Off Topic
Sponsored by

The slow death of MAGA

17,704 Views | 213 Replies | Last: 10 days ago by DiabloWags
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?

BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

Also, McConnel will not seek another term, his replacement will most likely be a Republican.


Thank god for small favors
DaddyLegend
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Since Democrats are polling at 20% (16% among men), a serious question should be asked:

Should MAGA financially support current Democratic politicians to keep them in office in perpetuity?
Joe Biden pardoned his son, Anthony Fauci, Gen Milley, Schiff, and the J6 Unselect Committee. The mods all voted for Kamala. They had no choice after the Biden coup. The people who shot Trump and Charlie Kirk probably vote Democrat too. The people who were obsessed with Russia hoax, vax status of others, J6, and the Epstein list are ignorant fools. Building genocide could have been prevented. Queers for Palestine. Trans rights. No Kings. Hamas not Hummus. Cousin love. Allahu Akbar.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Woman beaten up at a Trump rally, MTG chimes in.



" Late stage MAGA is so disgusting and unrecognizable to me, and I find this shocking as one who attended more Trump rallies than I can count.
A woman with a "Release The Epstein Files" shirt stands at a Trump rally shouting at Trump to release the Epstein files and gets physically beaten by the MAGA men around her, who probably call themselves Christians.
Then our obese President makes fun of her calling her "fat" and "him" claiming she's a paid protestor.
She got thrown out and the men who attacked her got to stay.
MAGA rallies used to be filled with people who agreed with releasing the Epstein files, defended women, and would step in if a woman was attacked.
Now the dying remnant of MAGA is made up of people who emulate their cult leader.
Attacking women, making fun of their looks, and turning on the victims of the elites.
It's a cult, an ugly grotesque cult that does not display Christian values because the cult leader himself is not a Christian even though the vast majority who attend his rallies would identify as Christian.
Know them by their fruit.
The fruit is rotten.
Because the cult leader himself is a wolf in sheep's clothing who has led the flock astray."

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:


It's a cult, an ugly grotesque cult that does not display Christian values because the cult leader himself is not a Christian even though the vast majority who attend his rallies would identify as Christian.

Know them by their fruit.
The fruit is rotten.

Because the cult leader himself is a wolf in sheep's clothing who has led the flock astray."



Truer words have never been spoken about Trump and his current MAGA followers.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Where was she beaten up? Good job by security for removing her and allowing the event to continue on.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Where was she beaten up? Good job by security for removing her and allowing the event to continue on.

Don't believe your lying eyes.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Where was she beaten up? Good job by security for removing her and allowing the event to continue on.

Don't believe your lying eyes.


Nothing in that video showed her being beat up. She was being restrained and resisted.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:









Jonestown, 1978



I'm surprised to see that Bearister didn't post this. His humor is a bit more macabre than yours.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
More spin on here than in a laundromat.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

More spin on here than in a laundromat.


True, it's crazy how often posters don't practice what they preach
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Where was she beaten up? Good job by security for removing her and allowing the event to continue on.


I see a clear punch into the face on top of grabbing her hair.
How do you not see that?

You're just not a credible good faith poster here.

BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

Where was she beaten up? Good job by security for removing her and allowing the event to continue on.


I see a clear punch into the face on top of grabbing her hair.
How do you not see that?

You're just not a credible good faith poster here.




She was being restrained, that's what I see. I also see her swinging. This type of thing happens at sporting events, concerts, etc every day.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

Where was she beaten up? Good job by security for removing her and allowing the event to continue on.


I see a clear punch into the face on top of grabbing her hair.
How do you not see that?

You're just not a credible good faith poster here.




This is the same guy that is trying to sell you the notion that this Trump rally was absolutely packed, and that all the empty seats are because of "equipment issues" and "bad sightlines"...

BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

Where was she beaten up? Good job by security for removing her and allowing the event to continue on.


I see a clear punch into the face on top of grabbing her hair.
How do you not see that?

You're just not a credible good faith poster here.




This is the same guy that is trying to sell you the notion that this Trump rally was absolutely packed, and that all the empty seats are because of "equipment issues" and "bad sightlines"...




