Sam in FIBA U20

4,571 Views | 39 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by BigDaddy
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Great experience for him


sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No doubt. But I was kind of shocked that a non-basketball country (ranked 75th in the world) like Ireland made the European championships. It turns out the competition in Georgia is the NIT of U20 championships. The top 16 teams are playing in a separate competition. Looking at the Irish roster, none are playing anywhere of note so Alajiki may be the star. It could be that he gets a chance to handle the ball and expand his game.

I wonder why Okafor is not on the team, if he got cut or if he had other things to do.
sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Scored 15 points on 4/8 from 2, 1/4 from 3, 4/5 from the line in 67-65 win over Hungary. Third leader in minutes as well, so he must be a key player.

You can actually watch this game, and maybe you can watch others live. If I get insomnia ...
https://www.fiba.basketball/europe/u20b/2022/game/1507/Hungary-Ireland#tab=overview
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

Great experience for him





dul go hErinn!
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sluggo said:

Scored 15 points on 4/8 from 2, 1/4 from 3, 4/5 from the line in 67-65 win over Hungary. Third leader in minutes as well, so he must be a key player.

You can actually watch this game, and maybe you can watch others live. If I get insomnia ...
https://www.fiba.basketball/europe/u20b/2022/game/1507/Hungary-Ireland#tab=overview

If I'm reading the schedule right, Sam and Ireland will be playing Latvia at 10:15 AM PDT Sunday morning and Bulgaria at 5:45 AM PDT Wednesday morning. FIBA's Youtube channel
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

sluggo said:

Scored 15 points on 4/8 from 2, 1/4 from 3, 4/5 from the line in 67-65 win over Hungary. Third leader in minutes as well, so he must be a key player.

You can actually watch this game, and maybe you can watch others live. If I get insomnia ...
https://www.fiba.basketball/europe/u20b/2022/game/1507/Hungary-Ireland#tab=overview

If I'm reading the schedule right, Sam and Ireland will be playing Latvia at 10:15 AM PDT Sunday morning and Bulgaria at 5:45 AM PDT Wednesday morning. FIBA's Youtube channel
I got here late and missed the game, but thanks very much for this info.
SFCityBear
sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

sluggo said:

Scored 15 points on 4/8 from 2, 1/4 from 3, 4/5 from the line in 67-65 win over Hungary. Third leader in minutes as well, so he must be a key player.

You can actually watch this game, and maybe you can watch others live. If I get insomnia ...
https://www.fiba.basketball/europe/u20b/2022/game/1507/Hungary-Ireland#tab=overview

If I'm reading the schedule right, Sam and Ireland will be playing Latvia at 10:15 AM PDT Sunday morning and Bulgaria at 5:45 AM PDT Wednesday morning. FIBA's Youtube channel
I got here late and missed the game, but thanks very much for this info.
You can catch a replay. As can anyone else.
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sluggo said:

SFCityBear said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

sluggo said:

Scored 15 points on 4/8 from 2, 1/4 from 3, 4/5 from the line in 67-65 win over Hungary. Third leader in minutes as well, so he must be a key player.

You can actually watch this game, and maybe you can watch others live. If I get insomnia ...
https://www.fiba.basketball/europe/u20b/2022/game/1507/Hungary-Ireland#tab=overview

If I'm reading the schedule right, Sam and Ireland will be playing Latvia at 10:15 AM PDT Sunday morning and Bulgaria at 5:45 AM PDT Wednesday morning. FIBA's Youtube channel
I got here late and missed the game, but thanks very much for this info.
You can catch a replay. As can anyone else.
Thanks. I tried before my post to find a replay, but it said the video was unavailable. I'll try again later. today.
SFCityBear
sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

sluggo said:

SFCityBear said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

sluggo said:

Scored 15 points on 4/8 from 2, 1/4 from 3, 4/5 from the line in 67-65 win over Hungary. Third leader in minutes as well, so he must be a key player.

You can actually watch this game, and maybe you can watch others live. If I get insomnia ...
https://www.fiba.basketball/europe/u20b/2022/game/1507/Hungary-Ireland#tab=overview

If I'm reading the schedule right, Sam and Ireland will be playing Latvia at 10:15 AM PDT Sunday morning and Bulgaria at 5:45 AM PDT Wednesday morning. FIBA's Youtube channel
I got here late and missed the game, but thanks very much for this info.
You can catch a replay. As can anyone else.
Thanks. I tried before my post to find a replay, but it said the video was unavailable. I'll try again later. today.
I found that if you go to specific game results you find a link to the whole game video. Here is today.

https://www.fiba.basketball/europe/u20b/2022/game/1707/Ireland-Latvia#tab=overview
HearstMining
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I watched part of the Ireland-Latvia game. Sam was clearly the most athletic player on the Irish team. He hit a couple of 3pt shots, I think, and added a pump-fake and drive that I don't recall seeing last season. It would have been more effective if his ball handling had improved. Still no mid-range shot. I hoped for more rebounding, but didn't see it in this game. To summarize, Sam has improved, but not a quantum leap. Of course, all this is just IMO.
sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HearstMining said:

I watched part of the Ireland-Latvia game. Sam was clearly the most athletic player on the Irish team. He hit a couple of 3pt shots, I think, and added a pump-fake and drive that I don't recall seeing last season. It would have been more effective if his ball handling had improved. Still no mid-range shot. I hoped for more rebounding, but didn't see it in this game. To summarize, Sam has improved, but not a quantum leap. Of course, all this is just IMO.
I watched the first half as well. The bright side was that he drove strong to the hoop. I did not see any 3 point shots, but rather traditional two pointers with fouls. He is still very right-handed, but when he drives he can spin left if he feels someone on his back. He is strong and can jump. But his awareness and movement is still bad. His team sets screens and moves without the ball. He stood around, moved only towards the ball and forced shots. Mark Fox must be proud.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sluggo said:

HearstMining said:

I watched part of the Ireland-Latvia game. Sam was clearly the most athletic player on the Irish team. He hit a couple of 3pt shots, I think, and added a pump-fake and drive that I don't recall seeing last season. It would have been more effective if his ball handling had improved. Still no mid-range shot. I hoped for more rebounding, but didn't see it in this game. To summarize, Sam has improved, but not a quantum leap. Of course, all this is just IMO.
I watched the first half as well. The bright side was that he drove strong to the hoop. I did not see any 3 point shots, but rather traditional two pointers with fouls. He is still very right-handed, but when he drives he can spin left if he feels someone on his back. He is strong and can jump. But his awareness and movement is still bad. His team sets screens and moves without the ball. He stood around, moved only towards the ball and forced shots. Mark Fox must be proud.

You or somebody here has compared Alajiki to Theo Robertson (in some respects). One aspect of Theo's game I would like to see Sam try and emulate is the "hoops IQ" / "glue guy" aspect. In other words, doing the little things that help a team win. I suppose it is a process, but I hope he has the mindset that this is the way to go (pus the instruction to get him there).
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sluggo said:

SFCityBear said:

sluggo said:

SFCityBear said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

sluggo said:

Scored 15 points on 4/8 from 2, 1/4 from 3, 4/5 from the line in 67-65 win over Hungary. Third leader in minutes as well, so he must be a key player.

You can actually watch this game, and maybe you can watch others live. If I get insomnia ...
https://www.fiba.basketball/europe/u20b/2022/game/1507/Hungary-Ireland#tab=overview

If I'm reading the schedule right, Sam and Ireland will be playing Latvia at 10:15 AM PDT Sunday morning and Bulgaria at 5:45 AM PDT Wednesday morning. FIBA's Youtube channel
I got here late and missed the game, but thanks very much for this info.
You can catch a replay. As can anyone else.
Thanks. I tried before my post to find a replay, but it said the video was unavailable. I'll try again later. today.
I found that if you go to specific game results you find a link to the whole game video. Here is today.

https://www.fiba.basketball/europe/u20b/2022/game/1707/Ireland-Latvia#tab=overview

Thanks for this, Sluggo.
SFCityBear
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sluggo said:

HearstMining said:

I watched part of the Ireland-Latvia game. Sam was clearly the most athletic player on the Irish team. He hit a couple of 3pt shots, I think, and added a pump-fake and drive that I don't recall seeing last season. It would have been more effective if his ball handling had improved. Still no mid-range shot. I hoped for more rebounding, but didn't see it in this game. To summarize, Sam has improved, but not a quantum leap. Of course, all this is just IMO.
I watched the first half as well. The bright side was that he drove strong to the hoop. I did not see any 3 point shots, but rather traditional two pointers with fouls. He is still very right-handed, but when he drives he can spin left if he feels someone on his back. He is strong and can jump. But his awareness and movement is still bad. His team sets screens and moves without the ball. He stood around, moved only towards the ball and forced shots. Mark Fox must be proud.
Why say this? isn't it possible that Fox is telling his players to set screens and move without the ball, but some or most of them are just not doing it? This is basic basketball 1A, which back in the 1950s we learned before high school if we had a coach, or we would at least be taught this as high school freshmen. By the time we were juniors in high school we were running more complicated pattern plays, utilizing 3-5 players. I can't believe Fox is not trying to have players set screens or move without the ball. I suspect he has collected a number of players who were never taught these fairly simple skills before or during high school. Alajiki is not the only player we have who doesn't seem to have developed good instincts for what to do in a motion offense. I think and older coach like Fox expects players to have some instincts when they arrive in college, but as the years go by, there seem to be fewer and fewer of them arriving in college, especially at Cal. Just IMHO.
SFCityBear
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

sluggo said:

HearstMining said:

I watched part of the Ireland-Latvia game. Sam was clearly the most athletic player on the Irish team. He hit a couple of 3pt shots, I think, and added a pump-fake and drive that I don't recall seeing last season. It would have been more effective if his ball handling had improved. Still no mid-range shot. I hoped for more rebounding, but didn't see it in this game. To summarize, Sam has improved, but not a quantum leap. Of course, all this is just IMO.
I watched the first half as well. The bright side was that he drove strong to the hoop. I did not see any 3 point shots, but rather traditional two pointers with fouls. He is still very right-handed, but when he drives he can spin left if he feels someone on his back. He is strong and can jump. But his awareness and movement is still bad. His team sets screens and moves without the ball. He stood around, moved only towards the ball and forced shots. Mark Fox must be proud.
Why say this? isn't it possible that Fox is telling his players to set screens and move without the ball, but some or most of them are just not doing it? This is basic basketball 1A, which back in the 1950s we learned before high school if we had a coach, or we would at least be taught this as high school freshmen. By the time we were juniors in high school we were running more complicated pattern plays, utilizing 3-5 players. I can't believe Fox is not trying to have players set screens or move without the ball. I suspect he has collected a number of players who were never taught these fairly simple skills before or during high school. Alajiki is not the only player we have who doesn't seem to have developed good instincts for what to do in a motion offense. I think and older coach like Fox expects players to have some instincts when they arrive in college, but as the years go by, there seem to be fewer and fewer of them arriving in college, especially at Cal. Just IMHO.

