bearister said:

---

---

He hasn't done any foam parties in ages, he'd be up for that.

BearlySane88 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema in Alexandria, Virginia, on Friday also barred the government from moving forward with the fund's creation while litigation is pending to challenge it.

The judge, who was nominated to the bench by President Bill Clinton, a Democrat, scheduled a June 12 hearing for arguments on whether to extend the order blocking payouts from an "Anti-Weaponization Fund." The government created the fund to resolve Trump's lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service over the leak of his tax returns.

Judge temporarily blocks payouts from Trump's $1.8B 'anti-weaponization' settlement fund

---

First, this isn't earmarked for J6 people. As has been said, they can apply with no guarantee of getting payment as can anyone else. Would you rather the government pays out the entire amount to Trump? How about the original amount of the lawsuit straight to Trump? Trump is saving the government from having to pay out billions more

---

For your argument to be correct, you have to start at the beginning. Why does Trump deserve 1.8 billion dollars?

---

It's not my place to say he does or doesn't, that was for the court to decide until the settlement was arrived at. Trump is arguing he deserved much more for the release of his private information in what plausibly was a hit job.

---

No court awarded Trump 1.8 billion dollars. Trump literally settled with people he manages. Shouldn't that smell funny?

---

I never said a court awarded Trump anything. Everything in government smells funny.

---

You made the following statement:

"Trump is saving the government from having to pay out billions more."

In order for this to be true, you have to believe that Trump has earned 1.8+ billion dollars. Please demonstrate why Trump deserves this money.

---

I never said he deserves it, that wasn't for me to decide. The government would have either paid out more in court fees or in a larger settlement/ruling.

---

Why would the government have paid out more in court fees or in a larger settlement/ruling? Courts don't give people things they don't deserve. Your arguments here appear to have no foundation. And, while I understand the legal system is expensive, hourly attorney fees are generally in the thousands, not billions.

oski003 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema in Alexandria, Virginia, on Friday also barred the government from moving forward with the fund's creation while litigation is pending to challenge it.

The judge, who was nominated to the bench by President Bill Clinton, a Democrat, scheduled a June 12 hearing for arguments on whether to extend the order blocking payouts from an "Anti-Weaponization Fund." The government created the fund to resolve Trump's lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service over the leak of his tax returns.

Judge temporarily blocks payouts from Trump's $1.8B 'anti-weaponization' settlement fund

---

First, this isn't earmarked for J6 people. As has been said, they can apply with no guarantee of getting payment as can anyone else. Would you rather the government pays out the entire amount to Trump? How about the original amount of the lawsuit straight to Trump? Trump is saving the government from having to pay out billions more

---

For your argument to be correct, you have to start at the beginning. Why does Trump deserve 1.8 billion dollars?

---

It's not my place to say he does or doesn't, that was for the court to decide until the settlement was arrived at. Trump is arguing he deserved much more for the release of his private information in what plausibly was a hit job.

---

No court awarded Trump 1.8 billion dollars. Trump literally settled with people he manages. Shouldn't that smell funny?

---

I never said a court awarded Trump anything. Everything in government smells funny.

---

You made the following statement:

"Trump is saving the government from having to pay out billions more."

In order for this to be true, you have to believe that Trump has earned 1.8+ billion dollars. Please demonstrate why Trump deserves this money.

---

I never said he deserves it, that wasn't for me to decide. The government would have either paid out more in court fees or in a larger settlement/ruling.

---

Why would the government have paid out more in court fees or in a larger settlement/ruling? Courts don't give people things they don't deserve. Your arguments here appear to have no foundation. And, while I understand the legal system is expensive, hourly attorney fees are generally in the thousands, not billions.

---

If Trump had won, they would have paid out more

Any case Trump testifies in is close to impossible to win, even if it is meritorious. The man can't even lie straight in bed. He'd say anything but his prayers.*

*Sampled from Breaker Morant

aw, come on, let the dreamer rest.

BearlySane88 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema in Alexandria, Virginia, on Friday also barred the government from moving forward with the fund's creation while litigation is pending to challenge it.

The judge, who was nominated to the bench by President Bill Clinton, a Democrat, scheduled a June 12 hearing for arguments on whether to extend the order blocking payouts from an "Anti-Weaponization Fund." The government created the fund to resolve Trump's lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service over the leak of his tax returns.

