This is hilarious to me. Those that repeatedly call Trump a Nazi and a racist can't even admonish one of your own for using a racist term on these boards. Even after I call you out for it once, you still post other stuff and avoid saying anything about it. Yall are the biggest hypocrites I've ever seen.

Two of you even starred it.

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/129669/replies/2649989

DiabloWags said:

---

Trump issues Verdict on Renee Goode and Alex Pretti in NBC Interview:







Trump says Good, Pretti were 'not angels' but their actions didn't justify fatal shootings

Minneapolis live updates: Trump says Good, Pretti killings 'should not have happened' - ABC News

---

So basically exactly what I and others on the right have said here. It sucks they both happened, we wish they hadn't happened, and both were in part caused by the actions of Good and Pretti.

Many of yall view us and Trump as monsters. We aren't but I know that doesn't fit your silly narratives.

BearlySane88 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

Trump issues Verdict on Renee Goode and Alex Pretti in NBC Interview:







Trump says Good, Pretti were 'not angels' but their actions didn't justify fatal shootings

Minneapolis live updates: Trump says Good, Pretti killings 'should not have happened' - ABC News

---

So basically exactly what I and others on the right have said here. It sucks they both happened, we wish they hadn't happened, and both were in part caused by the actions of Good and Pretti.

Many of yall view us and Trump as monsters. We aren't but I know that doesn't fit your silly narratives.

---

From what I recall, there were Trump supporters here that said that Pretti asked for "trouble" because he came to a protest with a loaded gun and interfered with police. Trump and his FBI Director also said that "you cant have guns. You can't walk in with guns, you just can't ..."

Seems like some revisionist history and backpedaling going on.
Thanks for your "narrative".

BearlySane88 said:

---

This is hilarious to me. Those that repeatedly call Trump a Nazi and a racist can't even admonish one of your own for using a racist term on these boards. Even after I call you out for it once, you still post other stuff and avoid saying anything about it. Yall are the biggest hypocrites I've ever seen.

Two of you even starred it.

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/129669/replies/2649989

---

smh wrote: "yeahbutt, wett-baxs was gonna be waay worse; bbs auto-censored as swell"

Google: "Yes, "wetb-ck" is considered a highly derogatory, offensive, and racist slur in the United States."

DiabloWags said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

Trump issues Verdict on Renee Goode and Alex Pretti in NBC Interview:







Trump says Good, Pretti were 'not angels' but their actions didn't justify fatal shootings

Minneapolis live updates: Trump says Good, Pretti killings 'should not have happened' - ABC News

---

So basically exactly what I and others on the right have said here. It sucks they both happened, we wish they hadn't happened, and both were in part caused by the actions of Good and Pretti.

Many of yall view us and Trump as monsters. We aren't but I know that doesn't fit your silly narratives.

---

From what I recall, there were Trump supporters here that said that Pretti asked for "trouble" because he came to a protest with a loaded gun and interfered with police. Trump and his FBI Director also said that "you cant have guns. You can't walk in with guns, you just can't ..."

Seems like some revisionist history and backpedaling going on.
Thanks for your "narrative".

---

You're playing with fire to be a likely paid agitator, emotionally combative, possibly even be a dark triad personality, and bring a gun where you then physically confront police officers while bedlam occurs in the streets.

P.S. I don't see many brothas there.

BearlySane88 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

Trump issues Verdict on Renee Goode and Alex Pretti in NBC Interview:







Trump says Good, Pretti were 'not angels' but their actions didn't justify fatal shootings

Minneapolis live updates: Trump says Good, Pretti killings 'should not have happened' - ABC News

---

So basically exactly what I and others on the right have said here. It sucks they both happened, we wish they hadn't happened, and both were in part caused by the actions of Good and Pretti.

Many of yall view us and Trump as monsters. We aren't but I know that doesn't fit your silly narratives.

---

Yup.

DiabloWags said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

Trump issues Verdict on Renee Goode and Alex Pretti in NBC Interview:







Trump says Good, Pretti were 'not angels' but their actions didn't justify fatal shootings

Minneapolis live updates: Trump says Good, Pretti killings 'should not have happened' - ABC News

---

So basically exactly what I and others on the right have said here. It sucks they both happened, we wish they hadn't happened, and both were in part caused by the actions of Good and Pretti.

