The financial implications of not firing a bad coach

12,034 Views | 190 Replies | Last: 10 hrs ago by calumnus
Alkiadt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Strykur said:

BearSD said:

82gradDLSdad said:

dimitrig said:

82gradDLSdad said:

dimitrig said:

82gradDLSdad said:

Bowlesman80 said:

Notice Cignetti negotiated his contract extension before the tOSU game?

I have a sinking feeling that he might end up improving Indiana, but leaving them middling with a big buyout on his contract. Indiana AD would have been smarter to wait-and-see, at least after the tOSU game.

Watch him hit the recruiting glass ceiling when his grades and graduation rates plummet. Indiana has academic standards similar to Cal. I am pretty sure his "aces" brought over from JMU may not all meet those standards for graduating from IU.

I am waiting before I drink the Cignetti Kool-Aid.
You have to like his recruiting/portal quotes above though. Doesn't beat around the bush. Wilcox reminds me of every ****ty CEO with his coach speak.
I don't really like that attitude at all.

New coach comes in and blasts the kids that have been busting their butts and then says he's glad they left while bringing in dozens of kids from his old program?
But then he goes 9-0. That's the whole goal. It's not pee wee football.
Is it? I'd like to think that at Cal winning isn't everything. We give USC, Alabama, Oregon et al., a lot of flack for having that mentality.
If this is the case, and it very well may be, then we are wasting time and money. Building a race car with a catalytic converter.
Michigan reportedly just flipped a QB recruit from LSU to Michigan because donors kicked in $3 million a year in NIL. Even Colorado is getting donor money from somewhere; they flipped a QB from USC to CU, and you can't outbid USC with nickels and dimes.
And what the **** does any of this have to do with us, TALENT IS NOT THE ISSUE


You need talent on the offensive line.
Bowlesman80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
82gradDLSdad said:

Strykur said:

BearSD said:

82gradDLSdad said:

dimitrig said:

82gradDLSdad said:

dimitrig said:

82gradDLSdad said:

Bowlesman80 said:

Notice Cignetti negotiated his contract extension before the tOSU game?

I have a sinking feeling that he might end up improving Indiana, but leaving them middling with a big buyout on his contract. Indiana AD would have been smarter to wait-and-see, at least after the tOSU game.

Watch him hit the recruiting glass ceiling when his grades and graduation rates plummet. Indiana has academic standards similar to Cal. I am pretty sure his "aces" brought over from JMU may not all meet those standards for graduating from IU.

I am waiting before I drink the Cignetti Kool-Aid.
You have to like his recruiting/portal quotes above though. Doesn't beat around the bush. Wilcox reminds me of every ****ty CEO with his coach speak.
I don't really like that attitude at all.

New coach comes in and blasts the kids that have been busting their butts and then says he's glad they left while bringing in dozens of kids from his old program?
But then he goes 9-0. That's the whole goal. It's not pee wee football.
Is it? I'd like to think that at Cal winning isn't everything. We give USC, Alabama, Oregon et al., a lot of flack for having that mentality.
If this is the case, and it very well may be, then we are wasting time and money. Building a race car with a catalytic converter.
Michigan reportedly just flipped a QB recruit from LSU to Michigan because donors kicked in $3 million a year in NIL. Even Colorado is getting donor money from somewhere; they flipped a QB from USC to CU, and you can't outbid USC with nickels and dimes.
And what the **** does any of this have to do with us, TALENT IS NOT THE ISSUE
Talent is always an issue. Good coaching can get you a winning record against peers (not just including the cupcakes). Coaching isn't the reason we've put less and less guys in the NFL.

[ol]
"The two most important things that affect winning and losing are A. Getting good talent. How do you bring talent to your team? And in our case, that's recruiting. Secondly, how do you develop those players so that they can be the best players they can be? That's what we always try to focus on. That's what I enjoy the most." -Nick Saban[/ol]
"Just win, baby."
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Strykur said:

BearSD said:

82gradDLSdad said:

dimitrig said:

82gradDLSdad said:

dimitrig said:

82gradDLSdad said:

Bowlesman80 said:

Notice Cignetti negotiated his contract extension before the tOSU game?

