BearsWiin said:I'll take that as a yescalbear93 said:
You are an admitted old fart using that word. Am I seriously supposed to take anything you say as relevant? Why don't you go spend your next Saturday night exchanging sexually charged innuendos with Yogi Bear again when you feel compellied to degrade women using that word? Are you relevant even to your poor wife? You are a sad excuse for life.
Because I'm not the one making an abject fool of myself on this board.calbear93 said:
Do you realize how irrelevant you are? Why don't you give it a rest when you feel compelled to use that word?
BearsWiin said:Because I'm not the one making an abject fool of myself on this board.calbear93 said:
Do you realize how irrelevant you are? Why don't you give it a rest when you feel compelled to use that word?
I've met Golden One, and although I don't agree with his politics, he seems to be an OK sort. You I haven't met, so all I have to go on is the self-righteous c u n t iness you display here.
But keep digging the hole if you feel you must. It's still a free country, for the moment.
This is an internet message OT board. I understand that we're all irrelevant. You don't seem to realize it.calbear93 said:BearsWiin said:Because I'm not the one making an abject fool of myself on this board.calbear93 said:
Do you realize how irrelevant you are? Why don't you give it a rest when you feel compelled to use that word?
I've met Golden One, and although I don't agree with his politics, he seems to be an OK sort. You I haven't met, so all I have to go on is the self-righteous c u n t iness you display here.
But keep digging the hole if you feel you must. It's still a free country, for the moment.
But you are making an abject fool of yourself continuing to use such hateful misogynistic word like that at your advanced age.
Digging a hole among you fake liberals? Be honest, who other than other fake liberals here really give a **** what you think? Seriously? Do you really think you are relevant? What are you taking to delude yourself to this extent? Does it seem like I am catering to fakers like you?
Golden One said:It's fair game to criticize her politics or the way she does her job. It's NOT fair game to criticize her looks. That's just plain chicken sh*t. But then, you're a hypocritical lib, so I shouldn't expect any better from you.Another Bear said:Well I know I'm way look better than Sarah, if that's what you're getting at. For god sake, I'd make a better looking woman and I'm 5'11", 190...with a beard.calbear93 said:
Yeah, I am sure you are quite the looker and not at all a misogynist. But do tell how progressive you are. The only one who seems like a mean girl is you.
As for misogyny, I carry that cultural trait in the U.S. like most men raised here. The question is if it's cultural or applied. Cultural would be attitudes and I can't deny that. Applied would be boffing a porn stars and playmate while starting your third marriage. Applied misogyny would be telling Billy Bush to GRAB THEM BY THE P&SSY. Applied would be an anti-woman agenda or party platform. So say hello to your Grand Old Party!
Regardless...Sarah is a public figure and she's fair game.
BearsWiin said:This is an internet message OT board. I understand that we're all irrelevant. You don't seem to realize it.calbear93 said:BearsWiin said:Because I'm not the one making an abject fool of myself on this board.calbear93 said:
Do you realize how irrelevant you are? Why don't you give it a rest when you feel compelled to use that word?
I've met Golden One, and although I don't agree with his politics, he seems to be an OK sort. You I haven't met, so all I have to go on is the self-righteous c u n t iness you display here.
But keep digging the hole if you feel you must. It's still a free country, for the moment.
But you are making an abject fool of yourself continuing to use such hateful misogynistic word like that at your advanced age.
Digging a hole among you fake liberals? Be honest, who other than other fake liberals here really give a **** what you think? Seriously? Do you really think you are relevant? What are you taking to delude yourself to this extent? Does it seem like I am catering to fakers like you?
FWIW, I don't use the c-word with regard to women, just people like you. C u n t y is as c u n t y does. Dial back the c u n t iness, and you might get more engagement and less derision.