Bahahahaha as you use the biggest liar on X as your source. Too funny.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:


This is the same guy that is trying to sell you the notion that this Trump rally was absolutely packed, and that all the empty seats are because of "equipment issues" and "bad sightlines"...




Excellent point.
Goes to credibility.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

Where was she beaten up? Good job by security for removing her and allowing the event to continue on.


I see a clear punch into the face on top of grabbing her hair.
How do you not see that?

You're just not a credible good faith poster here.




This is the same guy that is trying to sell you the notion that this Trump rally was absolutely packed, and that all the empty seats are because of "equipment issues" and "bad sightlines"...




Bahahahaha as you use the biggest liar on X as your source. Too funny.

Don't believe your lying eyes, attendance for Trump rallies really is off the charts, those empty seats are only because of bad sightlines and all that special equipment that needs to go there - even when there is no special equipment there.

SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:

Where was she beaten up? Good job by security for removing her and allowing the event to continue on.


I see a clear punch into the face on top of grabbing her hair.
How do you not see that?

You're just not a credible good faith poster here.




This is the same guy that is trying to sell you the notion that this Trump rally was absolutely packed, and that all the empty seats are because of "equipment issues" and "bad sightlines"...



Yes, this is the truth. Say no to dishonesty.

Vote Blue and Vote Kamala
"I Abide by Old and New Rules, and I Never Personally Attack. Gambling is illegal at Bushwood, sir, and I never slice."
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:


Bahahahaha as you use the biggest liar on X as your source. Too funny.


So this video of empty seats is fake?
Is that what your logic is claiming given that the post is from the "biggest liar on X"?



BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:


Bahahahaha as you use the biggest liar on X as your source. Too funny.


So this video of empty seats is fake?
Is that what your logic is claiming given that the post is from the "biggest liar on X"?






No but let me explain it to you. It's just comical that the biggest sycophant, liberal liar in X was his source. Way too much irony.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:


Bahahahaha as you use the biggest liar on X as your source. Too funny.


So this video of empty seats is fake?
Is that what your logic is claiming given that the post is from the "biggest liar on X"?



No but let me explain it to you. It's just comical that the biggest sycophant, liberal liar in X was his source. Way too much irony.


No irony in you trying to use an ad hominem to refute irrefutable photo evidence of that rally not being close to sold out, it is entirely in character.

And what does it say about the state of the MAGA cult when "the biggest sycophant, liberal liar in X" is correct and you're not...
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:


Bahahahaha as you use the biggest liar on X as your source. Too funny.


So this video of empty seats is fake?
Is that what your logic is claiming given that the post is from the "biggest liar on X"?



No but let me explain it to you. It's just comical that the biggest sycophant, liberal liar in X was his source. Way too much irony.


No irony in you trying to use an ad hominem to refute irrefutable photo evidence of that rally not being close to sold out, it is entirely in character.

And what does it say about the state of the MAGA cult when "the biggest sycophant, liberal liar in X" is correct and you're not...


I didn't refute anything in your post from Krassenstein. I made a connection to the irony of it. You're wayyyy too invested in this this lmao
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:


Bahahahaha as you use the biggest liar on X as your source. Too funny.


So this video of empty seats is fake?
Is that what your logic is claiming given that the post is from the "biggest liar on X"?



No but let me explain it to you. It's just comical that the biggest sycophant, liberal liar in X was his source. Way too much irony.


No irony in you trying to use an ad hominem to refute irrefutable photo evidence of that rally not being close to sold out, it is entirely in character.

And what does it say about the state of the MAGA cult when "the biggest sycophant, liberal liar in X" is correct and you're not...


I didn't refute anything in your post from Krassenstein. I made a connection to the irony of it. You're wayyyy too invested in this this lmao


You were far more invested trying to deny the basic fact of blocks of empty seats at that Trump rally, judging by the length of the word salad you wrote trying to deny that :
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/127293/replies/2759436

And now you're trying to "disinvest" because you were caught BSing... lmao indeed.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:


Bahahahaha as you use the biggest liar on X as your source. Too funny.


So this video of empty seats is fake?
Is that what your logic is claiming given that the post is from the "biggest liar on X"?



No but let me explain it to you. It's just comical that the biggest sycophant, liberal liar in X was his source. Way too much irony.