Sarcasm is often born out of frustration.

Honest question: Would you describe Fox's offense as a "motion offense"? Maybe it is, What I typically see is passing around the perimeter for 15-20 seconds, often followed by an on-ball screen up high, with the screener occasionally rolling to the basket. Player with the ball as the shot clock goes under eight seconds makes a snap decision.

Second honest question (and here's where my ignorance comes in regarding implementation): Why is it so hard to tell players to, when you don't have the ball, do _____ and/or _____ and/or maybe _____? Have them do that in practice. Have them watch film of players on other teams who do it right (Klay Thompson comes to mind.) After the game, you watch film and see who was doing what they were supposed to do and who wasn't. Those who consistently don't face diminished playing time.

Admittedly, there must be more to it, otherwise I'd be making the seven-figures and Fox would be home posting on Bear Insider.
sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

sluggo said:

HearstMining said:

I watched part of the Ireland-Latvia game. Sam was clearly the most athletic player on the Irish team. He hit a couple of 3pt shots, I think, and added a pump-fake and drive that I don't recall seeing last season. It would have been more effective if his ball handling had improved. Still no mid-range shot. I hoped for more rebounding, but didn't see it in this game. To summarize, Sam has improved, but not a quantum leap. Of course, all this is just IMO.
I watched the first half as well. The bright side was that he drove strong to the hoop. I did not see any 3 point shots, but rather traditional two pointers with fouls. He is still very right-handed, but when he drives he can spin left if he feels someone on his back. He is strong and can jump. But his awareness and movement is still bad. His team sets screens and moves without the ball. He stood around, moved only towards the ball and forced shots. Mark Fox must be proud.
Why say this? isn't it possible that Fox is telling his players to set screens and move without the ball, but some or most of them are just not doing it? This is basic basketball 1A, which back in the 1950s we learned before high school if we had a coach, or we would at least be taught this as high school freshmen. By the time we were juniors in high school we were running more complicated pattern plays, utilizing 3-5 players. I can't believe Fox is not trying to have players set screens or move without the ball. I suspect he has collected a number of players who were never taught these fairly simple skills before or during high school. Alajiki is not the only player we have who doesn't seem to have developed good instincts for what to do in a motion offense. I think and older coach like Fox expects players to have some instincts when they arrive in college, but as the years go by, there seem to be fewer and fewer of them arriving in college, especially at Cal. Just IMHO.
I only care what the players do. If they don't listen, maybe you get a new one, don't you think?
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sluggo said:

SFCityBear said:

sluggo said:

HearstMining said:

I watched part of the Ireland-Latvia game. Sam was clearly the most athletic player on the Irish team. He hit a couple of 3pt shots, I think, and added a pump-fake and drive that I don't recall seeing last season. It would have been more effective if his ball handling had improved. Still no mid-range shot. I hoped for more rebounding, but didn't see it in this game. To summarize, Sam has improved, but not a quantum leap. Of course, all this is just IMO.
I watched the first half as well. The bright side was that he drove strong to the hoop. I did not see any 3 point shots, but rather traditional two pointers with fouls. He is still very right-handed, but when he drives he can spin left if he feels someone on his back. He is strong and can jump. But his awareness and movement is still bad. His team sets screens and moves without the ball. He stood around, moved only towards the ball and forced shots. Mark Fox must be proud.
Why say this? isn't it possible that Fox is telling his players to set screens and move without the ball, but some or most of them are just not doing it? This is basic basketball 1A, which back in the 1950s we learned before high school if we had a coach, or we would at least be taught this as high school freshmen. By the time we were juniors in high school we were running more complicated pattern plays, utilizing 3-5 players. I can't believe Fox is not trying to have players set screens or move without the ball. I suspect he has collected a number of players who were never taught these fairly simple skills before or during high school. Alajiki is not the only player we have who doesn't seem to have developed good instincts for what to do in a motion offense. I think and older coach like Fox expects players to have some instincts when they arrive in college, but as the years go by, there seem to be fewer and fewer of them arriving in college, especially at Cal. Just IMHO.
I only care what the players do. If they don't listen, maybe you get a new one, don't you think?


I think it is far more important to be an effective communicator and educator. Student athletes at Cal are smart kids and just getting people to follow orders might work in the military, but at a place like Cal, it is far better to have them understand WHY they are to do what you are asking them to do. That was when Monty was at his best, when he was an educator. That is also why he has such a strong coaching tree. Players who played for him got a great education in basketball.
CalLifer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sluggo said:

SFCityBear said:

sluggo said:

HearstMining said:

I watched part of the Ireland-Latvia game. Sam was clearly the most athletic player on the Irish team. He hit a couple of 3pt shots, I think, and added a pump-fake and drive that I don't recall seeing last season. It would have been more effective if his ball handling had improved. Still no mid-range shot. I hoped for more rebounding, but didn't see it in this game. To summarize, Sam has improved, but not a quantum leap. Of course, all this is just IMO.
I watched the first half as well. The bright side was that he drove strong to the hoop. I did not see any 3 point shots, but rather traditional two pointers with fouls. He is still very right-handed, but when he drives he can spin left if he feels someone on his back. He is strong and can jump. But his awareness and movement is still bad. His team sets screens and moves without the ball. He stood around, moved only towards the ball and forced shots. Mark Fox must be proud.
Why say this? isn't it possible that Fox is telling his players to set screens and move without the ball, but some or most of them are just not doing it? This is basic basketball 1A, which back in the 1950s we learned before high school if we had a coach, or we would at least be taught this as high school freshmen. By the time we were juniors in high school we were running more complicated pattern plays, utilizing 3-5 players. I can't believe Fox is not trying to have players set screens or move without the ball. I suspect he has collected a number of players who were never taught these fairly simple skills before or during high school. Alajiki is not the only player we have who doesn't seem to have developed good instincts for what to do in a motion offense. I think and older coach like Fox expects players to have some instincts when they arrive in college, but as the years go by, there seem to be fewer and fewer of them arriving in college, especially at Cal. Just IMHO.
I only care what the players do. If they don't listen, maybe you get a new one, don't you think?
More importantly, if Fox wants kids to come in already having those skills or that knowledge, then why is he recruiting players who don't have them? You can't recruit kids who don't know how to set screens/move and then blame them for execution problems when you fail to teach them those things. This is 100% Fox's programs; he is deciding the type of players to recruit, and all of the success or failures of the program are on his shoulders.
sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

sluggo said:

SFCityBear said:

sluggo said:

HearstMining said:

I watched part of the Ireland-Latvia game. Sam was clearly the most athletic player on the Irish team. He hit a couple of 3pt shots, I think, and added a pump-fake and drive that I don't recall seeing last season. It would have been more effective if his ball handling had improved. Still no mid-range shot. I hoped for more rebounding, but didn't see it in this game. To summarize, Sam has improved, but not a quantum leap. Of course, all this is just IMO.
I watched the first half as well. The bright side was that he drove strong to the hoop. I did not see any 3 point shots, but rather traditional two pointers with fouls. He is still very right-handed, but when he drives he can spin left if he feels someone on his back. He is strong and can jump. But his awareness and movement is still bad. His team sets screens and moves without the ball. He stood around, moved only towards the ball and forced shots. Mark Fox must be proud.
Why say this? isn't it possible that Fox is telling his players to set screens and move without the ball, but some or most of them are just not doing it? This is basic basketball 1A, which back in the 1950s we learned before high school if we had a coach, or we would at least be taught this as high school freshmen. By the time we were juniors in high school we were running more complicated pattern plays, utilizing 3-5 players. I can't believe Fox is not trying to have players set screens or move without the ball. I suspect he has collected a number of players who were never taught these fairly simple skills before or during high school. Alajiki is not the only player we have who doesn't seem to have developed good instincts for what to do in a motion offense. I think and older coach like Fox expects players to have some instincts when they arrive in college, but as the years go by, there seem to be fewer and fewer of them arriving in college, especially at Cal. Just IMHO.
I only care what the players do. If they don't listen, maybe you get a new one, don't you think?


I think it is far more important to be an effective communicator and educator. Student athletes at Cal are smart kids and just getting people to follow orders might work in the military, but at a place like Cal, it is far better to have them understand WHY they are to do what you are asking them to do. That was when Monty was at his best, when he was an educator. That is also why he has such a strong coaching tree. Players who played for him got a great education in basketball.
Well, whatever works, as long as the coach is respectful to the players.
sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CalLifer said:

sluggo said:

SFCityBear said:

sluggo said:

HearstMining said:

I watched part of the Ireland-Latvia game. Sam was clearly the most athletic player on the Irish team. He hit a couple of 3pt shots, I think, and added a pump-fake and drive that I don't recall seeing last season. It would have been more effective if his ball handling had improved. Still no mid-range shot. I hoped for more rebounding, but didn't see it in this game. To summarize, Sam has improved, but not a quantum leap. Of course, all this is just IMO.
I watched the first half as well. The bright side was that he drove strong to the hoop. I did not see any 3 point shots, but rather traditional two pointers with fouls. He is still very right-handed, but when he drives he can spin left if he feels someone on his back. He is strong and can jump. But his awareness and movement is still bad. His team sets screens and moves without the ball. He stood around, moved only towards the ball and forced shots. Mark Fox must be proud.
Why say this? isn't it possible that Fox is telling his players to set screens and move without the ball, but some or most of them are just not doing it? This is basic basketball 1A, which back in the 1950s we learned before high school if we had a coach, or we would at least be taught this as high school freshmen. By the time we were juniors in high school we were running more complicated pattern plays, utilizing 3-5 players. I can't believe Fox is not trying to have players set screens or move without the ball. I suspect he has collected a number of players who were never taught these fairly simple skills before or during high school. Alajiki is not the only player we have who doesn't seem to have developed good instincts for what to do in a motion offense. I think and older coach like Fox expects players to have some instincts when they arrive in college, but as the years go by, there seem to be fewer and fewer of them arriving in college, especially at Cal. Just IMHO.
I only care what the players do. If they don't listen, maybe you get a new one, don't you think?
More importantly, if Fox wants kids to come in already having those skills or that knowledge, then why is he recruiting players who don't have them? You can't recruit kids who don't know how to set screens/move and then blame them for execution problems when you fail to teach them those things. This is 100% Fox's programs; he is deciding the type of players to recruit, and all of the success or failures of the program are on his shoulders.
Totally agree. While his recruiting is the worst in the last 40 years, he has emphasized athleticism over skills in the players he has gotten. So he needs to be able to teach skills.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sluggo said:

calumnus said:

sluggo said:

SFCityBear said:

sluggo said:

HearstMining said:

I watched part of the Ireland-Latvia game. Sam was clearly the most athletic player on the Irish team. He hit a couple of 3pt shots, I think, and added a pump-fake and drive that I don't recall seeing last season. It would have been more effective if his ball handling had improved. Still no mid-range shot. I hoped for more rebounding, but didn't see it in this game. To summarize, Sam has improved, but not a quantum leap. Of course, all this is just IMO.
I watched the first half as well. The bright side was that he drove strong to the hoop. I did not see any 3 point shots, but rather traditional two pointers with fouls. He is still very right-handed, but when he drives he can spin left if he feels someone on his back. He is strong and can jump. But his awareness and movement is still bad. His team sets screens and moves without the ball. He stood around, moved only towards the ball and forced shots. Mark Fox must be proud.
Why say this? isn't it possible that Fox is telling his players to set screens and move without the ball, but some or most of them are just not doing it? This is basic basketball 1A, which back in the 1950s we learned before high school if we had a coach, or we would at least be taught this as high school freshmen. By the time we were juniors in high school we were running more complicated pattern plays, utilizing 3-5 players. I can't believe Fox is not trying to have players set screens or move without the ball. I suspect he has collected a number of players who were never taught these fairly simple skills before or during high school. Alajiki is not the only player we have who doesn't seem to have developed good instincts for what to do in a motion offense. I think and older coach like Fox expects players to have some instincts when they arrive in college, but as the years go by, there seem to be fewer and fewer of them arriving in college, especially at Cal. Just IMHO.
I only care what the players do. If they don't listen, maybe you get a new one, don't you think?


I think it is far more important to be an effective communicator and educator. Student athletes at Cal are smart kids and just getting people to follow orders might work in the military, but at a place like Cal, it is far better to have them understand WHY they are to do what you are asking them to do. That was when Monty was at his best, when he was an educator. That is also why he has such a strong coaching tree. Players who played for him got a great education in basketball.
Well, whatever works, as long as the coach is respectful to the players.


Coach as authoritarian disciplinarian, even if a chess master (which Fox is not), went out decades ago, but now with the portal it is even less effective. Especially at a place like Cal. Especially when you are losing. You cannot recruit good players to it and you cannot retain the players you do have if they have reasonable options in the portal, which is what we have seen.
HearstMining
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CalLifer said:

sluggo said:

SFCityBear said:

sluggo said:

HearstMining said:

I watched part of the Ireland-Latvia game. Sam was clearly the most athletic player on the Irish team. He hit a couple of 3pt shots, I think, and added a pump-fake and drive that I don't recall seeing last season. It would have been more effective if his ball handling had improved. Still no mid-range shot. I hoped for more rebounding, but didn't see it in this game. To summarize, Sam has improved, but not a quantum leap. Of course, all this is just IMO.
I watched the first half as well. The bright side was that he drove strong to the hoop. I did not see any 3 point shots, but rather traditional two pointers with fouls. He is still very right-handed, but when he drives he can spin left if he feels someone on his back. He is strong and can jump. But his awareness and movement is still bad. His team sets screens and moves without the ball. He stood around, moved only towards the ball and forced shots. Mark Fox must be proud.
Why say this? isn't it possible that Fox is telling his players to set screens and move without the ball, but some or most of them are just not doing it? This is basic basketball 1A, which back in the 1950s we learned before high school if we had a coach, or we would at least be taught this as high school freshmen. By the time we were juniors in high school we were running more complicated pattern plays, utilizing 3-5 players. I can't believe Fox is not trying to have players set screens or move without the ball. I suspect he has collected a number of players who were never taught these fairly simple skills before or during high school. Alajiki is not the only player we have who doesn't seem to have developed good instincts for what to do in a motion offense. I think and older coach like Fox expects players to have some instincts when they arrive in college, but as the years go by, there seem to be fewer and fewer of them arriving in college, especially at Cal. Just IMHO.
I only care what the players do. If they don't listen, maybe you get a new one, don't you think?
More importantly, if Fox wants kids to come in already having those skills or that knowledge, then why is he recruiting players who don't have them? You can't recruit kids who don't know how to set screens/move and then blame them for execution problems when you fail to teach them those things. This is 100% Fox's programs; he is deciding the type of players to recruit, and all of the success or failures of the program are on his shoulders.
I'm definitely in the ever-increasing Mark Fox skeptic category, but I think the answer to your question is: Fox can't get players who are athletic, skilled, and have basketball savvy. So, he figures he'll go for the athletes and hope he can "coach them up". The problem is, if it takes three years just to make them an average/good player, then you only get one final year where they play at that good/average level. You'll almost never get even six average/good players at the same time.

Back to Sam: somebody compared him to Theo - I'd say, not even close. Theo as a freshman had way more basketball acumen than Sam. I'd say Sam is on the trajectory for Fox's "four year plan".

sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

sluggo said:

HearstMining said:

I watched part of the Ireland-Latvia game. Sam was clearly the most athletic player on the Irish team. He hit a couple of 3pt shots, I think, and added a pump-fake and drive that I don't recall seeing last season. It would have been more effective if his ball handling had improved. Still no mid-range shot. I hoped for more rebounding, but didn't see it in this game. To summarize, Sam has improved, but not a quantum leap. Of course, all this is just IMO.
I watched the first half as well. The bright side was that he drove strong to the hoop. I did not see any 3 point shots, but rather traditional two pointers with fouls. He is still very right-handed, but when he drives he can spin left if he feels someone on his back. He is strong and can jump. But his awareness and movement is still bad. His team sets screens and moves without the ball. He stood around, moved only towards the ball and forced shots. Mark Fox must be proud.