Judge temporarily blocks payouts from Trump's $1.8B 'anti-weaponization' settlement fund

---

First, this isn't earmarked for J6 people. As has been said, they can apply with no guarantee of getting payment as can anyone else. Would you rather the government pays out the entire amount to Trump? How about the original amount of the lawsuit straight to Trump? Trump is saving the government from having to pay out billions more

---

For your argument to be correct, you have to start at the beginning. Why does Trump deserve 1.8 billion dollars?

---

It's not my place to say he does or doesn't, that was for the court to decide until the settlement was arrived at. Trump is arguing he deserved much more for the release of his private information in what plausibly was a hit job.

---

No court awarded Trump 1.8 billion dollars. Trump literally settled with people he manages. Shouldn't that smell funny?

---

I never said a court awarded Trump anything. Everything in government smells funny.

---

You made the following statement:

"Trump is saving the government from having to pay out billions more."

In order for this to be true, you have to believe that Trump has earned 1.8+ billion dollars. Please demonstrate why Trump deserves this money.

---

I never said he deserves it, that wasn't for me to decide. The government would have either paid out more in court fees or in a larger settlement/ruling.

---

Why would the government have paid out more in court fees or in a larger settlement/ruling? Courts don't give people things they don't deserve. Your arguments here appear to have no foundation. And, while I understand the legal system is expensive, hourly attorney fees are generally in the thousands, not billions.

---

If Trump had won, they would have paid out more

---

So Trump decided he had already won, so just pay him now!

For too long, our political class treated efficiency as a substitute for resilience and consumption as a measure of prosperity.

Trade policy, industrial capacity, and national security are inseparable. And to allow foreign dependencies to degrade any one of those domains is to… pic.twitter.com/hyQaMg07pA

— Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent (@SecScottBessent) May 29, 2026

sycasey said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema in Alexandria, Virginia, on Friday also barred the government from moving forward with the fund's creation while litigation is pending to challenge it.

The judge, who was nominated to the bench by President Bill Clinton, a Democrat, scheduled a June 12 hearing for arguments on whether to extend the order blocking payouts from an "Anti-Weaponization Fund." The government created the fund to resolve Trump's lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service over the leak of his tax returns.

Judge temporarily blocks payouts from Trump's $1.8B 'anti-weaponization' settlement fund

---

First, this isn't earmarked for J6 people. As has been said, they can apply with no guarantee of getting payment as can anyone else. Would you rather the government pays out the entire amount to Trump? How about the original amount of the lawsuit straight to Trump? Trump is saving the government from having to pay out billions more

---

For your argument to be correct, you have to start at the beginning. Why does Trump deserve 1.8 billion dollars?

---

It's not my place to say he does or doesn't, that was for the court to decide until the settlement was arrived at. Trump is arguing he deserved much more for the release of his private information in what plausibly was a hit job.

---

No court awarded Trump 1.8 billion dollars. Trump literally settled with people he manages. Shouldn't that smell funny?

---

I never said a court awarded Trump anything. Everything in government smells funny.

---

You made the following statement:

"Trump is saving the government from having to pay out billions more."

In order for this to be true, you have to believe that Trump has earned 1.8+ billion dollars. Please demonstrate why Trump deserves this money.

---

I never said he deserves it, that wasn't for me to decide. The government would have either paid out more in court fees or in a larger settlement/ruling.

---

Why would the government have paid out more in court fees or in a larger settlement/ruling? Courts don't give people things they don't deserve. Your arguments here appear to have no foundation. And, while I understand the legal system is expensive, hourly attorney fees are generally in the thousands, not billions.

---

If Trump had won, they would have paid out more

---

So Trump decided he had already won, so just pay him now!

---

Trump saved us BILLIONS bro!
America is truly blessed.

In Trump We Trust

MAGA!

BearlySane88 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema in Alexandria, Virginia, on Friday also barred the government from moving forward with the fund's creation while litigation is pending to challenge it.

The judge, who was nominated to the bench by President Bill Clinton, a Democrat, scheduled a June 12 hearing for arguments on whether to extend the order blocking payouts from an "Anti-Weaponization Fund." The government created the fund to resolve Trump's lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service over the leak of his tax returns.

