Breaking News

1,200,587 Views | 12797 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by bear2034
MinotStateBeav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Center For Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) is a Labour Party front who's goal apparently is to kill Musk's X. Members of our government attended a conference with them, Adam Schiff and the White House staff. Hrmm a foreign government tampering with our businesses and elections....

SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

movielover said:

VOTE PEACE!


That post just seem innately unbelievable. There's no way Trump isn't supporting / enabling Israel. And no US troops are on the ground in either battle; Biden has done a good job on that front.
I believe US troops are on the ground, in Israel now, and were and are, I assume, still in Jordan, Iraq, and on the Red Sea, with some getting killed not long ago.
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

tequila4kapp said:

movielover said:

VOTE PEACE!


That post just seem innately unbelievable. There's no way Trump isn't supporting / enabling Israel. And no US troops are on the ground in either battle; Biden has done a good job on that front.
I believe US troops are on the ground, in Israel now, and were and are, I assume, still in Jordan, Iraq, and on the Red Sea, with some getting killed not long ago.
Technically, you are right - I forgot we will have @100 troops in Israel operating the latest missile defense system we agreed to supply. And Red Sea. But I really meant our folks aren't in combat in either Ukraine or Israel.

Iraq / Jordan/ Syria is presumably a different mission.
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

tequila4kapp said:

movielover said:

VOTE PEACE!


That post just seem innately unbelievable. There's no way Trump isn't supporting / enabling Israel. And no US troops are on the ground in either battle; Biden has done a good job on that front.
I believe US troops are on the ground, in Israel now, and were and are, I assume, still in Jordan, Iraq, and on the Red Sea, with some getting killed not long ago.


US troops are everywhere. I had an acquaintance in the Air Force and there were always special forces in far flung places like Thailand and Ethiopia. I have to imagine there are American soldiers on the ground in every country except maybe North Korea, including in Iran.

movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A better question is - what areas in substantial numbers, and / or harms way.

I'm sure we have systems operators in Ukraine, and US / NATO personnel running targeting, logistics, training, etc.
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
An Election story from a Left of Center source:

Turnout from Black voters, a reliably Democratic demographic, is down compared to this point four years ago, though some Democrats have said it's a mistake to compare early voting turnout this year to 2020, noting the upheaval caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. And GOP early voting is in a better place than in 2020
* * *
The early voting data has come as a relief to the GOP. One prominent Republican in the state, granted anonymity to speak freely, predicted Trump will be able to focus elsewhere in the final two weeks because "the ground has shifted here in North Carolina."

A Harris campaign official, granted anonymity to speak freely about the state of the race here, said "Trump is cherry picking early vote data," while claiming that internal Harris campaign data shows Trump "has consequential slippage with suburban women voters" in the state compared to 2020. The official also noted an uptick in early voting turnout in the Raleigh and Greensboro areas, "both key parts of our path to victory in the state."

* * *
"We now have five days of early voting data, and so what we're seeing is that Republicans are in a stronger position than they've ever been historically," said Jason Simmons, chair of the North Carolina Republican Party.

Republicans "have out voted, out performed" Democrats during two of those five days, Simmons said. At this point in 2020, "they held a 19 point advantage." Today, Simmons said, the Democratic advantage after five days of early voting is 1 point.

"When you're looking at just the early voting data," Simmons said, "it continues to show that Republicans are over performing and Democrats are underperforming."

It's not a sign Democrats want to see. At least 67,000 fewer Black voters have cast ballots so far compared to this point in 2020, noted North Carolina Democratic consultant Thomas Mills, calling it "a huge deficit that Democrats should be scrambling to address," and urging them to increase money and time spent on mobilizing Black voters to the polls here.

An Election story from a Right of Center source:
The presidential election might be slipping away from Vice President Kamala Harris, Democrats indicated Wednesday.
* * *
"Everyone keeps saying, 'It's close.' Yes, it's close, but are things trending our way? No. And no one wants to openly admit that," a Democrat strategist told the Hill's Amie Parnes. "Could we still win? Maybe. Should anyone be even slightly optimistic right now? No."

