DiabloWags said:

---

movielover said:

---

Two peer-reviewed studies

---

From who exactly?
A forensic pathologist?
Or a "survey" of embalmers?

---

It's Misinformationpalooza, lucky us

VOTE BLUE

SBGold said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

movielover said:

---

Two peer-reviewed studies

---

From who exactly?
A forensic pathologist?
Or a "survey" of embalmers?

---

It's Misinformationpalooza, lucky us

VOTE BLUE

---

I'm looking forward to an Amusing tweet or two.
Aren't you?

I was skeptical but I just took a knife and cut my arm and a bunch of white fibers oozed out

Do your own research

dajo9 said:

---

I was skeptical but I just took a knife and cut my arm and a bunch of white fibers oozed out

Do your own research

---

LOL

DiabloWags said:

---

SBGold said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

movielover said:

---

Two peer-reviewed studies

---

From who exactly?
A forensic pathologist?
Or a "survey" of embalmers?

---

It's Misinformationpalooza, lucky us

VOTE BLUE

---

I'm looking forward to an Amusing tweet or two.
Aren't you?

---

And the sock puppets, we need their views on this!

Thanks for your attention to this matter!

tequila4kapp said:

---

I would appreciate hearing from people with medical expertise on this. Online / AI reports indicate these existed before COVID vaccines and they form post-mortem.

---

The rate of those clots increased substantially after 2019:

I was under the impression that these calamary clots didn't appear before after the vaccines were introduced and that only the vaccinated got it.

Link to the paper "Self-Reported Observations of Unusual White Fibrous Structures in Embalmed Corpses: Multi-Year Survey Results from… pic.twitter.com/2JPlIJdkax

— Gaute Adler Nilsen - Shadowbanning is censorship! (@GauteNilsen) July 2, 2026

Terribly small sample size.
Not even remotely statistically significant.

Let me know when a peer reviewed research study from a group of PATHOLOGISTS exists.
Not embalmers from a funeral home.

SBGold said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

SBGold said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

movielover said:

---

Two peer-reviewed studies

---

From who exactly?
A forensic pathologist?
Or a "survey" of embalmers?

---

It's Misinformationpalooza, lucky us

VOTE BLUE

---

I'm looking forward to an Amusing tweet or two.
Aren't you?

---

And the sock puppets, we need their views on this!

Thanks for your attention to this matter!

---

It is pretty entertaining seeing how much you guys think about puppets.

movielover said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

SBGold said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

I thought it was going to be BELGIUM.

---

What's wrong with Spain? That's an amazing country

---

Spain did not allow the US to use its bases in the Gaza and Iran campaigns, as well their government is openly hostile to Israel wrt the Gaza genocide.

Better stock up on Spanish wines!

https://shop.klwines.com/products/details/2001030
https://shop.klwines.com/products/details/1976711

---

I think Spain also didn't even make any promises to increase its military spend like the other NATO members did? (Not that I expect most of them to keep this "promise" anyway.)

---

Spain doesn't need to spend more than 2% of its budget on defense, neither do most European countries.

---

They do if they want to carry their weight if they go after Russia. They'll probably wait Trump out, and commit US Treasury and blood (men).

---

Why would Spain go after Russia? There's probably 1500 miles and a half dozen countries between the two. Also, why would Spain have the capability of committing "US Treasury"?

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

movielover said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

SBGold said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

I thought it was going to be BELGIUM.

---

What's wrong with Spain? That's an amazing country

---

Spain did not allow the US to use its bases in the Gaza and Iran campaigns, as well their government is openly hostile to Israel wrt the Gaza genocide.

Better stock up on Spanish wines!

https://shop.klwines.com/products/details/2001030
https://shop.klwines.com/products/details/1976711

---

I think Spain also didn't even make any promises to increase its military spend like the other NATO members did? (Not that I expect most of them to keep this "promise" anyway.)

---

Spain doesn't need to spend more than 2% of its budget on defense, neither do most European countries.

---

They do if they want to carry their weight if they go after Russia. They'll probably wait Trump out, and commit US Treasury and blood (men).

---

Why would Spain go after Russia? There's probably 1500 miles and a half dozen countries between the two. Also, why would Spain have the capability of committing "US Treasury"?

---

Europe going after Russia and they would use it through NATO.

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

movielover said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

SBGold said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

I thought it was going to be BELGIUM.

---

What's wrong with Spain? That's an amazing country

---

Spain did not allow the US to use its bases in the Gaza and Iran campaigns, as well their government is openly hostile to Israel wrt the Gaza genocide.

