The official Trump 2.0 shatshow thread

3,023 Views | 112 Replies | Last: 2 days ago by concordtom
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States."

Not under the "Law & Order" President.
Yesterday, he signed a directive to revoke the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.




What is his/their intention of revoking the 14th Amendment? What is the end game goal ?
In your estimation?
Was this in the project 2025 plan ?
"Nothing feels better to a coward than to watch a brave guy fall..."
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It should be obvious.
He wants to reduce undocumented immigration.

He wants to reinterpret the phrasing "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" to mean that the federal govt would not recognize automatic birthright citizenship for children born in the US to parents without legal status.

Trump to make historic move toward revoking birthright citizenship | WAMC

tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States."

Not under the "Law & Order" President.
Yesterday, he signed a directive to revoke the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.
Grandiose imprecise language is harmful to the anti-Trump crowd. It makes people ignore criticisms and disregard the speaker. As there are any number of legitimate criticisms to make, this matters.

He is not revoking an Amendment, as if any President had that power.

As your later post notes, he is attempting to end birthright citizenship for people here without legal status. This will be litigated immediately. TBD.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I never believe the obvious when I comes to these types of situations… the US government is a mystery bag lol
"Nothing feels better to a coward than to watch a brave guy fall..."
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:



As your later post notes, he is attempting to end birthright citizenship for people here without legal status. This will be litigated immediately. TBD.

Of course it will be.
No surprise there.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

I never believe the obvious when I comes to these types of situations… the US government is a mystery bag lol

I bet you can find the "answers" from watching TikTok.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States."

Not under the "Law & Order" President.
Yesterday, he signed a directive to revoke the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.




Revoking the 14th Amendment? Wrong again. FIGURES.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States."

Not under the "Law & Order" President.
Yesterday, he signed a directive to revoke the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.




Revoking the 14th Amendment? Wrong again. FIGURES.

Your reading comprehension is poor.
But I knew that posting would totally "trigger" you and the other Trump FANBOYS.
As it did.

From my reply to G4R:

"It should be obvious.
He wants to reduce undocumented immigration.

He wants to reinterpret the phrasing "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" to mean that the federal govt would not recognize automatic birthright citizenship for children born in the US to parents without legal status."
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States."

Not under the "Law & Order" President.
Yesterday, he signed a directive to revoke the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.




Revoking the 14th Amendment? Wrong again. FIGURES.

Your reading comprehension is poor.
But I knew that posting would totally "trigger" you and the other Trump FANBOYS.
As it did.

From my reply to G4R:

"It should be obvious.
He wants to reduce undocumented immigration.

He wants to reinterpret the phrasing "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" to mean that the federal govt would not recognize automatic birthright citizenship for children born in the US to parents without legal status."



Did you back Biden because you both are confused? Do you seriously not remember typing the below words?

"Yesterday, he signed a directive to revoke the 14th Amendment of the Constitution."

WOW.

"
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No.
I don't believe that I'm suffering from dementia.
I'm the guy that bought 18,000 shares of NTRA and am currently up over $3 million dollars.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

No.
I don't believe that I'm suffering from dementia.
I'm the guy that bought 18,000 shares of NTRA and am currently up over $3 million dollars.



You are so successful and mature. INCREDIBLE.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

No.
I don't believe that I'm suffering from dementia.
I'm the guy that bought 18,000 shares of NTRA and am currently up over $3 million dollars.



You are so successful and mature. INCREDIBLE.

I'm doing well.
Thanks!


DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Damn, looks like I dipped below $3 million.

I better post right away to CLARIFY so that strangers on a anonymous message board on the internet won't get all bent out of shape.

For those that are keeping "score" in real-time:





Maybe I will donate some money this year to finding a new Cal Head Football Coach.



oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Damn, looks like I dipped below $3 million.

I better post right away to CLARIFY so that strangers on a anonymous message board on the internet won't get all bent out of shape.

For those that are keeping "score" in real-time:




Maybe I will donate some money this year to finding a new Cal Head Football Coach.




