GBear4Life said:

---

CP5 were guilty of violent felonies. The accusations of coercion and abuse in detainment and interrogation were proven propaganda (the netflix film was pure trash fiction -- it contradicts the record). But I know, they were just sweet kids looking to catch a game of chess at the park and were wrong place wrong time. The ideological Left are hopeless in matters of crime and

By their own admission they engaged in multiple assaults that night. All 5 members of the Central Park 5 admitted participating violent attacks that night. They were implicated by other suspects.Santana, McCray, and Richardson admitted their participation in assaults at their parole hearings. I believe it was Santana who declared they went to the park for the purpose of jumping innocent civilians. Salaam's lawyer argued his client couldn't have raped the jogger because he was beating somebody else up nearby at the time.

The media weren't interested in the facts of that night, only salivating at the idea that 5 violent menaces many enhance their careers, affirm their deluded world view, and provide virtue signaling opportunities. How were they going to explain away the facts and the boy's multiple confessions accompanied by their parents? CLAIM POLICE MISCONDUCT. They don't have to worry if that's true, the morons that eat this garbage up with a spoon will love it.

Santana: ""I had nothing to do with the rape. All I did was feel the woman's t*ts."

Wise per witness: "You heard about that woman that was beat up and raped in the park last night? That was us!"

Wise's friend: "he only held her legs down while Kevin (Richardson) f---ed her."

These kids were perpetrators of battery, assault, and at minimum accomplices and enablers of rape
Those degenerates were where they belong. They may have $41M, but they will get theirs.

These people watched the WM3 HBO docs and were like "INNOCENT"! All they had to do was to look at the case files for like 10 minutes. Let me guess, Michael Peterson from The Staircase and the inbred on Making a Murderer are innocent too? Poor babies, victimized by the Bad Policemen!

Can we save the virtue signaling for actual victims who did NOT commit violent crimes? Don't blame LE because some dumb violent kids told some lies in the course of saving their own a**.

---

Professor David Romer said:

---

GBear4Life said:

---

CP5 were guilty of violent felonies. The accusations of coercion and abuse in detainment and interrogation were proven propaganda (the netflix film was pure trash fiction -- it contradicts the record). But I know, they were just sweet kids looking to catch a game of chess at the park and were wrong place wrong time. The ideological Left are hopeless in matters of crime and

By their own admission they engaged in multiple assaults that night. All 5 members of the Central Park 5 admitted participating violent attacks that night. They were implicated by other suspects.Santana, McCray, and Richardson admitted their participation in assaults at their parole hearings. I believe it was Santana who declared they went to the park for the purpose of jumping innocent civilians. Salaam's lawyer argued his client couldn't have raped the jogger because he was beating somebody else up nearby at the time.

The media weren't interested in the facts of that night, only salivating at the idea that 5 violent menaces many enhance their careers, affirm their deluded world view, and provide virtue signaling opportunities. How were they going to explain away the facts and the boy's multiple confessions accompanied by their parents? CLAIM POLICE MISCONDUCT. They don't have to worry if that's true, the morons that eat this garbage up with a spoon will love it.

Santana: ""I had nothing to do with the rape. All I did was feel the woman's t*ts."

Wise per witness: "You heard about that woman that was beat up and raped in the park last night? That was us!"

Wise's friend: "he only held her legs down while Kevin (Richardson) f---ed her."

These kids were perpetrators of battery, assault, and at minimum accomplices and enablers of rape
Those degenerates were where they belong. They may have $41M, but they will get theirs.

These people watched the WM3 HBO docs and were like "INNOCENT"! All they had to do was to look at the case files for like 10 minutes. Let me guess, Michael Peterson from The Staircase and the inbred on Making a Murderer are innocent too? Poor babies, victimized by the Bad Policemen!

Can we save the virtue signaling for actual victims who did NOT commit violent crimes? Don't blame LE because some dumb violent kids told some lies in the course of saving their own a**.

---

Excellent job of providing your sources for your information.

---

Quote:

---

My opinion is simply based on real-world events that have taken place since the original incident: new evidence emerges that exonerates the CP5, so their convictions are vacated. Regardless of media storylines or whatever, those are the underlying facts

---

GBear4Life said:

---

What a joke this post is.

What you have is DNA confirmation that the CP5 didn't PENETRATE the victim. The opposing evidence is overwhelming -- both by NUMEROUS uncoerced admissions and confessions and hundreds of case files -- that they were involved in multiple assaults and sexual assaults, including the noted female jogger.

One must have an agenda to dismiss the ENTIRETY of a confession simply because SOME of it is demonstrably untrue. You dismiss out of hand with zero evidence the testimony (backed by case documents) of the central players in the case merely because they are in law enforcement (what a joke). Yet you eat up with a spoon the media narrative and unreliable testimony of 5 criminals with an obvious motive to lie (as you say) who incessantly ignore the facts.

Again, they weren't convicted on DNA evidence so they can't be exonerated by the absence of it. (Again, only the pelvic area and socks were tested).

Again, there is zero evidence that they were tortured and mistreated into confessions. The police questioned over 35 suspects that were placed at the scene, they DIDN'T TARGET THE CP5 -- the evidence and witness testimony did.

STOP taking the media narrative hook line and sinker. They took one fact -- that the CP5 didn't penetrate the victim -- and created multiple demonstrably false narratives about their conduct and felonious actions that night, including the misguided "exoneration" of the perps. Participating in a rape is legally committing rape. And committing gang assaults on multiple victims puts you in jail for multiple years.

This video breaks down all the material evidence that the MEDIA PURPOSEFULLY IGNORES.

---

sycasey said:

---

It's not just that the DNA was for another guy. It's that the guy also said he acted alone.

---

GBear4Life said:

---

sycasey said:

---

It's not just that the DNA was for another guy. It's that the guy also said he acted alone.

---

LOL, I guess case closed, a psychopath's testimony seals the deal (yet the other testimonies you dismiss out of hand). Nevermind all else, a psycho said so. Dude, it's okay, this case obviously wasn't that compelling to you or most of America to look at anything other than what you're spoon fed. When I watched the WM3 documentaries I thought it was likely a case of misjustice! Then I actually read the facts of the case.

---

sycasey said:

---

GBear4Life said:

---

sycasey said:

---

It's not just that the DNA was for another guy. It's that the guy also said he acted alone.

---

LOL, I guess case closed, a psychopath's testimony seals the deal (yet the other testimonies you dismiss out of hand). Nevermind all else, a psycho said so. Dude, it's okay, this case obviously wasn't that compelling to you or most of America to look at anything other than what you're spoon fed. When I watched the WM3 documentaries I thought it was likely a case of misjustice! Then I actually read the facts of the case.

---

In this case, the psychopath would be the only person who was definitely a direct witness to the incident.

---