No irony in you trying to use an ad hominem to refute irrefutable photo evidence of that rally not being close to sold out, it is entirely in character.

And what does it say about the state of the MAGA cult when "the biggest sycophant, liberal liar in X" is correct and you're not...


I didn't refute anything in your post from Krassenstein. I made a connection to the irony of it. You're wayyyy too invested in this this lmao


You were far more invested trying to deny the basic fact of blocks of empty seats at that Trump rally, judging by the length of the word salad you wrote trying to deny that :
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/127293/replies/2759436

And now you're trying to "disinvest" because you were caught BSing... lmao indeed.


Lmao It was a copy and paste from the venue itself.

My investment is now much more in the irony of your source.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:


Bahahahaha as you use the biggest liar on X as your source. Too funny.


So this video of empty seats is fake?
Is that what your logic is claiming given that the post is from the "biggest liar on X"?



No but let me explain it to you. It's just comical that the biggest sycophant, liberal liar in X was his source. Way too much irony.


No irony in you trying to use an ad hominem to refute irrefutable photo evidence of that rally not being close to sold out, it is entirely in character.

And what does it say about the state of the MAGA cult when "the biggest sycophant, liberal liar in X" is correct and you're not...


I didn't refute anything in your post from Krassenstein. I made a connection to the irony of it. You're wayyyy too invested in this this lmao


You were far more invested trying to deny the basic fact of blocks of empty seats at that Trump rally, judging by the length of the word salad you wrote trying to deny that :

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/127293/replies/2759436

And now you're trying to "disinvest" because you were caught BSing... lmao indeed.


IMO, I don't believe that he posts in good faith.
This is just another example.

It's too bad that the "ignore" feature doesn't work in reality.
Otherwise, I would have used it a long time ago and never looked back.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:


Bahahahaha as you use the biggest liar on X as your source. Too funny.


So this video of empty seats is fake?
Is that what your logic is claiming given that the post is from the "biggest liar on X"?



No but let me explain it to you. It's just comical that the biggest sycophant, liberal liar in X was his source. Way too much irony.


No irony in you trying to use an ad hominem to refute irrefutable photo evidence of that rally not being close to sold out, it is entirely in character.

And what does it say about the state of the MAGA cult when "the biggest sycophant, liberal liar in X" is correct and you're not...


I didn't refute anything in your post from Krassenstein. I made a connection to the irony of it. You're wayyyy too invested in this this lmao


You were far more invested trying to deny the basic fact of blocks of empty seats at that Trump rally, judging by the length of the word salad you wrote trying to deny that :
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/127293/replies/2759436

And now you're trying to "disinvest" because you were caught BSing... lmao indeed.


Lmao It was a copy and paste from the venue itself.


It did look like a pretty bad cut and paste word salad job, bad enough that you then tried to compensate by copying and pasting an even bigger word salad of talking points lifted from another board in a futile attempt to deny irrefutable photo evidence:

Quote:

BearlySane88 said:

Stage placement is a major factor in which seats were available or usable.
The Covelli Centre (capacity roughly 7,000 for stage events) uses different configurations for concerts and stage shows, including full house, three-quarter house, and half house setups. In a typical end-stage configuration, the stage is placed at one end of the arena. Sections directly behind the stage, or those with severe sightline problems (especially once press risers, camera platforms, and production elements are in place), are often closed off because people sitting there cannot properly see the stage.
Local reporting from the October 12, 2026, Trump midterm rally confirms this in practice:
Roughly a quarter of the seats were tarped off (intentionally closed).
Of the seats that remained available, only about two-thirds filled up.
The venue was described as roughly half full earlier in the evening, with several sections remaining empty through the event despite energy in the occupied areas.
The photos match this layout. One image shows a large American flag hanging over a big empty section, which is consistent with covering or de-emphasizing a poor-view area (often behind or beside the stage). Other empty seats align with areas critics noted as being behind press risers or otherwise obstructed. Emily Davies (the original poster) later acknowledged tarps over certain sections and also shared views of fuller areas.
In short: Stage placement and production setup explain why some sections were closed or left empty by design, those seats simply aren't practical for an end-stage rally. At the same time, the remaining available seats were not fully occupied, which local coverage characterized as relatively sluggish attendance overall.

