BearlySane88 said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

oski003 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

I also think this is a big mistake by the right wing, going after Indians. That's a pretty wealthy and successful and visible group of immigrants right there; the public isn't going to buy those negative claims like they might for Somalis.

---

How does this guy represent the right wing? I have never heard of him. Is he an elected official?

---

No one person represents the entire right wing, but you must have a pretty curated Twitter bubble if you haven't seen the unabashed anti-Indian sentiment rising among right-wing MAGA types.

This man is the Republican nominee for Railroad Commissioner in Texas, a statewide office that handles regulation of oil and gas and other fuels.

---

I haven't seen the unabashed anti-Indian sentiment rising among right-wing MAGA types. Hopefully, he doesn't get elected.

---

Me neither nor have I heard of this guy. Hopefully he doesn't win.

For context though, French's 663,679 votes would probably represent only roughly 79% of Texas's Republican/Republican-leaning registered voters. Not exactly fair to categorize this as an entire right wing issue.

---

So what percentage would represent the right wing? 85%? 90%? 95%?

---

7-9% is an incredibly small number to say it represents the whole population.

---

You typed 79%, not 7-9%. If it's truly 7%-9%, then I'd agree with you.

---

he got 51 percent of the gop voters, so I'm not so sure what the 7 percent signifies

---

7-9% of right leaning registered voters, as stated earlier.

---

lots of registered voters didn't vote. The ones that did you think would reflect the will of ALL of the people at the same run rate . So more than 50 percent of voters and registered non voters.

BearlySane88 said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

oski003 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

I also think this is a big mistake by the right wing, going after Indians. That's a pretty wealthy and successful and visible group of immigrants right there; the public isn't going to buy those negative claims like they might for Somalis.

---

How does this guy represent the right wing? I have never heard of him. Is he an elected official?

---

No one person represents the entire right wing, but you must have a pretty curated Twitter bubble if you haven't seen the unabashed anti-Indian sentiment rising among right-wing MAGA types.

This man is the Republican nominee for Railroad Commissioner in Texas, a statewide office that handles regulation of oil and gas and other fuels.

---

I haven't seen the unabashed anti-Indian sentiment rising among right-wing MAGA types. Hopefully, he doesn't get elected.

---

Me neither nor have I heard of this guy. Hopefully he doesn't win.

For context though, French's 663,679 votes would probably represent only roughly 79% of Texas's Republican/Republican-leaning registered voters. Not exactly fair to categorize this as an entire right wing issue.

---

So what percentage would represent the right wing? 85%? 90%? 95%?

---

7-9% is an incredibly small number to say it represents the whole population.

---

You typed 79%, not 7-9%. If it's truly 7%-9%, then I'd agree with you.

---

he got 51 percent of the gop voters, so I'm not so sure what the 7 percent signifies

---

7-9% of right leaning registered voters, as stated earlier.

---

For what it's worth, in the Republican primary, Ken Paxton got 886,000 votes or 64% of the vote. French's 663,000 votes would be about 3/4 of that or 48% of the Republican voters. That's quite a bit higher than 7-9%. You can probably wiggle the numbers somewhat, but I can't see how you can fudge away 40% even if you decide every single Republican that didn't vote thinks like you want them to.

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

oski003 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

I also think this is a big mistake by the right wing, going after Indians. That's a pretty wealthy and successful and visible group of immigrants right there; the public isn't going to buy those negative claims like they might for Somalis.

---

How does this guy represent the right wing? I have never heard of him. Is he an elected official?

---

No one person represents the entire right wing, but you must have a pretty curated Twitter bubble if you haven't seen the unabashed anti-Indian sentiment rising among right-wing MAGA types.

This man is the Republican nominee for Railroad Commissioner in Texas, a statewide office that handles regulation of oil and gas and other fuels.

---

I haven't seen the unabashed anti-Indian sentiment rising among right-wing MAGA types. Hopefully, he doesn't get elected.

---

Me neither nor have I heard of this guy. Hopefully he doesn't win.

For context though, French's 663,679 votes would probably represent only roughly 79% of Texas's Republican/Republican-leaning registered voters. Not exactly fair to categorize this as an entire right wing issue.