It wouldn't make any sense to call you the n-word. I haven't called you the c-word, either; I've characterized your behavior using that word. I stand by that, and I'd say it to your face if given the opportunity. You act very c u n t y here, and not just in this thread.calbear93 said:BearsWiin said:This is an internet message OT board. I understand that we're all irrelevant. You don't seem to realize it.calbear93 said:BearsWiin said:Because I'm not the one making an abject fool of myself on this board.calbear93 said:
Do you realize how irrelevant you are? Why don't you give it a rest when you feel compelled to use that word?
I've met Golden One, and although I don't agree with his politics, he seems to be an OK sort. You I haven't met, so all I have to go on is the self-righteous c u n t iness you display here.
But keep digging the hole if you feel you must. It's still a free country, for the moment.
But you are making an abject fool of yourself continuing to use such hateful misogynistic word like that at your advanced age.
Digging a hole among you fake liberals? Be honest, who other than other fake liberals here really give a **** what you think? Seriously? Do you really think you are relevant? What are you taking to delude yourself to this extent? Does it seem like I am catering to fakers like you?
FWIW, I don't use the c-word with regard to women, just people like you. C u n t y is as c u n t y does. Dial back the c u n t iness, and you might get more engagement and less derision.
Your deteriorating mental facility is becoming too obvious. You think using such an obviously women-hating word is OK as long as it is used under rules you make on the fly. Why don't you next call me by the n word as an insult and explain how that is OK as
long as it is not directed at a minority? Clearly you are not making a fool of yourself.
And take your own advice and stop thinking you are relevant or that your opinion of others matters any more than what Archie Bunker thinks of others. Maybe your wife Edith can play a song for you to calm you down.
BearsWiin said:It wouldn't make any sense to call you the n-word. I haven't called you the c-word, either; I've characterized your behavior using that word. I stand by that, and I'd say it to your face if given the opportunity. You act very c u n t y here, and not just in this thread.calbear93 said:BearsWiin said:This is an internet message OT board. I understand that we're all irrelevant. You don't seem to realize it.calbear93 said:BearsWiin said:Because I'm not the one making an abject fool of myself on this board.calbear93 said:
Do you realize how irrelevant you are? Why don't you give it a rest when you feel compelled to use that word?
I've met Golden One, and although I don't agree with his politics, he seems to be an OK sort. You I haven't met, so all I have to go on is the self-righteous c u n t iness you display here.
But keep digging the hole if you feel you must. It's still a free country, for the moment.
But you are making an abject fool of yourself continuing to use such hateful misogynistic word like that at your advanced age.
Digging a hole among you fake liberals? Be honest, who other than other fake liberals here really give a **** what you think? Seriously? Do you really think you are relevant? What are you taking to delude yourself to this extent? Does it seem like I am catering to fakers like you?
FWIW, I don't use the c-word with regard to women, just people like you. C u n t y is as c u n t y does. Dial back the c u n t iness, and you might get more engagement and less derision.
Your deteriorating mental facility is becoming too obvious. You think using such an obviously women-hating word is OK as long as it is used under rules you make on the fly. Why don't you next call me by the n word as an insult and explain how that is OK as
long as it is not directed at a minority? Clearly you are not making a fool of yourself.
And take your own advice and stop thinking you are relevant or that your opinion of others matters any more than what Archie Bunker thinks of others. Maybe your wife Edith can play a song for you to calm you down.
It's weird that you keep directing age-related insults at me, when if "93" is your grad year, then we were undergrads at the same time. It's merely confusing (and a bit c u n t y), and in no way hurtful. But keep on keepin' on, c u n t yBear93. I know you won't disappoint.
