SoCal fires thread

23,008 Views | 647 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by movielover
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

BearGoggles said:

Stating that liberal policies (and incompetence by a complacent liberal dominated California government) exacerbated the fire is a fair opinion. Yes - its political.

To me the "liberal policies" argument loses steam when it becomes about how the government should have spent more money on X thing. Typically conservatives are against that, and to bring it up now smells of convenience.


Bingo.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

bear2034 said:

sycasey said:

BearGoggles said:

Stating that liberal policies (and incompetence by a complacent liberal dominated California government) exacerbated the fire is a fair opinion. Yes - its political.

To me the "liberal policies" argument loses steam when it becomes about how the government should have spent more money on X thing. Typically conservatives are against that, and to bring it up now smells of convenience.

There are always tradeoffs. What did the government spend on and what did they cut? It's hard to blame conservatives in a state and city overwhelmingly run by Democrats.

In this specific case yes. But when natural disasters hit in Republican-run states the same people aren't going on and on about blaming the local politicians. Excuse me if I'm skeptical of your motives.

God's will.
Thoughts and prayers.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
smh said:

thanks to management for deleting my unhelpful rant in this thread, several days ago, unhinged by general indifference to global warming's consequences. today's guardian article speaks to the issue fwiw (nada)..
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jan/11/los-angeles-fire-fossil-fuel-big-oil

> Every barrel of oil, every cubic meter of gas, and every ton of coal burned brings us closer to environmental catastrophe. The wildfires raging across Los Angeles are not just natural disasters they are the direct result of human choices.. ..

Queue "88" to post his charts that any warming is within the natural up-trend which has existed for longer than man's contribution.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:



If Palisades rebuilds, they need a second reservoir along w other upgrades.


Thank you for posting a SOLUTION.
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
smh said:

thanks to management for deleting my unhelpful rant in this thread, several days ago, unhinged by general indifference to global warming's consequences. today's guardian article speaks to the issue fwiw (nada)..
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jan/11/los-angeles-fire-fossil-fuel-big-oil

> Every barrel of oil, every cubic meter of gas, and every ton of coal burned brings us closer to environmental catastrophe. The wildfires raging across Los Angeles are not just natural disasters they are the direct result of human choices.. ..


The state spends 15-20 billion on climate a good deal on lofty goals like eliminating fossil fuels but I'm beginning to question the wisdom as it is a i$$hole in the snow of a global problem and it doesn't necesssrily improve the material well being of Californians

If you really want to address fires on the ground the major initiatives should probably be less development or re-building of homes in fire prone areas, stricter building codes and more mitigation and infrastructure on the ground but I don't see any of this happening as they won't turn off the money tap on development and prefer virtue signaling that big capital spending on solar brings. But what's the use when the global use of carbon rises and all the carbon we "save" is released in a week of fire
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:





I wouldn't discount the possibility that this massive catastrophe happened because of arson.
It could happen by disgruntled homeless or by Al Queda type enemies of the state - and is relatively very very simple.

All the more reason to strategize a Manhattan Project for defense against such an attack.

Creating fewer enemies is a great deterrent start!!


I recall hearing how the wealthy in Buenos Aires live behind huge walls with bars on every window - that struck me as a hell of a (unfortunate) way to live.

Wealth concentration, whether locally or globally, is a B*. Man is jealous. And we've always known it. Cain vs Abel.
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This politician may be movie's and 2034's idol.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
After the NorCal fires of 2018, Michael Wara at the Climate and Energy Policy Program at Stanford was asked by the state senate to develop financial models for a Wildfire Fund for catastrophic fires in three areas of the state ... Moraga-Orinda,os Altos Hills, and Pacific Pallisades

The estimated losses for a megafire burning every single home down in the Palisades were somewhere around $30 Billion, without factoring post-pandemic inflation rates and inflated reconstruction costs.

And here we are.