Judge temporarily blocks payouts from Trump's $1.8B 'anti-weaponization' settlement fund

---

First, this isn't earmarked for J6 people. As has been said, they can apply with no guarantee of getting payment as can anyone else. Would you rather the government pays out the entire amount to Trump? How about the original amount of the lawsuit straight to Trump? Trump is saving the government from having to pay out billions more

---

For your argument to be correct, you have to start at the beginning. Why does Trump deserve 1.8 billion dollars?

---

It's not my place to say he does or doesn't, that was for the court to decide until the settlement was arrived at. Trump is arguing he deserved much more for the release of his private information in what plausibly was a hit job.

---

No court awarded Trump 1.8 billion dollars. Trump literally settled with people he manages. Shouldn't that smell funny?

---

I never said a court awarded Trump anything. Everything in government smells funny.

---

You made the following statement:

"Trump is saving the government from having to pay out billions more."

In order for this to be true, you have to believe that Trump has earned 1.8+ billion dollars. Please demonstrate why Trump deserves this money.

---

I never said he deserves it, that wasn't for me to decide. The government would have either paid out more in court fees or in a larger settlement/ruling.

---

Why would the government have paid out more in court fees or in a larger settlement/ruling? Courts don't give people things they don't deserve. Your arguments here appear to have no foundation. And, while I understand the legal system is expensive, hourly attorney fees are generally in the thousands, not billions.

---

If Trump had won, they would have paid out more

---

This is a really dumb take. IF Trump had won he would NOT have received $1.776 billion or more. This would be an award for damages of half his net worth at the time for the IRS failing to properly oversee a contractor who leaked his tax return.

In exchange for the Trump administration dropping a $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS, the Justice Department established the multi-billion-dollar fund. The lawsuit originally argued the IRS should have prevented a contractor from leaking Trump's tax records.

Why don't leftists practice equality? They could have leaked Biden's, Kamala's, and Obama's tax records as well.

This video was deleted from Facebook yesterday.

You know what to do ‼️ https://t.co/8yXf4srPYe

— Elon Mack (@ElonMackk) May 30, 2026

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

In exchange for the Trump administration dropping a $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS, the Justice Department established the multi-billion-dollar fund. The lawsuit originally argued the IRS should have prevented a contractor from leaking Trump's tax records.

Why don't leftists practice equality? They could have leaked Biden's, Kamala's, and Obama's tax records as well.

---

have you looked for better IRS contractors? Ones that can leak stuff more equitably?

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

In exchange for the Trump administration dropping a $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS, the Justice Department established the multi-billion-dollar fund. The lawsuit originally argued the IRS should have prevented a contractor from leaking Trump's tax records.

Why don't leftists practice equality? They could have leaked Biden's, Kamala's, and Obama's tax records as well.

---

Biden, Kamala. And Obama voluntarily released their own tax returns as has been customary for American presidential contenders. Surprised you didnt know that with all the time you spend on politics.

Is Trump's mugshot being used on his $250 bill?

"…..It doesn't fit with the administration's priorities….."

…..which consist exclusively of prosecuting baseless vindictive prosecution actions.

bearister said:

---

"…..It doesn't fit with the administration's priorities….."

…..which consist exclusively of prosecuting baseless vindictive prosecution actions.

---

You mean like this?



Ex-FBI director James Comey posted a picture of seashells. Now he's being probed for 'threats' to Trump | The Independent

Kevin Hassert.
Just another Trump Cheerleader and Sycophant.

Are people really this gullible???
Are American's really this stupid?



Trump economic advisor claims people spending more on groceries is a sign they're 'optimistic about the future'

DiabloWags said:

---

bearister said:

---

"…..It doesn't fit with the administration's priorities….."

…..which consist exclusively of prosecuting baseless vindictive prosecution actions.

---

You mean like this?



Ex-FBI director James Comey posted a picture of seashells. Now he's being probed for 'threats' to Trump | The Independent

---

DiabloWags said:

---

A federal judge dismissed criminal charges against a media executive in a long-running bribery case involving FIFA after the US Justice Department said the case no longer fits the Trump administration's priorities.