---

So what percentage would represent the right wing? 85%? 90%? 95%?

---

7-9% is an incredibly small number to say it represents the whole population.

---

You typed 79%, not 7-9%. If it's truly 7%-9%, then I'd agree with you.

---

he got 51 percent of the gop voters, so I'm not so sure what the 7 percent signifies

---

7-9% of right leaning registered voters, as stated earlier.

---

For what it's worth, in the Republican primary, Ken Paxton got 886,000 votes or 64% of the vote. French's 663,000 votes would be about 3/4 of that or 48% of the Republican voters. That's quite a bit higher than 7-9%. You can probably wiggle the numbers somewhat, but I can't see how you can fudge away 40% even if you decide every single Republican that didn't vote thinks like you want them to.

---

which is an absurd assumption he won the primary with 51pwrcent of the vote. It's most likely that it's likely that 51 percent of the non voters would vote the same.
So 644k + ( x*51%) / (all gop registered voters)

Where x. = registered voters not voting

Way the hell more than 7-9%

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

oski003 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

I also think this is a big mistake by the right wing, going after Indians. That's a pretty wealthy and successful and visible group of immigrants right there; the public isn't going to buy those negative claims like they might for Somalis.

---

How does this guy represent the right wing? I have never heard of him. Is he an elected official?

---

No one person represents the entire right wing, but you must have a pretty curated Twitter bubble if you haven't seen the unabashed anti-Indian sentiment rising among right-wing MAGA types.

This man is the Republican nominee for Railroad Commissioner in Texas, a statewide office that handles regulation of oil and gas and other fuels.

---

I haven't seen the unabashed anti-Indian sentiment rising among right-wing MAGA types. Hopefully, he doesn't get elected.

---

Me neither nor have I heard of this guy. Hopefully he doesn't win.

For context though, French's 663,679 votes would probably represent only roughly 79% of Texas's Republican/Republican-leaning registered voters. Not exactly fair to categorize this as an entire right wing issue.

---

So what percentage would represent the right wing? 85%? 90%? 95%?

---

7-9% is an incredibly small number to say it represents the whole population.

---

You typed 79%, not 7-9%. If it's truly 7%-9%, then I'd agree with you.

---

he got 51 percent of the gop voters, so I'm not so sure what the 7 percent signifies

---

7-9% of right leaning registered voters, as stated earlier.

---

For what it's worth, in the Republican primary, Ken Paxton got 886,000 votes or 64% of the vote. French's 663,000 votes would be about 3/4 of that or 48% of the Republican voters. That's quite a bit higher than 7-9%. You can probably wiggle the numbers somewhat, but I can't see how you can fudge away 40% even if you decide every single Republican that didn't vote thinks like you want them to.

---

Not 7-9% of the republican vote, 7-9% of the registered/lean republican vote. Yall really need to read better.

Show me your math. I showed you mine.

cal83dls79 said:

---

Show me your math. I showed you mine.

---

You didn't show me your math, you showed numbers.

It's really simple. 18 million ish registered voters in Texas. Let's say half, which is an undersell, of them are right leaning. 9 million right leaning voters. Just under 700,000 voted for French.

700,000 divided by 9,000,000 = 0.077777777

7.77%

BearlySane88 said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Show me your math. I showed you mine.

---

You didn't show me your math, you showed numbers.

It's really simple. 18 million ish registered voters in Texas. Let's say half, which is an undersell, of them are right leaning. 9 million right leaning voters. Just under 700,000 voted for French.

700,000 divided by 9,000,000 = 0.077777777

7.77%

---

It's quite the assumption that none of the 7.5 million non voters would have voted for French.

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Show me your math. I showed you mine.

---

You didn't show me your math, you showed numbers.

It's really simple. 18 million ish registered voters in Texas. Let's say half, which is an undersell, of them are right leaning. 9 million right leaning voters. Just under 700,000 voted for French.

700,000 divided by 9,000,000 = 0.077777777

7.77%

---

It's quite the assumption that none of the 7.5 million non voters would have voted for French.

---

It not an assumption. They were registered to vote and didn't vote for him. It's a fact.

