Chapman_is_Gone said:

---

It's OK for a thread to completely violate board rules, as long as the mod(s) and owners of this site are Giants and/or Dodgers fans. OK, I get it. Not a good look at all, but I get it.

As for you other inconsiderate people who post in this thread, understand that your fellow board posters do not want to have to wade through this thread every time they visit the board. This has absolutely nothing to do with Cal or college football. There is a reason for the O/T board. Get it?

---

Lol, why do you keep clicking on it?

calumnus said:

---

Chapman_is_Gone said:

---

It's OK for a thread to completely violate board rules, as long as the mod(s) and owners of this site are Giants and/or Dodgers fans. OK, I get it. Not a good look at all, but I get it.

As for you other inconsiderate people who post in this thread, understand that your fellow board posters do not want to have to wade through this thread every time they visit the board. This has absolutely nothing to do with Cal or college football. There is a reason for the O/T board. Get it?

---

Lol, why do you keep clicking on it?

---

Some people want to find reasons to be mad.

15-0? Did the Giants go for the 2 pt PAT just to rub it in?

Swept at home by the Giants. Appropriate karma for indulging the sisters of perpetual wokeness.

The Gods have punished wokeness by granting victories to San Francisco.

bearsandgiants said:

---

Statistically speaking there are at least one or two gay players on every ball club. Pride month festivities and Kershaw injecting himself into the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence drama have disrupted team chemistry, it seems. Go Giants!

---

Pride month is great. Celebrating diversity and inclusion is great. Doing it through a group that openly mocks and offends another protected class is wrong and small-minded. The Dodgers flubbed this one like a Steve Sax throw to 1B.

calumnus said:

---

tequila4kapp said:

---

bearsandgiants said:

---

Statistically speaking there are at least one or two gay players on every ball club. Pride month festivities and Kershaw injecting himself into the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence drama have disrupted team chemistry, it seems. Go Giants!

---

Pride month is great. Celebrating diversity and inclusion is great. Doing it through a group that openly mocks and offends another protected class is wrong and small-minded. The Dodgers flubbed this one like a Steve Sax throw to 1B.

---

Well said. Plus, it is not like they couldn't find any gay celebrities in Los Angeles.

---

I should probably leave it alone, but ...

The Sisters were selected for their charity work because they are a charity organization. They were not selected because they were famous or popular. But the Dodgers should never have selected to anyone honor anyone who would obviously cause controversy because their job is to embrace everyone and offend no one.

That said, there's a lot wrong with this discussion. One group may openly mock and offend another protected class, but that other protected class has done far worse than openly mock and offend the first group. In addition, that other protected class has been caught committing some of the most evil crimes imaginable all across the planet. Where's the outrage for that?

Perhaps a group whose mission it is to help help homeless youth, help people overcome drug addiction, and preach about safe sex all to communities that are typically shunned by other charities (charities like other protected class) isn't the best place for your ire when the other side protects child sex predators. All because people don't like they outfits they wear while doing it.

Seems like our values are out-of-whack.

berserkeley said:

---

calumnus said:

---

tequila4kapp said:

---

bearsandgiants said:

---

Statistically speaking there are at least one or two gay players on every ball club. Pride month festivities and Kershaw injecting himself into the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence drama have disrupted team chemistry, it seems. Go Giants!

---

Pride month is great. Celebrating diversity and inclusion is great. Doing it through a group that openly mocks and offends another protected class is wrong and small-minded. The Dodgers flubbed this one like a Steve Sax throw to 1B.

---

Well said. Plus, it is not like they couldn't find any gay celebrities in Los Angeles.

---

I should probably leave it alone, but ...

The Sisters were selected for their charity work because they are a charity organization. They were not selected because they were famous or popular. But the Dodgers should never have selected to anyone honor anyone who would obviously cause controversy because their job is to embrace everyone and offend no one.

That said, there's a lot wrong with this discussion. One group may openly mock and offend another protected class, but that other protected class has done far worse than openly mock and offend the first group. In addition, that other protected class has been caught committing some of the most evil crimes imaginable all across the planet. Where's the outrage for that?

Perhaps a group whose mission it is to help help homeless youth, help people overcome drug addiction, and preach about safe sex all to communities that are typically shunned by other charities (charities like other protected class) isn't the best place for your ire when the other side protects child sex predators. All because people don't like they outfits they wear while doing it.

Seems like our values are out-of-whack.

---

I must have missed the Dodger's Catholic Priest Child Molestor Appreciation Night.

How about a German culture appreciation night with white blond hair people wearing swastikas? If they claim they do charity work they get a pass? Please.

tequila4kapp said:

---

berserkeley said:

---

calumnus said:

---

tequila4kapp said:

---

bearsandgiants said:

---

Statistically speaking there are at least one or two gay players on every ball club. Pride month festivities and Kershaw injecting himself into the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence drama have disrupted team chemistry, it seems. Go Giants!

---

Pride month is great. Celebrating diversity and inclusion is great. Doing it through a group that openly mocks and offends another protected class is wrong and small-minded. The Dodgers flubbed this one like a Steve Sax throw to 1B.

---

Well said. Plus, it is not like they couldn't find any gay celebrities in Los Angeles.

---

I should probably leave it alone, but ...

The Sisters were selected for their charity work because they are a charity organization. They were not selected because they were famous or popular. But the Dodgers should never have selected to anyone honor anyone who would obviously cause controversy because their job is to embrace everyone and offend no one.

That said, there's a lot wrong with this discussion. One group may openly mock and offend another protected class, but that other protected class has done far worse than openly mock and offend the first group. In addition, that other protected class has been caught committing some of the most evil crimes imaginable all across the planet. Where's the outrage for that?

Perhaps a group whose mission it is to help help homeless youth, help people overcome drug addiction, and preach about safe sex all to communities that are typically shunned by other charities (charities like other protected class) isn't the best place for your ire when the other side protects child sex predators. All because people don't like they outfits they wear while doing it.

Seems like our values are out-of-whack.

---

I must have missed the Dodger's Catholic Priest Child Molestor Appreciation Night.

How about a German culture appreciation night with white blond hair people wearing swastikas? If they claim they do charity work they get a pass? Please.

---

They are doing a Christian Faith and Family Night. Would there be any controversy if they honored a Catholic charitable group that night? I very much doubt it. Nor should there be,

It's not that the Catholic Church had members molest children; it's the organization's systemic behavior in protecting them that's the issue.

And did you just seriously compare the Catholic Church to Nazis? Doing charity in a nun outfit is OK, but doing charity in a nun's outfit with face paint is the same as sporting Nazi memorabilia? I assure you, it is not.