LOL
Post Reply
1 of 1
The Lincoln Project
1,943 Views |
16 Replies |
Last: 3 yr ago by Econ For Dummies
GBear4Life
LOL
LOL
American Vermin
Good to know that Glenn Greenwald and BF2 now consider the New York Times a source of reliable reporting.
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.sycasey said:
Good to know that Glenn Greenwald and BF2 now consider the New York Times a source of reliable reporting.
The difference between a right wing conspiracy and the truth is about 20 months.
I see, so they're only reliable when their conclusion is politically useful to you.BearForce2 said:Even a clock is right twice a day.sycasey said:
Good to know that Glenn Greenwald and BF2 now consider the New York Times a source of reliable reporting.
Good to know.
How's that Russia investigation going for you?sycasey said:I see, so they're only reliable when their conclusion is politically useful to you.BearForce2 said:Even a clock is right twice a day.sycasey said:
Good to know that Glenn Greenwald and BF2 now consider the New York Times a source of reliable reporting.
Good to know.
Dunno, how do you feel about the New York Times' reporting on that matter?MinotStateBeav said:How's that Russia investigation going for you?sycasey said:I see, so they're only reliable when their conclusion is politically useful to you.BearForce2 said:Even a clock is right twice a day.sycasey said:
Good to know that Glenn Greenwald and BF2 now consider the New York Times a source of reliable reporting.
Good to know.
Do Russian oligarchs accept a discharge in bankruptcy order from a bankruptcy court with regard to a defaulted loan?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
The Lincoln Project SOUNDED like such a good idea, but the more I watched their videos, the more I agreed with the guy above who said they were "videos made for liberals".
Oh well, Trump's gone, so the story has a happy ending. Some weapons in a war won't be all that effective, nor will some drugs in a pandemic. Some will profit when they don't deserve it. Point is, we won the war.
Big C said:
The Lincoln Project SOUNDED like such a good idea, but the more I watched their videos, the more I agreed with the guy above who said they were "videos made for liberals".
Oh well, Trump's gone, so the story has a happy ending. Some weapons in a war won't be all that effective, nor will some drugs in a pandemic. Some will profit when they don't deserve it. Point is, we won the war.
My attitude towards them was that I'm totally fine with running attack ads against Trump, but it didn't seem like they really needed my money.
I'd be curious to know what the primary source of their donations actually was. Folks like Greenwald love to claim that it was all liberals, but they also seem like a prime target for affluent Never Trump conservatives who don't want to donate to Democrats.
dittosycasey said:Big C said:
The Lincoln Project SOUNDED like such a good idea, but the more I watched their videos, the more I agreed with the guy above who said they were "videos made for liberals".
Oh well, Trump's gone, so the story has a happy ending. Some weapons in a war won't be all that effective, nor will some drugs in a pandemic. Some will profit when they don't deserve it. Point is, we won the war.
My attitude towards them was that I'm totally fine with running attack ads against Trump, but it didn't seem like they really needed my money.
I'd be curious to know what the primary source of their donations actually was. Folks like Greenwald love to claim that it was all liberals, but they also seem like a prime target for affluent Never Trump conservatives who don't want to donate to Democrats.
American Vermin
How many people? Bearister and who else?BlueAnon said:They grifted you resistance liberals something fierce. Look at all the people who talked about their ads on this website and count how many of them were Biden voters.sycasey said:Big C said:
The Lincoln Project SOUNDED like such a good idea, but the more I watched their videos, the more I agreed with the guy above who said they were "videos made for liberals".
Oh well, Trump's gone, so the story has a happy ending. Some weapons in a war won't be all that effective, nor will some drugs in a pandemic. Some will profit when they don't deserve it. Point is, we won the war.
My attitude towards them was that I'm totally fine with running attack ads against Trump, but it didn't seem like they rlly needed my money.
I'd be curious to know what the primary source of their donations actually was. Folks like Greenwald love to claim that it was all liberals, but they also seem like a prime target for affluent Never Trump conservatives who don't want to donate to Democrats.
sycasey project said:You.sycasey said:How many people? Bearister and who else?BlueAnon said:They grifted you resistance liberals something fierce. Look at all the people who talked about their ads on this website and count how many of them were Biden voters.sycasey said:Big C said:
The Lincoln Project SOUNDED like such a good idea, but the more I watched their videos, the more I agreed with the guy above who said they were "videos made for liberals".
Oh well, Trump's gone, so the story has a happy ending. Some weapons in a war won't be all that effective, nor will some drugs in a pandemic. Some will profit when they don't deserve it. Point is, we won the war.
My attitude towards them was that I'm totally fine with running attack ads against Trump, but it didn't seem like they rlly needed my money.
I'd be curious to know what the primary source of their donations actually was. Folks like Greenwald love to claim that it was all liberals, but they also seem like a prime target for affluent Never Trump conservatives who don't want to donate to Democrats.
