The Babes of News Thread

BearsWiin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
iwantwinners said:

BearsWiin said:

calbear93 said:

You seem very repentant about your misogyny and judging people based on their physical appearance (except color, I'm sure).

In others words, those like you who would pretend to us that you actually believe any of the crap you spew just because you allege to do something's so sacrificial like vote for something need to shut the **** up. You fake SJW are irrelevant because you actually don't behave the way you would pretend to believe.


Are you this c u n t y in real life? I'm genuinely curious. I mean, I hope it's just an act, but you never can tell.
for calling out the abject hyporcrites on this board? I doubt 93 cares that much, except for the fact these same people spew sanctimonious garbage out of the other side of their mouth on the same issues.

C u n t y is a great word, along with c u n t, and I agree it can be applicable to both sexes, but 93 was calling out the c u n t s and c u n t i n e s s of they partisan hypocrites. You using it doesn't even make any sense. And whining about the c u n t s being called out for being c u n t y makes YOU the C U N T


We do agree that it's a great word. Common ground!
B.A. Bearacus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Golden One said:



Sorry, B.A., but I don't keep a running log of all the outlandish and stupid things said on MSNBC and CNN; if I did, I'd get writer's cramp. My observation comes from hours of watching the anchors and panels on these channels spew very liberal-biased commentary and opinions. Because of your own personal views, I suppose you're unable to recognize it.
G One, I'm sure you're a busy guy, so I won't ask you anymore to provide a single, solitary example for Maddow. The panels on CNN are often **** shows IMO and I don't spend time watching them. Jeff Zucker's ratings-minded battle royale format for panels is set up for extremely polarized arguments and yelling matches and have low value for me. I do like Jeffrey Toobin, though, so I will specifically seek out his commentary on YouTube.

I do think it's a meaningful distinction to draw between the hosts and the panels or guest analysts. The hosts have more power and represent the networks in a more direct way than guests.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearsWiin said:

calbear93 said:

You seem very repentant about your misogyny and judging people based on their physical appearance (except color, I'm sure).

In others words, those like you who would pretend to us that you actually believe any of the crap you spew just because you allege to do something's so sacrificial like vote for something need to shut the **** up. You fake SJW are irrelevant because you actually don't behave the way you would pretend to believe.


Are you this c u n t y in real life? I'm genuinely curious. I mean, I hope it's just an act, but you never can tell.


Hey BW, do you remember when LD got in a lot of trouble during a poker game?


Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
iwantwinners said:

BearsWiin said:

calbear93 said:

You seem very repentant about your misogyny and judging people based on their physical appearance (except color, I'm sure).

In others words, those like you who would pretend to us that you actually believe any of the crap you spew just because you allege to do something's so sacrificial like vote for something need to shut the **** up. You fake SJW are irrelevant because you actually don't behave the way you would pretend to believe.


Are you this c u n t y in real life? I'm genuinely curious. I mean, I hope it's just an act, but you never can tell.
for calling out the abject hyporcrites on this board? I doubt 93 cares that much, except for the fact these same people spew sanctimonious garbage out of the other side of their mouth on the same issues.

C u n t y is a great word, along with c u n t, and I agree it can be applicable to both sexes, but 93 was calling out the c u n t s and c u n t i n e s s of they partisan hypocrites. You using it doesn't even make any sense. And whining about the c u n t s being called out for being c u n t y makes YOU the C U N T


You're the only that seems to get it. They don't seem to get the absolute disdain I have for the hypocrisy from some of these pretend SJWs here who talk one way and behave another. I don't give a **** about the follies of stupid old guys on this board deluding themselves into thinking that using profane words, writing about socialism or anarchy on their latest iPhones and iPads, or posting stupid picture from the web with trite references to pop culture is edgy and makes their pathetic emasculated cowardice less apparent. Wearing a false veneer of liberal beliefs meant to disguise their misogynistic, racist beliefs while jerking each other off along party lines makes them worthy of disdain. All I have to do is scratch the surface and poke them a bit for their bigotry and true character to manifest. Then they are surprised that we are not seeking their approval. They are so used to saying things they don't believe to get a pat on the back. They can't get that me calling out their bull**** means I don't care whether they approve no more than we would care whether some Nazi approves of us. I just want them to reveal their true bigotry, which they unfailingly do with the least bit of prompting.
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Blargh --- "Lock her up!" --- blargh --- "Nobama!" --gurgle -- "Whatabout..." --- glurp --- "Libtard SJWs!"