I have a sinking feeling that he might end up improving Indiana, but leaving them middling with a big buyout on his contract. Indiana AD would have been smarter to wait-and-see, at least after the tOSU game.

Watch him hit the recruiting glass ceiling when his grades and graduation rates plummet. Indiana has academic standards similar to Cal. I am pretty sure his "aces" brought over from JMU may not all meet those standards for graduating from IU.

I am waiting before I drink the Cignetti Kool-Aid.
You have to like his recruiting/portal quotes above though. Doesn't beat around the bush. Wilcox reminds me of every ****ty CEO with his coach speak.
I don't really like that attitude at all.

New coach comes in and blasts the kids that have been busting their butts and then says he's glad they left while bringing in dozens of kids from his old program?
But then he goes 9-0. That's the whole goal. It's not pee wee football.
Is it? I'd like to think that at Cal winning isn't everything. We give USC, Alabama, Oregon et al., a lot of flack for having that mentality.
If this is the case, and it very well may be, then we are wasting time and money. Building a race car with a catalytic converter.
Michigan reportedly just flipped a QB recruit from LSU to Michigan because donors kicked in $3 million a year in NIL. Even Colorado is getting donor money from somewhere; they flipped a QB from USC to CU, and you can't outbid USC with nickels and dimes.
And what the **** does any of this have to do with us, TALENT IS NOT THE ISSUE


We don't have the same amount of talent as most teams in the top 25. Our last 3 recruiting classes, including transfer rankings, composite out at #54, #46, and #39. Yet, folks here, Calumnus specifically, acts like we have a top 10 class each year. Also, our Heisman running back got hurt and hasn't looked the same. Folks here, Calumnus and Shocky notably, blame his 3.0 ypc on the run plays called. However, his healthy backup, J Thomas, averages 5.8 yards per carry. Jeanty averages 6.1.

What impact offensive players do we truly have? Nando was originally going to play for Yale. He is doing well, but we talk about him as if he is a blue chip. Mikey Matthews was a 3 star high school prospect with 200 yards receiving last year for Utah yet we talk about him like we took Utah's best receiver. He was the #27 transfer wr.

Why do we overrate our players? They are good enough to win a lot of games with good coaching, but they aren't top 25 talent. Perhaps the coaches did a good job coaching them up to make it close against top 10 team Miami and some of the other tough teams on our schedule?
DoubtfulBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearSD said:

82gradDLSdad said:

dimitrig said:

82gradDLSdad said:

dimitrig said:

82gradDLSdad said:

Bowlesman80 said:

Notice Cignetti negotiated his contract extension before the tOSU game?

I have a sinking feeling that he might end up improving Indiana, but leaving them middling with a big buyout on his contract. Indiana AD would have been smarter to wait-and-see, at least after the tOSU game.

Watch him hit the recruiting glass ceiling when his grades and graduation rates plummet. Indiana has academic standards similar to Cal. I am pretty sure his "aces" brought over from JMU may not all meet those standards for graduating from IU.

I am waiting before I drink the Cignetti Kool-Aid.

You have to like his recruiting/portal quotes above though. Doesn't beat around the bush. Wilcox reminds me of every ****ty CEO with his coach speak.

I don't really like that attitude at all.

New coach comes in and blasts the kids that have been busting their butts and then says he's glad they left while bringing in dozens of kids from his old program?


But then he goes 9-0. That's the whole goal. It's not pee wee football.


Is it? I'd like to think that at Cal winning isn't everything. We give USC, Alabama, Oregon et al., a lot of flack for having that mentality.

If this is the case, and it very well may be, then we are wasting time and money. Building a race car with a catalytic converter.