So, in other words, if Trump's a turd, you feel you must be one also. OK, I get it now. By the way, to be honest, even if we assume Trump's nailed a few, don't forget about Clinton's transgressions in the White House with Monica Lewinsky. Inappropriate behavior is not limited to Trump, my friend. But I guess blind libs can't see the whole picture. I suppose you also refer to Hillary Clinton as a sturdy woman with tree stumps for legs.Another Bear said:Golden One said:It's fair game to criticize her politics or the way she does her job. It's NOT fair game to criticize her looks. That's just plain chicken sh*t. But then, you're a hypocritical lib, so I shouldn't expect any better from you.Another Bear said:Well I know I'm way look better than Sarah, if that's what you're getting at. For god sake, I'd make a better looking woman and I'm 5'11", 190...with a beard.calbear93 said:
Yeah, I am sure you are quite the looker and not at all a misogynist. But do tell how progressive you are. The only one who seems like a mean girl is you.
As for misogyny, I carry that cultural trait in the U.S. like most men raised here. The question is if it's cultural or applied. Cultural would be attitudes and I can't deny that. Applied would be boffing a porn stars and playmate while starting your third marriage. Applied misogyny would be telling Billy Bush to GRAB THEM BY THE P&SSY. Applied would be an anti-woman agenda or party platform. So say hello to your Grand Old Party!
Regardless...Sarah is a public figure and she's fair game.
In polite company, you don't talk about a person's looks, age and a few other things. But this past year has been extraordinary, unreal...and all that goes out the window. We're no longer in polite company in regards to the current POTUS, in regards to public figures.
Now more than ever, people need to call things as they are, IRL. Call a turd a turd, no lies. Tell the simple truth.
But I get your drift conservatives, you want it both ways. You want me to be nice to your party's plainer female officials, while looking the other way on Trump, the guy who nailed a porn star and playmate a few months after getting hitched, and bragged about grabbing p&ssy. To say nothing pee parties. Com'n man, *** are you smoking, or not smoking?
So to be nicer, I'll refer to Sarah Huckabee Sanders as a sturdy woman with vulgar tendencies, and leave it at that.
C u n t y people like to think that violence is a way of solving things. I'm not impressed by the chimpy one-step-removed-from-the-jungle chest-thumping.calbear93 said:BearsWiin said:It wouldn't make any sense to call you the n-word. I haven't called you the c-word, either; I've characterized your behavior using that word. I stand by that, and I'd say it to your face if given the opportunity. You act very c u n t y here, and not just in this thread.calbear93 said:BearsWiin said:This is an internet message OT board. I understand that we're all irrelevant. You don't seem to realize it.calbear93 said:BearsWiin said:Because I'm not the one making an abject fool of myself on this board.calbear93 said:
Do you realize how irrelevant you are? Why don't you give it a rest when you feel compelled to use that word?
I've met Golden One, and although I don't agree with his politics, he seems to be an OK sort. You I haven't met, so all I have to go on is the self-righteous c u n t iness you display here.
But keep digging the hole if you feel you must. It's still a free country, for the moment.
But you are making an abject fool of yourself continuing to use such hateful misogynistic word like that at your advanced age.
Digging a hole among you fake liberals? Be honest, who other than other fake liberals here really give a **** what you think? Seriously? Do you really think you are relevant? What are you taking to delude yourself to this extent? Does it seem like I am catering to fakers like you?
FWIW, I don't use the c-word with regard to women, just people like you. C u n t y is as c u n t y does. Dial back the c u n t iness, and you might get more engagement and less derision.
Your deteriorating mental facility is becoming too obvious. You think using such an obviously women-hating word is OK as long as it is used under rules you make on the fly. Why don't you next call me by the n word as an insult and explain how that is OK as
long as it is not directed at a minority? Clearly you are not making a fool of yourself.
And take your own advice and stop thinking you are relevant or that your opinion of others matters any more than what Archie Bunker thinks of others. Maybe your wife Edith can play a song for you to calm you down.
It's weird that you keep directing age-related insults at me, when if "93" is your grad year, then we were undergrads at the same time. It's merely confusing (and a bit c u n t y), and in no way hurtful. But keep on keepin' on, c u n t yBear93. I know you won't disappoint.