You got owned worst of all.
Remember this?
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/96368/replies/1769021Quote:
Is this supposed to be controversial? The people who are doing the work are getting paid?
And this?
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/86962/replies/1771218Quote:
Yeah, I understand why some liberals/leftists would be skeptical of The Lincoln Project, given the histories of those who founded it. But they aren't just going after Trump, they're also running ads to help defeat Republican House and Senate candidates. They legit believe the Republican Party needs to be burned to the ground and rebuilt (and on that point, I agree with them).
And this?
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/81358/replies/1802790Quote:
What is the grift and where was it exposed?
And this?
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/81358/replies/1802828Quote:
This is what I thought as well. The accusation seems to be that they were getting too much money to possibly be spending it all, but that's not evidence of grift. It's just evidence you don't know everything about their internal finances.
And this?
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/98115/replies/1803060Quote:
Where was that thread? The one I saw had a lot of assumptions and guesswork, not actual data.
And this?
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/98147/replies/1803186Quote:
More like I wanted to see more actual proof and it isn't there.
But you'll do your usual thing and ignore that while continuing to go with your preconceived notion.
And this?
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/98700/replies/1812561Quote:
The thing is that turnout was up all over, which means you also had a lot of NEW REPUBLICANS. Theoretically, Lincoln Project ads could have turned some Republicans who were just replaced with new Trump voters. Or turned people who no longer call themselves Republicans. This data doesn't necessarily tell you anything definitive, though of course many people are using it to confirm their prior assumptions. And that's without even getting into how exit poll data is probably not reliable at this stage.
I don't care much about the Lincoln Project one way or the other. I think it's very possible their methods didn't work; I just don't think anything out there right now proves it. And as for calling them a "grift," IMO to prove that you have to prove more than just ineffectiveness. A true grifter takes your money and never does what he promised to do. The Lincoln Project promised to produce anti-Republican ads and they did, so on that level it doesn't look like a grift to me. Even if the ads were ineffective that doesn't make it a grift.
And yet you claim you "don't care much about the Lincoln Project one way or the other."
For a guy who didn't care, you sure defended them a lot. Probably because of all the money you gave them.
Not only are you the most intellectually dishonest person on this forum, you're also very very dumb.
#BlueAnon is sycasey
sycasey is #BlueAnon
Is the sycaseyproject reporting sycasey to the moderators for disinformation?
sycasey project said:You.sycasey said:How many people? Bearister and who else?BlueAnon said:They grifted you resistance liberals something fierce. Look at all the people who talked about their ads on this website and count how many of them were Biden voters.sycasey said:Big C said:
The Lincoln Project SOUNDED like such a good idea, but the more I watched their videos, the more I agreed with the guy above who said they were "videos made for liberals".
Oh well, Trump's gone, so the story has a happy ending. Some weapons in a war won't be all that effective, nor will some drugs in a pandemic. Some will profit when they don't deserve it. Point is, we won the war.
My attitude towards them was that I'm totally fine with running attack ads against Trump, but it didn't seem like they rlly needed my money.
I'd be curious to know what the primary source of their donations actually was. Folks like Greenwald love to claim that it was all liberals, but they also seem like a prime target for affluent Never Trump conservatives who don't want to donate to Democrats.
You got owned worst of all.
Remember this?
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/96368/replies/1769021Quote:
Is this supposed to be controversial? The people who are doing the work are getting paid?
And this?
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/86962/replies/1771218Quote:
Yeah, I understand why some liberals/leftists would be skeptical of The Lincoln Project, given the histories of those who founded it. But they aren't just going after Trump, they're also running ads to help defeat Republican House and Senate candidates. They legit believe the Republican Party needs to be burned to the ground and rebuilt (and on that point, I agree with them).
And this?
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/81358/replies/1802790Quote:
What is the grift and where was it exposed?
And this?
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/81358/replies/1802828Quote:
This is what I thought as well. The accusation seems to be that they were getting too much money to possibly be spending it all, but that's not evidence of grift. It's just evidence you don't know everything about their internal finances.
And this?
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/98115/replies/1803060Quote:
Where was that thread? The one I saw had a lot of assumptions and guesswork, not actual data.
And this?
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/98147/replies/1803186Quote:
More like I wanted to see more actual proof and it isn't there.
But you'll do your usual thing and ignore that while continuing to go with your preconceived notion.
And this?
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/98700/replies/1812561Quote:
The thing is that turnout was up all over, which means you also had a lot of NEW REPUBLICANS. Theoretically, Lincoln Project ads could have turned some Republicans who were just replaced with new Trump voters. Or turned people who no longer call themselves Republicans. This data doesn't necessarily tell you anything definitive, though of course many people are using it to confirm their prior assumptions. And that's without even getting into how exit poll data is probably not reliable at this stage.