Better stock up on Spanish wines!

https://shop.klwines.com/products/details/2001030
https://shop.klwines.com/products/details/1976711

---

I think Spain also didn't even make any promises to increase its military spend like the other NATO members did? (Not that I expect most of them to keep this "promise" anyway.)

---

Spain doesn't need to spend more than 2% of its budget on defense, neither do most European countries.

---

They do if they want to carry their weight if they go after Russia. They'll probably wait Trump out, and commit US Treasury and blood (men).

---

Why would Spain go after Russia? There's probably 1500 miles and a half dozen countries between the two. Also, why would Spain have the capability of committing "US Treasury"?

---

Great question.
I can't wait to become better informed.

DiabloWags said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

movielover said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

SBGold said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

I thought it was going to be BELGIUM.

---

What's wrong with Spain? That's an amazing country

---

Spain did not allow the US to use its bases in the Gaza and Iran campaigns, as well their government is openly hostile to Israel wrt the Gaza genocide.

Better stock up on Spanish wines!

https://shop.klwines.com/products/details/2001030
https://shop.klwines.com/products/details/1976711

---

I think Spain also didn't even make any promises to increase its military spend like the other NATO members did? (Not that I expect most of them to keep this "promise" anyway.)

---

Spain doesn't need to spend more than 2% of its budget on defense, neither do most European countries.

---

They do if they want to carry their weight if they go after Russia. They'll probably wait Trump out, and commit US Treasury and blood (men).

---

Why would Spain go after Russia? There's probably 1500 miles and a half dozen countries between the two. Also, why would Spain have the capability of committing "US Treasury"?

---

Great question.
I can't wait to become better informed.

---

You would be better informed if you didn't put people you disagree with on ignore.

DiabloWags said:

---

Terribly small sample size.
Not even remotely statistically significant.

Let me know when a peer reviewed research study from a group of PATHOLOGISTS exists.
Not embalmers from a funeral home.

---

Embalmers process a large number of bodies and are in a unique position to report anomalies.

Who is going to finance the type of study you are advocating, Pfizer?

Cal88 said:

---

DiabloWags said:

---

Terribly small sample size.
Not even remotely statistically significant.

Let me know when a peer reviewed research study from a group of PATHOLOGISTS exists.
Not embalmers from a funeral home.

---

Embalmers process a large number of bodies and are in a unique position to report anomalies.

Who is going to finance the type of study you are advocating, Pfizer?

---

The NIH.

Good luck with that.

Cal88 said:

---

Good luck with that.

---

Are you claiming that a group of embalmers can't apply for an NIH grant?
How about a group of pathologists?

The NIH is unlikely to fund research that could threaten hundreds of billions in big pharma sales. As well in terms of HR, the NIH and FDA have a revolving door situation with the industry. They don't bite the hand that feeds them.

Quote:

---

An investigation published by The BMJ highlighted that nine of the past 10 FDA commissioners went on to work for the pharmaceutical industry or serve on a drug company's board after leaving the agency. [1, 2]
Several prominent high-ranking officials from both the FDA and NIH transitioned into influential positions within the private pharmaceutical sector:

1. Dr. Scott Gottlieb (Former FDA Commissioner)

• Government Role: FDA Commissioner (20172019). [1]
• Private Sector Transition: Only two months after stepping down from his role as the nation's top drug regulator, Gottlieb joined the board of directors at Pfizer. He also became a venture capitalist for health-sector firms like New Enterprise Associates. [1, 2, 3]
• Revolving Door Impact: During his time leading the FDA, Gottlieb advanced policies aimed at speeding up generic drug approvals. Critics noted that his swift move to Pfizerone of the largest drug manufacturers in the worldsymbolised a classic revolving door scenario. [1, 2, 3]

2. Dr. Margaret Hamburg (Former FDA Commissioner)

• Government Role: FDA Commissioner (20092015). [1, 2]
• Private Sector Transition: Following her leadership at the FDA, Hamburg served on the boards of multiple healthcare and public health organisations.
• Revolving Door Impact: Media and ethics watchdogs later raised scrutiny regarding financial overlap. According to The BMJ, while she led the FDA, she was permitted to maintain an interest in a hedge fund managed by her husband's company that consistently held investments in FDA-regulated drug companies. [1]

3. Dr. Robert Califf (Former FDA Commissioner)

• Government Role: FDA Commissioner (Two terms: 20162017 and 20222025). [1]
• Private Sector Transition: Between his two stints as FDA Commissioner, Califf worked closely with tech and pharma, notably as a senior advisor for Alphabet (Google Health and Verily) and a consultant for pharmaceutical giants like Merck, Amgen, and Biogen. [1]
• Revolving Door Impact: His deep corporate ties drew heavy criticism from progressive lawmakers during his second Senate confirmation hearing, pointing to his multi-million dollar corporate earnings between government terms as an example of a "double-revolving" door.

