are.

Also no where in the video does he say land strikes ON Mexico. He says against the cartels

---

Okay. I am assuming that this means there would be strikes on Mexican territory, but maybe not. Maybe it's only the cartels' overseas operations!

On Mexican territory yes, against Mexico though, no.

Are attacks on ISIS attacks against the country they are holed up in? No. Same thing applies here.

BearlySane88 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

sycasey said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

I think the point is it's not against Mexico, it's against the Mexican cartels.

---

What I posted said "on Mexico" not "against Mexico." This would be on Mexico's land, would it not?

---

I have found that some people suffer from very poor reading comprehension.
Studies have shown that 54% of Americans have reading comprehension BELOW the 6th grade level.

Sad really.

Half of Americans read at 6th grade level or below and it's crushing North Denver Tribune.com

49 Adult Literacy Statistics and Facts for 2026 | National University

---

"Let's make this a better place while I continue with the personal attacks blah blah blah."

---

+1000. The way he treats folks is absolutely horrible. He has Trump's worst characteristics.

sycasey said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

But not against Mexico. Unless you're confirming that the Mexican government is in bed with the cartels.

Which they are.

Also no where in the video does he say land strikes ON Mexico. He says against the cartels

---

Okay. I am assuming that this means there would be strikes on Mexican territory, but maybe not. Maybe it's only the cartels' overseas operations!

---

Yes, it is vague, which is more appropriate.

cal83dls79 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

I think the point is it's not against Mexico, it's against the Mexican cartels.

---

What I posted said "on Mexico" not "against Mexico." This would be on Mexico's land, would it not?

---

Please read linked article on the extent of Mexican cartels' global operations.

https://insightcrime.org/news/analysis/mexico-cartels-connections-abroad/

---

is there an update? This is from 2012.

---

Ask and you shall receive, even though I am pretty sure you knew that they still operate in other countries in the Americas.

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-foreign-policies-of-the-sinaloa-cartel-and-cjng-part-i-in-the-americas/

oski003 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

sycasey said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

I think the point is it's not against Mexico, it's against the Mexican cartels.

---

What I posted said "on Mexico" not "against Mexico." This would be on Mexico's land, would it not?

---

I have found that some people suffer from very poor reading comprehension.
Studies have shown that 54% of Americans have reading comprehension BELOW the 6th grade level.

Sad really.

Half of Americans read at 6th grade level or below and it's crushing North Denver Tribune.com

49 Adult Literacy Statistics and Facts for 2026 | National University

---

"Let's make this a better place while I continue with the personal attacks blah blah blah."

---

+1000. The way he treats folks is absolutely horrible. He has Trump's worst characteristics.

---

I fully admit I'm not always as kind with my words as I should be. That's called self awareness.

Maybe Diablo should look up the numbers for how many Americans aren't self aware and then do some reflection.

5.4% Q4 projected GDP Growth

4.9% Q3 Productivity Growth

S&P hit another record high.

Bessent Says Trump Tariffs and Tax Cuts Powered a 'Historic Turnaround'

The Trump economy is back.

Go Bruins!

Hegseth had cameras recording him working out with recruits today at UCLA pic.twitter.com/vahh9c7lN6

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) January 9, 2026

sycasey said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

But not against Mexico. Unless you're confirming that the Mexican government is in bed with the cartels.

Which they are.

Also no where in the video does he say land strikes ON Mexico. He says against the cartels

---

Okay. I am assuming that this means there would be strikes on Mexican territory, but maybe not. Maybe it's only the cartels' overseas operations!

---

Yeah, I guess it's OK if we make land strikes on almost every country in Central and South America, Spain and Australia instead of Mexico.

In Mexico, not against Mexico. That's a big difference to me.

I don't see any posts from any of you complaining about the US bombing ISIS targets in Syria today

I do not understand how the Democrats can win the midterms. Trump is delivering 5% GDP. They are delivering fraud and chaos.

— Bill Mitchell (@mitchellvii) January 10, 2026