Nick Sandmann agrees.sycasey said:
As always, wait until more information comes out to draw your conclusions.
Ammonia NitrateBearForce2 said:
Chemical plant?
Remind us of your error-free sources of information.BearForce2 said:Nick Sandmann agrees.sycasey said:
As always, wait until more information comes out to draw your conclusions.
Okaydo's tweets.drizzlybears brother said:Remind us of your error-free sources of information.BearForce2 said:Nick Sandmann agrees.sycasey said:
As always, wait until more information comes out to draw your conclusions.
You just pile snide on top of snide.BearForce2 said:Okaydo's tweets.drizzlybears brother said:Remind us of your error-free sources of information.BearForce2 said:Nick Sandmann agrees.sycasey said:
As always, wait until more information comes out to draw your conclusions.
You responded with snide and also implied that what happened to Nick Sandmann is a common occurrence, an innocent mistake since no source is "error-free" It was more than just an error, it was libel, defamation.drizzlybears brother said:You just pile snide on top of snide.BearForce2 said:Okaydo's tweets.drizzlybears brother said:Remind us of your error-free sources of information.BearForce2 said:Nick Sandmann agrees.sycasey said:
As always, wait until more information comes out to draw your conclusions.
catching up the morning after..okaydo said:
twitter.com/yenisafaken/status/1291003468891729921?s=21
If what you want is an honest discussion, you need to respond in kind. You're the one who thought it fair to insert the Sandmann reference.BearForce2 said:You responded with snide and also implied that what happened to Nick Sandmann is a common occurrence, an innocent mistake since no source is "error-free" It was more than just an error, it was libel, defamation.drizzlybears brother said:You just pile snide on top of snide.BearForce2 said:Okaydo's tweets.drizzlybears brother said:Remind us of your error-free sources of information.BearForce2 said:Nick Sandmann agrees.sycasey said:
As always, wait until more information comes out to draw your conclusions.
People can jump to whatever conclusions they want here. We're talking about the mainstream media, it's their job to report accurately and not jump to conclusions.sycasey said:
People definitely jumped to conclusions about the Sandmann photo. People here also jumped to conclusions about that guy who got punched on the Berkeley campus, even though it turned out the attacker was not someone associated with the University in any way.
My advice works for all sides of the political spectrum.
Which news media doesn't have the job to report accurately and not jump to conclusions?BearForce2 said:People can jump to whatever conclusions they want here. We're talking about the mainstream media, it's their job to report accurately and not jump to conclusions.sycasey said:
People definitely jumped to conclusions about the Sandmann photo. People here also jumped to conclusions about that guy who got punched on the Berkeley campus, even though it turned out the attacker was not someone associated with the University in any way.
My advice works for all sides of the political spectrum.
cry havoc, let slip the dogs of war <- ever popular WS JuliusC sound-bitegoing4roses said:
..whatever it was there.. (and more)