Michigan reportedly just flipped a QB recruit from LSU to Michigan because donors kicked in $3 million a year in NIL. Even Colorado is getting donor money from somewhere; they flipped a QB from USC to CU, and you can't outbid USC with nickels and dimes.
Larry Ellison was willing to pay for a storied and winning program, while our billionaires want nothing to do with the bureaucratic cluster**** that is our athletic department
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

Perhaps the coaches did a good job coaching them up to make it close against top 10 team Miami and some of the other tough teams on our schedule?
This kind of judgment needs to go both ways, though. It would also mean the coaches coached them DOWN to the level of losing to a team no one else has lost to (FSU).
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

oski003 said:

Perhaps the coaches did a good job coaching them up to make it close against top 10 team Miami and some of the other tough teams on our schedule?
This kind of judgment needs to go both ways, though. It would also mean the coaches coached them DOWN to the level of losing to a team no one else has lost to (FSU).


Yup. Unless they win the next two games, the only thing keeping Wilcox here should be the buyout. Personally, if they don't get 8 wins this year (including bowl game), Wilcox should be gone even with the buyout. The fans want more than mediocre seasons. I wonder if all the administration cares about is no controversies, the team goes to class (unlike at top programs), we having a winning or near winning record each year, and a winning record against stanfurd.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

Perhaps the coaches did a good job coaching them up to make it close against top 10 team Miami and some of the other tough teams on our schedule?
This kind of judgment needs to go both ways, though. It would also mean the coaches coached them DOWN to the level of losing to a team no one else has lost to (FSU).


Yup. Unless they win the next two games, the only thing keeping Wilcox here should be the buyout. Personally, if they don't get 8 wins this year (including bowl game), Wilcox should be gone even with the buyout. The fans want more than mediocre seasons. I wonder if all the administration cares about is no controversies, the team goes to class (unlike at top programs), we having a winning or near winning record each year, and a winning record against stanfurd.
Yeah, to me a Cal program in a good place would be getting around 8 wins per year (including bowl), with the higher-tide seasons being at 9 or 10 and the lower ebb at 6 or 7. Once in a while the stars would align and allow us to win the conference. I recognize that there are structural reasons why Cal will find it hard to be consistently at the top of a power league, but we should at least be regularly competitive.

Wilcox is simply not meeting that bar. With the exception of one season (five years ago), he's just sitting at the low ebb all the time. Cal has enough talent and donor support to do better than THAT.
Bowlesman80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

oski003 said:

sycasey said:

oski003 said:

Perhaps the coaches did a good job coaching them up to make it close against top 10 team Miami and some of the other tough teams on our schedule?
This kind of judgment needs to go both ways, though. It would also mean the coaches coached them DOWN to the level of losing to a team no one else has lost to (FSU).


Yup. Unless they win the next two games, the only thing keeping Wilcox here should be the buyout. Personally, if they don't get 8 wins this year (including bowl game), Wilcox should be gone even with the buyout. The fans want more than mediocre seasons. I wonder if all the administration cares about is no controversies, the team goes to class (unlike at top programs), we having a winning or near winning record each year, and a winning record against stanfurd.
Yeah, to me a Cal program in a good place would be getting around 8 wins per year (including bowl), with the higher-tide seasons being at 9 or 10 and the lower ebb at 6 or 7. Once in a while the stars would align and allow us to win the conference. I recognize that there are structural reasons why Cal will find it hard to be consistently at the top of a power league, but we should at least be regularly competitive.

Wilcox is simply not meeting that bar. With the exception of one season (five years ago), he's just sitting at the low ebb all the time. Cal has enough talent and donor support to do better than THAT.
Yes, 8 wins as a floor. After all, we're not in the SEC.

Looking forward to the CFP being renamed the SEC & Others (with solid brands, no matter their record) Football Playoff Championship.
"Just win, baby."
BearSD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DoubtfulBear said:

BearSD said:

82gradDLSdad said:

dimitrig said:

82gradDLSdad said:

dimitrig said:

82gradDLSdad said:

Bowlesman80 said:

Notice Cignetti negotiated his contract extension before the tOSU game?

I have a sinking feeling that he might end up improving Indiana, but leaving them middling with a big buyout on his contract. Indiana AD would have been smarter to wait-and-see, at least after the tOSU game.

