Whether or not he was liked by the fans were likely low on his list of reasons to want out.calumnus said:BearSD said:You're right. The correct comparison is between Dykes and Chip Kelly. Both wanted out but were not offered head coaching jobs elsewhere. The difference is that Chip chose to take a coordinator position elsewhere instead of squeezing UCLA for every penny remaining on his contract, while Dykes chose to squeeze every penny he could out of Cal.MrGPAC said:
Can we please stop pretending the situations with Wilcox interviewing at Oregon were *anything* like Dykes interviewing elsewhere?
Dykes knew he was not liked by the fans at Cal and, like Kelly, was looking for other jobs whitch would have meant him paying us, but instead we fired him first which requires us to pay him off. Don't blame Dykes for that, that was our choice (stupid IMO).
He was apparently given promises that weren't upheld with regard to the universities prioritization of football.
He didn't get the institutional support that he needed to succeed here.
He got kicked off his field so the band could practice.
Culturally the fit was worse than he expected.
Recruiting limitations were harder than he expected (he DID help a lot with the APR scores in the process though)
No certificate program made getting grad transfers a lot harder
I'm sure not being liked didn't help but there were a lot of good reasons why he left. Constantly fighting the administration instead of being supported by it probably played a bigger role.
Hell, a lot of these problems were the things Wilcox demand be fixed for him to stay. These are certaily not problems he has at TCU...