HKBear97! said:
sycasey said:
tequila4kapp said:
sycasey said:
HKBear97! said:
I think nearly everyone agrees, legal migration is needed and welcome.
I'm not sure that's true anymore. I think large segments of the right wing who are ascendant right now (the Stephen Miller types) want no immigration at all and see this all as a means to that end.
We all run in particular circles, which makes it anecdotal. But I have never heard - not once - an every day conservative person express that type of opinion. If anything I've heard very uncomfortable for me talk (bordering on racism) about not wanting to lose their cheap gardeners type talk.
I'm guessing your social circle is not filled with the Stephen Miller types.
Will second the anecdote from tequila4kapp. In my circle which includes liberals and conservatives across the spectrum, everyone agrees legal immigration is beneficial and needed. Surprisingly, even my most super liberal friends agree that illegal immigration needs to be addressed. It's about the only thing they agree with this administration on!
The real issue is what is considered legal immigration. When Trump was calling the Haitians in Ohio, illegal aliens, even though they were legally in the country he was purposefully being misleading. Once in power he changed their status from legal to illegal.
Trump will revoke green cards, visas, and even birthright citizenship if the courts let him. Then all these people become illegal. I am against illegal immigration. I am against the approach Trump is taking of illegalizing legal immigration. I am against deporting people that grew up in this country even if they came here illegally.
I am in favor of ending birthright citizenship but unlike lawless magats, I understand that would take a constitutional amendment.
I am in favor of severely restricting amnesty but unlike lawless magats, I understand that would take an act of Congress.