Watch him hit the recruiting glass ceiling when his grades and graduation rates plummet. Indiana has academic standards similar to Cal. I am pretty sure his "aces" brought over from JMU may not all meet those standards for graduating from IU.

I am waiting before I drink the Cignetti Kool-Aid.

You have to like his recruiting/portal quotes above though. Doesn't beat around the bush. Wilcox reminds me of every ****ty CEO with his coach speak.

I don't really like that attitude at all.

New coach comes in and blasts the kids that have been busting their butts and then says he's glad they left while bringing in dozens of kids from his old program?


But then he goes 9-0. That's the whole goal. It's not pee wee football.


Is it? I'd like to think that at Cal winning isn't everything. We give USC, Alabama, Oregon et al., a lot of flack for having that mentality.

If this is the case, and it very well may be, then we are wasting time and money. Building a race car with a catalytic converter.

Michigan reportedly just flipped a QB recruit from LSU to Michigan because donors kicked in $3 million a year in NIL. Even Colorado is getting donor money from somewhere; they flipped a QB from USC to CU, and you can't outbid USC with nickels and dimes.
Larry Ellison was willing to pay for a storied and winning program, while our billionaires want nothing to do with the bureaucratic cluster**** that is our athletic department
That rationalization is never going to get us anywhere, because there are football programs whose supporters donated generously when the team was mediocre or worse, and as a result their team doesn't suck anymore. Oregon football was in the same state at Cal when Phil Knight and others started making large donations. All of that donor money is why Oregon football is no longer in the same state as Cal football. At TCU, boosters raised $100 million starting when the team was 1-10 and the boosters didn't want to take it anymore.

DoubtfulBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearSD said:

DoubtfulBear said:

BearSD said:

82gradDLSdad said:

dimitrig said:

82gradDLSdad said:

dimitrig said:

82gradDLSdad said:

Bowlesman80 said:

Notice Cignetti negotiated his contract extension before the tOSU game?

I have a sinking feeling that he might end up improving Indiana, but leaving them middling with a big buyout on his contract. Indiana AD would have been smarter to wait-and-see, at least after the tOSU game.

Watch him hit the recruiting glass ceiling when his grades and graduation rates plummet. Indiana has academic standards similar to Cal. I am pretty sure his "aces" brought over from JMU may not all meet those standards for graduating from IU.

I am waiting before I drink the Cignetti Kool-Aid.

You have to like his recruiting/portal quotes above though. Doesn't beat around the bush. Wilcox reminds me of every ****ty CEO with his coach speak.

I don't really like that attitude at all.

New coach comes in and blasts the kids that have been busting their butts and then says he's glad they left while bringing in dozens of kids from his old program?


But then he goes 9-0. That's the whole goal. It's not pee wee football.


Is it? I'd like to think that at Cal winning isn't everything. We give USC, Alabama, Oregon et al., a lot of flack for having that mentality.

If this is the case, and it very well may be, then we are wasting time and money. Building a race car with a catalytic converter.

Michigan reportedly just flipped a QB recruit from LSU to Michigan because donors kicked in $3 million a year in NIL. Even Colorado is getting donor money from somewhere; they flipped a QB from USC to CU, and you can't outbid USC with nickels and dimes.
Larry Ellison was willing to pay for a storied and winning program, while our billionaires want nothing to do with the bureaucratic cluster**** that is our athletic department
That rationalization is never going to get us anywhere, because there are football programs whose supporters donated generously when the team was mediocre or worse, and as a result their team doesn't suck anymore. Oregon football was in the same state at Cal when Phil Knight and others started making large donations. All of that donor money is why Oregon football is no longer in the same state as Cal football. At TCU, boosters raised $100 million starting when the team was 1-10 and the boosters didn't want to take it anymore.
What do you propose? Do you want to drive down to Sand Hill Road and pitch to Cal alumni that they should open their checkbooks to support the program?
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearSD said:

DoubtfulBear said:

BearSD said:

82gradDLSdad said:

dimitrig said:

82gradDLSdad said:

dimitrig said:

82gradDLSdad said:

Bowlesman80 said:

Notice Cignetti negotiated his contract extension before the tOSU game?

