Cal at Wazzu (2.0) Game Thread

7,443 Views | 105 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by BearlyCareAnymore
Bear8995
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sonofabear51 said:

And Bradley now has 4 fouls
He is the only one who came to play. Love his heart. Wish the other guys would follow his lead.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sonofabear51 said:

And Bradley now has 4 fouls


We should not have had him on Williams, especially after he was sick? Better assignment for Celestine or even Brown.
sonofabear51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agreed
sonofabear51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oh my, this is getting out of hand. Cal will be lucky if they score 60 tonight
Bear8995
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sonofabear51 said:

Oh my, this is getting out of hand. Cal will be lucky if they score 60 tonight
getting? We are down 31. What is "out of hand?"

Hyder brings nothing to the team. I hope Fox cleans house after this year.

I like Grant but I'm fine if he moves on after this season. No Betley or Foreman either.

Take Bradley out of this sh*t show so he doesn't get hurt.

HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bradley read my posts on floaters, but he doesn't have it down yet
Bear8995
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Beyond embarrassing. Down 30+ to the 10th place team that is missing their best player.
calbearsfan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hyder brings nothing to the team. I hope Fox cleans house after this year.

And to think we were so happy when the NCAA reversed its original decision and let him play this year.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Klonaras with two baskets to get us over 50
KoreAmBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Flush this game and watch Pac-12 Networks it's the 2014 Cal football game at Wazzu. I predict we win 60-59 on a missed chip shot FGA!
KoreAmBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NathanAllen said:

IssyBear said:

To beat their zone, you need to pass to a player on the free throw line, who can pass or shoot from that spot. We repeatedly got good passes to that player, and they were all "good" shooters, yet no one could make the shot. That, added to the array of ticky-tack fouls being called, added to our lack of energy, resulted in the half time score.
Or dribble penetration, which no one besides Bradley has shown consistent interest in doing so far this year.
Celestine did it once in the first half and never again. Brown has gotten back to using his quickness to the basket and not looking to score. Sigh.
NathanAllen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
KoreAmBear said:

NathanAllen said:

IssyBear said:

To beat their zone, you need to pass to a player on the free throw line, who can pass or shoot from that spot. We repeatedly got good passes to that player, and they were all "good" shooters, yet no one could make the shot. That, added to the array of ticky-tack fouls being called, added to our lack of energy, resulted in the half time score.
Or dribble penetration, which no one besides Bradley has shown consistent interest in doing so far this year.
Celestine did it once in the first half and never again. Brown has gotten back to using his quickness to the basket and not looking to score. Sigh.
My point exactly. Consistent interest is key.
IssyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fun fact: Dimitrios Klonaras currently has a season field goal percentage of 62.5. He is 5 for 8 for the year and was 2 for 3 tonight.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fox vs Smith
Game 1 Cal +7
Game 2 Cal +6
Game 3 WSU +11
Game 4 WSU +31
NathanAllen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
IssyBear said:

Fun fact: Dimitrios Klonaras currently has a season field goal percentage of 62.5. He is 5 for 8 for the year and was 2 for 3 tonight.
That is fun.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IssyBear said:

Fun fact: Dimitrios Klonaras currently has a season field goal percentage of 62.5. He is 5 for 8 for the year and was 2 for 3 tonight.


Last year he lead Cal in 3pt % at .500 overall and .667 in conference.

(2 of 4 and 2 of 3).

The year before David Serge shot 1.000 overall and 1.000 from 3 (1 of 1).
hoop97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think Fox is a good coach and this year is a disappointment. It shows this team lacks leadership and how valuable Paris Austin was last year.

It's not reasonable to win a lot when 2 starters at beginning of the year are grad transfers and very average. No chemistry.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hoop97 said:

I think Fox is a good coach and this year is a disappointment. It shows this team lacks leadership and how valuable Paris Austin was last year.

It's not reasonable to win a lot when 2 starters at beginning of the year are grad transfers and very average. No chemistry.


We just lost by 31 to a team that was 5-10 in conference and missing their best player and you are pointing to the starting lineup at the beginning of the season?