Many of yall view us and Trump as monsters. We aren't but I know that doesn't fit your silly narratives.

---

From what I recall, there were Trump supporters here that said that Pretti asked for "trouble" because he came to a protest with a loaded gun and interfered with police. Trump and his FBI Director also said that "you cant have guns. You can't walk in with guns, you just can't ..."

Seems like some revisionist history and backpedaling going on.
Thanks for your "narrative".

---

Nope.

movielover said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

Trump issues Verdict on Renee Goode and Alex Pretti in NBC Interview:







Trump says Good, Pretti were 'not angels' but their actions didn't justify fatal shootings

Minneapolis live updates: Trump says Good, Pretti killings 'should not have happened' - ABC News

---

So basically exactly what I and others on the right have said here. It sucks they both happened, we wish they hadn't happened, and both were in part caused by the actions of Good and Pretti.

Many of yall view us and Trump as monsters. We aren't but I know that doesn't fit your silly narratives.

---

From what I recall, there were Trump supporters here that said that Pretti asked for "trouble" because he came to a protest with a loaded gun and interfered with police. Trump and his FBI Director also said that "you cant have guns. You can't walk in with guns, you just can't ..."

Seems like some revisionist history and backpedaling going on.
Thanks for your "narrative".

---

You're playing with fire to be a likely paid agitator, emotionally combative, possibly even be a dark triad personality, and bring a gun where you then physically confront police officers while bedlam occurs in the streets.

P.S. I don't see many brothas there.

---

Yup.

DiabloWags said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

Trump issues Verdict on Renee Goode and Alex Pretti in NBC Interview:







Trump says Good, Pretti were 'not angels' but their actions didn't justify fatal shootings

Minneapolis live updates: Trump says Good, Pretti killings 'should not have happened' - ABC News

---

So basically exactly what I and others on the right have said here. It sucks they both happened, we wish they hadn't happened, and both were in part caused by the actions of Good and Pretti.

Many of yall view us and Trump as monsters. We aren't but I know that doesn't fit your silly narratives.

---

From what I recall, there were Trump supporters here that said that Pretti asked for "trouble" because he came to a protest with a loaded gun and interfered with police. Trump and his FBI Director also said that "you cant have guns. You can't walk in with guns, you just can't ..."

Seems like some revisionist history and backpedaling going on.
Thanks for your "narrative".

---

I didn't say all on here, I said myself and others on the right.

He did ask for trouble by his actions, having a gun on him exacerbated that trouble. Still doesn't mean he should have been killed, as myself and others on the right have said multiple times on these boards.

Reminds me of when an emotionally deranged young man ran by police officers in Walnut Creek a few years ago with a 5' long steel 30# pry bar. They shouted "Stop", they fired rubber bullets, and then they shot him. He died. If they let him go, and he turns the corner and kills Granny, that's no good. Tazers? I dunno, I wonder in the olden days if an ex Golden Gloves boxer would just deck them. WC Police sued, multi-million-dollar Verdict for the family.

movielover said:

---

Reminds me of when an emotionally deranged young man ran by police officers in Walnut Creek a few years ago with a 5' long steel 30# pry bar. They shouted "Stop", they fired rubber bullets, and then they shot him. He died. If they let him go, and he turns the corner and kills Granny, that's no good. Tazers? I dunno, I wonder in the olden days if an ex Golden Gloves boxer would just deck them. WC Police sued, multi-million-dollar Verdict for the family.

---

I remember the story. Sad but probably saved others from harm by doing it.

His name was Miles Hall.
He went to my high school in WC.



Police Call Fatal Officer-Involved Shooting Of Mentally Ill Walnut Creek Man 'Tragic' - CBS San Francisco

🚨NEW: CNN's Harry Enten predicts MAGA will "OUTLAST DONALD TRUMP"🚨

"MAGA is as POWERFUL as it has ever been! ... What he brought into the GOP looks like it's going to last long beyond him."

"The Republican base LOVES JD Vance."@DailyCaller pic.twitter.com/2ch9UX9nGM

— Jason Cohen 🇺🇸 (@JasonJournoDC) February 5, 2026

So Trump wouldn't need approval from Congress?
How does that work?

His own Treasury Secretary said that these checks would REQUIRE APPROVAL from CONGRESS.
Duh.