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Show me your math. I showed you mine.

---

You didn't show me your math, you showed numbers.

It's really simple. 18 million ish registered voters in Texas. Let's say half, which is an undersell, of them are right leaning. 9 million right leaning voters. Just under 700,000 voted for French.

700,000 divided by 9,000,000 = 0.077777777

7.77%

---

It's quite the assumption that none of the 7.5 million non voters would have voted for French.

---

This was rhe quote:

"For context though, French's 663,679 votes would probably represent only roughly 79% of Texas's Republican/Republican-leaning registered voters. Not exactly fair to categorize this as an entire right wing issue."

The question was what percentage of the gop was far right like this guy. You forgot the folks that didn't vote that support him in your numerator. Furthermore your new denominator is ALL voters not just GOP registered voters. That's your math.

cal83dls79 said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Show me your math. I showed you mine.

---

You didn't show me your math, you showed numbers.

It's really simple. 18 million ish registered voters in Texas. Let's say half, which is an undersell, of them are right leaning. 9 million right leaning voters. Just under 700,000 voted for French.

700,000 divided by 9,000,000 = 0.077777777

7.77%

---

It's quite the assumption that none of the 7.5 million non voters would have voted for French.

---

This was rhe quote:

"For context though, French's 663,679 votes would probably represent only roughly 79% of Texas's Republican/Republican-leaning registered voters. Not exactly fair to categorize this as an entire right wing issue."

The question was what percentage of the gop was far right like this guy. You forgot the folks that didn't vote that support him in your numerator. Furthermore your new denominator is ALL voters not just GOP registered voters. That's your math.

---

I'm not gonna argue back and forth with you anymore on this, I made my claim and showed the numbers I used that got me exactly to my claim.

BearlySane88 said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Show me your math. I showed you mine.

---

You didn't show me your math, you showed numbers.

It's really simple. 18 million ish registered voters in Texas. Let's say half, which is an undersell, of them are right leaning. 9 million right leaning voters. Just under 700,000 voted for French.

700,000 divided by 9,000,000 = 0.077777777

7.77%

---

It's quite the assumption that none of the 7.5 million non voters would have voted for French.

---

This was rhe quote:

"For context though, French's 663,679 votes would probably represent only roughly 79% of Texas's Republican/Republican-leaning registered voters. Not exactly fair to categorize this as an entire right wing issue."

The question was what percentage of the gop was far right like this guy. You forgot the folks that didn't vote that support him in your numerator. Furthermore your new denominator is ALL voters not just GOP registered voters. That's your math.

---

I'm not gonna argue back and forth with you anymore on this, I made my claim and showed the numbers I used that got me exactly to my claim.

---

I believe your denominator is questionable

cal83dls79 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Show me your math. I showed you mine.

---

You didn't show me your math, you showed numbers.

It's really simple. 18 million ish registered voters in Texas. Let's say half, which is an undersell, of them are right leaning. 9 million right leaning voters. Just under 700,000 voted for French.

700,000 divided by 9,000,000 = 0.077777777

7.77%

---

It's quite the assumption that none of the 7.5 million non voters would have voted for French.

---

This was rhe quote:

"For context though, French's 663,679 votes would probably represent only roughly 79% of Texas's Republican/Republican-leaning registered voters. Not exactly fair to categorize this as an entire right wing issue."

The question was what percentage of the gop was far right like this guy. You forgot the folks that didn't vote that support him in your numerator. Furthermore your new denominator is ALL voters not just GOP registered voters. That's your math.

---

I'm not gonna argue back and forth with you anymore on this, I made my claim and showed the numbers I used that got me exactly to my claim.

---

wow. What a baby. Learn math buddy, Nobody can explain what that percentage is that you calculated but whatever. They weren't kidding when that teacher complained about cal kids math skills.

---

Thank you for making it abundantly clear why I don't want to go back and forth with you.

Trump might be coming out as pro-French?

The Bo French drama (seemingly) reaches the White House: After @TexasTribune reported that Rove wouldn’t vote for French, Trump rants that Rove “is so bad for the Republican Party” and “a stone cold loser” pic.twitter.com/GNiV0rQA7x

— Bayliss Wagner (@baylisswagner) September 14, 2026

sycasey said:

---

Trump might be coming out as pro-French?