That's amazing, mister.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah it is.

I always had wanted to be a Biology major at CAL.
But I couldn't hack all of the math and knew it wasn't going to happen.
But I was able to get involved in oncology screening with this medical diagnostics company.


oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Yeah it is.

I always had wanted to be a Biology major at CAL.
But I couldn't hack all of the math and knew it wasn't going to happen.
But I was able to get involved in oncology screening with this medical diagnostics company.





Yes, I did notice it is up 32% since you said you had a position on it in September 2024. Most of the time you brag about your trades after the fact, which is what you see from a lot of teenagers on stocktwits. As of right now, your standing prediction is that we now have the easiest short play ever on the market. What is your time frame and what specific index is best to short?
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

going4roses said:

I never believe the obvious when I comes to these types of situations… the US government is a mystery bag lol

I bet you can find the "answers" from watching TikTok.



Nope my ethnographic research shows me the truth daily
"Nothing feels better to a coward than to watch a brave guy fall..."
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Those are not in the same ballpark. Please provide context with videos showing those people snapping their body and arms in the same authoritarian way that Musk did. Thanks in advance, BG.
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rubio seems to think he works for Trump--not Americans.


DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

Yeah it is.

I always had wanted to be a Biology major at CAL.
But I couldn't hack all of the math and knew it wasn't going to happen.
But I was able to get involved in oncology screening with this medical diagnostics company.





Yes, I did notice it is up 32% since you said you had a position on it in September 2024. Most of the time you brag about your trades after the fact, which is what you see from a lot of teenagers on stocktwits. As of right now, your standing prediction is that we now have the easiest short play ever on the market. What is your time frame and what specific index is best to short?

No one here is actively involved in the stock market hence the Stock Market thread that died a long time ago.
Thus, your point about me "bragging after the fact" is largely irrelevant given the audience here.

But, if you want to continue along with that logic feel free.
You could have made another $6.00 in NTRA since my post this morning.




BearGoggles
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States."

Not under the "Law & Order" President.
Yesterday, he signed a directive to revoke the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.


He did no such thing. Just another falsehood posted by you. Which is funny because you're the first person to call out someone for being imprecise in their posting.

And I note you said nothing when Biden purported to ratify the long expired "28th Amendment" by executive decree. You have no actual guiding principles - just partisan hyperbole.
BearGoggles
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chazzed said:

Those are not in the same ballpark. Please provide context with videos showing those people snapping their body and arms in the same authoritarian way that Musk did. Thanks in advance, BG.
They are in the same ballpark. The "ballpark" is partisans taking things out of context. No one operating in good faith thinks Musk was making a Nazi salute or, for that matter, supports nazis. That is the context.
BearGoggles
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

No.
I don't believe that I'm suffering from dementia.
I'm the guy that bought 18,000 shares of NTRA and am currently up over $3 million dollars.

Do you realize how small and insecure this makes you look? I have never seen another poster on this board brag about their wealth (or for that matter their expensive cars). Certainly not in the middle of a political thread.

And no doubt plenty of people could brag about their wealth, but they have the good sense to realize that being wealthy doesn't make a person smart or "right" or for that matter, a moral, good person.
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

DiabloWags said:

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States."

Not under the "Law & Order" President.
Yesterday, he signed a directive to revoke the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.




What is his/their intention of revoking the 14th Amendment? What is the end game goal ?
In your estimation?
Was this in the project 2025 plan ?
This is definitely a part of Project 2025.


chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The column below breaks down, point by point, how nonsensical Trump's inauguration speech was.

"Trump's speech raises the old question: Is he evil or merely stupid?"
https://www.dailykos.com/story/2025/1/21/2298037/-Trump-s-speech-raises-the-old-question-Is-he-evil-or-merely-stupid?
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

It should be obvious.
He wants to reduce undocumented immigration.

He wants to reinterpret the phrasing "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" to mean that the federal govt would not recognize automatic birthright citizenship for children born in the US to parents without legal status.

Trump to make historic move toward revoking birthright citizenship | WAMC




It's a horrible economic plan.
The country needs more workers, more consumers, more tax payers.