I have a sinking feeling that he might end up improving Indiana, but leaving them middling with a big buyout on his contract. Indiana AD would have been smarter to wait-and-see, at least after the tOSU game.

Watch him hit the recruiting glass ceiling when his grades and graduation rates plummet. Indiana has academic standards similar to Cal. I am pretty sure his "aces" brought over from JMU may not all meet those standards for graduating from IU.

I am waiting before I drink the Cignetti Kool-Aid.

You have to like his recruiting/portal quotes above though. Doesn't beat around the bush. Wilcox reminds me of every ****ty CEO with his coach speak.

I don't really like that attitude at all.

New coach comes in and blasts the kids that have been busting their butts and then says he's glad they left while bringing in dozens of kids from his old program?


But then he goes 9-0. That's the whole goal. It's not pee wee football.


Is it? I'd like to think that at Cal winning isn't everything. We give USC, Alabama, Oregon et al., a lot of flack for having that mentality.

If this is the case, and it very well may be, then we are wasting time and money. Building a race car with a catalytic converter.

Michigan reportedly just flipped a QB recruit from LSU to Michigan because donors kicked in $3 million a year in NIL. Even Colorado is getting donor money from somewhere; they flipped a QB from USC to CU, and you can't outbid USC with nickels and dimes.
Larry Ellison was willing to pay for a storied and winning program, while our billionaires want nothing to do with the bureaucratic cluster**** that is our athletic department
That rationalization is never going to get us anywhere, because there are football programs whose supporters donated generously when the team was mediocre or worse, and as a result their team doesn't suck anymore. Oregon football was in the same state at Cal when Phil Knight and others started making large donations. All of that donor money is why Oregon football is no longer in the same state as Cal football. At TCU, boosters raised $100 million starting when the team was 1-10 and the boosters didn't want to take it anymore.




The difference is at Oregon, for that money, they let Knight call the shots. At Cal the money donors gave to Knowlton was used to buyout Jones to get Fox, or used to give Wilcox a raise and six year $30 million extension. I am happy enough with Madsen, but he was not the guy the big donors reportedly wanted and were willing to back. Knowlton does what Knowlton does. Maybe he got it right for once, but "Give Knowlton even more money" does not sound like a wise use of anyone's money to me.

That is one reason I am advocating for much more donor and alumni control, even outsourcing the management and marketing of the revenue sports to an alumni run not for profit that would eventually employ the coaches and players.
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

BearSD said:

DoubtfulBear said:

BearSD said:

82gradDLSdad said:

dimitrig said:

82gradDLSdad said:

dimitrig said:

82gradDLSdad said:

Bowlesman80 said:

Notice Cignetti negotiated his contract extension before the tOSU game?

I have a sinking feeling that he might end up improving Indiana, but leaving them middling with a big buyout on his contract. Indiana AD would have been smarter to wait-and-see, at least after the tOSU game.

Watch him hit the recruiting glass ceiling when his grades and graduation rates plummet. Indiana has academic standards similar to Cal. I am pretty sure his "aces" brought over from JMU may not all meet those standards for graduating from IU.

I am waiting before I drink the Cignetti Kool-Aid.

You have to like his recruiting/portal quotes above though. Doesn't beat around the bush. Wilcox reminds me of every ****ty CEO with his coach speak.

I don't really like that attitude at all.

New coach comes in and blasts the kids that have been busting their butts and then says he's glad they left while bringing in dozens of kids from his old program?


But then he goes 9-0. That's the whole goal. It's not pee wee football.


Is it? I'd like to think that at Cal winning isn't everything. We give USC, Alabama, Oregon et al., a lot of flack for having that mentality.

If this is the case, and it very well may be, then we are wasting time and money. Building a race car with a catalytic converter.