I don't care much about the Lincoln Project one way or the other. I think it's very possible their methods didn't work; I just don't think anything out there right now proves it. And as for calling them a "grift," IMO to prove that you have to prove more than just ineffectiveness. A true grifter takes your money and never does what he promised to do. The Lincoln Project promised to produce anti-Republican ads and they did, so on that level it doesn't look like a grift to me. Even if the ads were ineffective that doesn't make it a grift.
And yet you claim you "don't care much about the Lincoln Project one way or the other."
For a guy who didn't care, you sure defended them a lot. Probably because of all the money you gave them.
Not only are you the most intellectually dishonest person on this forum, you're also very very dumb.
#BlueAnon is sycasey
sycasey is #BlueAnon
In every one of these threads I said there wasn't enough evidence the Lincoln Project was a grift, and that I wanted to see more about how their internal finances worked. The NYT seems to be doing some of that work now. That's fine. You seem to have confused uncertainty with dishonesty.
I never sent the LP a dime.
sycasey project said:sycasey is currently snitching on me to the moderators for informationAnarchistbear said:Is the sycaseyproject reporting sycasey to the moderators for disinformation?sycasey project said:You.sycasey said:How many people? Bearister and who else?BlueAnon said:They grifted you resistance liberals something fierce. Look at all the people who talked about their ads on this website and count how many of them were Biden voters.sycasey said:Big C said:
The Lincoln Project SOUNDED like such a good idea, but the more I watched their videos, the more I agreed with the guy above who said they were "videos made for liberals".
Oh well, Trump's gone, so the story has a happy ending. Some weapons in a war won't be all that effective, nor will some drugs in a pandemic. Some will profit when they don't deserve it. Point is, we won the war.
My attitude towards them was that I'm totally fine with running attack ads against Trump, but it didn't seem like they rlly needed my money.
I'd be curious to know what the primary source of their donations actually was. Folks like Greenwald love to claim that it was all liberals, but they also seem like a prime target for affluent Never Trump conservatives who don't want to donate to Democrats.
You got owned worst of all.
Remember this?
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/96368/replies/1769021Quote:
Is this supposed to be controversial? The people who are doing the work are getting paid?
And this?
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/86962/replies/1771218Quote:
Yeah, I understand why some liberals/leftists would be skeptical of The Lincoln Project, given the histories of those who founded it. But they aren't just going after Trump, they're also running ads to help defeat Republican House and Senate candidates. They legit believe the Republican Party needs to be burned to the ground and rebuilt (and on that point, I agree with them).
And this?
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/81358/replies/1802790Quote:
What is the grift and where was it exposed?
And this?
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/81358/replies/1802828Quote:
This is what I thought as well. The accusation seems to be that they were getting too much money to possibly be spending it all, but that's not evidence of grift. It's just evidence you don't know everything about their internal finances.
And this?
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/98115/replies/1803060Quote:
Where was that thread? The one I saw had a lot of assumptions and guesswork, not actual data.
And this?
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/98147/replies/1803186Quote:
More like I wanted to see more actual proof and it isn't there.
But you'll do your usual thing and ignore that while continuing to go with your preconceived notion.
And this?
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/98700/replies/1812561Quote:
The thing is that turnout was up all over, which means you also had a lot of NEW REPUBLICANS. Theoretically, Lincoln Project ads could have turned some Republicans who were just replaced with new Trump voters. Or turned people who no longer call themselves Republicans. This data doesn't necessarily tell you anything definitive, though of course many people are using it to confirm their prior assumptions. And that's without even getting into how exit poll data is probably not reliable at this stage.
I don't care much about the Lincoln Project one way or the other. I think it's very possible their methods didn't work; I just don't think anything out there right now proves it. And as for calling them a "grift," IMO to prove that you have to prove more than just ineffectiveness. A true grifter takes your money and never does what he promised to do. The Lincoln Project promised to produce anti-Republican ads and they did, so on that level it doesn't look like a grift to me. Even if the ads were ineffective that doesn't make it a grift.
And yet you claim you "don't care much about the Lincoln Project one way or the other."
For a guy who didn't care, you sure defended them a lot. Probably because of all the money you gave them.
Not only are you the most intellectually dishonest person on this forum, you're also very very dumb.
#BlueAnon is sycasey
sycasey is #BlueAnon
The moderators can't fix stupid and gullible. It would destroy their business model of running a sports website on Cal sports if they could.
Sycasey and BearGreg may be the same person.
The difference between a right wing conspiracy and the truth is about 20 months.
Featured Stories
See All
Bears Add Former 4 star Wisconsin DE TJ Bollers
by Jim McGill
Bears Add Maryland Portal Tight End Corey Dyches
by Jim McGill
Cal Duo Earns Pac-12 Weekly Honors
by Cal Athletics