Economically, it's a loser!

Grant all the Dreamers citizenship, and negotiate a border bill with democrats in order to control the inflow.

But that would be far too rational.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'd say he just advertises stuff to his people regardless of whether it's true or even makes sense.

I didn't read your link, but I heard his speech and it was full of a bunch of malarkey.

I simply cannot comprehend how a person can so comfortably and confidently go around speaking wild untruths.

He's simply crazy!!
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

No.
I don't believe that I'm suffering from dementia.
I'm the guy that bought 18,000 shares of NTRA and am currently up over $3 million dollars.



I would like to lift a beer in celebration of you right now. I feel your joy!

You can be a cutting jerk to people sometimes, and so can I, but this is awesome! Congratulations! Does Skips still have sawdust all over the floor? I think last time I went there it was gone and I was told there was (some logical reason why). At any rate, I'd be glad to buy a pitcher and spill some suds in the mug smashing toast!!

Hip hip, hooray!
Big trade wins feel awesome!
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearGoggles said:

DiabloWags said:

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States."

Not under the "Law & Order" President.
Yesterday, he signed a directive to revoke the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.


He did no such thing. Just another falsehood posted by you. Which is funny because you're the first person to call out someone for being imprecise in their posting.

And I note you said nothing when Biden purported to ratify the long expired "28th Amendment" by executive decree. You have no actual guiding principles - just partisan hyperbole.


Just like how your claim that Teri McKeever sued CAL was totally bogus.

#triggered.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearGoggles said:

chazzed said:

Those are not in the same ballpark. Please provide context with videos showing those people snapping their body and arms in the same authoritarian way that Musk did. Thanks in advance, BG.
They are in the same ballpark. The "ballpark" is partisans taking things out of context. No one operating in good faith thinks Musk was making a Nazi salute or, for that matter, supports nazis. That is the context.


South Africa has a lot of Nazis.
BearGoggles
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearGoggles said:

DiabloWags said:

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States."

Not under the "Law & Order" President.
Yesterday, he signed a directive to revoke the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.


He did no such thing. Just another falsehood posted by you. Which is funny because you're the first person to call out someone for being imprecise in their posting.

And I note you said nothing when Biden purported to ratify the long expired "28th Amendment" by executive decree. You have no actual guiding principles - just partisan hyperbole.


Just like how your claim that Teri McKeever sued CAL was totally bogus.

#triggered.

Yes - like you I was imprecise and should have said "threatened to sue and pursue claims" since, as a technical matter, she has not yet filed. The larger point I was making - that she has claims that Cal would need to defend - is true. When you nit picked and pointed it out, I acknowledged the (largely irrelevant) distinction which didn't change the larger point.

The difference between us is you made a big deal about this meaningless distinction as if it was material. You do this all the time, as if it matters. Then you post something objectively false which is quite rich. And when called out, you decide to randomly tell people you're wealthy as if that matters. I can't help but wonder if you behave this way in real life (which this board is not).
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:

I'd say he just advertises stuff to his people regardless of whether it's true or even makes sense.
No doubt, and they eat it up. As for crazy, Trump may qualify. But the guy is good at manipulating and activating bitter people.
HawaiiBear33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
More amazingly good stuff



Keep erasing all the incredible destruction
HawaiiBear33
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Trump has not succeeded in anything important until these swamp creatures go to jail and even CT and DW will look at the evidence and realize OMG these are all criminals…what was I thinking?
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chazzed said:

concordtom said:

I'd say he just advertises stuff to his people regardless of whether it's true or even makes sense.
No doubt, and they eat it up. As for crazy, Trump may qualify. But the guy is good at manipulating and activating bitter people.


I never would have imagined people could be so controlled by nonsensicality as we observe.

As I always say, I know understand how a (good German) population could be driven to commit such unfathomable atrocities as we saw in the Holocaust.

It's been a massive social experiment, this MAGA movement, and the results are both unappealing and dangerous.

It's sad. Very sad.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.