end quote
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

Blargh --- "Lock her up!" --- blargh --- "Nobama!" --gurgle -- "Whatabout..." --- glurp --- "Libtard SJWs!"

end quote


https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/the-coded-language-of-the-alt-right-is-helping-to-power-its-rise/2017/04/07/5f269a82-1ba4-11e7-bcc2-7d1a0973e7b2_story.html?utm_term=.f18c1248ac3d

I would really like to see a picture of Oskie hugging it out with Richard Spencer-even more than that picture of tRump autographing naked boobs at a Penthouse party.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
B.A. Bearacus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There are lots of different forums where people discuss politics: Fox News comments, Reddit's "The Donald", ShaggyTexas Cloak Room, Oral Roberts Golden Eagles Off Topic, etc. For those who are conservative and who get vein-popping angry in an instant and escalate to physical threats like Joe Pesci in Goodfellas, well, engaging on BI OT is going to increase your blood pressure while Trump is president. Just saying everyone needs to look out for their health.
Another Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So progressives are libtards and SJW. I guess that would make conservatives wife-beater, Russkie Pee Drinkers.

If the shoe fits...
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
BearsWiin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

BearsWiin said:

calbear93 said:

You seem very repentant about your misogyny and judging people based on their physical appearance (except color, I'm sure).

In others words, those like you who would pretend to us that you actually believe any of the crap you spew just because you allege to do something's so sacrificial like vote for something need to shut the **** up. You fake SJW are irrelevant because you actually don't behave the way you would pretend to believe.


Are you this c u n t y in real life? I'm genuinely curious. I mean, I hope it's just an act, but you never can tell.


Hey BW, do you remember when LD got in a lot of trouble during a poker game?



Great clip. And he's right; he should have used p u s s y instead, since a p u s s y is somebody who doesn't have the balls to do something. A c u n t is something entirely different; there are elements of being mean-spirited, disagreeable, shrill, and tiresome, but there's no real element of fear or risk aversion to being c u n t y. If there were, said folk probably wouldn't be c u n t y in the first place.
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bearwins is probably using cun$ in the UK context which is not gender specific but is similar to "*******" here though probably a degree beyond that- say some hypocritical, pompous raging twit.
B.A. Bearacus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearsWiin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
B.A. Bearacus said:


It isn't already?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
B.A. Bearacus said:




In the fine tradition of Cyberbears which catered to the aficionados of the hirsute.

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
B.A. Bearacus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearsWiin said:


It isn't already?
B.A. Bearacus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ah yes, those crazy Brits and their English language. Ever see "The Inbetweeners", a UK comedy from a few years back. Lots of imaginative words, like clunge, bumder, posh t w a t.

AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
True story: My Irish bro-in-law uses t w a t all the time. When coming from the mouth of a Dub, the word rhymes with "fat". My now 14 y.o. daughter grew up hearing her uncle use that word so many times that it became, unbeknownst to me, a part of her lexicon. She recently told us how upset she was at some boy in her PE class that she said "Go away, you silly [rhymes with cat]!" Kinda funny - an American kid using an Irish/English pejorative, but going under the radar because she is also using the Irish/English pronunciation.