He brought in grad transfers because he did not have worthy high school prospects for those slots. It is a valid excuse in year 1 but not in year 2. Moreover, no one is forcing him to start and play Betley more minutes than any other player on the team.

WSU started 3 freshmen. We started a grad transfer and a freshman and quickly replaced one with Bradley. We should have the advantage in continuity. You'll have to come up with a better excuse for losing to WSU who is also in year 2 under a new coach.
drizzlybear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That was probably the game I was most looking forward to all season and it turned out to be the worst game of the season. Ugh.

Nathan, I have tried hard to have patience with Hyder, but ... Not only is it not getting better, it seems to get worse each game. The poor shots, missed shots, and turnovers are obvious enough, but his lack of awareness/positioning on "defending" that 2-on-2 transition basket (dunk) in H1 looked like someone who doesn't understand the game.

It's confusing to me why Brown was DNP-CD for H2, especially when it's hard to imagine worse play than Hyder's performance tonight.

Hyder certainly wasn't the only one who played poorly; almost everyone else did as well. GA was MIA and got called for multiple bad screens. I know the refs seemed tough for Cal tonight, but for a guy who gets a lot of credit (including from me) for being fundamentally sound, you can't be giving possessions away on bad screens 20+ feet from the basket.

What the heck happened to Celestine on that loose ball on the baseline?? It seemed like he just stopped and stared at the loose ball (and then was immediately pulled for nearly the entire rest of the game).

Certainly it's hard to judge from just one game, but I liked WSU's personnel better than ours (and they were missing their best player).

The only thing more annoying than annoying referees is when you're losing so badly anyway that it doesn't even matter if the officiating was any good. You can't use it as an excuse; it just adds to the misery.

Tonight was a stinker. It happens to every team. It can't happen repeatedly. Looking for the Bears to bounce back Saturday.
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

What the heck happened to Celestine on that loose ball on the baseline?? It seemed like he just stopped and stared at the loose ball (and then was immediately pulled for nearly the entire rest of the game).
I think he drove too far with defenders all around, picked up his dribble, left his feet, and had no shot or pass so he let go of the ball rather than travel.
drizzlybear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
stu said:

Quote:

What the heck happened to Celestine on that loose ball on the baseline?? It seemed like he just stopped and stared at the loose ball (and then was immediately pulled for nearly the entire rest of the game).
I think he drove too far with defenders all around, picked up his dribble, left his feet, and had no shot or pass so he let go of the ball rather than travel.

Yeah that makes sense. I couldn't see it well and it looked weird.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
drizzlybear said:

That was probably the game I was most looking forward to all season and it turned out to be the worst game of the season. Ugh.

Nathan, I have tried hard to have patience with Hyder, but ... Not only is it not getting better, it seems to get worse each game. The poor shots, missed shots, and turnovers are obvious enough, but his lack of awareness/positioning on "defending" that 2-on-2 transition basket (dunk) in H1 looked like someone who doesn't understand the game.

It's confusing to me why Brown was DNP-CD for H2, especially when it's hard to imagine worse play than Hyder's performance tonight.

Hyder certainly wasn't the only one who played poorly; almost everyone else did as well. GA was MIA and got called for multiple bad screens. I know the refs seemed tough for Cal tonight, but for a guy who gets a lot of credit (including from me) for being fundamentally sound, you can't be giving possessions away on bad screens 20+ feet from the basket.

What the heck happened to Celestine on that loose ball on the baseline?? It seemed like he just stopped and stared at the loose ball (and then was immediately pulled for nearly the entire rest of the game).

Certainly it's hard to judge from just one game, but I liked WSU's personnel better than ours (and they were missing their best player).

The only thing more annoying than annoying referees is when you're losing so badly anyway that it doesn't even matter if the officiating was any good. You can't use it as an excuse; it just adds to the misery.

Tonight was a stinker. It happens to every team. It can't happen repeatedly. Looking for the Bears to bounce back Saturday.


UW is the worst team in the conference, just what the doctor ordered.
KoreAmBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

drizzlybear said:

That was probably the game I was most looking forward to all season and it turned out to be the worst game of the season. Ugh.