You or somebody here has compared Alajiki to Theo Robertson (in some respects). One aspect of Theo's game I would like to see Sam try and emulate is the "hoops IQ" / "glue guy" aspect. In other words, doing the little things that help a team win. I suppose it is a process, but I hope he has the mindset that this is the way to go (pus the instruction to get him there).
Not me. Somewhat similar body types but completely opposite in terms of awareness on the court and fundamentals. But maybe not fair to Alajiki because Robertson had a perfect basketball education before coming to Cal and Alajiki comes from a soccer playing country and may have started playing late.
CalLifer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HearstMining said:

CalLifer said:

sluggo said:

SFCityBear said:

sluggo said:

HearstMining said:

I watched part of the Ireland-Latvia game. Sam was clearly the most athletic player on the Irish team. He hit a couple of 3pt shots, I think, and added a pump-fake and drive that I don't recall seeing last season. It would have been more effective if his ball handling had improved. Still no mid-range shot. I hoped for more rebounding, but didn't see it in this game. To summarize, Sam has improved, but not a quantum leap. Of course, all this is just IMO.
I watched the first half as well. The bright side was that he drove strong to the hoop. I did not see any 3 point shots, but rather traditional two pointers with fouls. He is still very right-handed, but when he drives he can spin left if he feels someone on his back. He is strong and can jump. But his awareness and movement is still bad. His team sets screens and moves without the ball. He stood around, moved only towards the ball and forced shots. Mark Fox must be proud.
Why say this? isn't it possible that Fox is telling his players to set screens and move without the ball, but some or most of them are just not doing it? This is basic basketball 1A, which back in the 1950s we learned before high school if we had a coach, or we would at least be taught this as high school freshmen. By the time we were juniors in high school we were running more complicated pattern plays, utilizing 3-5 players. I can't believe Fox is not trying to have players set screens or move without the ball. I suspect he has collected a number of players who were never taught these fairly simple skills before or during high school. Alajiki is not the only player we have who doesn't seem to have developed good instincts for what to do in a motion offense. I think and older coach like Fox expects players to have some instincts when they arrive in college, but as the years go by, there seem to be fewer and fewer of them arriving in college, especially at Cal. Just IMHO.
I only care what the players do. If they don't listen, maybe you get a new one, don't you think?
More importantly, if Fox wants kids to come in already having those skills or that knowledge, then why is he recruiting players who don't have them? You can't recruit kids who don't know how to set screens/move and then blame them for execution problems when you fail to teach them those things. This is 100% Fox's programs; he is deciding the type of players to recruit, and all of the success or failures of the program are on his shoulders.
I'm definitely in the ever-increasing Mark Fox skeptic category, but I think the answer to your question is: Fox can't get players who are athletic, skilled, and have basketball savvy. So, he figures he'll go for the athletes and hope he can "coach them up". The problem is, if it takes three years just to make them an average/good player, then you only get one final year where they play at that good/average level. You'll almost never get even six average/good players at the same time.

Back to Sam: somebody compared him to Theo - I'd say, not even close. Theo as a freshman had way more basketball acumen than Sam. I'd say Sam is on the trajectory for Fox's "four year plan".




So my response was to the complaint that the players aren't executing Fox's desired "offense" because they don't know how to do the things Fox needs them to do, so why should we lay that at Fox's feet? My point was just that for whatever reason, Fox has targeted kids who are athletic but raw with regards to their basketball skills, rather than targeting the less athletic but maybe more developed in terms of basketball IQ/skill. That being the case, he either needs to teach them the skills to succeed at his desired "offense", or he needs to adjust his offense to highlight their athleticism. He can't focus on raw but athletic athletes to bring into the program and then be given a pass for bad offense because his offense requires skills that his own recruited players don't have.
eastcoastcal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
These musings as to why it is Fox has failed to attract talent are interesting but unfortunately for us, unimportant.

For whatever reason, despite being unable to secure any high end talent earlier in his tenure, Fox hasn't adjusted a thing in terms of recruiting staff. It's too late now. No matter what he does he's trying to sell tickets to a ship that is already underwater. No (good) recruit is going to buy what he's selling given his track record. The one credit I'll give him is getting Askew, who was very highly rated out of high school, but clearly fell off hard at Kentucky/Texas.

Regardless, he should've been fired after this past season and the issue is that he will now delay any improvement in the program until the class of '24 at the earliest, if he gets fired after the upcoming season. Alajiki has some talent, but lets be real- a true winning program wouldn't even be thinking about him playing a massive role on their team.

The issue at large is also that the solutions being posited by Knowlton & co are unviable imo. The $120 million practice facility is not going to get funded and since they can't start the process til funding is secured, it'll be yeeaaarrrssss until that comes to fruition. I'm sure they can blame Monkeypox as well and give another extra year of extension.

Really, the biggest fault is Knowlton not recognizing he messed up with the Fox hire. It would've been one thing to have hired him, realize he's not a viable recruiter, and target another coach. Instead, he's given Fox too long of a leash. My personal theory is that Knowlton himself doesn't understand Cal's basketball history. I think he associates the program solely with the ineptitude of Wyking, and sees the limitations of Berkeley as impossible to surmount. Obviously, this isn't the case considering coaches have won plenty here and we were literally a high seed in the tournament like 6 years ago. Oh well.

Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sluggo said:

Big C said:

sluggo said:

HearstMining said:

I watched part of the Ireland-Latvia game. Sam was clearly the most athletic player on the Irish team. He hit a couple of 3pt shots, I think, and added a pump-fake and drive that I don't recall seeing last season. It would have been more effective if his ball handling had improved. Still no mid-range shot. I hoped for more rebounding, but didn't see it in this game. To summarize, Sam has improved, but not a quantum leap. Of course, all this is just IMO.
I watched the first half as well. The bright side was that he drove strong to the hoop. I did not see any 3 point shots, but rather traditional two pointers with fouls. He is still very right-handed, but when he drives he can spin left if he feels someone on his back. He is strong and can jump. But his awareness and movement is still bad. His team sets screens and moves without the ball. He stood around, moved only towards the ball and forced shots. Mark Fox must be proud.

You or somebody here has compared Alajiki to Theo Robertson (in some respects). One aspect of Theo's game I would like to see Sam try and emulate is the "hoops IQ" / "glue guy" aspect. In other words, doing the little things that help a team win. I suppose it is a process, but I hope he has the mindset that this is the way to go (pus the instruction to get him there).
Not me. Somewhat similar body types but completely opposite in terms of awareness on the court and fundamentals. But maybe not fair to Alajiki because Robertson had a perfect basketball education before coming to Cal and Alajiki comes from a soccer playing country and may have started playing late.

I believe the Theo comparisons were based on similar size, similar position and seeming to have a good outside shot coming in as a freshman. I completely agree with you: That is where the comparison ends, in terms of fundamentals and hoops IQ. My hope for Alajiki is that he sees that that is where he needs improvement and is willing to do the work in that area.
PtownBear1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eastcoastcal said:

These musings as to why it is Fox has failed to attract talent are interesting but unfortunately for us, unimportant.

For whatever reason, despite being unable to secure any high end talent earlier in his tenure, Fox hasn't adjusted a thing in terms of recruiting staff. It's too late now. No matter what he does he's trying to sell tickets to a ship that is already underwater. No (good) recruit is going to buy what he's selling given his track record. The one credit I'll give him is getting Askew, who was very highly rated out of high school, but clearly fell off hard at Kentucky/Texas.

Regardless, he should've been fired after this past season and the issue is that he will now delay any improvement in the program until the class of '24 at the earliest, if he gets fired after the upcoming season. Alajiki has some talent, but lets be real- a true winning program wouldn't even be thinking about him playing a massive role on their team.

The issue at large is also that the solutions being posited by Knowlton & co are unviable imo. The $120 million practice facility is not going to get funded and since they can't start the process til funding is secured, it'll be yeeaaarrrssss until that comes to fruition. I'm sure they can blame Monkeypox as well and give another extra year of extension.

Really, the biggest fault is Knowlton not recognizing he messed up with the Fox hire. It would've been one thing to have hired him, realize he's not a viable recruiter, and target another coach. Instead, he's given Fox too long of a leash. My personal theory is that Knowlton himself doesn't understand Cal's basketball history. I think he associates the program solely with the ineptitude of Wyking, and sees the limitations of Berkeley as impossible to surmount. Obviously, this isn't the case considering coaches have won plenty here and we were literally a high seed in the tournament like 6 years ago. Oh well.


I think you're giving the AD too much credit. It's not that he doesn't know Cal's history, it's that he's incapable of making sound decisions IMO. It takes all of 2 minutes to Wikipedia Cal basketball and see that we had regular NCAA tournament teams in the 15 years before Williams and Knowlton destroyed the program.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

sluggo said:

Big C said:

sluggo said:

HearstMining said:

I watched part of the Ireland-Latvia game. Sam was clearly the most athletic player on the Irish team. He hit a couple of 3pt shots, I think, and added a pump-fake and drive that I don't recall seeing last season. It would have been more effective if his ball handling had improved. Still no mid-range shot. I hoped for more rebounding, but didn't see it in this game. To summarize, Sam has improved, but not a quantum leap. Of course, all this is just IMO.
I watched the first half as well. The bright side was that he drove strong to the hoop. I did not see any 3 point shots, but rather traditional two pointers with fouls. He is still very right-handed, but when he drives he can spin left if he feels someone on his back. He is strong and can jump. But his awareness and movement is still bad. His team sets screens and moves without the ball. He stood around, moved only towards the ball and forced shots. Mark Fox must be proud.

You or somebody here has compared Alajiki to Theo Robertson (in some respects). One aspect of Theo's game I would like to see Sam try and emulate is the "hoops IQ" / "glue guy" aspect. In other words, doing the little things that help a team win. I suppose it is a process, but I hope he has the mindset that this is the way to go (pus the instruction to get him there).
Not me. Somewhat similar body types but completely opposite in terms of awareness on the court and fundamentals. But maybe not fair to Alajiki because Robertson had a perfect basketball education before coming to Cal and Alajiki comes from a soccer playing country and may have started playing late.

I believe the Theo comparisons were based on similar size, similar position and seeming to have a good outside shot coming in as a freshman. I completely agree with you: That is where the comparison ends, in terms of fundamentals and hoops IQ. My hope for Alajiki is that he sees that that is where he needs improvement and is willing to do the work in that area.


I think I was the one who made the Theo "comparison" but it was more of a suggestion for how Alajiki could become more effective.