Thankfully, she never picked up "Mad c u n t" - another Irish/English favorite.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
Another Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ah a trendsetter. That's hilarious and I wonder if the other kids know what it means..or is tone enough?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/opinions/trump-is-ignoring-the-worst-attack-on-america-since-911/2018/02/18/5ad888f2-14f3-11e8-8b08-027a6ccb38eb_story.html
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's worth noting that for all of the criticism of the "fake SJW of the Left," almost no one has actually participated in the original discussion topic, which was to post "Babes of News." Only the OP did. Nearly all of the rest of this discussion has been those on the right and left hurling insults at one another.

If you want to know my opinion, I find all of it distasteful and useless. This conversation has no constructive purpose and should be abandoned.
B.A. Bearacus
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Nicole Wallace

I like Nicole's show, though I don't watch it frequently because it comes on in the afternoon.

Fun facts:
  • Went to Miramonte High School (Orinda)
  • Graduated in Mass Comm from Cal in '94
  • Is a Republican, but not a mindless Trump apologist.
  • Was W's White House Communications Director
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

Blargh --- "Lock her up!" --- blargh --- "Nobama!" --gurgle -- "Whatabout..." --- glurp --- "Libtard SJWs!"

end quote
That's funny. Posts from your kind are all about Whatabout. The fake liberals are sexists and racist? Whatabout Trump? The liberals have no fiscal discipline? Whatabout Trump?

Your response to everything is whatabout Trump without really addressing the merits of a point. Because you can't handle that the liberal agenda is bankrupt, you seek solace in your fallacy that we are all Trump or Trump followers. That way, you never have to discuss that no one actually behaves the way you would dictate others behave and that your generosity stops at other people's wallet and right before yours.

You identify whatabout in your whatabout post. Brilliant.
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

It's worth noting that for all of the criticism of the "fake SJW of the Left," almost no one has actually participated in the original discussion topic, which was to post "Babes of News." Only the OP did. Nearly all of the rest of this discussion has been those on the right and left hurling insults at one another.

If you want to know my opinion, I find all of it distasteful and useless. This conversation has no constructive purpose and should be abandoned.
Right. Because silence means you object. Cheering on ogling women, criticizing women based on physical appearance (including the stupid statement that she deserves it because she's in position of power) , and using a term that has been one of the most offensive term used to degrade and abuse women as an insult (wow, using an n word to denigrate non-minority isn't insulting) followed by complete silence from other on the left demonstrate how strong your beliefs are, right? I can't imagine what the outrage would have been if a conservative member dehumanized women like that. I am not even commenting on the stupid follies, in the abstract, of the old idiots for engaging in that behavior. It's just worthy of ridicule that those who flaunt their progressive credential to be so sexist, followed by silence from those who think abuse of women from the left deserves silent approval.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

sycasey said:

It's worth noting that for all of the criticism of the "fake SJW of the Left," almost no one has actually participated in the original discussion topic, which was to post "Babes of News." Only the OP did. Nearly all of the rest of this discussion has been those on the right and left hurling insults at one another.

If you want to know my opinion, I find all of it distasteful and useless. This conversation has no constructive purpose and should be abandoned.
Right. Because silence means you object. Cheering on ogling women, criticizing women based on physical appearance (including the stupid statement that she deserves it because she's in position of power) , and using a term that has been one of the most offensive term used to degrade and abuse women as an insult (wow, using an n word to denigrate non-minority isn't insulting) followed by complete silence from other on the left demonstrate how strong your beliefs are, right? I can't imagine what the outrage would have been if a conservative member dehumanized women like that. I am not even commenting on the stupid follies, in the abstract, of the old idiots for engaging in that behavior. It's just worthy of ridicule that those who flaunt their progressive credential to be so sexist, followed by silence from those who think abuse of women from the left deserves silent approval.
Honestly? I think this thread would have died out from inactivity if you and others could just resist the urge to keep firing back.

But by all means, keep it afloat.
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

calbear93 said:

sycasey said:

It's worth noting that for all of the criticism of the "fake SJW of the Left," almost no one has actually participated in the original discussion topic, which was to post "Babes of News." Only the OP did. Nearly all of the rest of this discussion has been those on the right and left hurling insults at one another.