The Bo French drama (seemingly) reaches the White House: After @TexasTribune reported that Rove wouldn’t vote for French, Trump rants that Rove “is so bad for the Republican Party” and “a stone cold loser” pic.twitter.com/GNiV0rQA7x

— Bayliss Wagner (@baylisswagner) September 14, 2026

---

Racism is at Trump's core

cal83dls79 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Show me your math. I showed you mine.

---

You didn't show me your math, you showed numbers.

It's really simple. 18 million ish registered voters in Texas. Let's say half, which is an undersell, of them are right leaning. 9 million right leaning voters. Just under 700,000 voted for French.

700,000 divided by 9,000,000 = 0.077777777

7.77%

---

It's quite the assumption that none of the 7.5 million non voters would have voted for French.

---

This was rhe quote:

"For context though, French's 663,679 votes would probably represent only roughly 79% of Texas's Republican/Republican-leaning registered voters. Not exactly fair to categorize this as an entire right wing issue."

The question was what percentage of the gop was far right like this guy. You forgot the folks that didn't vote that support him in your numerator. Furthermore your new denominator is ALL voters not just GOP registered voters. That's your math.

---

I'm not gonna argue back and forth with you anymore on this, I made my claim and showed the numbers I used that got me exactly to my claim.

---

wow. What a baby. Learn math buddy, Nobody can explain what that percentage is that you calculated but whatever. They weren't kidding when that teacher complained about cal kids math skills.

---

Thank you for making it abundantly clear why I don't want to go back and forth with you.

---

---

Do you feel better now? You're just reinforcing my decision to not engage with the back and forth.

Seems like the Fort Worth Young Republicans are also doubling down on support.

The weepy moralizing is disgusting. Why doesn’t your heart break for the Heritage Texans who were locked out of opportunity at our state flagship?

Every spot that goes to an immigrant is a spot taken away from Texans whose families made UT a world class university. https://t.co/k3hdnLTlUy

— Fort Worth Young Republicans (@FortWorthYR) September 13, 2026

DiabloWags said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Show me your math. I showed you mine.

---

You didn't show me your math, you showed numbers.

It's really simple. 18 million ish registered voters in Texas. Let's say half, which is an undersell, of them are right leaning. 9 million right leaning voters. Just under 700,000 voted for French.

700,000 divided by 9,000,000 = 0.077777777

7.77%

---

It's quite the assumption that none of the 7.5 million non voters would have voted for French.

---

This was rhe quote:

"For context though, French's 663,679 votes would probably represent only roughly 79% of Texas's Republican/Republican-leaning registered voters. Not exactly fair to categorize this as an entire right wing issue."

The question was what percentage of the gop was far right like this guy. You forgot the folks that didn't vote that support him in your numerator. Furthermore your new denominator is ALL voters not just GOP registered voters. That's your math.

---

I'm not gonna argue back and forth with you anymore on this, I made my claim and showed the numbers I used that got me exactly to my claim.

---

I believe your denominator is questionable

---

Fractions are hard.

dajo9 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Trump might be coming out as pro-French?

---

Racism is at Trump's core

---

Why? Just because he agrees with you that Kamala is a useful idiot?

DiabloWags said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Thinks only 7percent of Texan republicans are hard liners that think like this guy is a good one and based on some absurd calculation that makes no sense at all. Ok.

This guy Bo really own his racism and get it out there so we can see who he really is. Trump would never take back a racist statement like this, why should he? lol.

---

I didn't understand his calculation either.
It appeared highly flawed to me.

In my opinion, there was no good faith interest in discussing how he arrived at his calculation and what assumptions were made that went into that calculation.

Sad, for those of us here who are interested in engaging in a good faith discussion.

---

He explained his calculation in a post. It was very clear.

Sad that some of you can't do simple division and claim to have gone to Cal.

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Show me your math. I showed you mine.

---

You didn't show me your math, you showed numbers.

It's really simple. 18 million ish registered voters in Texas. Let's say half, which is an undersell, of them are right leaning. 9 million right leaning voters. Just under 700,000 voted for French.