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/127293/replies/2759377

Then after all this work, you claim that you weren't "invested",.. yeah right.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:


Bahahahaha as you use the biggest liar on X as your source. Too funny.


So this video of empty seats is fake?
Is that what your logic is claiming given that the post is from the "biggest liar on X"?



No but let me explain it to you. It's just comical that the biggest sycophant, liberal liar in X was his source. Way too much irony.


No irony in you trying to use an ad hominem to refute irrefutable photo evidence of that rally not being close to sold out, it is entirely in character.

And what does it say about the state of the MAGA cult when "the biggest sycophant, liberal liar in X" is correct and you're not...


I didn't refute anything in your post from Krassenstein. I made a connection to the irony of it. You're wayyyy too invested in this this lmao


You were far more invested trying to deny the basic fact of blocks of empty seats at that Trump rally, judging by the length of the word salad you wrote trying to deny that :
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/127293/replies/2759436

And now you're trying to "disinvest" because you were caught BSing... lmao indeed.


Lmao It was a copy and paste from the venue itself.


It did look like a pretty bad cut and paste word salad job, bad enough that you then tried to compensate by copying and pasting an even bigger word salad of talking points lifted from another board in a futile attempt to deny irrefutable photo evidence:

Quote:

BearlySane88 said:

Stage placement is a major factor in which seats were available or usable.
The Covelli Centre (capacity roughly 7,000 for stage events) uses different configurations for concerts and stage shows, including full house, three-quarter house, and half house setups. In a typical end-stage configuration, the stage is placed at one end of the arena. Sections directly behind the stage, or those with severe sightline problems (especially once press risers, camera platforms, and production elements are in place), are often closed off because people sitting there cannot properly see the stage.
Local reporting from the October 12, 2026, Trump midterm rally confirms this in practice:
Roughly a quarter of the seats were tarped off (intentionally closed).
Of the seats that remained available, only about two-thirds filled up.
The venue was described as roughly half full earlier in the evening, with several sections remaining empty through the event despite energy in the occupied areas.
The photos match this layout. One image shows a large American flag hanging over a big empty section, which is consistent with covering or de-emphasizing a poor-view area (often behind or beside the stage). Other empty seats align with areas critics noted as being behind press risers or otherwise obstructed. Emily Davies (the original poster) later acknowledged tarps over certain sections and also shared views of fuller areas.
In short: Stage placement and production setup explain why some sections were closed or left empty by design, those seats simply aren't practical for an end-stage rally. At the same time, the remaining available seats were not fully occupied, which local coverage characterized as relatively sluggish attendance overall.

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/127293/replies/2759377

Then after all this work, you claim that you weren't "invested",.. yeah right.


Correct, I'm glad you're following now. That 30 second post lol
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:


Bahahahaha as you use the biggest liar on X as your source. Too funny.


So this video of empty seats is fake?
Is that what your logic is claiming given that the post is from the "biggest liar on X"?



No but let me explain it to you. It's just comical that the biggest sycophant, liberal liar in X was his source. Way too much irony.


No irony in you trying to use an ad hominem to refute irrefutable photo evidence of that rally not being close to sold out, it is entirely in character.

And what does it say about the state of the MAGA cult when "the biggest sycophant, liberal liar in X" is correct and you're not...


I didn't refute anything in your post from Krassenstein. I made a connection to the irony of it. You're wayyyy too invested in this this lmao


You were far more invested trying to deny the basic fact of blocks of empty seats at that Trump rally, judging by the length of the word salad you wrote trying to deny that :
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/127293/replies/2759436

And now you're trying to "disinvest" because you were caught BSing... lmao indeed.


Lmao It was a copy and paste from the venue itself.