Let's be honest. You would never call me that to my face. I know people like you. You know I would knock your weak ass to the ground if you used such a word to my face. Don't act brave. In my prior life, I would have destroyed weak-ass like you if you said that to my face. You said we haven't met. I guarantee you you wouldn't say anything like that to anyone's face. I don't need to meet you to recognize a coward.
Only person who would think calling someone by that word isn't misogynistic is an emasculated old **** like you.
BearsWiin said:C u n t y people like to think that violence is a way of solving things. I'm not impressed by the chimpy one-step-removed-from-the-jungle chest-thumping.calbear93 said:BearsWiin said:It wouldn't make any sense to call you the n-word. I haven't called you the c-word, either; I've characterized your behavior using that word. I stand by that, and I'd say it to your face if given the opportunity. You act very c u n t y here, and not just in this thread.calbear93 said:BearsWiin said:This is an internet message OT board. I understand that we're all irrelevant. You don't seem to realize it.calbear93 said:BearsWiin said:Because I'm not the one making an abject fool of myself on this board.calbear93 said:
Do you realize how irrelevant you are? Why don't you give it a rest when you feel compelled to use that word?
I've met Golden One, and although I don't agree with his politics, he seems to be an OK sort. You I haven't met, so all I have to go on is the self-righteous c u n t iness you display here.
But keep digging the hole if you feel you must. It's still a free country, for the moment.
But you are making an abject fool of yourself continuing to use such hateful misogynistic word like that at your advanced age.
Digging a hole among you fake liberals? Be honest, who other than other fake liberals here really give a **** what you think? Seriously? Do you really think you are relevant? What are you taking to delude yourself to this extent? Does it seem like I am catering to fakers like you?
FWIW, I don't use the c-word with regard to women, just people like you. C u n t y is as c u n t y does. Dial back the c u n t iness, and you might get more engagement and less derision.
Your deteriorating mental facility is becoming too obvious. You think using such an obviously women-hating word is OK as long as it is used under rules you make on the fly. Why don't you next call me by the n word as an insult and explain how that is OK as
long as it is not directed at a minority? Clearly you are not making a fool of yourself.
And take your own advice and stop thinking you are relevant or that your opinion of others matters any more than what Archie Bunker thinks of others. Maybe your wife Edith can play a song for you to calm you down.
It's weird that you keep directing age-related insults at me, when if "93" is your grad year, then we were undergrads at the same time. It's merely confusing (and a bit c u n t y), and in no way hurtful. But keep on keepin' on, c u n t yBear93. I know you won't disappoint.
Let's be honest. You would never call me that to my face. I know people like you. You know I would knock your weak ass to the ground if you used such a word to my face. Don't act brave. In my prior life, I would have destroyed weak-ass like you if you said that to my face. You said we haven't met. I guarantee you you wouldn't say anything like that to anyone's face. I don't need to meet you to recognize a coward.
Only person who would think calling someone by that word isn't misogynistic is an emasculated old **** like you.
You're one of those c u n t y people who absolutely have to have the last word, aren't you? You just can't help yourself. Go ahead, you know you want to. You need to.
calbear93 said:
If a thread like this where women surely are so honorably judged or mocked based on looks and made to be honorably dehumanized doesn't teach you about the sincerity of the progressive folks here, nothing will. Stay here and learn from the gentlemen here how to be morally, if only superficially, superior
So she's a frump 4 Trump?bearister said:calbear93 said:
If a thread like this where women surely are so honorably judged or mocked based on looks and made to be honorably dehumanized doesn't teach you about the sincerity of the progressive folks here, nothing will. Stay here and learn from the gentlemen here how to be morally, if only superficially, superior
Since I feel somewhat responsible for setting off this recent round of sh@tstorm with my comments about SHS, I would like to set the record straight: I was not commenting on her looks when I drew the prison/camp guard analogy. In the movies many of those women are very sexy and at Nuremberg many were attractive women. I made the comparison because SHS has a black heart (as evidenced by the fact that she is purportedly a religious person yet day after day she goes to the podium to spew orchestrated lies at the behest of a demonstrable moral bankrupt).
bearister said:BearsWiin said:I used to like Martha MacCallum when she was at CNBC, but then she moved over to Fox so she's dead to meB.A. Bearacus said:
None
Martha is still one of the most beautiful women for her age on earth (with no visible cutting on her face).
