Alkiadt;842822363 said:
The same as Pasternak. Except he actually had a head job....and failed.
If you knew Dennis at all, he has the make up of a head coach. Everybody starts somewhere and they've all been assistants before they became head coach. He's a noted national recruiter, he's academically oriented. He's going to get a job somewhere.
"The same as Pasternack..." kind of sums it up for me (I am not pro-Pasternack.).
Okay, there are three things I like about Gates. First, I will take people's word he is a good recruiter. Second, he went to Cal and, third, since he excelled here academically, the academics.
But where is the evidence he knows the Xs and Os and can teach them? Where is the evidence he will assemble a good staff, including (what many coaches never figure out, including CM) the awareness of what they don't know and the willingness to hire an assistant that compliments their skills?
When you say "if you knew Dennis at all, he has the make up of a head coach", it comes dangerously close, to me, of the way Shocky becomes enamored of guys that schmooze him up, or George W Bush looking into Putin's soul and being able to make a judgement of character. Or, for that matter, of any of the thousands of bosses who think they can hire people because they can judge their character in a couple of interviews.
I could go for Gates if Williams were able to find and confirm satisfactory answers to the questions I have about him (above) because, certainly, MAYBE he would be really good. But I have reservations.
I'm still hoping we come up with a "none-of-the-above" as per Dr. Danger's post. Something like when they surprised us with Cuonzo Martin (except better, of course!). And I think we will. The "usual suspects" aren't thrilling me right now.