It did look like a pretty bad cut and paste word salad job, bad enough that you then tried to compensate by copying and pasting an even bigger word salad of talking points lifted from another board in a futile attempt to deny irrefutable photo evidence:

Quote:

BearlySane88 said:

Stage placement is a major factor in which seats were available or usable.
The Covelli Centre (capacity roughly 7,000 for stage events) uses different configurations for concerts and stage shows, including full house, three-quarter house, and half house setups. In a typical end-stage configuration, the stage is placed at one end of the arena. Sections directly behind the stage, or those with severe sightline problems (especially once press risers, camera platforms, and production elements are in place), are often closed off because people sitting there cannot properly see the stage.
Local reporting from the October 12, 2026, Trump midterm rally confirms this in practice:
Roughly a quarter of the seats were tarped off (intentionally closed).
Of the seats that remained available, only about two-thirds filled up.
The venue was described as roughly half full earlier in the evening, with several sections remaining empty through the event despite energy in the occupied areas.
The photos match this layout. One image shows a large American flag hanging over a big empty section, which is consistent with covering or de-emphasizing a poor-view area (often behind or beside the stage). Other empty seats align with areas critics noted as being behind press risers or otherwise obstructed. Emily Davies (the original poster) later acknowledged tarps over certain sections and also shared views of fuller areas.
In short: Stage placement and production setup explain why some sections were closed or left empty by design, those seats simply aren't practical for an end-stage rally. At the same time, the remaining available seats were not fully occupied, which local coverage characterized as relatively sluggish attendance overall.

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/127293/replies/2759377

Then after all this work, you claim that you weren't "invested",.. yeah right.


Correct, I'm glad you're following now. That 30 second post lol


Yes, I've been following. The bigger world salad is only you digging deeper in trying to refute irrefutable photo evidence.


BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
High road
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

High road


Since you like to cut and paste your responses, here's a suggestion that represents the high road here:

"I guess you were right, that Trump rally wasn't close to being sold out, I stand corrected".
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

DiabloWags said:

BearlySane88 said:


Bahahahaha as you use the biggest liar on X as your source. Too funny.


So this video of empty seats is fake?
Is that what your logic is claiming given that the post is from the "biggest liar on X"?



No but let me explain it to you. It's just comical that the biggest sycophant, liberal liar in X was his source. Way too much irony.


No irony in you trying to use an ad hominem to refute irrefutable photo evidence of that rally not being close to sold out, it is entirely in character.

And what does it say about the state of the MAGA cult when "the biggest sycophant, liberal liar in X" is correct and you're not...


I didn't refute anything in your post from Krassenstein. I made a connection to the irony of it. You're wayyyy too invested in this this lmao


You were far more invested trying to deny the basic fact of blocks of empty seats at that Trump rally, judging by the length of the word salad you wrote trying to deny that :
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/127293/replies/2759436

And now you're trying to "disinvest" because you were caught BSing... lmao indeed.


Lmao It was a copy and paste from the venue itself.


It did look like a pretty bad cut and paste word salad job, bad enough that you then tried to compensate by copying and pasting an even bigger word salad of talking points lifted from another board in a futile attempt to deny irrefutable photo evidence:

Quote:

BearlySane88 said:

Stage placement is a major factor in which seats were available or usable.
The Covelli Centre (capacity roughly 7,000 for stage events) uses different configurations for concerts and stage shows, including full house, three-quarter house, and half house setups. In a typical end-stage configuration, the stage is placed at one end of the arena. Sections directly behind the stage, or those with severe sightline problems (especially once press risers, camera platforms, and production elements are in place), are often closed off because people sitting there cannot properly see the stage.
Local reporting from the October 12, 2026, Trump midterm rally confirms this in practice:
Roughly a quarter of the seats were tarped off (intentionally closed).
Of the seats that remained available, only about two-thirds filled up.
The venue was described as roughly half full earlier in the evening, with several sections remaining empty through the event despite energy in the occupied areas.
The photos match this layout. One image shows a large American flag hanging over a big empty section, which is consistent with covering or de-emphasizing a poor-view area (often behind or beside the stage). Other empty seats align with areas critics noted as being behind press risers or otherwise obstructed. Emily Davies (the original poster) later acknowledged tarps over certain sections and also shared views of fuller areas.
In short: Stage placement and production setup explain why some sections were closed or left empty by design, those seats simply aren't practical for an end-stage rally. At the same time, the remaining available seats were not fully occupied, which local coverage characterized as relatively sluggish attendance overall.

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/127293/replies/2759377

Then after all this work, you claim that you weren't "invested",.. yeah right.