700,000 divided by 9,000,000 = 0.077777777

7.77%

---

It's quite the assumption that none of the 7.5 million non voters would have voted for French.

---

This was rhe quote:

"For context though, French's 663,679 votes would probably represent only roughly 79% of Texas's Republican/Republican-leaning registered voters. Not exactly fair to categorize this as an entire right wing issue."

The question was what percentage of the gop was far right like this guy. You forgot the folks that didn't vote that support him in your numerator. Furthermore your new denominator is ALL voters not just GOP registered voters. That's your math.

---

I'm not gonna argue back and forth with you anymore on this, I made my claim and showed the numbers I used that got me exactly to my claim.

---

I believe your denominator is questionable

---

Fractions are hard.

---

Fractions are super easy and actually make math way easier. Anyone unable to understand fractions really shouldn't be judging anyone else's math.

ChudBear said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Show me your math. I showed you mine.

---

You didn't show me your math, you showed numbers.

It's really simple. 18 million ish registered voters in Texas. Let's say half, which is an undersell, of them are right leaning. 9 million right leaning voters. Just under 700,000 voted for French.

700,000 divided by 9,000,000 = 0.077777777

7.77%

---

It's quite the assumption that none of the 7.5 million non voters would have voted for French.

---

This was rhe quote:

"For context though, French's 663,679 votes would probably represent only roughly 79% of Texas's Republican/Republican-leaning registered voters. Not exactly fair to categorize this as an entire right wing issue."

The question was what percentage of the gop was far right like this guy. You forgot the folks that didn't vote that support him in your numerator. Furthermore your new denominator is ALL voters not just GOP registered voters. That's your math.

---

I'm not gonna argue back and forth with you anymore on this, I made my claim and showed the numbers I used that got me exactly to my claim.

---

I believe your denominator is questionable

---

Fractions are hard.

---

Fractions are super easy and actually make math way easier. Anyone unable to understand fractions really shouldn't be judging anyone else's math.

---

Whoosh!

EOB watches the sarcasm sail over ChudBear's head.

FWIW, I took so many math courses in my field of study that I could have minored in Mathematics if I'd been willing to take 1 or 2 more courses.

sycasey said:

---

Seems like the Fort Worth Young Republicans are also doubling down on support.

The weepy moralizing is disgusting. Why doesn’t your heart break for the Heritage Texans who were locked out of opportunity at our state flagship?

Every spot that goes to an immigrant is a spot taken away from Texans whose families made UT a world class university. https://t.co/k3hdnLTlUy

— Fort Worth Young Republicans (@FortWorthYR) September 13, 2026

---

It's crazy to me that 45% of non Black poc voted for that

ChudBear said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Thinks only 7percent of Texan republicans are hard liners that think like this guy is a good one and based on some absurd calculation that makes no sense at all. Ok.

This guy Bo really own his racism and get it out there so we can see who he really is. Trump would never take back a racist statement like this, why should he? lol.

---

I didn't understand his calculation either.
It appeared highly flawed to me.

In my opinion, there was no good faith interest in discussing how he arrived at his calculation and what assumptions were made that went into that calculation.

Sad, for those of us here who are interested in engaging in a good faith discussion.

---

He explained his calculation in a post. It was very clear.

Sad that some of you can't do simple division and claim to have gone to Cal.

---

I understand the math. It's the application that is bad.

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

ChudBear said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Show me your math. I showed you mine.

---

You didn't show me your math, you showed numbers.

It's really simple. 18 million ish registered voters in Texas. Let's say half, which is an undersell, of them are right leaning. 9 million right leaning voters. Just under 700,000 voted for French.

700,000 divided by 9,000,000 = 0.077777777

7.77%

---

It's quite the assumption that none of the 7.5 million non voters would have voted for French.

---

This was rhe quote:

"For context though, French's 663,679 votes would probably represent only roughly 79% of Texas's Republican/Republican-leaning registered voters. Not exactly fair to categorize this as an entire right wing issue."

The question was what percentage of the gop was far right like this guy. You forgot the folks that didn't vote that support him in your numerator. Furthermore your new denominator is ALL voters not just GOP registered voters. That's your math.

