Nazi on the loose :(

2,270 Views | 56 Replies | Last: 11 hrs ago by oski003
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DFIX7OIIzzL/?igsh=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==

The us government has always coddled facists/racists. Hence where we are
"Nothing feels better to a coward than to watch a brave guy fall..."
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearGoggles said:

sycasey said:

BearGoggles said:

sycasey said:

BearGoggles said:

sycasey said:

The ADL is happy with whoever will keep letting Israel do whatever they want.
And AOC is happy to defend some of the worst antisemites (Talib/Omar) and only call out people like Musk under the false pretense of caring about antisemitism. She objects to a random arm motion by Elon, but none of the truly awful things done by Talib/Omar or for that matter the pro-hamas demonstrators who threaten violence and support genocide. She's a fraud.
What is the most awful thing done by Tlaib or Omar, in your view?
First of all, both are obsessed with alleged wrongdoing by Israel (e.g., "genocide" or "war crimes") but have literally nothing to say about genocide or human rights violations in Arab counties or Iran. A double standard like that is one definition of antisemitism.

I can't say what is the "most awful", but Tilab has defended hamas, adopted the genocidal "from the river to the see" change, posted a map of the middle east in her office without Israel on it (hint hint), and voted against a resolution condemning rape and violence by Hamas on 10/7 (she was the only vote against). I believe she was censured by congress for her antisemitism. She opposes as two state solution.

Omar has been a consistent purveyor of antisemitic tropes and statements.

https://www.ajc.org/news/ilhan-omar-has-a-problem-with-jews

I believe both voted against providing Iron Dome DEFENSIVE weapons to Israel. Because they apparently think Israel should not have a defense to Hamas/Hezbollah missiles.
I was looking for something more along the lines of actual directly anti-semitic quotes or something, not statements that some people interpreted as such, or some instance where they failed to mention something or didn't vote for some non-binding resolution. None of that actually causes anyone harm. Also, have you actually checked up on some of these claims?

You say that Tlaib "posted a map of the middle east without Israel on it," but the only actual visual I can find of that is this:

https://www.newarab.com/news/congresswoman-rashida-tlaib-puts-palestine-map-literally


That looks to me like ADDING Palestine to the map, not removing Israel. She is the child of Palestinian immigrants, so I can see why she might have done that and it's not necessarily due to antisemitism.
From the river to the sea is "directly" antisemitic. Full stop. It is from Hamas' charter as a call to end the existence of Israel and attack/remove/kill jews. A call for genocide.

She has defended Hamas and other bad actors. In her initial statement on 10/7, she refused to condemn Hamas (didn't even mention them) and made a lot of other awful comments. She was censured for it.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/house-vote-censure-rashida-tlaib-israel-hamas-palestine-remarks-rcna124005
Rashida Tlaib has been explicit about what she means by "from the river to the sea," and it's not to end the existence of Israel.



Personally, I thought that censure was ridiculous and that people get way too overheated about any comments critical of Israel, painting all of it as antisemitic. Look, I'm sure that when the Hamas guys use that phrase they do mean they want to kill all of the Jews. When some American college students say it? I highly doubt that's what they mean. But the ADL and other organizations want us to believe they do.

But again, I will just note that all of the "awful" things you say these people have done is just statements or refusal to mention/condemn certain things, not actual actions that affect people's lives. I recall you guys rolling your eyes when folks on the left said this about Trump comments during his first term. I guess it's okay when you're doing it to Democrats now?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Don't worry folks.
We are in good hands now that SPAIN is a BRICS nation.

South Africa just got replaced because of the Nazi influence.
Lmfao.


BearGoggles
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearGoggles said:

sycasey said:

BearGoggles said:

sycasey said:

BearGoggles said:

sycasey said:

The ADL is happy with whoever will keep letting Israel do whatever they want.
And AOC is happy to defend some of the worst antisemites (Talib/Omar) and only call out people like Musk under the false pretense of caring about antisemitism. She objects to a random arm motion by Elon, but none of the truly awful things done by Talib/Omar or for that matter the pro-hamas demonstrators who threaten violence and support genocide. She's a fraud.
What is the most awful thing done by Tlaib or Omar, in your view?
First of all, both are obsessed with alleged wrongdoing by Israel (e.g., "genocide" or "war crimes") but have literally nothing to say about genocide or human rights violations in Arab counties or Iran. A double standard like that is one definition of antisemitism.

I can't say what is the "most awful", but Tilab has defended hamas, adopted the genocidal "from the river to the see" change, posted a map of the middle east in her office without Israel on it (hint hint), and voted against a resolution condemning rape and violence by Hamas on 10/7 (she was the only vote against). I believe she was censured by congress for her antisemitism. She opposes as two state solution.

Omar has been a consistent purveyor of antisemitic tropes and statements.

https://www.ajc.org/news/ilhan-omar-has-a-problem-with-jews

I believe both voted against providing Iron Dome DEFENSIVE weapons to Israel. Because they apparently think Israel should not have a defense to Hamas/Hezbollah missiles.
I was looking for something more along the lines of actual directly anti-semitic quotes or something, not statements that some people interpreted as such, or some instance where they failed to mention something or didn't vote for some non-binding resolution. None of that actually causes anyone harm. Also, have you actually checked up on some of these claims?

You say that Tlaib "posted a map of the middle east without Israel on it," but the only actual visual I can find of that is this:

https://www.newarab.com/news/congresswoman-rashida-tlaib-puts-palestine-map-literally


That looks to me like ADDING Palestine to the map, not removing Israel. She is the child of Palestinian immigrants, so I can see why she might have done that and it's not necessarily due to antisemitism.
From the river to the sea is "directly" antisemitic. Full stop. It is from Hamas' charter as a call to end the existence of Israel and attack/remove/kill jews. A call for genocide.

