Truly Horrible

16,871 Views | 115 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by oski003
TheSouseFamily
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BC Calfan said:

When Cuonzo came on board he knew the importance of keeping the roster intact. He had to recruit his own roster. No one left and I'm sure players were suspect of a new coach. You start losing players and the rebuild will get exponentially harder.

And imho, this isn't even a rebuild situation. If fox retains everyone and implements a tough defense then I think the team could be .500


When Cuonzo came on board, the portal didn't exist and it's changed the dynamics completely, especially for schools going through coaching changes. Alabama has 5 guys in the portal and I don't think anyone would call Nate Oats a bad hire (two of those in the portal have announced they're returning too). Wazzu currently has four guys in the portal and one just announced his return. I agree completely that we need to shore things up with existing players, but it's harder now with the portal. Fortunately, the one year sit-out period still is in place or the chaos would be even more out of control.

If all our guys leave, then I'll attribute some of it to Fox but for now; with guys just putting their names in there, it's more of a reflection of the environment in college basketball.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OaktownBear said:

oski003 said:

"Instead, Cal received a slapdash, hurried process that was dominated by a search agency with ulterior motives."

Please explain this statement. What were the ulterior motives of the search agency? What evidence do you have to support this assertion.
I would recommend you do some internet searches on Todd Turner, his record in sports administration, his search firm's record, and what people think of them. I'd also consider how things have gone for Cal athletics since they brought his firm in.


Can you give me further guidance than that? I might need some googling help. I tried "Todd Turner" "College Sports Associates" and "Search Firm Record" but did not find evidence that they have an ulterior motive. Can you give me the exact Google terms to use to lead to an unbiased conclusion that they had an ulterior motive on this search?
sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wifeisafurd said:

Yogi Bear said:

KoreAmBear said:

Yogi Bear said:

KoreAmBear said:


No way we have these transfers with Decuire, as classy and respectable person as you can get.
How can you possibly know that?


Yes it's not possible to predict the future, but you have the ability to reason Yogi and determine probabilities and likelihoods.

Decuire is an easy going but firm African American coach who carries himself like a very respectable parental figure you can trust. I thought that when he was here. This is in stark contrast to Fox who came in like the new sheriff in town telling them he's going to correct their bad habits. Hmm which sounds better?

I firmly believe the players would have bought in. At least there would not be an exodus. At a minimum, get some feedback. Ugh.
Maybe they don't like the university. Maybe they don't like playing for a bad team. Maybe they don't like Fox. I don't know what their reasons are unless they tell us. But there's no way to know that Decuire would have kept them here. That's just a bitter fan who didn't get the coach he wanted hired assuming that everything would've been sun and roses with that guy.

I don't even want Fox as the coach. I don't know if Decuire was the best available guy (I doubt it, but I'd have preferred him to Fox). But I don't know how someone projects that a guy with no established relationships with anyone on the team is going to come in and convince everybody that they'll be happy sticking with him. There's no probability, reasoning, or anything else going on here other than wishcasting.

And at any point, it's pointless at this point. We got who we got and all we can hope is that he gets some good transfers to replace all the guys he's losing and rights this ship quickly.
I'm not sure what the f____everyone expected. This is the worst team in school history, the fans and university are unsupportive, and besides a losing environment, you actually have to attend a hard school. There were going to be a ton of transfers regardless of coach. Guys were going to leave because they could. Guys were and are going to be moved out because they don't fit (recall last year?). Sure Vanover look like future Pac 12 talent, but let's be serious, why should he stay for a long rebuild with a coaching staff most fans don't even like, when he can he can go to school known for producing big men (Gonzaga comes to mind)? This is a few year process, and probably starts with transfers like Nevada, trying to keep a few good players that fit, while we recruiting foreign talent that actually wants to stay around for a degree. Anybody thinking this was a quick turn around from the worst team in history clearly doesn't understand how limited in number are the game changing players that want an academic school, and the undesirably of the Pac as a basketball conference with its poor visibility and refs that don't allow physical NBA style play even for those few who do think about academics.
Is there a college basketball consulting firm that can help figure out solutions to these problems?

Sluggo
B.A. Bearacus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NYCGOBEARS said:

This is getting hilarious.
Alexa heard that. Don't be surprised if you get a lot of dark comedy suggestions when you turn on your tv tonight.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

OaktownBear said:

oski003 said:

"Instead, Cal received a slapdash, hurried process that was dominated by a search agency with ulterior motives."

Please explain this statement. What were the ulterior motives of the search agency? What evidence do you have to support this assertion.
I would recommend you do some internet searches on Todd Turner, his record in sports administration, his search firm's record, and what people think of them. I'd also consider how things have gone for Cal athletics since they brought his firm in.


Can you give me further guidance than that? I might need some googling help. I tried "Todd Turner" "College Sports Associates" and "Search Firm Record" but did not find evidence that they have an ulterior motive. Can you give me the exact Google terms to use to lead to an unbiased conclusion that they had an ulterior motive on this search?
Look, I don't know that much about CSA, but ANY time you hire a search firm (or any firm, for that matter), you have to wonder if THEIR best interests coincide 100% with yours. Our AD, on the other hand, should be working 100% for Cal, so he should only be employing a search firm for services that he is unable to perform himself. In Knowlton's case, I guess this was a lot.
BearlyCareAnymore
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

OaktownBear said:

oski003 said:

"Instead, Cal received a slapdash, hurried process that was dominated by a search agency with ulterior motives."