Nathan, I have tried hard to have patience with Hyder, but ... Not only is it not getting better, it seems to get worse each game. The poor shots, missed shots, and turnovers are obvious enough, but his lack of awareness/positioning on "defending" that 2-on-2 transition basket (dunk) in H1 looked like someone who doesn't understand the game.

It's confusing to me why Brown was DNP-CD for H2, especially when it's hard to imagine worse play than Hyder's performance tonight.

Hyder certainly wasn't the only one who played poorly; almost everyone else did as well. GA was MIA and got called for multiple bad screens. I know the refs seemed tough for Cal tonight, but for a guy who gets a lot of credit (including from me) for being fundamentally sound, you can't be giving possessions away on bad screens 20+ feet from the basket.

What the heck happened to Celestine on that loose ball on the baseline?? It seemed like he just stopped and stared at the loose ball (and then was immediately pulled for nearly the entire rest of the game).

Certainly it's hard to judge from just one game, but I liked WSU's personnel better than ours (and they were missing their best player).

The only thing more annoying than annoying referees is when you're losing so badly anyway that it doesn't even matter if the officiating was any good. You can't use it as an excuse; it just adds to the misery.

Tonight was a stinker. It happens to every team. It can't happen repeatedly. Looking for the Bears to bounce back Saturday.


UW is the worst team in the conference, just what the doctor ordered.
Speaking of doctor, it will help to have a healthy Matt on Saturday. But yes certainly a winnable game.

calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KoreAmBear said:

calumnus said:

drizzlybear said:

That was probably the game I was most looking forward to all season and it turned out to be the worst game of the season. Ugh.

Nathan, I have tried hard to have patience with Hyder, but ... Not only is it not getting better, it seems to get worse each game. The poor shots, missed shots, and turnovers are obvious enough, but his lack of awareness/positioning on "defending" that 2-on-2 transition basket (dunk) in H1 looked like someone who doesn't understand the game.

It's confusing to me why Brown was DNP-CD for H2, especially when it's hard to imagine worse play than Hyder's performance tonight.

Hyder certainly wasn't the only one who played poorly; almost everyone else did as well. GA was MIA and got called for multiple bad screens. I know the refs seemed tough for Cal tonight, but for a guy who gets a lot of credit (including from me) for being fundamentally sound, you can't be giving possessions away on bad screens 20+ feet from the basket.

What the heck happened to Celestine on that loose ball on the baseline?? It seemed like he just stopped and stared at the loose ball (and then was immediately pulled for nearly the entire rest of the game).

Certainly it's hard to judge from just one game, but I liked WSU's personnel better than ours (and they were missing their best player).

The only thing more annoying than annoying referees is when you're losing so badly anyway that it doesn't even matter if the officiating was any good. You can't use it as an excuse; it just adds to the misery.

Tonight was a stinker. It happens to every team. It can't happen repeatedly. Looking for the Bears to bounce back Saturday.


UW is the worst team in the conference, just what the doctor ordered.
Speaking of doctor, it will help to have a healthy Matt on Saturday. But yes certainly a winnable game.




Matt played well (as always). I wonder why he didn't start? Just because he missed practice with illness?
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Because he was still not 100% from his illness

Sounds like he had the flu or something. Matt was off yesterday because of it. He lost the ball a couple of times which is not like him. Just not as alert. It wasn't till he took it as a personal challenge to take on Williams (by the way, Williams scored on him after an obvious moving screen, by the same refs who called that second ridiculous moving screen on Grant)

Sounds like UW's Green also had the flu as he missed one game because of it and didn't look himself in yesterday's game vs Stanford



calumnus said:

KoreAmBear said:

calumnus said:

drizzlybear said:

That was probably the game I was most looking forward to all season and it turned out to be the worst game of the season. Ugh.

Nathan, I have tried hard to have patience with Hyder, but ... Not only is it not getting better, it seems to get worse each game. The poor shots, missed shots, and turnovers are obvious enough, but his lack of awareness/positioning on "defending" that 2-on-2 transition basket (dunk) in H1 looked like someone who doesn't understand the game.

It's confusing to me why Brown was DNP-CD for H2, especially when it's hard to imagine worse play than Hyder's performance tonight.