If you want to know my opinion, I find all of it distasteful and useless. This conversation has no constructive purpose and should be abandoned.
Right. Because silence means you object. Cheering on ogling women, criticizing women based on physical appearance (including the stupid statement that she deserves it because she's in position of power) , and using a term that has been one of the most offensive term used to degrade and abuse women as an insult (wow, using an n word to denigrate non-minority isn't insulting) followed by complete silence from other on the left demonstrate how strong your beliefs are, right? I can't imagine what the outrage would have been if a conservative member dehumanized women like that. I am not even commenting on the stupid follies, in the abstract, of the old idiots for engaging in that behavior. It's just worthy of ridicule that those who flaunt their progressive credential to be so sexist, followed by silence from those who think abuse of women from the left deserves silent approval.
Honestly? I think this thread would have died out from inactivity if you and others could just resist the urge to keep firing back.

But by all means, keep it afloat.
I see. It's my fault for pointing out the sexism by those old fools who would have us believe they are women's champions. When we see something, just don't respond and bury it like you did when you revived it.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

sycasey said:

calbear93 said:

sycasey said:

It's worth noting that for all of the criticism of the "fake SJW of the Left," almost no one has actually participated in the original discussion topic, which was to post "Babes of News." Only the OP did. Nearly all of the rest of this discussion has been those on the right and left hurling insults at one another.

If you want to know my opinion, I find all of it distasteful and useless. This conversation has no constructive purpose and should be abandoned.
Right. Because silence means you object. Cheering on ogling women, criticizing women based on physical appearance (including the stupid statement that she deserves it because she's in position of power) , and using a term that has been one of the most offensive term used to degrade and abuse women as an insult (wow, using an n word to denigrate non-minority isn't insulting) followed by complete silence from other on the left demonstrate how strong your beliefs are, right? I can't imagine what the outrage would have been if a conservative member dehumanized women like that. I am not even commenting on the stupid follies, in the abstract, of the old idiots for engaging in that behavior. It's just worthy of ridicule that those who flaunt their progressive credential to be so sexist, followed by silence from those who think abuse of women from the left deserves silent approval.
Honestly? I think this thread would have died out from inactivity if you and others could just resist the urge to keep firing back.

But by all means, keep it afloat.
I see. It's my fault for pointing out the sexism by those old fools who would have us believe they are women's champions. When we see something, just don't respond and bury it like you did when you revived it.
By the way, this is me not being silent about it. I do find the entire purpose behind this thread distasteful. I didn't say anything until now because I honestly hadn't noticed it until I looked at all the OT threads and saw one that had a lot of replies but that I hadn't read through yet. So your outrage is misplaced with me.

I also didn't "revive" the thread. Judging by the dates on the posts, it's had consistent replies for the last three days before I showed up.
B.A. Bearacus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:


By the way, this is me not being silent about it. I do find the entire purpose behind this thread distasteful. I didn't say anything until now because I honestly hadn't noticed it until I looked at all the OT threads and saw one that had a lot of replies but that I hadn't read through yet. So your outrage is misplaced with me.

I also didn't "revive" the thread. Judging by the dates on the posts, it's had consistent replies for the last three days before I showed up.

Sycasey, I consider you to be a reasonable voice. If you genuinely find it distasteful for me to just kill some off-season time with you lovable randos on an Off Topic board that is anchored to a FOOTBALL board (context) by calling out women who I admire for their minds and the jobs they do to keep me informed, and who happen to be cute, please let me know and I'll do what I can to kill this thread.
Another Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I LOVE conservatives giving me PC lessons. The irony and stupidity is YUUUUGE!

Now it's my turn. I'm going to tell you conservatives how to be better authoritarians and fascists..elect Trump. There you guys are now more authoritarian and fascist.

calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another Bear said:

I LOVE conservatives giving me PC lessons. The irony and stupidity is YUUUUGE!