She has defended Hamas and other bad actors. In her initial statement on 10/7, she refused to condemn Hamas (didn't even mention them) and made a lot of other awful comments. She was censured for it.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/house-vote-censure-rashida-tlaib-israel-hamas-palestine-remarks-rcna124005


From the river to the sea first appeared in the charter of the Likud Party of Israel, before Hamas even existed.



Israel has been conducting ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from the river to the sea since 1948. It is the only country in the world that doesn't have defined borders, constantly stealing land from Palestinians, and lately, from Lebanon and Syria as well.


Has anything happened since 1977? Today, do you see great numbers of Jews or Israelis marching around screaming "from the river to the sea"? Not in Israel and certainly not in the US, or on college campuses.

There are some Israelis who want Israel to have sovereignty over all of Judea and Samaria. They are a minority. And with very limited exceptions on the very far right fringe of Israeli politics, those people do NOT advocate for ethnic cleansing oft Arabs/Palestinians, who are approximately 20% of Israel's total population. If Israel was intent on making Judea and Samaria Arab/Palestinian free (i.e., your false claim of ethnic cleansing), it wouldn't have 20% of its current population consisting of Arabs/Palestinians. And there would be no Palestinians in the West Bank.

We also know that Israel has not implemented from the river to the sea policy. It gave back Gaza. It ceded control over large parts of the West Bank which is part of historical Judea and Samaria. Israeli governments have supported and pursued a two state solution which is a direct repudiation of "from the river to the sea". The current government is not pursuing a two-state solution because of security concerns - i.e., Hamas - not because of wanting control over all of Judea and Samaria.

Now, lets turn to the Palestinians and in particular, Hamas. Their current mantra is from the river to the sea. They reject a two state solution. They reject living in peace with Jews in a single state.

When they say that, they don't just want sovereignty over Israel - they want all jews removed/killed from that area. Ethnic cleansing is their stated policy. There are no Jews in Gaza, none in the portions of the West Bank controlled by the PA, and very few Jews in any Arab country. There is a longstanding history of Arabs and Muslims expelling/killing Jews and Christians - again actual ethnic cleansing.

As used today by Palestinians, from the river to the sea is a call for war and ethnic cleansing/genocide. I note you don't dispute that and instead point to irrelevancies like "it doesn't have defined borders." And, quite ironically, your irrelevant claim is false because right now Russia (your favorite country) also does not have defined borders. Beyond that, there are many other international border disputes.

HawaiiBear33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GoOskie said:

You have to be a ****ing idiot if you think he was throwing his heart out to you.




Why do you keep believing msm…so many lies
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
None of those other people were doing what Elno was doing. Show videos of each of those moments in time and you will possibly understand.

But if you have no problem with Musk's casual arm movements, record and post a video of yourself doing the exact same gestures. Be sure to tag your employers - I am sure they would appreciate your demonstration of support of freedom of expression.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HawaiiBear33 said:

GoOskie said:

You have to be a ****ing idiot if you think he was throwing his heart out to you.




Why do you keep believing msm…so many lies
You all need to stop posting still images in response to a video.

Now, I'm on record as saying that I don't think Elon was trying to do a Nazi salute, more that he was just being an idiot. But none of these folks did the same motion he did, which was: thump the chest, then thrust his arm outward and up without saying anything. For all of these other folks they are talking and gesticulating and happen to throw their arm up during a portion of the speech, with no prior chest tap. It's way easier to mistake Musk's action for a Nazi salute.
GoOskie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HawaiiBear33 said:

GoOskie said:

You have to be a ****ing idiot if you think he was throwing his heart out to you.




Why do you keep believing msm…so many lies
****ing idiot
kelly09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearGoggles said:

sycasey said:

The ADL is happy with whoever will keep letting Israel do whatever they want.
And AOC is happy to defend some of the worst antisemites (Talib/Omar) and only call out people like Musk under the false pretense of caring about antisemitism. She objects to a random arm motion by Elon, but none of the truly awful things done by Talib/Omar or for that matter the pro-hamas demonstrators who threaten violence and support genocide. She's a fraud.





AOC says lots of stupid things but damn she's got a good body!
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

The Nashville school mass shooter was a neo-Nazi. This might make going4roses' head explode.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Return of the King said:





That's a Walzi!
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wow! Not even close to the same gesture as Elon.


Spin spin spin, boiz. Have some more KoolAid!
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
GoOskie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yea, Walz did the EXACT same thing Musk did. /s for those in the peanut gallery

Seriously, do you people have brain defects?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yup.

It should be pretty clear by now.
They do in fact suffer from brain defects.
There's just no other way to explain the lack of cognitive ability.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GoOskie said:

Yea, Walz did the EXACT same thing Musk did. /s for those in the peanut gallery

Seriously, do you people have brain defects?

Walz did it too, but with the tampons.
GoOskie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

GoOskie said:

Yea, Walz did the EXACT same thing Musk did. /s for those in the peanut gallery

Seriously, do you people have brain defects?

Walz did it too, but with the tampons.
You might have tampons for brain lining.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I use pads for that.
FourthQuartersOurs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DFGP7ysRtT9/?igsh=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Certainly not Maxis…
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Tampon Tim made us all tremble at one point.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Nothing feels better to a coward than to watch a brave guy fall..."
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:




When does he mention fascism?
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.