Breaking News

2,748,937 Views | 20039 Replies | Last: 17 hrs ago by movielover
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Video of assualt.

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/116468650367386223
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Media will say gun violence has no place in this country.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Video of assault.


He's the one.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

Media will say gun violence has no place in this country.

You're in favor of gun violence having a place in this country?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Media will say gun violence has no place in this country.

You're in favor of gun violence having a place in this country?

MinotStateBeav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
member when Russia helped insurgents kick out France/US forces out of Mali

ISIS/Al Queda pushing Russian backed Malian leaders...thought this comment was kind of funny

movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?


movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So jailing violent felons reduces violent crime.

movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WTH.



PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Koreans don't play.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1723106872394873/?mibextid=CDWPTG
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The lunatic Left.

movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
60 Minutes interview tonight and expected swipes by the presstitute.



Meanwhile, Obama gave marching orders to the Libs via X that we don't know the Democrat hateful shooters motives. (We have the manifesto.)

Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

The lunatic Left.




His main role is to brainwash right-leaning Americans into supporting a horrible war of choice waged for Israel.

You know what is the ultimate irony here? If Trump keeps escalating and blows up Iran's infrastructure destroying their economy, we will have 10 MILLION PLUS new Muslim refugees streaming into Europe.

That is why Robinson is a huge hypocrite. He is there paid by neocon billionaires to gin up support for mideast wars for Israel, which turn economically viable states like Iraq, Syria, Libya, Somalia, Iran etc into complete basketcases and failed states, pushing millions to emigrate to the West. Libya in particular was a special disaster because that country became the main pathway for African migration to Europe.

Tommy's always railing about immigrants, Muslim immigrants specifically, but he will never mention the reasons for their migration, because these wars that generated massive immigration waves have been promoted by the same crowd that funds him.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The wars which I typically don't support, have been going on for decades. The influx started with uninvolved Sweden (now a basket case), ans Merkel trying to keep AfD at bay.

Most of the posts I see from him have to do with immigrant crime, children veing r*ped, tortured, trafficked, and harrassed, cultures being lost, and cities / countries being overwhelmed. And most of Western Europe gas woken up.

P.S Q1 London: 2200+ r*pes, 6600 sexual assaults, and over 12,000 cases of harassment/ stalking.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

The lunatic Left.



How's the war going?
Are we still WINNING?

Did you vote for the Peace President?
The "No New War" President? The "America First" President?

Do you feel betrayed.
My brother does.

PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bro, you have to tell your teammates to "turn down the temperature", as they say.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Congress briefed on UFOs?? The one Congressman is a serious guy, is this real or AI?

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DWogDAfDtxt/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Congress briefed on UFOs?? The one Congressman is a serious guy, is this real or AI?

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DWogDAfDtxt/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==

Ther interview is real. With regards to aliens, Cal88 is waiting to hear what Massie has to say first after he reveals the Massie List.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It always seemed Charles Barkley was a sincere man, and this proves it. An unlikely friendship started at a hotel bar. Not 'breaking', but still great.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DUDuQtBDtZa/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

movielover said:

Congress briefed on UFOs?? The one Congressman is a serious guy, is this real or AI?

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DWogDAfDtxt/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==

Ther interview is real. With regards to aliens, Cal88 is waiting to hear what Massie has to say first after he reveals the Massie List.


In complex matters like these, I rely on your own sound judgment - it's all about alien ginger giants in Kandahar.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DWNASltjyCA/?igsh=MTc4MmM1YmI2Ng==

Underwater UFOs the size of a football field that move at 200 MPH? Five - six locations.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We are all Americans, we have an American gun violence problem.

Also we have a right wing pursuit of divisiveness among Americans problem
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DWNASltjyCA/?igsh=MTc4MmM1YmI2Ng==

Underwater UFOs the size of a football field that move at 200 MPH? Five - six locations.