Some Democrats, however, are ringing the alarm bells after early voting data in Nevada, Georgia, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania looked to benefit Republicans. "In Wilmington, they are frantically trying to figure that out," Democrat and cohost of The Morning Meeting Dan Turrentine said Tuesday about early vote trends. "If you look at, not just in Nevada, but so far, Democrats are underperforming in Philadelphia and Atlanta, and now we're seeing Las Vegas."

"The Harris campaign appears to be struggling with Latinos, black men, and young voters," Turrentine said. "It appears that those problems have not been solved … Things like this, you know, give you a little bit of heartburn … Nevada is supposed to be, you know, one of our best states. And so it appears that some of our base voters are not very energized right now."

Early voting is ongoing and the data is incomplete, but that has not stopped Democrats from noting the absence of momentum. "If this is a vibe election, the current vibes ain't great," another strategist told the Hill.

A former aide in the Obama administration believes that Harris might still win, but a loss would not be surprising.

"It feels like two things are true at the same time," an aide told the Hill. "It's either … of course she was always a flawed candidate, nobody likes her, she's tainted by Biden, and all of the macro-factors have slid away from Team Blue it's becoming a border, economy, foreign affairs election."

"Or, of course he was a terrible candidate, ran a horrible, crazy campaign, had no real ground game or fundraising and then acted like an insane person," the aide added. "It's sort of the opposite of 2016, which was, 'How could this happen?' This feels more like, 'Of course this happened.' … We just don't know which yet."

The Harris campaign appears to believe that if it wins, it will not win big. The same cannot be said for the Trump campaign, which seems to feel optimistic about victory.

"Democrats wish Donald Trump wouldn't get more than 46% of the vote," Harris campaign senior adviser David Plouffe told CNN. "That's not reality. He's going to get up to 48% in all of these states. And so we just have to make sure we're hitting our win number, which depending on the state, could be 50, could be 49.5."

"Historically, it would be unusual to have seven states come down to a point or less," he added. "But I think at this point, you have to assume that's a distinct possibility."
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm gonna say that comparing early or mail-in vote right now to 2020 is probably not very meaningful. It's not a COVID election this time. Trump was telling people not to trust mail ballots last time and isn't doing that this time.
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

An Election story from a Left of Center source:

Turnout from Black voters, a reliably Democratic demographic, is down compared to this point four years ago, though some Democrats have said it's a mistake to compare early voting turnout this year to 2020, noting the upheaval caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. And GOP early voting is in a better place than in 2020
* * *
The early voting data has come as a relief to the GOP. One prominent Republican in the state, granted anonymity to speak freely, predicted Trump will be able to focus elsewhere in the final two weeks because "the ground has shifted here in North Carolina."

A Harris campaign official, granted anonymity to speak freely about the state of the race here, said "Trump is cherry picking early vote data," while claiming that internal Harris campaign data shows Trump "has consequential slippage with suburban women voters" in the state compared to 2020. The official also noted an uptick in early voting turnout in the Raleigh and Greensboro areas, "both key parts of our path to victory in the state."

* * *
"We now have five days of early voting data, and so what we're seeing is that Republicans are in a stronger position than they've ever been historically," said Jason Simmons, chair of the North Carolina Republican Party.

Republicans "have out voted, out performed" Democrats during two of those five days, Simmons said. At this point in 2020, "they held a 19 point advantage." Today, Simmons said, the Democratic advantage after five days of early voting is 1 point.

"When you're looking at just the early voting data," Simmons said, "it continues to show that Republicans are over performing and Democrats are underperforming."

It's not a sign Democrats want to see. At least 67,000 fewer Black voters have cast ballots so far compared to this point in 2020, noted North Carolina Democratic consultant Thomas Mills, calling it "a huge deficit that Democrats should be scrambling to address," and urging them to increase money and time spent on mobilizing Black voters to the polls here.

