Breaking News

3,195,514 Views | 20865 Replies | Last: 11 hrs ago by SBGold
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

oski003 said:

I am not sure when this took effect but you now need to get a boater card to operate a boat in California. You need to take a 3-5 hour online course and apply for a boater card at Californiaboatercard.com.

Aunburdened said:

January 1, 2025



January 1st, 2018





It actually didn't apply to most adults until much more recently.

"By Jan. 1, 2023, all boaters 50 years of age or younger must carry a card. All boaters, regardless of age, will need to carry one by Jan. 1, 2025."

https://www.parks.ca.gov/NewsRelease/1102

Not sure why you felt the need to wrongly correct the poster above you. Bronze medal post.
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

oski003 said:

I am not sure when this took effect but you now need to get a boater card to operate a boat in California. You need to take a 3-5 hour online course and apply for a boater card at Californiaboatercard.com.

Aunburdened said:

January 1, 2025



January 1st, 2018




You should definitely visit Berkeley Optometry and probably sign up for Philosophy 12A as well.
https://californiaboatercard.com/about-the-card/
Quote:

As of January 1, 2025, the card is required for all motorized vessel operators, regardless of age.

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

oski003 said:

.I am not sure when this took effect but you now need to get a boater card to operate a boat in California. You need to take a 3-5 hour online course and apply for a boater card at Californiaboatercard.com.

Aunburdened said:

January 1, 2025



January 1st, 2018





It actually didn't apply to most adults until much more recently.




But it clearly started on January 1st, 2018
I got mine in the Fall of 2018.

Most courses are $30 to $40

60 multiple choice questions.
Must score 80% or better.

I scored 92%

Courses Information California Boater Card

smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

> But it clearly started on January 1st, 2018

huh. back a while, in the early 60s, anyone a'tall could steer a motorboat pulling skiers,
mosdef bratty me included. # south of coronado / san diego dunes
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looks like she had her eyes done.

Muckieeye
How long do you want to ignore this user?
One of these days you will cite an actual source rather than X MAGA content creators.


Who am I kidding? You'll never leave your MAGA "news" bubble.
Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives...
I never meant to say that the Conservatives are generally stupid. I meant to say that stupid people are generally Conservative.
-John Stewart Mill
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Muckieeye said:

One of these days you will cite an actual source rather than X MAGA content creators.

Who am I kidding? You'll never leave your MAGA "news" bubble.

The source from the post above was Hillary Clinton, herself, through an interview with CNN and posted on X by an account named Amuse.
Muckieeye
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No, the source is Amuse, posting an out of context clip, and providing his own spin and interpretation of what was said.

Not actual news or reporting of facts. Just garden variety MAGA social media content. And MAGA BI laps it up and spits it out as if it were fact.
Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives...
I never meant to say that the Conservatives are generally stupid. I meant to say that stupid people are generally Conservative.
-John Stewart Mill
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Muckieeye said:

No, the source is Amuse, posting an out of context clip, and providing his own spin and interpretation of what was said.

Not actual news or reporting of facts. Just garden variety MAGA social media content. And MAGA BI laps it up and spits it out as if it were fact.

"We lose total control..." - Hillary

We? Control?

Obama said similar things.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AMuse... is that the college drop out who couldn't make it thru the University of Texas and became a MAGA influencer on Twitter?
Muckieeye
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Psst : moderating content on a social media platform is not censorship of free speech. If it was, you and movie and 003 and the pretend 003 would be whining about the moderation on this site.
Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives...
I never meant to say that the Conservatives are generally stupid. I meant to say that stupid people are generally Conservative.
-John Stewart Mill
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Muckieeye said:

Psst : moderating content on a social media platform is not censorship of free speech. If it was, you and movie and 003 and the pretend 003 would be whining about the moderation on this site.

Direct government mandates, bans, viewpoint-based regulations on platforms, and coercive pressure (when officials use threats of regulation, antitrust action, funding cuts) are forms of censorship and unconstitutional.

You are the one whining about this site and currently posting from purgatory. Do they have AC there?
Muckieeye
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:


Direct government mandates, bans, viewpoint-based regulations on platforms, and coercive pressure (when officials use threats of regulation, antitrust action, funding cuts) are forms of censorship and unconstitutional.


I'm just gonna leave this here so the irony and hypocrisy of your post can really shine.
Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives...
I never meant to say that the Conservatives are generally stupid. I meant to say that stupid people are generally Conservative.
-John Stewart Mill
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Muckieeye said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:


Direct government mandates, bans, viewpoint-based regulations on platforms, and coercive pressure (when officials use threats of regulation, antitrust action, funding cuts) are forms of censorship and unconstitutional.

I'm just gonna leave this here so the irony and hypocrisy of your post can really shine.

BI OT prison mellowed you out.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Free drug paraphernalia passed out in The City, it sounds like Glide Memorial Church does it, too.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYqBKH6yFm4/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sounds of Gunfire at the White House

https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/23/politics/white-house-area-gunshots
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

movielover said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Muckieeye said:

BearlySane88 said:

We need 100 racist, bigots in senate?