---

I'm not gonna argue back and forth with you anymore on this, I made my claim and showed the numbers I used that got me exactly to my claim.

---

I believe your denominator is questionable

---

Fractions are hard.

---

Fractions are super easy and actually make math way easier. Anyone unable to understand fractions really shouldn't be judging anyone else's math.

---

Whoosh!

EOB watches the sarcasm sail over ChudBear's head.

FWIW, I took so many math courses in my field of study that I could have minored in Mathematics if I'd been willing to take 1 or 2 more courses.

---

Whoosh!

ChudBear watches the sarcasm sail over EOB's head.

dajo9 said:

---

ChudBear said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Thinks only 7percent of Texan republicans are hard liners that think like this guy is a good one and based on some absurd calculation that makes no sense at all. Ok.

This guy Bo really own his racism and get it out there so we can see who he really is. Trump would never take back a racist statement like this, why should he? lol.

---

I didn't understand his calculation either.
It appeared highly flawed to me.

In my opinion, there was no good faith interest in discussing how he arrived at his calculation and what assumptions were made that went into that calculation.

Sad, for those of us here who are interested in engaging in a good faith discussion.

---

He explained his calculation in a post. It was very clear.

Sad that some of you can't do simple division and claim to have gone to Cal.

---

I understand the math. It's the application that is bad.

---

Nah, he explained his numbers. Don't hate on the math because it doesn't fit your narrative

ChudBear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

ChudBear said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Thinks only 7percent of Texan republicans are hard liners that think like this guy is a good one and based on some absurd calculation that makes no sense at all. Ok.

This guy Bo really own his racism and get it out there so we can see who he really is. Trump would never take back a racist statement like this, why should he? lol.

---

I didn't understand his calculation either.
It appeared highly flawed to me.

In my opinion, there was no good faith interest in discussing how he arrived at his calculation and what assumptions were made that went into that calculation.

Sad, for those of us here who are interested in engaging in a good faith discussion.

---

He explained his calculation in a post. It was very clear.

Sad that some of you can't do simple division and claim to have gone to Cal.

---

I understand the math. It's the application that is bad.

---

Nah, he explained his numbers. Don't hate on the math because it doesn't fit your narrative

---

Has nothing to do with narrative.
His denominator was clearly wrong.

cal83dls79 said:

---

ChudBear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

ChudBear said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Thinks only 7percent of Texan republicans are hard liners that think like this guy is a good one and based on some absurd calculation that makes no sense at all. Ok.

This guy Bo really own his racism and get it out there so we can see who he really is. Trump would never take back a racist statement like this, why should he? lol.

---

I didn't understand his calculation either.
It appeared highly flawed to me.

In my opinion, there was no good faith interest in discussing how he arrived at his calculation and what assumptions were made that went into that calculation.

Sad, for those of us here who are interested in engaging in a good faith discussion.

---

He explained his calculation in a post. It was very clear.

Sad that some of you can't do simple division and claim to have gone to Cal.

---

I understand the math. It's the application that is bad.

---

Nah, he explained his numbers. Don't hate on the math because it doesn't fit your narrative

---

Explain in English what the 7.9% is? Can you please do that at least? Or do you have to have someone explain it to you. It's the number of Bo's Votes Divided by the Total Number of registered voters in Texas?

---

You didn't read very well. It's Bo's votes divided by the total number of right/registered Republicans in Texas. 9 million is not the entire voting population of Texas. Don't act like this and then be wrong.

ChudBear said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

ChudBear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

ChudBear said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Thinks only 7percent of Texan republicans are hard liners that think like this guy is a good one and based on some absurd calculation that makes no sense at all. Ok.

This guy Bo really own his racism and get it out there so we can see who he really is. Trump would never take back a racist statement like this, why should he? lol.

---

I didn't understand his calculation either.
It appeared highly flawed to me.

In my opinion, there was no good faith interest in discussing how he arrived at his calculation and what assumptions were made that went into that calculation.

Sad, for those of us here who are interested in engaging in a good faith discussion.

---

He explained his calculation in a post. It was very clear.

Sad that some of you can't do simple division and claim to have gone to Cal.