An Election story from a Right of Center source:
The presidential election might be slipping away from Vice President Kamala Harris, Democrats indicated Wednesday.
* * *
"Everyone keeps saying, 'It's close.' Yes, it's close, but are things trending our way? No. And no one wants to openly admit that," a Democrat strategist told the Hill's Amie Parnes. "Could we still win? Maybe. Should anyone be even slightly optimistic right now? No."

Some Democrats, however, are ringing the alarm bells after early voting data in Nevada, Georgia, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania looked to benefit Republicans. "In Wilmington, they are frantically trying to figure that out," Democrat and cohost of The Morning Meeting Dan Turrentine said Tuesday about early vote trends. "If you look at, not just in Nevada, but so far, Democrats are underperforming in Philadelphia and Atlanta, and now we're seeing Las Vegas."

"The Harris campaign appears to be struggling with Latinos, black men, and young voters," Turrentine said. "It appears that those problems have not been solved … Things like this, you know, give you a little bit of heartburn … Nevada is supposed to be, you know, one of our best states. And so it appears that some of our base voters are not very energized right now."

Early voting is ongoing and the data is incomplete, but that has not stopped Democrats from noting the absence of momentum. "If this is a vibe election, the current vibes ain't great," another strategist told the Hill.

A former aide in the Obama administration believes that Harris might still win, but a loss would not be surprising.

"It feels like two things are true at the same time," an aide told the Hill. "It's either … of course she was always a flawed candidate, nobody likes her, she's tainted by Biden, and all of the macro-factors have slid away from Team Blue it's becoming a border, economy, foreign affairs election."

"Or, of course he was a terrible candidate, ran a horrible, crazy campaign, had no real ground game or fundraising and then acted like an insane person," the aide added. "It's sort of the opposite of 2016, which was, 'How could this happen?' This feels more like, 'Of course this happened.' … We just don't know which yet."

The Harris campaign appears to believe that if it wins, it will not win big. The same cannot be said for the Trump campaign, which seems to feel optimistic about victory.

"Democrats wish Donald Trump wouldn't get more than 46% of the vote," Harris campaign senior adviser David Plouffe told CNN. "That's not reality. He's going to get up to 48% in all of these states. And so we just have to make sure we're hitting our win number, which depending on the state, could be 50, could be 49.5."

"Historically, it would be unusual to have seven states come down to a point or less," he added. "But I think at this point, you have to assume that's a distinct possibility."



Comparing behaviors to 2020 is stupid.

We were in the middle of the pandemic and Republicans were told to show up at the polls because they didn't trust vote by mail.

Totally different situation now.



movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another Kamala Lie - exaggerating her legal experience.

She claimed to have prosecuted hundreds of legal cases (which are all public), and has gradually walked that back.

Attorney Harmeet Dhillon says the figure is 10; her former boss Terrance Hallinan said it is nine.

LIED about working @ Mcdonalds
LIED about her legal experience
LIED about being middle class
Probably a lot more lies out there.


tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

I'm gonna say that comparing early or mail-in vote right now to 2020 is probably not very meaningful. It's not a COVID election this time. Trump was telling people not to trust mail ballots last time and isn't doing that this time.
Fair point. I'm just intrigued by the narrative coming out from both sides. As a matter of politics, this is a fascinating election cycle.

Another data point to the question of comparing to 2020.... Here is a 2016 early voting article from CNN that shows HRC with @300K early vote lead over Trump on Nov 8 in NC. The article notes this is concerning because it underperforms Obama 4 years earlier.

https://www.cnn.com/2016/11/07/politics/north-carolina-early-voting-2016/index.html
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"And let's be honest, even that number is suspect public records indicate no trace of her handling civil trials, and nobody can produce transcripts proving she actually led any of these supposed cases. "

A close friend was an attorney. She said as an insurance company attorney, she handled 60 - 65 cases at a time.
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There is a lot of Administrator / non-trial attorney time in her Wiki "CV". Seems pretty stupid to exaggerate her trial experience when she could easily have used an "I / my office" qualifier that nobody would have given 2 thoughts to.