The SJW strand of the left, many of whom frequent these boards, do not care about this behavior. They do only in so far as it, in their mind, signals their virtue to themselves and others and serves as a vehicle to discredit their political opponents.Kovy said:
Hard to believe with all the #metoo stuff going on for god knows how long now, someone would actually think this thread is appropriate or ok. Absolutely mind blowing.
You're hilarious! When you sober up, come back and post something insightful and intelligent.AunBear89 said:
Golden Onenote said:
"... that one can't have a civil and respectful discourse with libs."
Funny how the guy that always complains about being called names...
Just more Cultservative hypocrisy. Nothing to see here.
for calling out the abject hyporcrites on this board? I doubt 93 cares that much, except for the fact these same people spew sanctimonious garbage out of the other side of their mouth on the same issues.BearsWiin said:Are you this c u n t y in real life? I'm genuinely curious. I mean, I hope it's just an act, but you never can tell.calbear93 said:
You seem very repentant about your misogyny and judging people based on their physical appearance (except color, I'm sure).
In others words, those like you who would pretend to us that you actually believe any of the crap you spew just because you allege to do something's so sacrificial like vote for something need to shut the **** up. You fake SJW are irrelevant because you actually don't behave the way you would pretend to believe.
Well said! Libs thrive on making victims out of just about every group in the population except rich white people, who deep down they envy dearly.iwantwinners said:The SJW strand of the left, many of whom frequent these boards, do not care about this behavior. They do only in so far as it, in their mind, signals their virtue to themselves and others and serves as a vehicle to discredit their political opponents.Kovy said:
Hard to believe with all the #metoo stuff going on for god knows how long now, someone would actually think this thread is appropriate or ok. Absolutely mind blowing.
I don't ascribe malicious intent when I suspect people are engaging in off-the-cuff banter, but when one side starts to make a living on churning up the outrage machine over "sensitive" language, often destroying reputations and lives and creating actual victims in the process of their virtue signaling, they ought to get in line.
The #metoo and #timeisup movement are an identity politic, virtue signaling propaganda tactic that glorifies victims for being weak -- their character and behavior don't matter, it's their status as a victim (identity as a woman; and an alleged victim of an assault by a man) that defines them. It masquerades as a "justice" movement as if all men needed was a twitter hashtag to realize slamming your girl's head into a wall, or exposing every woman that turns you on to your genitals and sexual advances is a bad idea.
By my lights, Women are strong, capable individuals who have the ability to be advocates for themselves, stand up for themselves, and establish boundaries as they see fit. That is not what the #metoo movement is advocating. It is presenting women as meek, confused, co-dependent humans who require others to read and interpret their minds, thoughts, and consent at every second, because, as you know, women are incapable of establishing firmly and unequivocally their rejection of advanced behavior from others. There is nothing more sexist, racist, condescending and degrading to people's humanity than the SJW movement.
Over 90% of Americans believe in equality of rights and opportunities under the law for the sexes, yet over half reject the label of feminism. It's clear to me why.
Look at the outrage in every thread not over ideas or behavior, but rather who is advocating for them.
Nobody on this board has surpassed Grief Stage 4: BARGAINING. Most haven't gotten past Stage 3: ANGER. It's both sad and amusing.
There are people outraged over the WH Press Secretary! The Press Secretary! A person whose job it is to sput bullsh*t all day, everyday, since the beginning of the TV era. It's sooooo SAD.