4. Dr. Jeffrey Siegel (Former FDA Medical Officer)

• Government Role: Supervisory Medical Officer, FDA Division of Anesthesia, Analgesia, and Rheumatology Products.
• Private Sector Transition: Left the FDA to join Roche (and its subsidiary Genentech).
• Revolving Door Impact: At Genentech, Siegel was hired to direct the clinical development of the arthritis drug tocilizumab (Actemra). This was highly controversial because, while at the FDA, Siegel was the primary reviewer who had managed and overseen the successful clinical reviews of that exact drug. [1]

5. Dr. Elias Zerhouni (Former NIH Director)

• Government Role: Director of the National Institutes of Health (20022008).
• Private Sector Transition: Joined French pharmaceutical giant Sanofi in 2010 as their President of Global Research and Development.
• Revolving Door Impact: Zerhouni oversaw a multi-billion dollar budget at the NIH, and his transition directly into executive leadership at a top-five global pharmaceutical company underscored concerns about public health leaders monetising their agency experience to benefit private product pipelines.

The Micro-Level "Behind the Scenes" Transitions
The revolving door is not just limited to agency heads. According to an extensive study published in The BMJ, over 57% of FDA medical reviewers who leave the agency go on to work or consult directly for the biopharmaceutical companies they previously regulated. [1, 2]

---

Sorry, but I'm still not putting any significance on a sample size of 345.

I ran into a pair of grandfathers at the Costco Food Court when the ObamaCare website was imploding. The Indian grandfather said, "You should listen to him, his son is a big shot."

The European-American grandfather went on to say his son was the CEO of a big pharmaceutical company, flew in from Europe to meet w Obama, but all h-ll was breaking loose when their $400 million health care poorly designed database / website was inoperable.

The second grandfather went on to say that Obama only trusted two or three people, which included his wife and Valerie Jarrett.

Large sections of India also dodged the Covid bullet w a simple regiment, not vaxes.

DiabloWags said:

---

Sorry, but I'm still not putting any significance on a sample size of 345.

---

Would that be 345 embalmers? We're talking about literally tens of thousands of bodies having been processed in the last few years by these embalmers!

WASHINGTON, July 9 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday terminated the last three members of the Election Assistance Commission, the independent, federal commission that assists election administration officials nationwide, the White House confirmed.

The remaining three commissioners of the four-member bipartisan commission were forced out of the commission on Thursday in different ways. The one Republican appointee resigned and the other two Democratic appointees were fired via an email from the White House Presidential Personnel Office, according to one person familiar with the decision and two other people briefed on the terminations.


The fourth commissioner departed the commission in April.

The terminations follow the recent Supreme Court decision that granted the president more power to fire members of independent agencies, and a push by Trump for more federal intervention in voting processes, traditionally the purview of the states, as midterm elections approach in November.

"On behalf of President Donald J. Trump, I am writing to inform you that your position as Commissioner of the Election Assistance Commission is terminated, effective immediately. Thank you for your service," the termination email, seen by Reuters, said.

The White House confirmed the terminations after Reuters' initial report.

Two places I am going to depart this earth from without ever having fouled even as much as a baby toe touching their soil:

1. Las Vegas; and
2. Florida

*Drop nukes on both for all I care

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Are you excited to fly into President Donald J Trump Airport now in Palm Beach, Fl?

---

I only fly into Orlando and Miami.

And rarely as Florida is mostly terrible.

bearister said:

---

Two places I am going to depart this earth from without ever having fouled even as much as a baby toe touching their soil:

1. Las Vegas; and
2. Florida

*Drop nukes on both for all I care

---

Great Minds Think Alike: One of my lifetime goals is to never visit Las Vegas. (I find it helps me achieve if I have a few goals that take zero effort.) Unfortunately, a flight I was on about ten years ago stopped there, but since I didn't get off the plane, I'm saying I'm still good.

As for Florida, I'm no fan either, but:

+ the Citrus Bowl was awesome
+ one of my bestest friends ever lives in Tallahassee
+ my in-laws lived near Sarasota... it was actually a nice place to visit in January or February... summertime, forget it

Hmmm… not sure why I got a blank post.

Lindsey Graham launches a fact finding investigation into Charlie Kirk and Mitch McConnell

Pass the SAVE America Act in honor of Lindsey Graham.

For Lindsey.

— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) July 12, 2026

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

Pass the SAVE America Act in honor of Lindsey Graham.

For Lindsey.

— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) July 12, 2026

---

Good career move by Lindsay