Michigan reportedly just flipped a QB recruit from LSU to Michigan because donors kicked in $3 million a year in NIL. Even Colorado is getting donor money from somewhere; they flipped a QB from USC to CU, and you can't outbid USC with nickels and dimes.
Larry Ellison was willing to pay for a storied and winning program, while our billionaires want nothing to do with the bureaucratic cluster**** that is our athletic department
That rationalization is never going to get us anywhere, because there are football programs whose supporters donated generously when the team was mediocre or worse, and as a result their team doesn't suck anymore. Oregon football was in the same state at Cal when Phil Knight and others started making large donations. All of that donor money is why Oregon football is no longer in the same state as Cal football. At TCU, boosters raised $100 million starting when the team was 1-10 and the boosters didn't want to take it anymore.




The difference is at Oregon, for that money, they let Knight call the shots. At Cal the money donors gave to Knowlton was used to buyout Jones to get Fox, or used to give Wilcox a raise and six year $30 million extension. I am happy enough with Madsen, but he was not the guy the big donors reportedly wanted and were willing to back. Knowlton does what Knowlton does. Maybe he got it right for once, but "Give Knowlton even more money" does not sound like a wise use of anyone's money to me.

That is one reason I am advocating for much more donor and alumni control, even outsourcing the management and marketing of the revenue sports to an alumni run not for profit that would eventually employ the coaches and players.


Exactly. I wouldn't donate to this program. It hasn't shown anything and Wilcox hasn't shown he has a vision or a plan for turning it around. He's just keeping the seat warm for the next guy at this point.
HearstMining
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

BearSD said:

DoubtfulBear said:

BearSD said:

82gradDLSdad said:

dimitrig said:

82gradDLSdad said:

dimitrig said:

82gradDLSdad said:

Bowlesman80 said:

Notice Cignetti negotiated his contract extension before the tOSU game?

I have a sinking feeling that he might end up improving Indiana, but leaving them middling with a big buyout on his contract. Indiana AD would have been smarter to wait-and-see, at least after the tOSU game.

Watch him hit the recruiting glass ceiling when his grades and graduation rates plummet. Indiana has academic standards similar to Cal. I am pretty sure his "aces" brought over from JMU may not all meet those standards for graduating from IU.

I am waiting before I drink the Cignetti Kool-Aid.

You have to like his recruiting/portal quotes above though. Doesn't beat around the bush. Wilcox reminds me of every ****ty CEO with his coach speak.

I don't really like that attitude at all.

New coach comes in and blasts the kids that have been busting their butts and then says he's glad they left while bringing in dozens of kids from his old program?


But then he goes 9-0. That's the whole goal. It's not pee wee football.


Is it? I'd like to think that at Cal winning isn't everything. We give USC, Alabama, Oregon et al., a lot of flack for having that mentality.

If this is the case, and it very well may be, then we are wasting time and money. Building a race car with a catalytic converter.

Michigan reportedly just flipped a QB recruit from LSU to Michigan because donors kicked in $3 million a year in NIL. Even Colorado is getting donor money from somewhere; they flipped a QB from USC to CU, and you can't outbid USC with nickels and dimes.
Larry Ellison was willing to pay for a storied and winning program, while our billionaires want nothing to do with the bureaucratic cluster**** that is our athletic department
That rationalization is never going to get us anywhere, because there are football programs whose supporters donated generously when the team was mediocre or worse, and as a result their team doesn't suck anymore. Oregon football was in the same state at Cal when Phil Knight and others started making large donations. All of that donor money is why Oregon football is no longer in the same state as Cal football. At TCU, boosters raised $100 million starting when the team was 1-10 and the boosters didn't want to take it anymore.




The difference is at Oregon, for that money, they let Knight call the shots. At Cal the money donors gave to Knowlton was used to buyout Jones to get Fox, or used to give Wilcox a raise and six year $30 million extension. I am happy enough with Madsen, but he was not the guy the big donors reportedly wanted and were willing to back. Knowlton does what Knowlton does. Maybe he got it right for once, but "Give Knowlton even more money" does not sound like a wise use of anyone's money to me.

That is one reason I am advocating for much more donor and alumni control, even outsourcing the management and marketing of the revenue sports to an alumni run not for profit that would eventually employ the coaches and players.