Plenty of those on the right side of the aisle.
Edit to add: and even more among their base.

KKK looking to bypass SPLC and start getting funding directly from ActBlue?

The KKK was a Democrat organization, and all the Democrat big wigs attended long-term Senator Robert Byrd's (D-WV) funeral.

Byrd was a member and recruiter (Exalted Cyclops) for the Ku Klux Klan in the early 1940s; he led a 14-hour filibuster against the 1964 Civil Rights Act. With considerable power, in 1942, he recruited 150 members to organize a local KKK chapter in West Virginia.

81 million Democrats and independents voted for a president who was close friends with a prominent KKK member.

Byrd's views evolved over his life so maybe there's hope for you guys.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

movielover said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Muckieeye said:

BearlySane88 said:

We need 100 racist, bigots in senate?

Plenty of those on the right side of the aisle.
Edit to add: and even more among their base.

KKK looking to bypass SPLC and start getting funding directly from ActBlue?

The KKK was a Democrat organization, and all the Democrat big wigs attended long-term Senator Robert Byrd's (D-WV) funeral.

Byrd was a member and recruiter (Exalted Cyclops) for the Ku Klux Klan in the early 1940s; he led a 14-hour filibuster against the 1964 Civil Rights Act. With considerable power, in 1942, he recruited 150 members to organize a local KKK chapter in West Virginia.

81 million Democrats and independents voted for a president who was close friends with a prominent KKK member.

Byrd's views evolved over his life so maybe there's hope for you guys.

Byrd remained a lifelong Democrat until his death.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

Big C said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

movielover said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Muckieeye said:

BearlySane88 said:

We need 100 racist, bigots in senate?

Plenty of those on the right side of the aisle.
Edit to add: and even more among their base.

KKK looking to bypass SPLC and start getting funding directly from ActBlue?

The KKK was a Democrat organization, and all the Democrat big wigs attended long-term Senator Robert Byrd's (D-WV) funeral.

Byrd was a member and recruiter (Exalted Cyclops) for the Ku Klux Klan in the early 1940s; he led a 14-hour filibuster against the 1964 Civil Rights Act. With considerable power, in 1942, he recruited 150 members to organize a local KKK chapter in West Virginia.

81 million Democrats and independents voted for a president who was close friends with a prominent KKK member.

Byrd's views evolved over his life so maybe there's hope for you guys.

Byrd remained a lifelong Democrat until his death.

Yes, the Democratic Party evolved. I know you people like to bring up how Lincoln was the first Republican President and whites in the South were mostly Democrats from the Civil war until the mid-late 20th century, but as you know, things changed.

And the Dems are still evolving! Okay, maybe devolving a bit, but still...
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Suspect 'down' after shooting at officers near White House, official says
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Madison Prep graduation celebration.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1673398227036140/?mibextid=9drbnH
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't understand why people are attacking him on Memorial Day when families hit the road.

Prices of food and fuel have been very affordable under President Trump.
Especially compared to a year ago.

MAGA!!!





Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Where is the outrage?
Hello Title IX?





Trans track star sweeps three events, shares first-place podium and qualifies for CA state meet yet again | OutKick
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
^ Instances like this are very rare. Can be handled by promoting a third biological female to the podium.

If it starts happening significantly more often, reexamine the situation and come up with new solutions.

That said, if AB Hernandez hasn't been transgender for at least several years (and taking puberty blockers, etc), I would just remove her now. There are shades of gray to this issue.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

^ Instances like this are very rare. Can be handled by promoting a third biological female to the podium.

If it starts happening significantly more often, reexamine the situation and come up with new solutions.


I'm a big track and field fan.
Probably my most favorite sport of all-time to watch.
I've attended numerous Olympic Trials for T&F since 1984.

Yes, these instances are very rare but they are still a violation of Title IX.

Might as well have an Open Division and call it a day.

"As if in a quiet acknowledgment of the problematic nature of these circumstances, the CIF requires that, in later competition rounds of the state competitions, any trans athlete who places in an event must share the podium with the next highest-placing female, standing side by side."
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The issue is a joke and not debatable. Trans men can compete against men. That removes the discrimination issue from the equation. All that remains is the fairness issue….which means no competition against women by trans women.

Sometimes we make decisions in life that foreclose us from exercising an option we wanted to exercise. Somehow I don't think someone that never heard "no" from mummy and daddy thinks that rule applies to them.
“Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside”
—Jim Morrison

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Big C said:

^ Instances like this are very rare. Can be handled by promoting a third biological female to the podium.

If it starts happening significantly more often, reexamine the situation and come up with new solutions.


I'm a big track and field fan.
Probably my most favorite sport of all-time to watch.
I've attended numerous Olympic Trials for T&F since 1984.

Yes, these instances are very rare but they are still a violation of Title IX.

Might as well have an Open Division and call it a day.

"As if in a quiet acknowledgment of the problematic nature of these circumstances, the CIF requires that, in later competition rounds of the state competitions, any trans athlete who places in an event must share the podium with the next highest-placing female, standing side by side."


Hell has frozen over. I agree with Mr. Waggers.
First Page Last Page
Page 575 of 597
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.