---

I understand the math. It's the application that is bad.

---

Nah, he explained his numbers. Don't hate on the math because it doesn't fit your narrative

---

Explain in English what the 7.9% is? Can you please do that at least? Or do you have to have someone explain it to you. It's the number of Bo's Votes Divided by the Total Number of registered voters in Texas?

---

You didn't read very well. It's Bo's votes divided by the total number of right/registered Republicans in Texas. 9 million is not the entire voting population of Texas. Don't act like this and then be wrong.

---

"For context though, French's 663,679 votes would probably represent only roughly 79% of Texas's Republican/Republican-leaning registered voters. Not exactly fair to categorize this as an entire right wing issue."

cal83dls79 said:

---

ChudBear said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

ChudBear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

ChudBear said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Thinks only 7percent of Texan republicans are hard liners that think like this guy is a good one and based on some absurd calculation that makes no sense at all. Ok.

This guy Bo really own his racism and get it out there so we can see who he really is. Trump would never take back a racist statement like this, why should he? lol.

---

I didn't understand his calculation either.
It appeared highly flawed to me.

In my opinion, there was no good faith interest in discussing how he arrived at his calculation and what assumptions were made that went into that calculation.

Sad, for those of us here who are interested in engaging in a good faith discussion.

---

He explained his calculation in a post. It was very clear.

Sad that some of you can't do simple division and claim to have gone to Cal.

---

I understand the math. It's the application that is bad.

---

Nah, he explained his numbers. Don't hate on the math because it doesn't fit your narrative

---

Explain in English what the 7.9% is? Can you please do that at least? Or do you have to have someone explain it to you. It's the number of Bo's Votes Divided by the Total Number of registered voters in Texas?

---

You didn't read very well. It's Bo's votes divided by the total number of right/registered Republicans in Texas. 9 million is not the entire voting population of Texas. Don't act like this and then be wrong.

---

"For context though, French's 663,679 votes would probably represent only roughly 79% of Texas's Republican/Republican-leaning registered voters. Not exactly fair to categorize this as an entire right wing issue."

---

Why are you showing me what I already said and what confirms exactly what I said? Bo's votes represent 7%-9% of right leaning vote. The percentage would be half of that if it was being divided by total registered voters in Texas

Are you having a hard time with comprehension?

18 mil voters in Texas
9 mil right or right leaning
700,000 Bo voters/9,000,000 right/right leaning registered voters=7%ish

Argue against the way he's using his numbers, sure, but the math speaks for itself. Really don't know why you're arguing that.

ChudBear said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

ChudBear said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

ChudBear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

ChudBear said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Thinks only 7percent of Texan republicans are hard liners that think like this guy is a good one and based on some absurd calculation that makes no sense at all. Ok.

This guy Bo really own his racism and get it out there so we can see who he really is. Trump would never take back a racist statement like this, why should he? lol.

---

I didn't understand his calculation either.
It appeared highly flawed to me.

In my opinion, there was no good faith interest in discussing how he arrived at his calculation and what assumptions were made that went into that calculation.

Sad, for those of us here who are interested in engaging in a good faith discussion.

---

He explained his calculation in a post. It was very clear.

Sad that some of you can't do simple division and claim to have gone to Cal.

---

I understand the math. It's the application that is bad.

---

Nah, he explained his numbers. Don't hate on the math because it doesn't fit your narrative

---

Explain in English what the 7.9% is? Can you please do that at least? Or do you have to have someone explain it to you. It's the number of Bo's Votes Divided by the Total Number of registered voters in Texas?

---

You didn't read very well. It's Bo's votes divided by the total number of right/registered Republicans in Texas. 9 million is not the entire voting population of Texas. Don't act like this and then be wrong.

---

"For context though, French's 663,679 votes would probably represent only roughly 79% of Texas's Republican/Republican-leaning registered voters. Not exactly fair to categorize this as an entire right wing issue."

---

Why are you showing me what I already said and what confirms exactly what I said? Bo's votes represent 7%-9% of right leaning vote. The percentage would be half of that if it was being divided by total registered voters in Texas

Are you having a hard time with comprehension?