1990 - 1994 Deputy DA in Alameda County, California

1994 - Jan, 1998 appointed to the state Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board and later to the California Medical Assistance Commission

February 1998 - July 2000 SF Assistant DA. There, she became the chief of the Career Criminal Division, supervising five other attorneys, where she prosecuted homicide, burglary, robbery and sexual assault cases, particularly three-strikes cases.

August 2000, Harris took a job at San Francisco City Hall, working for city attorney Louise Renne. Harris ran the Family and Children's Services Division, representing child abuse and neglect cases.

2002 - 2011, SF DA.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
But how does one supervise junior attorneys, when one's own experience is highly limited?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Amen to that, Massie is the most honorable Representative.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

"And let's be honest, even that number is suspect public records indicate no trace of her handling civil trials, and nobody can produce transcripts proving she actually led any of these supposed cases. "

A close friend was an attorney. She said as an insurance company attorney, she handled 60 - 65 cases at a time.
I'm a legal counsel, handled and tried are different items altogether. I have no doubts that Harris handled and oversaw hundreds of cases. The vast majority of cases don't go to trial, if they did the court system would literally collapse.

She for sure handled and tried a lot of cases. I was barely a litigator in my career and I have tried about 5 cases myself.

There is no win for Repugs or points scored by Repugs here

VOTE BLUE
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

But how does one supervise junior attorneys, when one's own experience is highly limited?
1-2 years in the legal world is like a world of experience. You are not making any points here

VOTE BLUE
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harmeet Dhillon said she was responsible for 10 cases - which includes Contra Costa and San Francisco. A FOIA request also showed miniscule and incomplete billing hours, and only working one eight hour day. And no, two years as a lawyer doesn't make her an expert.

It's not a huge issue, but a continuation of her lies.

"And let's be honest, even that number is suspect public records indicate no trace of her handling civil trials, and nobody can produce transcripts proving she actually led any of these supposed cases. "

VOTE PEACE.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Harmeet Dhillon said she was responsible for 10 cases - which includes Contra Costa and San Francisco. A FOIA request also showed miniscule and incomplete billing hours, and only working one eight hour day. And no, two years as a lawyer doesn't make her an expert.

It's not a huge issue, but a continuation of her lies.

"And let's be honest, even that number is suspect public records indicate no trace of her handling civil trials, and nobody can produce transcripts proving she actually led any of these supposed cases. "

VOTE PEACE.
Doesn't make her an expert, but you can manage junior counsels at that level.

What the hell does Harmeet Dhillon know about anything? She should be disbarred.

She tried to lead a Hindu prayer at RNC and was roundly attacked by MAGA for it. She didn't even defend herself, total loser

VOTE BLUE
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Another Kamala Lie - exaggerating her legal experience.

She claimed to have prosecuted hundreds of legal cases (which are all public), and has gradually walked that back.

Attorney Harmeet Dhillon says the figure is 10; her former boss Terrance Hallinan said it is nine.

LIED about working @ Mcdonalds
LIED about her legal experience
LIED about being middle class
Probably a lot more lies out there.





Apparently she also lies about being a Christian.

movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:


I love this, protest is great.

Do stupid things, play the price Mickey D beyotches

VOTE BLUE
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:


nut job

VOTE BLUE
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

movielover said:

Another Kamala Lie - exaggerating her legal experience.

She claimed to have prosecuted hundreds of legal cases (which are all public), and has gradually walked that back.

Attorney Harmeet Dhillon says the figure is 10; her former boss Terrance Hallinan said it is nine.

LIED about working @ Mcdonalds
LIED about her legal experience
LIED about being middle class
Probably a lot more lies out there.