Joseph Nocella, the US attorney for the Eastern District of New York, appeared in court on Wednesday and told the judge, "The Department of Justice does not want to use its resources to continue to pursue the prosecution." He added, "It doesn't fit with the administration's priorities" which include terrorism, threats to national security, drug and human trafficking, and gangs.

MAGA!

Judge dismisses bribery case involving FIFA after DOJ says bribery is not a priority

---

Corruption is a core pillar of MAGA politicians

I would have posted a photo of Comey's seashells at the beach, but I don't want to be suspended.
I was once suspended for a month for posting a Polymarket link.

To this day, Trump's DoJ has never indicted Polymarket for sponsoring bets on various probabilities.
Even though the bar is quite low, per "seashells on the beach."

Never mind that a President might not be able to complete his term due to a whole host of events such as Article 25, Impeachment, Illness like Harrison and Taylor, Resignation like Richard Nixon, etc.

We've also seen the same at work with state and local politicians who have been "recalled".

dajo9 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

A federal judge dismissed criminal charges against a media executive in a long-running bribery case involving FIFA after the US Justice Department said the case no longer fits the Trump administration's priorities.

Joseph Nocella, the US attorney for the Eastern District of New York, appeared in court on Wednesday and told the judge, "The Department of Justice does not want to use its resources to continue to pursue the prosecution." He added, "It doesn't fit with the administration's priorities" which include terrorism, threats to national security, drug and human trafficking, and gangs.

MAGA!

Judge dismisses bribery case involving FIFA after DOJ says bribery is not a priority

---

Corruption is a core pillar of MAGA politicians

---

It certainly seems to be the case.

My question is why are MAGA supporters "ok" with this?
Do they not have any ethics, morals, or integrity?

DiabloWags said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

A federal judge dismissed criminal charges against a media executive in a long-running bribery case involving FIFA after the US Justice Department said the case no longer fits the Trump administration's priorities.

Joseph Nocella, the US attorney for the Eastern District of New York, appeared in court on Wednesday and told the judge, "The Department of Justice does not want to use its resources to continue to pursue the prosecution." He added, "It doesn't fit with the administration's priorities" which include terrorism, threats to national security, drug and human trafficking, and gangs.

MAGA!

Judge dismisses bribery case involving FIFA after DOJ says bribery is not a priority

---

Corruption is a core pillar of MAGA politicians

---

It certainly seems to be the case.

My question is why are MAGA supporters "ok" with this?
Do they not have any ethics, morals, or integrity?

---

The cult has TDS

dajo9 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

A federal judge dismissed criminal charges against a media executive in a long-running bribery case involving FIFA after the US Justice Department said the case no longer fits the Trump administration's priorities.

Joseph Nocella, the US attorney for the Eastern District of New York, appeared in court on Wednesday and told the judge, "The Department of Justice does not want to use its resources to continue to pursue the prosecution." He added, "It doesn't fit with the administration's priorities" which include terrorism, threats to national security, drug and human trafficking, and gangs.

MAGA!

Judge dismisses bribery case involving FIFA after DOJ says bribery is not a priority

---

Corruption is a core pillar of MAGA politicians

---

It certainly seems to be the case.

My question is why are MAGA supporters "ok" with this?
Do they not have any ethics, morals, or integrity?

---

The cult has TDS

---

They all must think that they are in the Top 1%.
Trump Delusional Syndrome.

It's pretty hard for some people to admit they were wrong all along but we will peel away a few percentage points from them, plus a lot of the independents.

A nice little invasion of Cuba wouldn't hurt, either.

DiabloWags said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

A federal judge dismissed criminal charges against a media executive in a long-running bribery case involving FIFA after the US Justice Department said the case no longer fits the Trump administration's priorities.

Joseph Nocella, the US attorney for the Eastern District of New York, appeared in court on Wednesday and told the judge, "The Department of Justice does not want to use its resources to continue to pursue the prosecution." He added, "It doesn't fit with the administration's priorities" which include terrorism, threats to national security, drug and human trafficking, and gangs.

MAGA!

Judge dismisses bribery case involving FIFA after DOJ says bribery is not a priority

---

Corruption is a core pillar of MAGA politicians

---

It certainly seems to be the case.

My question is why are MAGA supporters "ok" with this?
Do they not have any ethics, morals, or integrity?

---

The party of Hunter Biden, Eric Holder, Robert Byrd and the KKK lecturing us again?