Given that the previous fires of 2017 and 2018 were no fluke, the current approach to homeowner's insurance is no longer sustainable.

This fire (and the others before it) will forever impact home ownership in California.


DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A Republican in Ohio is claiming that Forestry Management has led to this devastating fire in the Palisades. Shocker!

He must have never been to LA.
Just like movielover.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agreed!

1. Stop joining or causing middle eastern wars
2. Close the border
3. Arrest/ deport criminals
4. Fire posers at LADWP (empty PP reservoir)

AccuWeather is estimating the total cost at $150 Billion. Given our States decades-long incompetence and idealogy, why would an insurer continue to underwrite homes here?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dr. Bill on KGO warned about this for decades.

oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

A Republican in Ohio is claiming that Forestry Management has led to this devastating fire in the Palisades. Shocker!

He must have never been to LA.
Just like movielover.



The fire started in the FORESTED hills behind Palisades Highlands. You must have never been to L.A.

Shocker!
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lived in Manhatran Beach on The Strand in 1993.

The region was free of stormy weather this week, so lightning was not a possibility.

The area near the Temescal Ridge Trail in the Palisades also appears to be free of power lines or transformers, which rules out another potential cause.

Try again son.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Lived in Manhatran Beach on The Strand in 1993.

The region was free of stormy weather this week, so lightning was not a possibility.

The area near the Temescal Ridge Trail in the Palisades also appears to be free of power lines or transformers, which rules out another potential cause.

Try again son.



Here is a good article on forest management, son.

https://www.context.news/climate-risks/la-wildfires-how-can-forest-management-mitigate-the-impact

I have never heard of Manhatran Beach.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

smh said:

thanks to management for deleting my unhelpful rant in this thread, several days ago, unhinged by general indifference to global warming's consequences. today's guardian article speaks to the issue fwiw (nada)..
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jan/11/los-angeles-fire-fossil-fuel-big-oil

> Every barrel of oil, every cubic meter of gas, and every ton of coal burned brings us closer to environmental catastrophe. The wildfires raging across Los Angeles are not just natural disasters they are the direct result of human choices.. ..

Queue "88" to post his charts that any warming is within the natural up-trend which has existed for longer than man's contribution.

By popular request:



Basic element of ecology here: fire is an integral part of the ecological life cycle in mediterranean climates. Trees like the stone pine or eucalyptus are designed to burn every decade or two. Mediterranean pine trees that are over a century old, as found on the Cal campus (pictured below, near Tolman) hardly ever exist in a natural setting.



Southern California and the LA Basin is barely mediterranean, it's closer to semi-arid. LA is an area with lush vegetation in a semi-arid landscape.

Historically, on an average year about 10% of the area of California burned every year.

BearGoggles
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

BearGoggles said:

Stating that liberal policies (and incompetence by a complacent liberal dominated California government) exacerbated the fire is a fair opinion. Yes - its political.

To me the "liberal policies" argument loses steam when it becomes about how the government should have spent more money on X thing. Typically conservatives are against that, and to bring it up now smells of convenience.
Conservative positions are irrelevant in most of California, particularly in LA, and certainly most big cities.

Do you know many republicans that oppose spending on police and fire? I don't. So this is just a deflection
BearGoggles
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

bear2034 said:

sycasey said:

BearGoggles said:

Stating that liberal policies (and incompetence by a complacent liberal dominated California government) exacerbated the fire is a fair opinion. Yes - its political.

To me the "liberal policies" argument loses steam when it becomes about how the government should have spent more money on X thing. Typically conservatives are against that, and to bring it up now smells of convenience.

There are always tradeoffs. What did the government spend on and what did they cut? It's hard to blame conservatives in a state and city overwhelmingly run by Democrats.

In this specific case yes. But when natural disasters hit in Republican-run states the same people aren't going on and on about blaming the local politicians. Excuse me if I'm skeptical of your motives.
When bad things happens, the press/dems (same thing) often default to blaming republicans, whether or not they are local. Bush/Katrina is a great example. Bush was heavily criticized when most of the mismanagement was local.