Hyder certainly wasn't the only one who played poorly; almost everyone else did as well. GA was MIA and got called for multiple bad screens. I know the refs seemed tough for Cal tonight, but for a guy who gets a lot of credit (including from me) for being fundamentally sound, you can't be giving possessions away on bad screens 20+ feet from the basket.

What the heck happened to Celestine on that loose ball on the baseline?? It seemed like he just stopped and stared at the loose ball (and then was immediately pulled for nearly the entire rest of the game).

Certainly it's hard to judge from just one game, but I liked WSU's personnel better than ours (and they were missing their best player).

The only thing more annoying than annoying referees is when you're losing so badly anyway that it doesn't even matter if the officiating was any good. You can't use it as an excuse; it just adds to the misery.

Tonight was a stinker. It happens to every team. It can't happen repeatedly. Looking for the Bears to bounce back Saturday.


UW is the worst team in the conference, just what the doctor ordered.
Speaking of doctor, it will help to have a healthy Matt on Saturday. But yes certainly a winnable game.




Matt played well (as always). I wonder why he didn't start? Just because he missed practice with illness?
NathanAllen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
drizzlybear said:

That was probably the game I was most looking forward to all season and it turned out to be the worst game of the season. Ugh.

Nathan, I have tried hard to have patience with Hyder, but ... Not only is it not getting better, it seems to get worse each game. The poor shots, missed shots, and turnovers are obvious enough, but his lack of awareness/positioning on "defending" that 2-on-2 transition basket (dunk) in H1 looked like someone who doesn't understand the game.

It's confusing to me why Brown was DNP-CD for H2, especially when it's hard to imagine worse play than Hyder's performance tonight.

Hyder certainly wasn't the only one who played poorly; almost everyone else did as well. GA was MIA and got called for multiple bad screens. I know the refs seemed tough for Cal tonight, but for a guy who gets a lot of credit (including from me) for being fundamentally sound, you can't be giving possessions away on bad screens 20+ feet from the basket.

What the heck happened to Celestine on that loose ball on the baseline?? It seemed like he just stopped and stared at the loose ball (and then was immediately pulled for nearly the entire rest of the game).

Certainly it's hard to judge from just one game, but I liked WSU's personnel better than ours (and they were missing their best player).

The only thing more annoying than annoying referees is when you're losing so badly anyway that it doesn't even matter if the officiating was any good. You can't use it as an excuse; it just adds to the misery.

Tonight was a stinker. It happens to every team. It can't happen repeatedly. Looking for the Bears to bounce back Saturday.
Yeah, I don't disagree with anything you said, really. It's all good perspective.

The PG position has turned into a blackhole for Cal's roster/rotation. That doesn't mean it can't be redeemed. I think Brown and Hyder will both turn into good P12 players. But for whatever reason, the two are both really struggling right now. You're right in that it's just one game. And, to be sure, nearly every team in college hoops this year not named Gonzaga or Baylor has laid at least one massive turd for a game. It happens.

One thing to keep in mind is while the PG play has been disappointing as of late, both Brown and Hyder have made improvements in many advanced analytics categories compared to last year. Patience might be needed in their development.

As far as the comment about WSU's personnel versus Cal's, it's a very interesting point. Both teams are in a similar place with being pretty bad and then hiring a new coach two years ago. Wazzu has basically stacked the roster with younger pieces and a couple traditional transfers from other schools or JuCo while Cal has gone a bit more grad transfer-heavy. Despite what happened last night, I still think it's too early to evaluate which one is/wll be more successful, but it is interesting to see some similarities and differences from the two different coaches and two different schools. (Please don't hijack this thread into another debate about Kyle Smith versus Mark Fox.)
Civil Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
stu said:

Bear8995 said:

They have taken 3 more shots and 8 more free throws.

They have 20 rebounds. We have 8.

They are shooting 59%.We are shooting 42%.

We have 7 TOs and they have 5.

Every statistic is in their favor, and not by a little.
Not exactly. Both teams have played 20 minutes.
That's debatable.
Civil Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

drizzlybear said:

That was probably the game I was most looking forward to all season and it turned out to be the worst game of the season. Ugh.