Theo would camp out at the left corner. That was his shot. He did not have a quick release but if he was passed the ball and he was open, he would nail that shot with a high percentage. If a defender closed out on him as he was shooting, he would pull the ball down and drive baseline, laying the ball up with his right hand. If there was help defense when he went up he might absorb contact for the foul or more often he would just pass to someone who was open. It was a simple, fairly easy to practice combination of offensive moves that made him an extremely efficient scorer. It is something that someone like Alajiki, with little basketball experience but good size, athleticism and a decent looking shot could work on and become proficient at.
sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Watched a bit of game 3, a 75-72 win over Bulgaria. Alajiki was the leading scorer for Ireland with 19 points and played well. I saw him draw two charges and he had good rebounding position and awareness, which was not true last game. Most of his points were on drives, and he seems to be able to finish now with both hands, sometimes after a good right to left spin move. Next step is to be able to drive with his left hand, or to stop and shoot an 8 footer, for now he always takes it all the way to the rim. As he was far and away the most athletic player on the floor, not sure how translatable his driving is, but it is great that he is doing it now.

Right now he is playing more like Matt Bradley than Theo Robertson. That could change against more athletic competition.

89Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sluggo said:

Watched a bit of game 3, a 75-72 win over Bulgaria. Alajiki was the leading scorer for Ireland with 19 points and played well. I saw him draw two charges and he had good rebounding position and awareness, which was not true last game. Most of his points were on drives, and he seems to be able to finish now with both hands, sometimes after a good right to left spin move. Next step is to be able to drive with his left hand, or to stop and shoot an 8 footer, for now he always takes it all the way to the rim. As he was far and away the most athletic player on the floor, not sure how translatable his driving is, but it is great that he is doing it now.

Right now he is playing more like Matt Bradley than Theo Robertson. That could change against more athletic competition.


If Bulgaria were playing in the PAC where would they finish?
sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
89Bear said:

sluggo said:

Watched a bit of game 3, a 75-72 win over Bulgaria. Alajiki was the leading scorer for Ireland with 19 points and played well. I saw him draw two charges and he had good rebounding position and awareness, which was not true last game. Most of his points were on drives, and he seems to be able to finish now with both hands, sometimes after a good right to left spin move. Next step is to be able to drive with his left hand, or to stop and shoot an 8 footer, for now he always takes it all the way to the rim. As he was far and away the most athletic player on the floor, not sure how translatable his driving is, but it is great that he is doing it now.

Right now he is playing more like Matt Bradley than Theo Robertson. That could change against more athletic competition.


If Bulgaria were playing in the PAC where would they finish?
Near the bottom, I think. But it is so hard to say. As is typical of European teams, they are well organized, move without the ball and shoot well but are not very athletic.
sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ireland ended up in ninth place. Alajiki slowed down to 13 pts and 6 rebounds per game. He shot only 5/29 (17%) on 3s. So while his improved driving ability was nice to see, his continued poor shooting is somewhat worrisome. I think he is somewhere between that level and the 50% (20/40) he shot last season. 30% seems about right.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sluggo said:

Ireland ended up in ninth place. Alajiki slowed down to 13 pts and 6 rebounds per game. He shot only 5/29 (17%) on 3s. So while his improved driving ability was nice to see, his continued poor shooting is somewhat worrisome. I think he is somewhere between that level and the 50% (20/40) he shot last season. 30% seems about right.


I'd like to see Alajiki focus and practice on his 3pt shot from a favored location. Askew and Brown too. A place where teammates know to look for you. All three can drive to the hoop if defended tightly outside, but our best chance of being OK on offense is if we knock down some threes. We were a poor shooting team last year and look to ge worse this year at this point.
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

sluggo said:

Ireland ended up in ninth place. Alajiki slowed down to 13 pts and 6 rebounds per game. He shot only 5/29 (17%) on 3s. So while his improved driving ability was nice to see, his continued poor shooting is somewhat worrisome. I think he is somewhere between that level and the 50% (20/40) he shot last season. 30% seems about right.


I'd like to see Alajiki focus and practice on his 3pt shot from a favored location. Askew and Brown too. A place where teammates know to look for you. All three can drive to the hoop if defended tightly outside, but our best chance of being OK on offense is if we knock down some threes. We were a poor shooting team last year and look to ge worse this year at this point.
Completely disagree. If these or any players will always be shooting their threes from their preferred location, every opponent except the opponent in the season opener will know that by watching video from that first game. Our players had better not be standing around at their preferred spots behind the three point line, or every opponent will be well prepared to stop their three point shots. I believe Alajiki already has favorite spots, and he needs to experiment and find more of them to utilize. And it is nice to hear Sluggo say he has improved his drives. I'll look forward to seeing if he can drive better than last season.

And here you go again with touting Brown's three point shooting. Most of his threes are prayers at best. Very few of his made threes go in hitting nothing but net, or just grazing the back of the rim, like most of the threes made by most of the good three-point shooters. His made threes rattle around, or hit the rim and bounce up 6 feet and drop in, or go in by bouncing off the backboard, likely not planned that way. Like I said in the past, let him take one three in the first half. If he makes it, let him take a second one. But that is it, unless he has made a massive improvement over the summer. I think he should work more on making his free throws (career 46%), distributing the ball, finishing his drives, and leave the three pointers to others.
SFCityBear
BC Calfan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nice highlight video here. If Sam can start putting the ball on the floor and improve his midrange game like this, it would be a nice development. And of course, love the joy he plays with!


Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.