No worse than you believing the crap spewed out by MSNBC and CNN, which are apparently your gospel.AunBear89 said:
But you can't. So noted. But don't let that stop you from making comments that you know in your heart and in your soul to be true -- because Faux News and Breitbart and The Blaze told you so.
You're funny. Nobody did a better job of humping women of all sizes and shapes and getting oral satisfaction than Bill Clinton, but I don't remember you calling him a pig dog. Typical liberal hypocrisy. And to use your language, wasn't Paula Jones pretty ugly, both spiritually and aesthetically?Another Bear said:
Nope conservatives want it both ways. You want the pig dog Trump in there grabbing p&ssy, hump porn stars and running his mouth, AND you want the political opposition to shut up and show respect to his people, in the name of PC-ism.
Typical conservative-authoritarian regimes double talk and double think. Well F V C K that. The surest way to fight double speak is call things as they are.
Jesus Christ have you watch Sarah Huckabee in action? She is an ugly vulgar public figure. And when I say ugly, I mean spiritually and aesthetically.
Now you're making stuff up. l don't know a single conservative that went after Chelsea Clinton's looks. And there's nothing amiss about referring to Bill Clinton's transgressions. My point is that you and your fraternity never criticized him for his behavior toward women when it was as bad or worse than that of Trump. Total hyprocrisy on your part.Another Bear said:
Yup Bill liked the ladies...and calling him up now is a typical conservative dick move...BECAUSE BILL AND HILLARY ARE GONE AND IT'S ALL ON DONNIE AND THE GOP. You guys own it all.
Re: Bill's daughter, conservatives went after her looks...when she was 14. Typical GOP hypocritical crap to call out people for call SHS ugly, while going after a kid.
The evil is revealed by her fairly gross smirks through her most outrageous lies. This, of course, DOES have to do with her appearance. It of course has NOTHING TO DO with anything related to any standard of beauty - although it DOES majorly distort whatever human qualities she may possess.bearister said:calbear93 said:
If a thread like this where women surely are so honorably judged or mocked based on looks and made to be honorably dehumanized doesn't teach you about the sincerity of the progressive folks here, nothing will. Stay here and learn from the gentlemen here how to be morally, if only superficially, superior
Since I feel somewhat responsible for setting off this recent round of sh@tstorm with my comments about SHS, I would like to set the record straight: I was not commenting on her looks when I drew the prison/camp guard analogy. In the movies many of those women are very sexy and at Nuremberg many were attractive women. I made the comparison because SHS has a black heart (as evidenced by the fact that she is purportedly a religious person yet day after day she goes to the podium to spew orchestrated lies at the behest of a demonstrable moral bankrupt).
mikecohen said:Please post any stupid and outlandish thing or things said by CNN and/or MSNBC hostsGolden One said:
Saying stupid things isn't a monopoly held by Fox commentators. CNN and MSNBC have plenty of hosts who outdo Fox when it comes to saying stupid and outlandish things.
So now just because Rush Limbaugh says something, you attribute that view to all conservatives? Wow! You libs get more outrageous every day.Another Bear said:
Ain't the interwebz great...it keeps track of stuff. Look, you're doing the Trump authoritarian lying thing now. So STOP LYING.
Flashback 1992: Rush Limbaugh Calls Chelsea Clinton, Age 12, the 'White House Dog'
[url=http://www.pensitoreview.com/2014/12/02/flashback-video-limbaugh-calls-chelsea-clinton-age-12-white-house-dog/][/url]
If you regularly watch MSNBC or CNN you'd have plenty of examples. Ever watch Rachel Maddow? How about Joe Scarborough and his lady? On CNN Don Lemon is a great example; he is the Sean Hannity of CNN. Fox News generally presents a more balanced view than either of the other two cable channels, and as much as you might hate to acknowledge it, the viewership of Fox News is greater than either MSNBC or CNN. That must really upset you libs.B.A. Bearacus said:mikecohen said:Please post any stupid and outlandish thing or things said by CNN and/or MSNBC hostsGolden One said:
Saying stupid things isn't a monopoly held by Fox commentators. CNN and MSNBC have plenty of hosts who outdo Fox when it comes to saying stupid and outlandish things.
