Golden Bears vs Fuskies Game Thread

38,653 Views | 424 Replies | Last: 7 yr ago by ARbear
LunchTime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fat_slice said:

Wish dykes recruited more receivers
Wish Dykes didn't suck so bad and we did well the last three years, instead of having to pay him millions to kick rocks.
southseasbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Strykur said:

TouchedTheAxeIn82 said:

The announcers have already tuned out the game in front of them.



It's over, the only question is the final score.
Exactly. Play reserves to give them experience and spare the starters from possible injury.
Econ141
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whoever that receiver was needs to apologize to America for that one
egbear82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So much for Dykes leaving us with good receivers,
Sebastabear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What could make this game more awful? I know, Larry Scott talking about how late kickoffs are actually beneficial to the PAC 12. Yup - that just did it.
oursdor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
that Larry Scott segment was somehow worse than the game. embarrassingly pathetic, ham-fisted PR response.
LunchTime
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Strykur said:

TouchedTheAxeIn82 said:

The announcers have already tuned out the game in front of them.



It's over, the only question is the final score.


50-0.
CaliforniaEternal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's pretty clear now that Cal is simply awful, and that UNC and Ole Miss are likewise bottom dwellers in their respective conferences. Damn that false hope starting out 3-0!
southseasbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CaliforniaEternal said:

It's pretty clear now that Cal is simply awful, and that UNC and Ole Miss are likewise bottom dwellers in their respective conferences. Damn that false hope starting out 3-0!
Washington is legitimately the #6 team in the country, and may possibly be in the top 4. Our defense has performed well and specifically has shown improvement against the run. The offense would be a work in progress without injuries to our top 3 WRs, TB, and TE.
HKBear97!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Uthaithani said:

Strykur said:

Everybody spent the first 3 games ragging on Dykes and his Air Raid, our defense now keeps us in games but when our offense is limp dick and everybody knows it, we're dead to rights.


To be fair I saw a lot of problems with Baldwin's offense against Weber State. And I said it was awful against Ole Miss (which it was). Even with a full deck, Baldwin's Cal offense has been terrible. Now it's nonexistent. Yes injuries are a problem, a lot of which were caused by Baldwin's poor coaching. Vicious circle. Baldwin needs to go.
Your shtick is funny. So disregard who we lost from last year, the injuries, a QB who had never started a game and a completely new scheme and we should fire Baldwin? By the way, you do realize Dykes had two QBs that ended up in the NFL, right? Bowers may not even be our starter next year. Let's wait until the season is over and how this turns out before calling for heads.
Cave Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearsandgiants said:

More targeting.

Watching Larry Scott suck ESPN shaft. Embarrassing. Like watching a dnc shill on cnn.
CNN has nothing on Fox when it comes to shilling
southseasbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HKBear97! said:

Uthaithani said:

Strykur said:

Everybody spent the first 3 games ragging on Dykes and his Air Raid, our defense now keeps us in games but when our offense is limp dick and everybody knows it, we're dead to rights.


To be fair I saw a lot of problems with Baldwin's offense against Weber State. And I said it was awful against Ole Miss (which it was). Even with a full deck, Baldwin's Cal offense has been terrible. Now it's nonexistent. Yes injuries are a problem, a lot of which were caused by Baldwin's poor coaching. Vicious circle. Baldwin needs to go.
Your shtick is funny. So disregard who we lost from last year, the injuries, a QB who had never started a game and a completely new scheme and we should fire Baldwin? By the way, you do realize Dykes had two QBs that ended up in the NFL, right? Bowers may not even be our starter next year. Let's wait until the season is over and how this turns out before calling for heads.
+1.
juarezbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's like they're playing against the JV
southseasbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
juarezbear said:

It's like they're playing against the JV
Considering Dykes' recruiting, they are.
juarezbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Furd is gonna beat Utah
Grigsby
How long do you want to ignore this user?
southseasbear said:

CaliforniaEternal said:

It's pretty clear now that Cal is simply awful, and that UNC and Ole Miss are likewise bottom dwellers in their respective conferences. Damn that false hope starting out 3-0!
Washington is legitimately the #6 team in the country, and may possibly be in the top 4. Our defense has performed well and specifically has shown improvement against the run. The offense would be a work in progress without injuries to our top 3 WRs, TB, and TE.


Nah UW isn't that good. They'd have serious issues against most teams in the top 15.

Cal is terribly undermanned
Econ141
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Luckily that took up almost the full quarter.

I wonder what starter will be declared out for the season before the next game.
Sebastabear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't feel like we left the Washington receiver wide open enough there. Maybe we could back up a bit and give the man some room to breathe.
CaliforniaEternal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
southseasbear said:

CaliforniaEternal said:

It's pretty clear now that Cal is simply awful, and that UNC and Ole Miss are likewise bottom dwellers in their respective conferences. Damn that false hope starting out 3-0!
Washington is legitimately the #6 team in the country, and may possibly be in the top 4. Our defense has performed well and specifically has shown improvement against the run. The offense would be a work in progress without injuries to our top 3 WRs, TB, and TE.
The run defense showed improvement against some really weak teams. Granted, that's better than what they showed under Kaufman but the interior DL is still lacking big time. A lot of the defense's improvement has been from turnovers, also against really bad teams.

All of these injuries show a continued problem with S&C.
Blueblood
How long do you want to ignore this user?

I's that time!....
staygolden2001
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't think I have ever been this uninterested in a Cal game. I'm emotionally numb.
pingpong2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
staygolden2001 said:

I don't think I have ever been this uninterested in a Cal game. I'm emotionally numb.



Did you not watch the Oregon game last week?
bearsandgiants
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We've gone through three strength and conditioning coaches, the only constant in all of this is the turf
KenBurnski
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gilmore is like Lumberg in Office Space. "Yeah..."
TeamBoomtho
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just look at the eyes of the players, Echols, Downs, etc. they look sad and defeated . Coaching staff is saying all the right things, but we need a crew that's bout that action.
oursdor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
we're staring down 75 yards of offense for the game. there's really no excuse for this with 85 P5 scholarship players.
philly1121
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We're losing 31-0. There's nothing anyone can say to paint a pretty picture here. Dykes is gone. We got what we got and we don't have much. North Xarolina is not good. Ole Miss either. Expectations gentleman. We are going to have a losing record this year.
Econ141
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think the defense is still playing!
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We may need more of that going forward.
kaplanfx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Woohoo, not a shutout!
philly1121
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And then we score! Lol
Sebastabear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yay!!! F U shutout. Take that!!!
CaliforniaEternal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No shutout!!! Fire up the truck, and bring on the Cougs!!!
bearsandgiants
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Boom?
CannonBlast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearsandgiants said:

Boom?


Sure. Why not.

 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.