BearlySane88 said:
Such a lazy answer. I'll remember this the next time someone makes an outlandish claim.
Like many a criminal defense attorney stuck representing a hopelessly guilty client, in your defense of Trump, you are cornered into using the defense strategies of the non sequitur, gaslighting and gish gallop. They are all effective techniques that can trigger a hung jury because everyone is scratching their heads trying to make sense of the distorted reality created.
The Zen Master of those techniques was Charlie Manson's trial attorney Irving Kanarek.
Irving Kanarek - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irving_Kanarek* Kanarek had once objected to a witness identifying himself: Kanarek claimed that the witness's name was hearsay because the witness had first heard it from his mother.
*The possibility exists that I am giving you more credit than you are due.
“Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside”
—Jim Morrison
“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”