Probably a US, Russian or Chinese supercavitating submarine. The Russians have had supercavitating torpedoes that move at those speeds for a while now.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I ain't observing any sort of pause on this
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

I ain't observing any sort of pause on this

And you can then blame yourself and others for the large percentage of young democrats who think political violence is okay
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What are those percentages and what are those sources?

Tsk tsk, you're spouting stuff as facts that you have no evidence to support
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

What are those percentages and what are those sources?

Tsk tsk, you're spouting stuff as facts that you have no evidence to support

lol here you go
Recent Yougov poll.
22% of young democrats vs 7% of young republicans support political violence.

Tsk tsk, can't do his own research.

Choose kindness lol
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

SBGold said:

What are those percentages and what are those sources?

Tsk tsk, you're spouting stuff as facts that you have no evidence to support

lol here you go
Recent Yougov poll.
22% of young democrats vs 7% of young republicans support political violence.

Tsk tsk, can't do his own research.

Choose kindness lol

Oh behave! Claude says your wrong teach:

"The specific 22% vs. 7% figures you're citing don't appear in the YouGov polling data I can find. Here's what YouGov actually found, broken down by ideology and age:
By ideology (after the Charlie Kirk shooting, Sept. 2025):
  • Among liberals under 45, 26% said political violence can sometimes be justified, compared to 12% of liberals 45 and older. Among younger conservatives, 7% said it's sometimes justified, compared to 4% of older conservatives. The Hill
By party (same polling period):
  • 14% of Democrats, 13% of independents, and 6% of Republicans said violence can be justified to achieve political goals. Yahoo!
So the 7% figure for young Republicans does appear in the data (for younger conservatives specifically). But the 22% figure for young Democrats doesn't match the closest number is 26% for liberals under 45, which is an ideological category, not a strict party affiliation.
It's possible the 22% figure comes from a different poll, a different question framing, or is a misremembering/misquote of the actual numbers. The data does show a real partisan and generational gap on this question, but the specific figures you mentioned don't appear to be what YouGov reported. Worth being careful about the exact numbers when citing these statistics."

Citing inaccurate numbers, Claude calls you out with the tsk tsk.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

BearlySane88 said:

SBGold said:

What are those percentages and what are those sources?

Tsk tsk, you're spouting stuff as facts that you have no evidence to support

lol here you go
Recent Yougov poll.
22% of young democrats vs 7% of young republicans support political violence.

Tsk tsk, can't do his own research.

Choose kindness lol

Oh behave! Claude says your wrong teach:

"The specific 22% vs. 7% figures you're citing don't appear in the YouGov polling data I can find. Here's what YouGov actually found, broken down by ideology and age:
By ideology (after the Charlie Kirk shooting, Sept. 2025):
  • Among liberals under 45, 26% said political violence can sometimes be justified, compared to 12% of liberals 45 and older. Among younger conservatives, 7% said it's sometimes justified, compared to 4% of older conservatives. The Hill
By party (same polling period):
  • 14% of Democrats, 13% of independents, and 6% of Republicans said violence can be justified to achieve political goals. Yahoo!
So the 7% figure for young Republicans does appear in the data (for younger conservatives specifically). But the 22% figure for young Democrats doesn't match the closest number is 26% for liberals under 45, which is an ideological category, not a strict party affiliation.
It's possible the 22% figure comes from a different poll, a different question framing, or is a misremembering/misquote of the actual numbers. The data does show a real partisan and generational gap on this question, but the specific figures you mentioned don't appear to be what YouGov reported. Worth being careful about the exact numbers when citing these statistics."

Citing inaccurate numbers, Claude calls you out with the tsk tsk.


Typo, 1vs2. It happens lol. Look at you, doing your own research. So proud of you student except it's you're not your. When correcting someone, you should check your grammar
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'll take the grammar hit if you take the hit on everything you noted and posted on the subject. Shouldn't be an issue because the actual research showed you to be citing faulty stats.

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN
First Page Last Page
Page 563 of 573
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.