DoubtfulBear said:I highly doubt Michael Drake, with his extensive B1G connections, was completely unaware of the UCLA move. Most likely he supported it secretly and had to run a show trial in December to appease Gavin Newsom and some Board membersberserkeley said:calumnus said:Bobodeluxe said:Like ucla and UC Berkeley?berserkeley said:sycasey said:berserkeley said:CALiforniALUM said:
Is there a circumstance where some teams who are likely in a Power conference currently might like to see the demise of both Stanford and Cal so that their chances of latching on to a sister school of their own might be more likely? If the ACC goes boom not all schools are going to be brought along from the ACC. Less competition means more opportunity. Schools are learning from these early rounds.
If you're asking about B1G and SEC teams, maybe? If you're asking about ACC teams, not a chance. They're the only ones supporting us and the only ones opposing us are the ones that believe they have a B1G/SEC invite in the bag.
And also NC State.
They seem to believe they'll go as a pair with UNC probably becauee the Regents have told UNC that they have to tell the B1G and SEC that they'll go with whichever conference accepts both schools.
That was not our ask. We tried to block UCLA from going instead. It made sense for Kliavkoff but we should not have supported his effort.
Can you imagine if Stanford was going to the B1G to get huge money and prestige and UCLA tried to hold us back from going too?
By that point, blocking UCLA was not really an option because UCLA would get sued and yet blocking UCLA was the only option.
If the Regents had a heads up, they could have negotiated both Cal and UCLA ny taking from UCLA's full share to pay Cal an even smaller share. We know the B1G wants Cal and we know Fox wants to corner the LA market. They would have made it work.
Though I don't really see why they can't make that deal now.
If so, that would make him amazingly bad at his job. The Regents are perilously close to having to assume 9 figures worth of Cal athletic debt. And it should have been obvious to anyone (like it was to Newsom and the rest of the sports media world) that without both LA schools, Cal athletics was at risk of extinction. And here we are, teetering on the edge of what was a very predictable outcome.
If he did know, the Regents in North Carolina are light-years ahead of those in California.