Knight is really a rare trifecta for Oregon:
  • He competed there as a track athlete, so values athletic success.
  • He is, of course, hugely successful as a businessman
  • He has created a true symbiotic relationship between UO sports and Nike. UO success benefits Nike - it's free advertising for the company.
BearSD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

BearSD said:

DoubtfulBear said:

BearSD said:

82gradDLSdad said:

dimitrig said:

82gradDLSdad said:

dimitrig said:

82gradDLSdad said:

Bowlesman80 said:

Notice Cignetti negotiated his contract extension before the tOSU game?

I have a sinking feeling that he might end up improving Indiana, but leaving them middling with a big buyout on his contract. Indiana AD would have been smarter to wait-and-see, at least after the tOSU game.

Watch him hit the recruiting glass ceiling when his grades and graduation rates plummet. Indiana has academic standards similar to Cal. I am pretty sure his "aces" brought over from JMU may not all meet those standards for graduating from IU.

I am waiting before I drink the Cignetti Kool-Aid.

You have to like his recruiting/portal quotes above though. Doesn't beat around the bush. Wilcox reminds me of every ****ty CEO with his coach speak.

I don't really like that attitude at all.

New coach comes in and blasts the kids that have been busting their butts and then says he's glad they left while bringing in dozens of kids from his old program?


But then he goes 9-0. That's the whole goal. It's not pee wee football.


Is it? I'd like to think that at Cal winning isn't everything. We give USC, Alabama, Oregon et al., a lot of flack for having that mentality.

If this is the case, and it very well may be, then we are wasting time and money. Building a race car with a catalytic converter.

Michigan reportedly just flipped a QB recruit from LSU to Michigan because donors kicked in $3 million a year in NIL. Even Colorado is getting donor money from somewhere; they flipped a QB from USC to CU, and you can't outbid USC with nickels and dimes.
Larry Ellison was willing to pay for a storied and winning program, while our billionaires want nothing to do with the bureaucratic cluster**** that is our athletic department
That rationalization is never going to get us anywhere, because there are football programs whose supporters donated generously when the team was mediocre or worse, and as a result their team doesn't suck anymore. Oregon football was in the same state at Cal when Phil Knight and others started making large donations. All of that donor money is why Oregon football is no longer in the same state as Cal football. At TCU, boosters raised $100 million starting when the team was 1-10 and the boosters didn't want to take it anymore.



The difference is at Oregon, for that money, they let Knight call the shots.
I think you are drastically underestimating the amount of money that has to be donated for a donor to have that kind of influence. Knight has reportedly donated about $1 billion to Oregon (overall, not just athletics),

Stanford hired Jim Harbaugh at the insistence of John Arrillaga. The Arrillaga family donated $300 million to the university, according to Stanford.
Alkiadt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearSD said:

calumnus said:

BearSD said:

DoubtfulBear said:

BearSD said:

82gradDLSdad said:

dimitrig said:

82gradDLSdad said:

dimitrig said:

82gradDLSdad said:

Bowlesman80 said:

Notice Cignetti negotiated his contract extension before the tOSU game?

I have a sinking feeling that he might end up improving Indiana, but leaving them middling with a big buyout on his contract. Indiana AD would have been smarter to wait-and-see, at least after the tOSU game.

Watch him hit the recruiting glass ceiling when his grades and graduation rates plummet. Indiana has academic standards similar to Cal. I am pretty sure his "aces" brought over from JMU may not all meet those standards for graduating from IU.

I am waiting before I drink the Cignetti Kool-Aid.

You have to like his recruiting/portal quotes above though. Doesn't beat around the bush. Wilcox reminds me of every ****ty CEO with his coach speak.

I don't really like that attitude at all.

New coach comes in and blasts the kids that have been busting their butts and then says he's glad they left while bringing in dozens of kids from his old program?


But then he goes 9-0. That's the whole goal. It's not pee wee football.


Is it? I'd like to think that at Cal winning isn't everything. We give USC, Alabama, Oregon et al., a lot of flack for having that mentality.