Now it's my turn. I'm going to tell you conservatives how to be better authoritarians and fascists..elect Trump. There you guys are now more authoritarian and fascist.


This Whatabout could have been written by a Russian bot.
Another Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nyet comrade, not in Petrograd, not waiting in bread line, or Putin's thugs to start the beatings.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
B.A. Bearacus said:

sycasey said:


By the way, this is me not being silent about it. I do find the entire purpose behind this thread distasteful. I didn't say anything until now because I honestly hadn't noticed it until I looked at all the OT threads and saw one that had a lot of replies but that I hadn't read through yet. So your outrage is misplaced with me.

I also didn't "revive" the thread. Judging by the dates on the posts, it's had consistent replies for the last three days before I showed up.

Sycasey, I consider you to be a reasonable voice. If you genuinely find it distasteful for me to just kill some off-season time with you lovable randos on an Off Topic board that is anchored to a FOOTBALL board (context) by calling out women who I admire for their minds and the jobs they do to keep me informed, and who happen to be cute, please let me know and I'll do what I can to kill this thread.

This is a thread devoted to discussing women "in the news" and appreciating them only for their physical attractiveness. We're not talking about actresses or models here, people who know their business is largely based on looks. We're talking about women who are at least trying to be taken seriously as professionals. Is there anything to be gained from this conversation, other than lecherous leering?

I'm also not sure how you would have expected this to devolve into anything other than partisan bickering, after you concluded your opening string of posts with a Fox News graphic and an assertion that there are no attractive newswomen there.
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The projection and deflection are strong with this one...

"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
BearsWiin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

The projection and deflection are strong with this one...




"Even Master Yogi doesn't have a midi-c u n t yan level that high!"

"No poster has."

"What does that mean?"

"He will ruin every thread he touches."
B.A. Bearacus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

B.A. Bearacus said:

sycasey said:


By the way, this is me not being silent about it. I do find the entire purpose behind this thread distasteful. I didn't say anything until now because I honestly hadn't noticed it until I looked at all the OT threads and saw one that had a lot of replies but that I hadn't read through yet. So your outrage is misplaced with me.

I also didn't "revive" the thread. Judging by the dates on the posts, it's had consistent replies for the last three days before I showed up.

Sycasey, I consider you to be a reasonable voice. If you genuinely find it distasteful for me to just kill some off-season time with you lovable randos on an Off Topic board that is anchored to a FOOTBALL board (context) by calling out women who I admire for their minds and the jobs they do to keep me informed, and who happen to be cute, please let me know and I'll do what I can to kill this thread.

This is a thread devoted to discussing women "in the news" and appreciating them only for their physical attractiveness. We're not talking about actresses or models here, people who know their business is largely based on looks. We're talking about women who are at least trying to be taken seriously as professionals. Is there anything to be gained from this conversation, other than lecherous leering?

I'm also not sure how you would have expected this to devolve into anything other than partisan bickering, after you concluded your opening string of posts with a Fox News graphic and an assertion that there are no attractive newswomen there.

Do you really think that, all things being equal (smart, insightful, articulate), that there is no professional advantage to televised news men and women being telegenic? Do you think the level of attractive people you find on news shows is the same as in print news rooms?

Is finding women cute being "lecherous"? Choosing pictures of people in a news setting at a desk (or at a press briefing) isn't setting a tone of lechery -- but maybe your definition of lechery is a lot looser than mine.

Aside from "Interesting Eric Clapton Documentary", what in OT do you not expect to devolve into "partisan bickering"?

But seriously -- context. We are only here because we are fans of Cal football. It's a game where we rejoice in violence, drinking, cheerleaders, talking constant shiit about a university in Palo Alto, and piped in music to varying degrees. Within this main reason we are here is this little booger of a section called Off Topic, within which, partly as a way to foster more engagement or just a little completely harmless entertainment for some of the 10-20 dudes who are on here, I created this thread, which has subsequently been killed from all sides: left, right, and from above.
Page 3 of 5
×
Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.