I think what should have been done is Knowlton having a committee or panel of knowledgeable basketball people to help him out. Similar to how Gladstone went about making the Tedford hire.
OaktownBear said:I'm not blaming the search firm. I'm blaming the guy that paid a search firm that is unqualified.GBear4Life said:
Blaming the search firm makes no sense.
The AD gives them the criteria they want in a candidate, and CSA gives them a list that matches. The AD goes through them, asks questions, shortens the list to a group for interviews and is the autonomous decision maker in all of that.
If an AD say yes to a bad candidate because of a poor list from a search firm, that's on the AD to take additional steps to find the right one. An AD has to know what he's looking for and be able to identify it.
Fox fits all the safe boxes that is typical of a Cal athletic hiring manager: squeaky clean reputation; solid graduation rates, and in Knowlton's case someone with success as a HC (Nevada). It was the safe hire with a high floor and low ceiling, in theory.
I'm not as down on the hire as most, but I acknowledge the optimism naturally is greater with a lower level HC with a track record of only success and no failure (or a P6 reputable assistant) than a HC whose most recent record at a low profile P6 school is a failure.
I disagree that the AD shouldn't have a list. He has all the alums, former players, former coaches from the school who can help. There are not that many names to sort through. It is a very small pool. I don't know how much Cal paid for the service, but one school paid $60K, so I doubt we got off cheaper. Monty would have come up with a better list in one phone call and probably would do it for free.