Any shooting is another example - immediate blaming of republicans or conservative gun policy. FEMA has performed abysmally in North Carolina after the recent hurricane/floods - including a proven scandal for refusing to offer benefits to Trump supporters. Biden/Harris got a complete pass. They also got a pass after the poor response to the East Palestine train derailment.

The only time government officials aren't blamed is when they're democrats. In this case, it being California/LA, there is no republican to blame, so there is a lot of misdirection.
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearGoggles said:

sycasey said:

bear2034 said:

sycasey said:

BearGoggles said:

Stating that liberal policies (and incompetence by a complacent liberal dominated California government) exacerbated the fire is a fair opinion. Yes - its political.

To me the "liberal policies" argument loses steam when it becomes about how the government should have spent more money on X thing. Typically conservatives are against that, and to bring it up now smells of convenience.

There are always tradeoffs. What did the government spend on and what did they cut? It's hard to blame conservatives in a state and city overwhelmingly run by Democrats.

In this specific case yes. But when natural disasters hit in Republican-run states the same people aren't going on and on about blaming the local politicians. Excuse me if I'm skeptical of your motives.
When bad things happens, the press/dems (same thing) often default to blaming republicans, whether or not they are local. Bush/Katrina is a great example. Bush was heavily criticized when most of the mismanagement was local.

Any shooting is another example - immediate blaming of republicans or conservative gun policy. FEMA has performed abysmally in North Carolina after the recent hurricane/floods - including a proven scandal for refusing to offer benefits to Trump supporters. Biden/Harris got a complete pass. They also got a pass after the poor response to the East Palestine train derailment.

The only time government officials aren't blamed is when they're democrats. In this case, it being California/LA, there is no republican to blame, so there is a lot of misdirection.

Of course, the Democrats are to blame, both for the policies and the execution. They own it all.
The scale of this disaster is unprecedented and everyone will be paying a very heavy price for it.
It blows my mind that apologists for these incompetent political hacks are more interested in protecting the image of their party than admitting the obvious and getting on the right side of this issue which is simple: California needs to end one party rule and sweep out all the useless politicians who can't ensure the provision of the most basic of services and that starts with the Loser in Chief, Newsom. Everyone should be outraged by what has been allowed to happen in the richest state in the country.

Not political? Tell that to the people in NC who have been left to twist in the wind by virtue of the fact that they are of the wrong political persuasion. If Trump played the same game, he would offer Californians the same $750 Biden offered. He'd force people off their own property. He'd prevent private crews from bringing in temporary housing and supplies.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MinotStateBeav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chazzed said:

This politician may be movie's and 2034's idol.

I mean, how much relief did Maui, North Carolina, and Ohio get? We were told FEMA is flat out broke and has no money and Biden now says the cost of the fires are going to be covered for the next 180 days 100%. That's pretty effed up to those other places that are STILL dealing with their disasters.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

Lived in Manhatran Beach on The Strand in 1993.

The region was free of stormy weather this week, so lightning was not a possibility.

The area near the Temescal Ridge Trail in the Palisades also appears to be free of power lines or transformers, which rules out another potential cause.

Try again son.



Here is a good article on forest management, son.

https://www.context.news/climate-risks/la-wildfires-how-can-forest-management-mitigate-the-impact

I have never heard of Manhatran Beach.


It's the Indian section of the Palisades.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lots of pots of money were tapped to fund our invasion.

New York Post: Feds say there's no money left to respond to hurricanes after FEMA spent $1.4B on migrants

https://nypost.com/2024/10/03/us-news/feds-say-theres-no-money-left-to-respond-to-hurricanes-after-fema-used-640-9m-this-year-on-migrants/

$800 Million was transferred from CBO to FEMA for illegal immigrants.