Nathan, I have tried hard to have patience with Hyder, but ... Not only is it not getting better, it seems to get worse each game. The poor shots, missed shots, and turnovers are obvious enough, but his lack of awareness/positioning on "defending" that 2-on-2 transition basket (dunk) in H1 looked like someone who doesn't understand the game.

It's confusing to me why Brown was DNP-CD for H2, especially when it's hard to imagine worse play than Hyder's performance tonight.

Hyder certainly wasn't the only one who played poorly; almost everyone else did as well. GA was MIA and got called for multiple bad screens. I know the refs seemed tough for Cal tonight, but for a guy who gets a lot of credit (including from me) for being fundamentally sound, you can't be giving possessions away on bad screens 20+ feet from the basket.

What the heck happened to Celestine on that loose ball on the baseline?? It seemed like he just stopped and stared at the loose ball (and then was immediately pulled for nearly the entire rest of the game).

Certainly it's hard to judge from just one game, but I liked WSU's personnel better than ours (and they were missing their best player).

The only thing more annoying than annoying referees is when you're losing so badly anyway that it doesn't even matter if the officiating was any good. You can't use it as an excuse; it just adds to the misery.

Tonight was a stinker. It happens to every team. It can't happen repeatedly. Looking for the Bears to bounce back Saturday.


UW is the worst team in the conference, just what the doctor ordered.
We'll see.
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

As far as the comment about WSU's personnel versus Cal's, it's a very interesting point. Both teams are in a similar place with being pretty bad and then hiring a new coach two years ago. Wazzu has basically stacked the roster with younger pieces and a couple traditional transfers from other schools or JuCo while Cal has gone a bit more grad transfer-heavy ...
From what I saw I's say WSU has filled their roster with better players. They looked longer, more athletic, and more skilled.

Reasons for that could include recruiting chops, scouting acumen, academic requirements, campus environment, more. I can't say since every player is different.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
After covering 3 games in a row, the Bears failed to cover by 32 points last night.

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
NathanAllen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
stu said:

Quote:

As far as the comment about WSU's personnel versus Cal's, it's a very interesting point. Both teams are in a similar place with being pretty bad and then hiring a new coach two years ago. Wazzu has basically stacked the roster with younger pieces and a couple traditional transfers from other schools or JuCo while Cal has gone a bit more grad transfer-heavy ...
From what I saw I's say WSU has filled their roster with better players. They looked longer, more athletic, and more skilled.

Reasons for that could include recruiting chops, scouting acumen, academic requirements, campus environment, more. I can't say since every player is different.
I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with you. But I do recommend making a judgment based on more than one game in which Cal lost by 31 points. (Maybe you have, just saying based on your statement, it doesn't seem like it.)

If you go off recruiting rankings, WSU's 2020 class was ranked fourth in the conference, but mainly because they had six commits (one four-star and five three-stars, according to 247Sports). Two players were ranked in the top-150, three in the 200 to 300 range, and one 400+. The 2019 class ranked 11th in the conference and had a whopping eight players from incoming freshmen to juco transfers to a traditional transfer. This class is really performing above its ranking as it includes Noah Williams, Isaac Bonton, and D.J. Rodman, among others. The 2018 class ranked last (12th) in the league, but the majority of WSU's rotation comes from the previous two classes.

Really, there is nothing special about Wazzu's classes, according to the rankings. Obviously, guys like Williams and Bonton have over-performed. And, of course, rankings aren't everything.

But I just want to reiterate my point that just because they looked longer, more athletic, and skilled in a lopsided win against Cal, doesn't mean they always are. Despite what we've seen them do to Cal this year, Wazzu isn't a good team. Outside of wins over Oregon and UCLA, they haven't beaten a KenPom top-100 team this season. Cal also has two wins over top-100 KenPom teams (Colorado and Utah). Keep in mind, Cal really depends on Bradley for a lot, and both times they've played Wazzu this year Bradley has been totally out with an injury or recovering from a sickness.

Now, I'm not defending Cal's performance last night. It was by far the worst of the season. With a sick Bradley or not, it was bad. They made a team with an adjusted offensive efficiency ranked in the 200s in KenPom look like the 2017 Warriors and Noah Williams look like Steph Curry. I just wouldn't come to too strong of a conclusion based on the sample size of one or two games.
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NathanAllen said:

stu said:

From what I saw I's say WSU has filled their roster with better players. They looked longer, more athletic, and more skilled.