BearlySane88 said:

---

This is hilarious to me. Those that repeatedly call Trump a Nazi and a racist can't even admonish one of your own for using a racist term on these boards. Even after I call you out for it once, you still post other stuff and avoid saying anything about it. Yall are the biggest hypocrites I've ever seen.

Two of you even starred it.

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/129669/replies/2649989

---

I've not said anything because smh is an older gentleman who has been upfront about having some mental decline. I didn't want to bring up something that may cause smh some pain and something that we're all likely to experience eventually, but I'll speak up because you continue to badger an old man.

Did he say something dumb and regrettable? Yes. I do think he may not have fully understood what he was saying. About a quarter of the time, I don't understand his point, though that may say something about me. He did go back and try to change it later. Do I think he's a racist? No. He doesn't have a history of saying things like that.

On the other hand, Trump has a long history of ugly statements and he's proclaimed loudly that he consistently aces mental acuity tests.

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

Did he say something dumb and regrettable? Yes. I do think he may not have fully understood what he was saying. About a quarter of the time, I don't understand his point, though that may say something about me. He did go back and try to change it later. Do I think he's a racist? No. He doesn't have a history of saying things like that.

On the other hand, Trump has a long history of ugly statements and he's proclaimed loudly that he consistently aces mental acuity tests.

---

Bingo.

Trump and his followers double-standards are well documented here when it comes to racism.
Smh doesn't even come close to that pattern of hypocrisy.

It's absurd to even make such a claim.
Doing so does nothing more than conflate and gaslight.

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

This is hilarious to me. Those that repeatedly call Trump a Nazi and a racist can't even admonish one of your own for using a racist term on these boards. Even after I call you out for it once, you still post other stuff and avoid saying anything about it. Yall are the biggest hypocrites I've ever seen.

Two of you even starred it.

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/129669/replies/2649989

---

I've not said anything because smh is an older gentleman who has been upfront about having some mental decline. I didn't want to bring up something that may cause smh some pain and something that we're all likely to experience eventually, but I'll speak up because you continue to badger an old man.

Did he say something dumb and regrettable? Yes. I do think he may not have fully understood what he was saying. About a quarter of the time, I don't understand his point, though that may say something about me. He did go back and try to change it later. Do I think he's a racist? No. He doesn't have a history of saying things like that.

On the other hand, Trump has a long history of ugly statements and he's proclaimed loudly that he consistently aces mental acuity tests.

---

ditto. I was like "really"? Props for smh for keeping his cool.

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

This is hilarious to me. Those that repeatedly call Trump a Nazi and a racist can't even admonish one of your own for using a racist term on these boards. Even after I call you out for it once, you still post other stuff and avoid saying anything about it. Yall are the biggest hypocrites I've ever seen.

Two of you even starred it.

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/129669/replies/2649989

---

I've not said anything because smh is an older gentleman who has been upfront about having some mental decline. I didn't want to bring up something that may cause smh some pain and something that we're all likely to experience eventually, but I'll speak up because you continue to badger an old man.

Did he say something dumb and regrettable? Yes. I do think he may not have fully understood what he was saying. About a quarter of the time, I don't understand his point, though that may say something about me. He did go back and try to change it later. Do I think he's a racist? No. He doesn't have a history of saying things like that.

On the other hand, Trump has a long history of ugly statements and he's proclaimed loudly that he consistently aces mental acuity tests.

---

It also seemed to me that smh was intending to use the term in an ironic fashion, applying it to people that the slur does not usually apply to as a way of making a point. I hope we can all understand context here.

The Marxists will sue JD Vance, possibly even assassinate him, and continue to flood the country with their future dependent voters. Trump's DOJ is clueless.

Anarchistbear said:

---

More Minnesota needed, less No Kings

---

What's the difference?

Trump's Crypto Venture World Liberty Financial Faces House Probe in $500 Million Deal

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

More Minnesota needed, less No Kings

---

What's the difference?

---

More people getting shot?

Actually he probably means that the Minnesota ICE protests are a more ground-level, bottom-up thing while the No Kings events are a bit more top-down (not directed by a national organization exactly, but more coordinated).

sycasey said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

More Minnesota needed, less No Kings

---

What's the difference?

---

More people getting shot?

Actually he probably means that the Minnesota ICE protests are a more ground-level, bottom-up thing while the No Kings events are a bit more top-down (not directed by a national organization exactly, but more coordinated).