"Included in that bill is the transfer of $800 million from CBP to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), $785 million of which will go "to support sheltering and related activities provided by non-Federal entities, including facility improvements and construction, in support of relieving overcrowding in short-term holding facilities"."

https://cis.org/Arthur/Massive-Spending-Bill-Includes-785-Million-Feed-House-and-Transport-Migrants
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

After the NorCal fires of 2018, Michael Wara at the Climate and Energy Policy Program at Stanford was asked by the state senate to develop financial models for a Wildfire Fund for catastrophic fires in three areas of the state ... Moraga-Orinda,os Altos Hills, and Pacific Pallisades

The estimated losses for a megafire burning every single home down in the Palisades were somewhere around $30 Billion, without factoring post-pandemic inflation rates and inflated reconstruction costs.

And here we are.

Given that the previous fires of 2017 and 2018 were no fluke, the current approach to homeowner's insurance is no longer sustainable.

This fire (and the others before it) will forever impact home ownership in California.


Smerconish said because of pooled risk, everyone nationwide would get a portion of the bill. We are all in this together.

He also referenced April issue of the Economist where in was said Real Estate is the #1 asset class and that this shared "bill" negatively impacts that. I think the article may have been suggesting that climate change throws planet earth's shared economy into a whole.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

A Republican in Ohio is claiming that Forestry Management has led to this devastating fire in the Palisades. Shocker!

He must have never been to LA.
Just like movielover.



Maybe he spends all day manufacturing rakes, and can send us some.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

concordtom said:

smh said:

thanks to management for deleting my unhelpful rant in this thread, several days ago, unhinged by general indifference to global warming's consequences. today's guardian article speaks to the issue fwiw (nada)..
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jan/11/los-angeles-fire-fossil-fuel-big-oil

> Every barrel of oil, every cubic meter of gas, and every ton of coal burned brings us closer to environmental catastrophe. The wildfires raging across Los Angeles are not just natural disasters they are the direct result of human choices.. ..

Queue "88" to post his charts that any warming is within the natural up-trend which has existed for longer than man's contribution.

By popular request:



Basic element of ecology here: fire is an integral part of the ecological life cycle in mediterranean climates. Trees like the stone pine or eucalyptus are designed to burn every decade or two. Mediterranean pine trees that are over a century old, as found on the Cal campus (pictured below, near Tolman) hardly ever exist in a natural setting.



Southern California and the LA Basin is barely mediterranean, it's closer to semi-arid. LA is an area with lush vegetation in a semi-arid landscape.

Historically, on an average year about 10% of the area of California burned every year.




I'll agree with this general push.
You take a desert, where the weather is pleasant, push water into it in order to "enjoy" a more lush environment (but not in the form of either rain or humidity) and then you are surprised when it burns??

I wonder who will tell Californians this is the equivalent of burning your oil and expecting no consequences.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fossil Fuels = Record Heat = Increased Natural Disasters

movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Poser.

bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Fossil Fuels = Record Heat = Increased Natural Disasters

Don't forget the arsonists, empty reservoirs, broken hydrants, and lesbians all named Kristin for some reason.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Poser.


Movielover and bear2034 can't help pointing out lesbians and gays. To them, LGBTQ means Let's Go Belittle The Queers.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

Movielover and bear2034 can't help pointing out lesbians and gays. To them, LGBTQ means Let's Go Belittle The Queers.
in a thread about fire, which is an ongoing tragedy of epic proportions.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This engineer had plan to mitigate this damage done in this disaster. 10 yrs ago he tried to get anyone to listen to no avail.


https://www.instagram.com/reel/DEtCXAVxnkC/?igsh=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==
"Nothing feels better to a coward than to watch a brave guy fall..."
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Article with maps of fire zone.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/los-angeles-wildfires-maps-180658307.html







concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CalFire has info.
Number of structures is not yet posted.

https://www.fire.ca.gov/
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.