Reasons for that could include recruiting chops, scouting acumen, academic requirements, campus environment, more. I can't say since every player is different.
I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with you. But I do recommend making a judgment based on more than one game in which Cal lost by 31 points. (Maybe you have, just saying based on your statement, it doesn't seem like it.)
You're correct, I haven't followed WSU at all. If WSU had a bad shooting night and we hit a few more open shots we might have won. But still they were blowing by everyone on our team and killing us on the boards.

Quote:

Really, there is nothing special about Wazzu's classes, according to the rankings. Obviously, guys like Williams and Bonton have over-performed. And, of course, rankings aren't everything.
Yes, I mentioned scouting because I agree with you and SFCB on rankings. Some teams find players who exceed their rankings, IMHO that's a huge factor in success at all but the very top programs.
OdontoBear66
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NathanAllen said:

stu said:

Quote:

As far as the comment about WSU's personnel versus Cal's, it's a very interesting point. Both teams are in a similar place with being pretty bad and then hiring a new coach two years ago. Wazzu has basically stacked the roster with younger pieces and a couple traditional transfers from other schools or JuCo while Cal has gone a bit more grad transfer-heavy ...
From what I saw I's say WSU has filled their roster with better players. They looked longer, more athletic, and more skilled.

Reasons for that could include recruiting chops, scouting acumen, academic requirements, campus environment, more. I can't say since every player is different.
I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with you. But I do recommend making a judgment based on more than one game in which Cal lost by 31 points. (Maybe you have, just saying based on your statement, it doesn't seem like it.)

If you go off recruiting rankings, WSU's 2020 class was ranked fourth in the conference, but mainly because they had six commits (one four-star and five three-stars, according to 247Sports). Two players were ranked in the top-150, three in the 200 to 300 range, and one 400+. The 2019 class ranked 11th in the conference and had a whopping eight players from incoming freshmen to juco transfers to a traditional transfer. This class is really performing above its ranking as it includes Noah Williams, Isaac Bonton, and D.J. Rodman, among others. The 2018 class ranked last (12th) in the league, but the majority of WSU's rotation comes from the previous two classes.

Really, there is nothing special about Wazzu's classes, according to the rankings. Obviously, guys like Williams and Bonton have over-performed. And, of course, rankings aren't everything.

But I just want to reiterate my point that just because they looked longer, more athletic, and skilled in a lopsided win against Cal, doesn't mean they always are. Despite what we've seen them do to Cal this year, Wazzu isn't a good team. Outside of wins over Oregon and UCLA, they haven't beaten a KenPom top-100 team this season. Cal also has two wins over top-100 KenPom teams (Colorado and Utah). Keep in mind, Cal really depends on Bradley for a lot, and both times they've played Wazzu this year Bradley has been totally out with an injury or recovering from a sickness.

Now, I'm not defending Cal's performance last night. It was by far the worst of the season. With a sick Bradley or not, it was bad. They made a team with an adjusted offensive efficiency ranked in the 200s in KenPom look like the 2017 Warriors and Noah Williams look like Steph Curry. I just wouldn't come to too strong of a conclusion based on the sample size of one or two games.
Yes, I know on a website it is your role to maintain and generate interest, but for the day to day fan that game was one where you best just turned it off and did an occasional score check rather than get upset. I was really feeling good about what Fox was doing with the team, and yes to calm the crowd we can cite the difficulty of playing in the Palouse, but "making judgment based on more than one game"??? We have played some very exciting games getting the unexpected wins with Utah and Colorado, but then we have stunk up the joint like last night by a so-so team without its best player. This team is 3-14 in conference and slipping below UW. I have followed every game to the end for Cal in my roughly 70 years as a fan, but BB of late has just made me move to better use of my time. It is not good except in spurts.