---

The No Kings protests are very organic. I mean, some organization I can't even name picks the dates but otherwise it's all word of mouth local support. Maybe anarchistbear thinks people shouldn't protest peacefully in communities that are not under attack to support the communities that are under attack - which doesn't make any sense from a movement standpoint. He's not an anarchist. He's just an edgelord.

movielover said:

---

The Marxists will sue JD Vance, possibly even assassinate him, and continue to flood the country with their future dependent voters. Trump's DOJ is clueless.

---

They will imprison Elon Musk and take down X as well.

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

I've not said anything because smh is an older gentleman who has been upfront about having some mental decline. I didn't want to bring up something that may cause smh some pain and something that we're all likely to experience eventually, but I'll speak up because you continue to badger an old man.. ..

---

um, tanks! # 73 years young // home alone (mostly) // forgot the rest
letter and versus..
https://bearinsider.com/account/profile/8235

DiabloWags said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

Did he say something dumb and regrettable? Yes. I do think he may not have fully understood what he was saying. About a quarter of the time, I don't understand his point, though that may say something about me. He did go back and try to change it later. Do I think he's a racist? No. He doesn't have a history of saying things like that.

On the other hand, Trump has a long history of ugly statements and he's proclaimed loudly that he consistently aces mental acuity tests.

---

Bingo.

Trump and his followers double-standards are well documented here when it comes to racism.
Smh doesn't even come close to that pattern of hypocrisy.

It's absurd to even make such a claim.
Doing so does nothing more than conflate and gaslight.

---

You support racists!

dajo9 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

More Minnesota needed, less No Kings

---

What's the difference?

---

More people getting shot?

Actually he probably means that the Minnesota ICE protests are a more ground-level, bottom-up thing while the No Kings events are a bit more top-down (not directed by a national organization exactly, but more coordinated).

---

The No Kings protests are very organic. I mean, some organization I can't even name picks the dates but otherwise it's all word of mouth local support. Maybe anarchistbear thinks people shouldn't protest peacefully in communities that are not under attack to support the communities that are under attack - which doesn't make any sense from a movement standpoint. He's not an anarchist. He's just an edgelord.

---

Organic??

NO KINGS Financials Released!

The Financers:
- Arabella: $79M
- Warren Buffet: $16M
- Ford: $51M
- Rockefeller: $26M
- Soros: $72M
- Tides: $45M

$294,487,641 MILLION

Source @realannapaulina pic.twitter.com/Op4Z28GUGN

— Tony Seruga (@TonySeruga) February 5, 2026

dajo9 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

More Minnesota needed, less No Kings

---

What's the difference?

---

More people getting shot?

Actually he probably means that the Minnesota ICE protests are a more ground-level, bottom-up thing while the No Kings events are a bit more top-down (not directed by a national organization exactly, but more coordinated).

---

The No Kings protests are very organic. I mean, some organization I can't even name picks the dates but otherwise it's all word of mouth local support. Maybe anarchistbear thinks people shouldn't protest peacefully in communities that are not under attack to support the communities that are under attack - which doesn't make any sense from a movement standpoint. He's not an anarchist. He's just an edgelord.

---

I mean the thing is that Indivisible does coordinate No Kings and sets the dates and all that, but Indivisible was also set up as a whole bunch of independent local organizations who read the Indivisible handbook and decided to start their own organizations for local political activism under that banner. So it's kind of a national organization but not really, more like a very loose confederation (if even that).

BearlySane88 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

More Minnesota needed, less No Kings

---

What's the difference?

---

More people getting shot?

Actually he probably means that the Minnesota ICE protests are a more ground-level, bottom-up thing while the No Kings events are a bit more top-down (not directed by a national organization exactly, but more coordinated).

---

The No Kings protests are very organic. I mean, some organization I can't even name picks the dates but otherwise it's all word of mouth local support. Maybe anarchistbear thinks people shouldn't protest peacefully in communities that are not under attack to support the communities that are under attack - which doesn't make any sense from a movement standpoint. He's not an anarchist. He's just an edgelord.

---

Organic??

NO KINGS Financials Released!