All amazing, lol

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE TALARICO
"I Abide by Old and New Rules, and I Never Personally Attack. Gambling is illegal at Bushwood, sir, and I never slice."
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I would agree.
MAGA has never been a "coherent political force"

This article from one year ago highlights (1) internal divisions (2) weakness of Latino vote (3) the economy.






This is How MAGA Falls | Newgeography.com
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

Woman beaten up at a Trump rally, MTG chimes in.



" Late stage MAGA is so disgusting and unrecognizable to me, and I find this shocking as one who attended more Trump rallies than I can count.
A woman with a "Release The Epstein Files" shirt stands at a Trump rally shouting at Trump to release the Epstein files and gets physically beaten by the MAGA men around her, who probably call themselves Christians.
Then our obese President makes fun of her calling her "fat" and "him" claiming she's a paid protestor.
She got thrown out and the men who attacked her got to stay.
MAGA rallies used to be filled with people who agreed with releasing the Epstein files, defended women, and would step in if a woman was attacked.
Now the dying remnant of MAGA is made up of people who emulate their cult leader.
Attacking women, making fun of their looks, and turning on the victims of the elites.
It's a cult, an ugly grotesque cult that does not display Christian values because the cult leader himself is not a Christian even though the vast majority who attend his rallies would identify as Christian.
Know them by their fruit.
The fruit is rotten.
Because the cult leader himself is a wolf in sheep's clothing who has led the flock astray."




MTG's words ring hollow. Trump has directed misogyny towards women who get out of line the entire time she supported him. People who supported Trump through 3 elections have no basis to be considered for good judgment now.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

Woman beaten up at a Trump rally, MTG chimes in.



" Late stage MAGA is so disgusting and unrecognizable to me, and I find this shocking as one who attended more Trump rallies than I can count.
A woman with a "Release The Epstein Files" shirt stands at a Trump rally shouting at Trump to release the Epstein files and gets physically beaten by the MAGA men around her, who probably call themselves Christians.
Then our obese President makes fun of her calling her "fat" and "him" claiming she's a paid protestor.
She got thrown out and the men who attacked her got to stay.
MAGA rallies used to be filled with people who agreed with releasing the Epstein files, defended women, and would step in if a woman was attacked.
Now the dying remnant of MAGA is made up of people who emulate their cult leader.
Attacking women, making fun of their looks, and turning on the victims of the elites.
It's a cult, an ugly grotesque cult that does not display Christian values because the cult leader himself is not a Christian even though the vast majority who attend his rallies would identify as Christian.
Know them by their fruit.
The fruit is rotten.
Because the cult leader himself is a wolf in sheep's clothing who has led the flock astray."




MTG's words ring hollow. Trump has directed misogyny towards women who get out of line the entire time she supported him. People who supported Trump through 3 elections have no basis to be considered for good judgment now.


For what it's worth, Trump thought it was a dude in this situation.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

Woman beaten up at a Trump rally, MTG chimes in.



" Late stage MAGA is so disgusting and unrecognizable to me, and I find this shocking as one who attended more Trump rallies than I can count.
A woman with a "Release The Epstein Files" shirt stands at a Trump rally shouting at Trump to release the Epstein files and gets physically beaten by the MAGA men around her, who probably call themselves Christians.
Then our obese President makes fun of her calling her "fat" and "him" claiming she's a paid protestor.
She got thrown out and the men who attacked her got to stay.
MAGA rallies used to be filled with people who agreed with releasing the Epstein files, defended women, and would step in if a woman was attacked.
Now the dying remnant of MAGA is made up of people who emulate their cult leader.
Attacking women, making fun of their looks, and turning on the victims of the elites.
It's a cult, an ugly grotesque cult that does not display Christian values because the cult leader himself is not a Christian even though the vast majority who attend his rallies would identify as Christian.
Know them by their fruit.
The fruit is rotten.
Because the cult leader himself is a wolf in sheep's clothing who has led the flock astray."




MTG's words ring hollow. Trump has directed misogyny towards women who get out of line the entire time she supported him. People who supported Trump through 3 elections have no basis to be considered for good judgment now.


For what it's worth, Trump thought it was a dude in this situation.


For what it's worth, Dajo is talking about MTG.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.