And believe me I know most of the reasons starting with Cuonzo (what he didn't leave on the table as he exited for his $21M) until current. This is not good currently Nathan, by almost any measure. And as I say that I will not point the finger at Fox. He just does not have enough Pac 12 talent to play a season.
NathanAllen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
OdontoBear66 said:

NathanAllen said:

stu said:

Quote:

As far as the comment about WSU's personnel versus Cal's, it's a very interesting point. Both teams are in a similar place with being pretty bad and then hiring a new coach two years ago. Wazzu has basically stacked the roster with younger pieces and a couple traditional transfers from other schools or JuCo while Cal has gone a bit more grad transfer-heavy ...
From what I saw I's say WSU has filled their roster with better players. They looked longer, more athletic, and more skilled.

Reasons for that could include recruiting chops, scouting acumen, academic requirements, campus environment, more. I can't say since every player is different.
I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with you. But I do recommend making a judgment based on more than one game in which Cal lost by 31 points. (Maybe you have, just saying based on your statement, it doesn't seem like it.)

If you go off recruiting rankings, WSU's 2020 class was ranked fourth in the conference, but mainly because they had six commits (one four-star and five three-stars, according to 247Sports). Two players were ranked in the top-150, three in the 200 to 300 range, and one 400+. The 2019 class ranked 11th in the conference and had a whopping eight players from incoming freshmen to juco transfers to a traditional transfer. This class is really performing above its ranking as it includes Noah Williams, Isaac Bonton, and D.J. Rodman, among others. The 2018 class ranked last (12th) in the league, but the majority of WSU's rotation comes from the previous two classes.

Really, there is nothing special about Wazzu's classes, according to the rankings. Obviously, guys like Williams and Bonton have over-performed. And, of course, rankings aren't everything.

But I just want to reiterate my point that just because they looked longer, more athletic, and skilled in a lopsided win against Cal, doesn't mean they always are. Despite what we've seen them do to Cal this year, Wazzu isn't a good team. Outside of wins over Oregon and UCLA, they haven't beaten a KenPom top-100 team this season. Cal also has two wins over top-100 KenPom teams (Colorado and Utah). Keep in mind, Cal really depends on Bradley for a lot, and both times they've played Wazzu this year Bradley has been totally out with an injury or recovering from a sickness.

Now, I'm not defending Cal's performance last night. It was by far the worst of the season. With a sick Bradley or not, it was bad. They made a team with an adjusted offensive efficiency ranked in the 200s in KenPom look like the 2017 Warriors and Noah Williams look like Steph Curry. I just wouldn't come to too strong of a conclusion based on the sample size of one or two games.
Yes, I know on a website it is your role to maintain and generate interest, but for the day to day fan that game was one where you best just turned it off and did an occasional score check rather than get upset. I was really feeling good about what Fox was doing with the team, and yes to calm the crowd we can cite the difficulty of playing in the Palouse, but "making judgment based on more than one game"??? We have played some very exciting games getting the unexpected wins with Utah and Colorado, but then we have stunk up the joint like last night by a so-so team without its best player. This team is 3-14 in conference and slipping below UW. I have followed every game to the end for Cal in my roughly 70 years as a fan, but BB of late has just made me move to better use of my time. It is not good except in spurts.

And believe me I know most of the reasons starting with Cuonzo (what he didn't leave on the table as he exited for his $21M) until current. This is not good currently Nathan, by almost any measure. And as I say that I will not point the finger at Fox. He just does not have enough Pac 12 talent to play a season.
I'm not sure what to tell you. It's going to take a while for Cal to get out of the hole it fell into. And Cal has some disadvantages when it comes to upgrading the roster (recent poor performance, no practice facility, admissions standards, etc.).

Again, I'm not defending Cal's performance last night. I'm just trying to offer some perspective. As you said, you were feeling good about what Fox was doing with the team. It's not going to be a linear path back to where many fans think this program should be.
OdontoBear66
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NathanAllen said:

OdontoBear66 said:

NathanAllen said:

stu said:

Quote:

As far as the comment about WSU's personnel versus Cal's, it's a very interesting point. Both teams are in a similar place with being pretty bad and then hiring a new coach two years ago. Wazzu has basically stacked the roster with younger pieces and a couple traditional transfers from other schools or JuCo while Cal has gone a bit more grad transfer-heavy ...
From what I saw I's say WSU has filled their roster with better players. They looked longer, more athletic, and more skilled.