The Financers:
- Arabella: $79M
- Warren Buffet: $16M
- Ford: $51M
- Rockefeller: $26M
- Soros: $72M
- Tides: $45M

$294,487,641 MILLION

Source @realannapaulina pic.twitter.com/Op4Z28GUGN

— Tony Seruga (@TonySeruga) February 5, 2026

---

It's hard to argue with stupid arguments like this. The League of Conservation Voters has received $40M. Here is their website.
https://www.lcv.org/

Now, because they have 'partnered" with the No Kings movement, all that money is now No Kings money. Any lie will do if it makes certain people feel good.

dajo9 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

More Minnesota needed, less No Kings

---

What's the difference?

---

More people getting shot?

Actually he probably means that the Minnesota ICE protests are a more ground-level, bottom-up thing while the No Kings events are a bit more top-down (not directed by a national organization exactly, but more coordinated).

---

The No Kings protests are very organic. I mean, some organization I can't even name picks the dates but otherwise it's all word of mouth local support. Maybe anarchistbear thinks people shouldn't protest peacefully in communities that are not under attack to support the communities that are under attack - which doesn't make any sense from a movement standpoint. He's not an anarchist. He's just an edgelord.

---

Organic??

NO KINGS Financials Released!

The Financers:
- Arabella: $79M
- Warren Buffet: $16M
- Ford: $51M
- Rockefeller: $26M
- Soros: $72M
- Tides: $45M

$294,487,641 MILLION

Source @realannapaulina pic.twitter.com/Op4Z28GUGN

— Tony Seruga (@TonySeruga) February 5, 2026

---

It's hard to argue with stupid arguments like this. The League of Conservation Voters has received $40M. Here is their website.
https://www.lcv.org/

Now, because they have 'partnered" with the No Kings movement, all that money is now No Kings money. Any lie will do if it makes certain people feel good.

---

Please feel free to explain the rest and how organic No Kings is….

BearlySane88 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

More Minnesota needed, less No Kings

---

What's the difference?

---

More people getting shot?

Actually he probably means that the Minnesota ICE protests are a more ground-level, bottom-up thing while the No Kings events are a bit more top-down (not directed by a national organization exactly, but more coordinated).

---

The No Kings protests are very organic. I mean, some organization I can't even name picks the dates but otherwise it's all word of mouth local support. Maybe anarchistbear thinks people shouldn't protest peacefully in communities that are not under attack to support the communities that are under attack - which doesn't make any sense from a movement standpoint. He's not an anarchist. He's just an edgelord.

---

Organic??

NO KINGS Financials Released!

The Financers:
- Arabella: $79M
- Warren Buffet: $16M
- Ford: $51M
- Rockefeller: $26M
- Soros: $72M
- Tides: $45M

$294,487,641 MILLION

Source @realannapaulina pic.twitter.com/Op4Z28GUGN

— Tony Seruga (@TonySeruga) February 5, 2026

---

It's hard to argue with stupid arguments like this. The League of Conservation Voters has received $40M. Here is their website.
https://www.lcv.org/

Now, because they have 'partnered" with the No Kings movement, all that money is now No Kings money. Any lie will do if it makes certain people feel good.

---

Please feel free to explain the rest and how organic No Kings is….

---

It's all the same. Your argument is stupid. Ford gave $14M to the ACLU. They've been giving money to the ACLU for decades. You are part of an effort to create a false image. You'd have to be stupid to fall for this con job.

dajo9 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

More Minnesota needed, less No Kings

---

What's the difference?

---

More people getting shot?

Actually he probably means that the Minnesota ICE protests are a more ground-level, bottom-up thing while the No Kings events are a bit more top-down (not directed by a national organization exactly, but more coordinated).

---

The No Kings protests are very organic. I mean, some organization I can't even name picks the dates but otherwise it's all word of mouth local support. Maybe anarchistbear thinks people shouldn't protest peacefully in communities that are not under attack to support the communities that are under attack - which doesn't make any sense from a movement standpoint. He's not an anarchist. He's just an edgelord.

---

Organic??

NO KINGS Financials Released!

The Financers:
- Arabella: $79M
- Warren Buffet: $16M
- Ford: $51M
- Rockefeller: $26M
- Soros: $72M
- Tides: $45M

$294,487,641 MILLION

Source @realannapaulina pic.twitter.com/Op4Z28GUGN

— Tony Seruga (@TonySeruga) February 5, 2026

---

It's hard to argue with stupid arguments like this. The League of Conservation Voters has received $40M. Here is their website.
https://www.lcv.org/

Now, because they have 'partnered" with the No Kings movement, all that money is now No Kings money. Any lie will do if it makes certain people feel good.