18 mil voters in Texas
9 mil right or right leaning
700,000 Bo voters/9,000,000 right/right leaning registered voters=7%ish

Argue against the way he's using his numbers, sure, but the math speaks for itself. Really don't know why you're arguing that.

---

its a meaningless number because you can't explain what it means. Pretend like you have to tell your boss what this 8% means to him/her. Or is it just a number of some random calculation?

cal83dls79 said:

---

ChudBear said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

ChudBear said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

ChudBear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

ChudBear said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

cal83dls79 said:

---

Thinks only 7percent of Texan republicans are hard liners that think like this guy is a good one and based on some absurd calculation that makes no sense at all. Ok.

This guy Bo really own his racism and get it out there so we can see who he really is. Trump would never take back a racist statement like this, why should he? lol.

---

I didn't understand his calculation either.
It appeared highly flawed to me.

In my opinion, there was no good faith interest in discussing how he arrived at his calculation and what assumptions were made that went into that calculation.

Sad, for those of us here who are interested in engaging in a good faith discussion.

---

He explained his calculation in a post. It was very clear.

Sad that some of you can't do simple division and claim to have gone to Cal.

---

I understand the math. It's the application that is bad.

---

Nah, he explained his numbers. Don't hate on the math because it doesn't fit your narrative

---

Explain in English what the 7.9% is? Can you please do that at least? Or do you have to have someone explain it to you. It's the number of Bo's Votes Divided by the Total Number of registered voters in Texas?

---

You didn't read very well. It's Bo's votes divided by the total number of right/registered Republicans in Texas. 9 million is not the entire voting population of Texas. Don't act like this and then be wrong.

---

"For context though, French's 663,679 votes would probably represent only roughly 79% of Texas's Republican/Republican-leaning registered voters. Not exactly fair to categorize this as an entire right wing issue."

---

Why are you showing me what I already said and what confirms exactly what I said? Bo's votes represent 7%-9% of right leaning vote. The percentage would be half of that if it was being divided by total registered voters in Texas

Are you having a hard time with comprehension?

18 mil voters in Texas
9 mil right or right leaning
700,000 Bo voters/9,000,000 right/right leaning registered voters=7%ish

Argue against the way he's using his numbers, sure, but the math speaks for itself. Really don't know why you're arguing that.

---

its a meaningless number because you can't explain what it means. Pretend like you have to tell your boss what this 8% means to him/her. Or is it just a number of some random calculation?

---

This is the last time I'll respond to you on this. The number represents the total percentage of right leaning voters in Texas who voted for French. If he was more popular among the right leaning voters in Texas, more would have gotten out and voted for him. I'm done watching you twist into a pretzel over this rudimentary math.

Primaries are always low turnout no matter who is on the ballot, so I'm not sure what this back-and-forth about the exact number of votes accomplishes. French got enough of the vote from Republicans who bothered to turn out. We'll see if he wins the general despite these racist comments.

sycasey said:

---

Primaries are always low turnout no matter who is on the ballot, so I'm not sure what this back-and-forth about the exact number of votes accomplishes. French got enough of the vote from Republicans who bothered to turn out. We'll see if he wins the general despite these racist comments.

---

Plenty of people have won races after making racist comments, on both sides.

BearlySane88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Primaries are always low turnout no matter who is on the ballot, so I'm not sure what this back-and-forth about the exact number of votes accomplishes. French got enough of the vote from Republicans who bothered to turn out. We'll see if he wins the general despite these racist comments.

---

Plenty of people have won races after making racist comments, on both sides.

---

This guy seems a lot more direct about it, though. I mean, unless you're going back to the 60s or something.

sycasey said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Primaries are always low turnout no matter who is on the ballot, so I'm not sure what this back-and-forth about the exact number of votes accomplishes. French got enough of the vote from Republicans who bothered to turn out. We'll see if he wins the general despite these racist comments.

---

Plenty of people have won races after making racist comments, on both sides.

---

This guy seems a lot more direct about it, though. I mean, unless you're going back to the 60s or something.

---

Maybe true, I don't know anything about this guy and hadn't even heard of him until this situation arose. I was thinking much more recently than the 60s