G One, you used the both sides card here to claim an equivalence between Fox and CNN/MSNBC hosts, even saying that CNN/MSNBC hosts "outdo" Fox hosts. Can you please elaborate because I think that Fox News hosts are clearly the outliers here to most objective observers, but I'll keep an open mind on this issue pending the examples you provide.
Laura Ingraham on LeBron: "Here's his barely intelligible, not to mention his ungrammatical take on President Trump... this is what happens when you attempt to leave high school a year early to join the NBA... shut up and dribble."
Golden One said:If you regularly watch MSNBC or CNN you'd have plenty of examples. Ever watch Rachel Maddow? How about Joe Scarborough and his lady? On CNN Don Lemon is a great example; he is the Sean Hannity of CNN. Fox News generally presents a more balanced view than either of the other two cable channels, and as much as you might hate to acknowledge it, the viewership of Fox News is greater than either MSNBC or CNN. That must really upset you libs.B.A. Bearacus said:mikecohen said:Please post any stupid and outlandish thing or things said by CNN and/or MSNBC hostsGolden One said:
Saying stupid things isn't a monopoly held by Fox commentators. CNN and MSNBC have plenty of hosts who outdo Fox when it comes to saying stupid and outlandish things.
G One, you used the both sides card here to claim an equivalence between Fox and CNN/MSNBC hosts, even saying that CNN/MSNBC hosts "outdo" Fox hosts. Can you please elaborate because I think that Fox News hosts are clearly the outliers here to most objective observers, but I'll keep an open mind on this issue pending the examples you provide.
Laura Ingraham on LeBron: "Here's his barely intelligible, not to mention his ungrammatical take on President Trump... this is what happens when you attempt to leave high school a year early to join the NBA... shut up and dribble."
Sorry, B.A., but I don't keep a running log of all the outlandish and stupid things said on MSNBC and CNN; if I did, I'd get writer's cramp. My observation comes from hours of watching the anchors and panels on these channels spew very liberal-biased commentary and opinions. Because of your own personal views, I suppose you're unable to recognize it.B.A. Bearacus said:Golden One said:If you regularly watch MSNBC or CNN you'd have plenty of examples. Ever watch Rachel Maddow? How about Joe Scarborough and his lady? On CNN Don Lemon is a great example; he is the Sean Hannity of CNN. Fox News generally presents a more balanced view than either of the other two cable channels, and as much as you might hate to acknowledge it, the viewership of Fox News is greater than either MSNBC or CNN. That must really upset you libs.B.A. Bearacus said:mikecohen said:Please post any stupid and outlandish thing or things said by CNN and/or MSNBC hostsGolden One said:
Saying stupid things isn't a monopoly held by Fox commentators. CNN and MSNBC have plenty of hosts who outdo Fox when it comes to saying stupid and outlandish things.
G One, you used the both sides card here to claim an equivalence between Fox and CNN/MSNBC hosts, even saying that CNN/MSNBC hosts "outdo" Fox hosts. Can you please elaborate because I think that Fox News hosts are clearly the outliers here to most objective observers, but I'll keep an open mind on this issue pending the examples you provide.
Laura Ingraham on LeBron: "Here's his barely intelligible, not to mention his ungrammatical take on President Trump... this is what happens when you attempt to leave high school a year early to join the NBA... shut up and dribble."
Hate to ask you to be specific, but as you are not offering any specific things said I'll ask something very specific: Please provide a quote of something Rachel Maddow said on her show that was either completely stupid, willfully dismissive of facts, or tinged with racism. Just threw that last one in to give you a very wide berth. If you're having a hard time coming up with something specific, could it be that whatever stupidity you have observed doesn't rise to the level of sometimes Orwellian BS seen on Fox?