Apparently she also lies about being a Christian.


Amuse is not credible, you should delete that X connection. It's rotting your brain

VOTE BLUE
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

movielover said:

Harmeet Dhillon said she was responsible for 10 cases - which includes Contra Costa and San Francisco. A FOIA request also showed miniscule and incomplete billing hours, and only working one eight hour day. And no, two years as a lawyer doesn't make her an expert.

It's not a huge issue, but a continuation of her lies.

"And let's be honest, even that number is suspect public records indicate no trace of her handling civil trials, and nobody can produce transcripts proving she actually led any of these supposed cases. "

VOTE PEACE.
Doesn't make her an expert, but you can manage junior counsels at that level.

What the hell does Harmeet Dhillon know about anything? She should be disbarred.

She tried to lead a Hindu prayer at RNC and was roundly attacked by MAGA for it. She didn't even defend herself, total loser

VOTE BLUE

Harmeet Dhillon, LOL...
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The same country helped fabricate the false dirty dossier, and set up George Papadopoulos and Carter Page. Read: Five Eyes.

movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

bear2034 said:


I love this, protest is great.

Do stupid things, play the price Mickey D beyotches

VOTE BLUE
"VOTE BLUE" ??????

What was intelligent about BLUE's exit from Afghanistan?

What was intelligent about BLUE surrendering Bagram Air Base to the Taliban, and evacuating all our forces, support personnel, and leaving behind many Americans, and Afghan allies? What was intelligent about BLUE making deal with the enemy to protect the escape route to the Kabul Airport, resulting in the death of 13 American soldiers? What was intelligent about turning over billions of dollars worth of weapons, ammunition, tanks, vehicles, artillery, planes, etc., to the enemy? (And don't say we saved on the shipping costs)

What was intelligent about BLUE deciding to throw open our southern border to all comers, with no plans to house, feed, or care for them? Did Blue even consider that the cost to the taxpayers, the citizens, will be in the billions or more. What was intelligent about BLUE deciding not to vet any of these people, resulting so far in 600,000+ people coming in who have previous criminal records? Along with hundreds who were on the terrorist watch list? As if land crossings were not enough, Blue decided to start flying these migrants over the border, at our and your expense. What was intelligent about granting amnesty to a million so far?

What is intelligent about BLUE reducing many felonies to misdemeanors, or eliminating bail, or not arresting some for felonies, or letting some felons from jail early? What is intelligent about defunding police, or not prosecuting some felony cases.

What is intelligent about BLUE's programs to end homelessness, or programs to fund sex change operations for prisoners?

What is intelligent about BLUE's public education policy, seducing young skulls of mush with left-wing political ideology from nursery school on up, instead of teaching math, science, and especially how to read and speak English?

Vote BLUE? As long as I live, if we are still permitted to vote, I won't be voting BLUE, if this is the kind of government we get with BLUE pols.

And Kamala Harris says she couldn't think of anything she would have done differently over the last 4 years, and then says her administration will be different from that of the current President. If you vote BLUE, you have no idea what you will be getting, except that it will be disastrous, like the last 4 years.

bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bill Clinton describes Kari Lake as 'physically attractive' while stumping for her opponent | Daily Mail Online


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13997391/bill-clinton-kari-lake-arizona-attractive.html




"If loving her is wrong, I don't wannabe right."
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Kari Lake gets less and less "physically attractive" the more you learn about her. Attractiveness is funny that way...
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Bill Clinton describes Kari Lake as 'physically attractive' while stumping for her opponent | Daily Mail Online


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13997391/bill-clinton-kari-lake-arizona-attractive.html




"If loving her is wrong, I don't wannabe right."

Dude has perpetual sober beer goggles.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:


why Repugs always want to kill off Big Bird, Rick Steve's and Check Please?

This has been going back to since the Bush days. Keep em uneducated

VOTE BLUE

First Page Last Page
Page 350 of 366
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.