Golden Bears vs Fuskies Game Thread

37,957 Views | 424 Replies | Last: 7 yr ago by ARbear
Econ141
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Statistically this checks out
Golden One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oskirules said:

Kovy said:

BearSD said:

Really, Petersen? Leading 24-0 and using your timeouts to ice a kicker before a 60-yard FG attempt?


Why wouldn't you?
I wouldn't, dick move.
Agree! That calling of two consecutive timeouts was pure chicken sh*t.
Econ141
How long do you want to ignore this user?
At least we get the ball first in the second hat. Doh!!!!
LunchTime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
alarsuel said:

So you'd prefer a 60 yard FG attempt which has a better chance at being returned for a TD than being good? I'll take a 2% chance at 7 vs. a 3% chance at 3. And before you say the INT could be returned, too, save it. Cal offense (with extra WR) has a far better chance stopping a return than the FG team against Pettis.


about an equal chance of a fumble, with 0% chance of a TD with a Hail Mary...

seriously. 4 seconds to get down field... 1-2 seconds of protection time. No chance of a score.

Actually laughing right now... at least something is funny tonight.
ColoradoBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NYCGOBEARS said:

Anyone miss The Tony Franklin System yet?

no
Econ141
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I thought the first was strategic - you don't know if we will Hail Mary or kick. The second might have been to ensure that we'd still try and kick. Did he do it a third time?
juarezbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CalGrad95 said:

juarezbear said:

I'm watching Utah/Furd. Utah has a mobile QB. You need one to keep the defense honest. Decisive runner who feeezes the backers
You should see what Arizona's running QB did to CU today - and many here had the Mildcats pencilled in as one of our Ws.


I'm thinking McIlwaine starts next year. At least we're recruiting OL, but we need DR back along with some JC or great WR recruits. Our guys get no separation.
FremontBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NYCGOBEARS said:

Anyone miss The Tony Franklin System yet?
Not even for a microsecond.
LunchTime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fat_slice said:

Statistically this checks out
Not if you include Cal's current statistics.

In 1000 random games, sure. But if coaching was pure statistics, we wouldn't have coaches.

Honestly, calling a kick stupid, AND saying a Hail Mary with this line and 40+ yards to go is pretty funny. Both are about equally unlikely to happen (with our kicker). Neither is bad coaching with our line and our kicker.

Kicking was probably more likely. No way Ross lasts 4 seconds running arround.
CaliforniaEternal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wilcox and Co. better recruit some playmakers at QB, RB, and WR quick, because this group is absolutely awful.
LunchTime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ColoradoBear said:

NYCGOBEARS said:

Anyone miss The Tony Franklin System yet?

no
Not even a little.

This is like asking if I miss 2007-2009 because this market isn't rising as fast as it did in 2007. **** no.
LunchTime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CaliforniaEternal said:

Wilcox and Co. better recruit some playmakers at QB, RB, and WR quick, because this group is absolutely awful.
I prefer recruiting linemen. I would be happy with an entire class of DL and OL for the mid/long term success... A good pair of lines can win a lot of games.
bearsandgiants
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aaron Rodgers and tony g? F this guy. Did he even read the press notes before phoning this in? His ass should be canned.
trueblue22
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Grigsby said:

TrueBlue42 said:

Worst half of Cal football I have ever seen. I know we don't have world beaters but we need to at least run some kind of misdirection. No play action or screen game. No reverses. Just letting Washington dominate us with a 4 man rush. Giving this offense zero chance at success. Say what you will about Dykes, at least he kept other teams guessing to offset the talent gap.


You realize Dykes poor recruiting put us in this mess.
No one denies that Dykes was a recruiting abomination. All I'm saying is that at least he knew how to gameplan the offense based on the talent at hand, vs the talent he wished he had. We have to change our current scheme if we want to compete. Playing straight up is getting us slaughtered. I have yet to see us run a RB screen, WR screen, reverse, halfback pass, shovel pass, outside tackle pitch. Get the ball out of the pocket and out of Bower's hands as quickly as possible. Ross with the ball in his hands is not a + matchup.
LunchTime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Haha. false start. Morans.
LunchTime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TrueBlue42 said:

Grigsby said:

TrueBlue42 said:

Worst half of Cal football I have ever seen. I know we don't have world beaters but we need to at least run some kind of misdirection. No play action or screen game. No reverses. Just letting Washington dominate us with a 4 man rush. Giving this offense zero chance at success. Say what you will about Dykes, at least he kept other teams guessing to offset the talent gap.


You realize Dykes poor recruiting put us in this mess.
No one denies that Dykes was a recruiting abomination. All I'm saying is that at least he knew how to gameplan the offense based on the talent at hand, vs the talent he wished he had. We have to change our current scheme if we want to compete. Playing straight up is getting us slaughtered. I have yet to see us run a RB screen, WR screen, reverse, halfback pass, shovel pass, outside tackle pitch. Get the ball out of the pocket and out of Bower's hands as quickly as possible. Ross with the ball in his hands is not a + matchup.
We actually have, though....
stimpy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LunchTime said:

Haha. false start. Morans.
the irony ...
CaliforniaEternal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LunchTime said:

CaliforniaEternal said:

Wilcox and Co. better recruit some playmakers at QB, RB, and WR quick, because this group is absolutely awful.
I prefer recruiting linemen. I would be happy with an entire class of DL and OL for the mid/long term success... A good pair of lines can win a lot of games.
Clearly, the OL and DL are in horrible shape too but without quality skill players this program won't win more than 3 games a year.
LunchTime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Paul is looking good.
Calcoholic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
egbear82 said:

Baldwin has about as much to work with on offense as Buh did when he ran our defense and we know how that turned out,,


Baldwin had less to work with at EWU and he had better offenses than this, even when they played FBS competition.
LunchTime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
stimpy said:

LunchTime said:

Haha. false start. Morans.
the irony ...


Just a meme. Calm down.
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Washington still hasn't come out of the locker room after halftime, maybe offense can take advantage.
PalyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Our D, when given time to breath, can actually be decent.
bearsandgiants
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think we have more tfl yards than offense
LunchTime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CaliforniaEternal said:

LunchTime said:

CaliforniaEternal said:

Wilcox and Co. better recruit some playmakers at QB, RB, and WR quick, because this group is absolutely awful.
I prefer recruiting linemen. I would be happy with an entire class of DL and OL for the mid/long term success... A good pair of lines can win a lot of games.
Clearly, the OL and DL are in horrible shape too but without quality skill players this program won't win more than 3 games a year.
Maybe true. Hopefully Wilcox is good enough to build a team, regardless of who is right here! haha.
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We get a deep route open and nothing. **** everybody
PalyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
QB keeper, that's new.
bearsandgiants
How long do you want to ignore this user?
More targeting.

Watching Larry Scott suck ESPN shaft. Embarrassing. Like watching a dnc shill on cnn.
LunchTime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OH MY GOD.

Why is cal so bad...always. aside from like 7 years total, that play, like the fumble at WSU is Cal as hell.
bearsandgiants
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jesus. That was horrible.
TouchedTheAxeIn82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OMG
TouchedTheAxeIn82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The announcers have already tuned out the game in front of them.
touchdownbears43
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This offense is collectivity God awful.
Econ141
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wish dykes recruited more receivers
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TouchedTheAxeIn82 said:

The announcers have already tuned out the game in front of them.



It's over, the only question is the final score.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.