Reasons for that could include recruiting chops, scouting acumen, academic requirements, campus environment, more. I can't say since every player is different.
I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with you. But I do recommend making a judgment based on more than one game in which Cal lost by 31 points. (Maybe you have, just saying based on your statement, it doesn't seem like it.)

If you go off recruiting rankings, WSU's 2020 class was ranked fourth in the conference, but mainly because they had six commits (one four-star and five three-stars, according to 247Sports). Two players were ranked in the top-150, three in the 200 to 300 range, and one 400+. The 2019 class ranked 11th in the conference and had a whopping eight players from incoming freshmen to juco transfers to a traditional transfer. This class is really performing above its ranking as it includes Noah Williams, Isaac Bonton, and D.J. Rodman, among others. The 2018 class ranked last (12th) in the league, but the majority of WSU's rotation comes from the previous two classes.

Really, there is nothing special about Wazzu's classes, according to the rankings. Obviously, guys like Williams and Bonton have over-performed. And, of course, rankings aren't everything.

But I just want to reiterate my point that just because they looked longer, more athletic, and skilled in a lopsided win against Cal, doesn't mean they always are. Despite what we've seen them do to Cal this year, Wazzu isn't a good team. Outside of wins over Oregon and UCLA, they haven't beaten a KenPom top-100 team this season. Cal also has two wins over top-100 KenPom teams (Colorado and Utah). Keep in mind, Cal really depends on Bradley for a lot, and both times they've played Wazzu this year Bradley has been totally out with an injury or recovering from a sickness.

Now, I'm not defending Cal's performance last night. It was by far the worst of the season. With a sick Bradley or not, it was bad. They made a team with an adjusted offensive efficiency ranked in the 200s in KenPom look like the 2017 Warriors and Noah Williams look like Steph Curry. I just wouldn't come to too strong of a conclusion based on the sample size of one or two games.
Yes, I know on a website it is your role to maintain and generate interest, but for the day to day fan that game was one where you best just turned it off and did an occasional score check rather than get upset. I was really feeling good about what Fox was doing with the team, and yes to calm the crowd we can cite the difficulty of playing in the Palouse, but "making judgment based on more than one game"??? We have played some very exciting games getting the unexpected wins with Utah and Colorado, but then we have stunk up the joint like last night by a so-so team without its best player. This team is 3-14 in conference and slipping below UW. I have followed every game to the end for Cal in my roughly 70 years as a fan, but BB of late has just made me move to better use of my time. It is not good except in spurts.

And believe me I know most of the reasons starting with Cuonzo (what he didn't leave on the table as he exited for his $21M) until current. This is not good currently Nathan, by almost any measure. And as I say that I will not point the finger at Fox. He just does not have enough Pac 12 talent to play a season.
I'm not sure what to tell you. It's going to take a while for Cal to get out of the hole it fell into. And Cal has some disadvantages when it comes to upgrading the roster (recent poor performance, no practice facility, admissions standards, etc.).

Again, I'm not defending Cal's performance last night. I'm just trying to offer some perspective. As you said, you were feeling good about what Fox was doing with the team. It's not going to be a linear path back to where many fans think this program should be.
But as much as you love Cal, like me, last night was just difficult to watch for the most ardent fan. I kept checking scores while doing something else and had they cut it to 10 or 12 the game would be reasonable and watchable as most games have been this year despite the W/L record. Last night was falling in a hole and digging deeper. I know you must be there in your role, but there is one thing standing by your team and another of come back for the next game. BTW, I never missed any games in the long, long UCLA streak. There was always hope whether real of not. This is just difficult and my personal feeling was CM fleeing for $$$ and hiring WJ was the day we fell in the hole. Its gonna take a lot of work.

BTW, as much as I love Cal FB hoops was always my game so this is a spear in the heart. Having grandkid also at G'town (they are rebuilding with difficulty in a much more difficult league) I get my BB there. Not riding a winner at all (see there record) but Patrick is bringing them along, albeit slowly. Great recruits coming with Aminu Muhammed and Motumbo's kid. That to will take time and patience, but there is a measure of things building after the 3 transfers last year.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.