If this is the case, and it very well may be, then we are wasting time and money. Building a race car with a catalytic converter.

Michigan reportedly just flipped a QB recruit from LSU to Michigan because donors kicked in $3 million a year in NIL. Even Colorado is getting donor money from somewhere; they flipped a QB from USC to CU, and you can't outbid USC with nickels and dimes.
Larry Ellison was willing to pay for a storied and winning program, while our billionaires want nothing to do with the bureaucratic cluster**** that is our athletic department
That rationalization is never going to get us anywhere, because there are football programs whose supporters donated generously when the team was mediocre or worse, and as a result their team doesn't suck anymore. Oregon football was in the same state at Cal when Phil Knight and others started making large donations. All of that donor money is why Oregon football is no longer in the same state as Cal football. At TCU, boosters raised $100 million starting when the team was 1-10 and the boosters didn't want to take it anymore.



The difference is at Oregon, for that money, they let Knight call the shots.
I think you are drastically underestimating the amount of money that has to be donated for a donor to have that kind of influence. Knight has reportedly donated about $1 billion to Oregon (overall, not just athletics),

Stanford hired Jim Harbaugh at the insistence of John Arrillaga. The Arrillaga family donated $300 million to the university, according to Stanford.

In a little known fact, (IIRC)…Knight also donated $100M to Stanford. Their Business School is named after him.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearSD said:

calumnus said:

BearSD said:

DoubtfulBear said:

BearSD said:

82gradDLSdad said:

dimitrig said:

82gradDLSdad said:

dimitrig said:

82gradDLSdad said:

Bowlesman80 said:

Notice Cignetti negotiated his contract extension before the tOSU game?

I have a sinking feeling that he might end up improving Indiana, but leaving them middling with a big buyout on his contract. Indiana AD would have been smarter to wait-and-see, at least after the tOSU game.

Watch him hit the recruiting glass ceiling when his grades and graduation rates plummet. Indiana has academic standards similar to Cal. I am pretty sure his "aces" brought over from JMU may not all meet those standards for graduating from IU.

I am waiting before I drink the Cignetti Kool-Aid.

You have to like his recruiting/portal quotes above though. Doesn't beat around the bush. Wilcox reminds me of every ****ty CEO with his coach speak.

I don't really like that attitude at all.

New coach comes in and blasts the kids that have been busting their butts and then says he's glad they left while bringing in dozens of kids from his old program?


But then he goes 9-0. That's the whole goal. It's not pee wee football.


Is it? I'd like to think that at Cal winning isn't everything. We give USC, Alabama, Oregon et al., a lot of flack for having that mentality.

If this is the case, and it very well may be, then we are wasting time and money. Building a race car with a catalytic converter.

Michigan reportedly just flipped a QB recruit from LSU to Michigan because donors kicked in $3 million a year in NIL. Even Colorado is getting donor money from somewhere; they flipped a QB from USC to CU, and you can't outbid USC with nickels and dimes.
Larry Ellison was willing to pay for a storied and winning program, while our billionaires want nothing to do with the bureaucratic cluster**** that is our athletic department
That rationalization is never going to get us anywhere, because there are football programs whose supporters donated generously when the team was mediocre or worse, and as a result their team doesn't suck anymore. Oregon football was in the same state at Cal when Phil Knight and others started making large donations. All of that donor money is why Oregon football is no longer in the same state as Cal football. At TCU, boosters raised $100 million starting when the team was 1-10 and the boosters didn't want to take it anymore.



The difference is at Oregon, for that money, they let Knight call the shots.
I think you are drastically underestimating the amount of money that has to be donated for a donor to have that kind of influence. Knight has reportedly donated about $1 billion to Oregon (overall, not just athletics),

Stanford hired Jim Harbaugh at the insistence of John Arrillaga. The Arrillaga family donated $300 million to the university, according to Stanford.


Most of the $1 billion Knight donated was AFTER he already had major influence. And that is my point, he donated and kept donating because he had great influence on how it was spent.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.