---

Please feel free to explain the rest and how organic No Kings is….

---

It's all the same. Your argument is stupid. Ford gave $14M to the ACLU. They've been giving money to the ACLU for decades. You are part of an effort to create a false image. You'd have to be stupid to fall for this con job.

---

No, upon further reflection, I'd best just take down my comment here.

DiabloWags said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

Trump issues Verdict on Renee Goode and Alex Pretti in NBC Interview:







Trump says Good, Pretti were 'not angels' but their actions didn't justify fatal shootings

Minneapolis live updates: Trump says Good, Pretti killings 'should not have happened' - ABC News

---

So basically exactly what I and others on the right have said here. It sucks they both happened, we wish they hadn't happened, and both were in part caused by the actions of Good and Pretti.

Many of yall view us and Trump as monsters. We aren't but I know that doesn't fit your silly narratives.

---

From what I recall, there were Trump supporters here that said that Pretti asked for "trouble" because he came to a protest with a loaded gun and interfered with police. Trump and his FBI Director also said that "you cant have guns. You can't walk in with guns, you just can't ..."

Seems like some revisionist history and backpedaling going on.
Thanks for your "narrative".

---

He did ask for trouble. He found it. The end.

Doesn't justify his shooting, but then who got blamed in this incident? The tiger who killed the morons that were taunting a wild animal or the morons who thought they were invincible and acted like idiots who got what they asked for?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/jan/18/animalwelfare.usa

Don't go looking for fights with angry armed feds. You'll live longer.

Aunburdened said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

Trump issues Verdict on Renee Goode and Alex Pretti in NBC Interview:







Trump says Good, Pretti were 'not angels' but their actions didn't justify fatal shootings

Minneapolis live updates: Trump says Good, Pretti killings 'should not have happened' - ABC News

---

So basically exactly what I and others on the right have said here. It sucks they both happened, we wish they hadn't happened, and both were in part caused by the actions of Good and Pretti.

Many of yall view us and Trump as monsters. We aren't but I know that doesn't fit your silly narratives.

---

From what I recall, there were Trump supporters here that said that Pretti asked for "trouble" because he came to a protest with a loaded gun and interfered with police. Trump and his FBI Director also said that "you cant have guns. You can't walk in with guns, you just can't ..."

Seems like some revisionist history and backpedaling going on.
Thanks for your "narrative".

---

He did ask for trouble. He found it. The end.

Doesn't justify his shooting, but then who got blamed in this incident? The tiger who killed the morons that were taunting a wild animal or the morons who thought they were invincible and acted like idiots who got what they asked for?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/jan/18/animalwelfare.usa

Don't go looking for fights with angry armed feds. You'll live longer.

---

Why should we have law enforcement that have to be treated like wild animals?

sycasey said:

---

Aunburdened said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

Trump issues Verdict on Renee Goode and Alex Pretti in NBC Interview:







Trump says Good, Pretti were 'not angels' but their actions didn't justify fatal shootings

Minneapolis live updates: Trump says Good, Pretti killings 'should not have happened' - ABC News

---

So basically exactly what I and others on the right have said here. It sucks they both happened, we wish they hadn't happened, and both were in part caused by the actions of Good and Pretti.

Many of yall view us and Trump as monsters. We aren't but I know that doesn't fit your silly narratives.

---

From what I recall, there were Trump supporters here that said that Pretti asked for "trouble" because he came to a protest with a loaded gun and interfered with police. Trump and his FBI Director also said that "you cant have guns. You can't walk in with guns, you just can't ..."

Seems like some revisionist history and backpedaling going on.
Thanks for your "narrative".

---

He did ask for trouble. He found it. The end.

Doesn't justify his shooting, but then who got blamed in this incident? The tiger who killed the morons that were taunting a wild animal or the morons who thought they were invincible and acted like idiots who got what they asked for?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/jan/18/animalwelfare.usa

Don't go looking for fights with angry armed feds. You'll live longer.

---

Why should we have law enforcement that have to be treated like wild animals?

---

I'm not starting up this stupid debate with you again. Both sides were wrong. One ended up dead as a result. The other will be dealt with legally.

He asked for it and he got it. I have zero sympathy for him.