Please explain this statement. What were the ulterior motives of the search agency? What evidence do you have to support this assertion.
I would recommend you do some internet searches on Todd Turner, his record in sports administration, his search firm's record, and what people think of them. I'd also consider how things have gone for Cal athletics since they brought his firm in.


Can you give me further guidance than that? I might need some googling help. I tried "Todd Turner" "College Sports Associates" and "Search Firm Record" but did not find evidence that they have an ulterior motive. Can you give me the exact Google terms to use to lead to an unbiased conclusion that they had an ulterior motive on this search?


Let me be clear. I was saying you'd find a lot of people who claim that Turner and CSA both suck. Look at the Twitter comments when Evan Daniels broke the news that we were using them. People from several teams commenting in the negative.

If there was "hard evidence" that they had ulterior motives, they wouldn't be in business. They do have a reputation for pushing retread coaches from their list when schools are too lazy to do their own damned work
Genocide Joe 58
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OaktownBear said:

oski003 said:

OaktownBear said:

oski003 said:

"Instead, Cal received a slapdash, hurried process that was dominated by a search agency with ulterior motives."

Please explain this statement. What were the ulterior motives of the search agency? What evidence do you have to support this assertion.
I would recommend you do some internet searches on Todd Turner, his record in sports administration, his search firm's record, and what people think of them. I'd also consider how things have gone for Cal athletics since they brought his firm in.


Can you give me further guidance than that? I might need some googling help. I tried "Todd Turner" "College Sports Associates" and "Search Firm Record" but did not find evidence that they have an ulterior motive. Can you give me the exact Google terms to use to lead to an unbiased conclusion that they had an ulterior motive on this search?


Let me be clear. I was saying you'd find a lot of people who claim that Turner and CSA both suck. Look at the Twitter comments when Evan Daniels broke the news that we were using them. People from several teams commenting in the negative.

If there was "hard evidence" that they had ulterior motives, they wouldn't be in business. They do have a reputation for pushing retread coaches from their list when schools are too lazy to do their own damned work
More importantly, think of a headhunter or search firm in any field. Their only interest in matching you with a great candidate is to get a positive endorsement from you so that they can attract even more business. But their biggest overriding motivation is to be the one who fills the opening.

For a sports placement firm, it's gonna be different because colleges don't work with multiple search firms that are competing for the placement. Maybe they should. Maybe the firms would put forth better candidates if they weren't guaranteed of getting paid after the hire is made.
wifeisafurd
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sluggo said:

wifeisafurd said:

Yogi Bear said:

KoreAmBear said:

Yogi Bear said:

KoreAmBear said:


No way we have these transfers with Decuire, as classy and respectable person as you can get.
How can you possibly know that?


Yes it's not possible to predict the future, but you have the ability to reason Yogi and determine probabilities and likelihoods.

Decuire is an easy going but firm African American coach who carries himself like a very respectable parental figure you can trust. I thought that when he was here. This is in stark contrast to Fox who came in like the new sheriff in town telling them he's going to correct their bad habits. Hmm which sounds better?

I firmly believe the players would have bought in. At least there would not be an exodus. At a minimum, get some feedback. Ugh.
Maybe they don't like the university. Maybe they don't like playing for a bad team. Maybe they don't like Fox. I don't know what their reasons are unless they tell us. But there's no way to know that Decuire would have kept them here. That's just a bitter fan who didn't get the coach he wanted hired assuming that everything would've been sun and roses with that guy.

I don't even want Fox as the coach. I don't know if Decuire was the best available guy (I doubt it, but I'd have preferred him to Fox). But I don't know how someone projects that a guy with no established relationships with anyone on the team is going to come in and convince everybody that they'll be happy sticking with him. There's no probability, reasoning, or anything else going on here other than wishcasting.

And at any point, it's pointless at this point. We got who we got and all we can hope is that he gets some good transfers to replace all the guys he's losing and rights this ship quickly.
I'm not sure what the f____everyone expected. This is the worst team in school history, the fans and university are unsupportive, and besides a losing environment, you actually have to attend a hard school. There were going to be a ton of transfers regardless of coach. Guys were going to leave because they could. Guys were and are going to be moved out because they don't fit (recall last year?). Sure Vanover look like future Pac 12 talent, but let's be serious, why should he stay for a long rebuild with a coaching staff most fans don't even like, when he can he can go to school known for producing big men (Gonzaga comes to mind)? This is a few year process, and probably starts with transfers like Nevada, trying to keep a few good players that fit, while we recruiting foreign talent that actually wants to stay around for a degree. Anybody thinking this was a quick turn around from the worst team in history clearly doesn't understand how limited in number are the game changing players that want an academic school, and the undesirably of the Pac as a basketball conference with its poor visibility and refs that don't allow physical NBA style play even for those few who do think about academics.
Is there a college basketball consulting firm that can help figure out solutions to these problems?

Sluggo
I see two problems that are not going to be cured soon. The first is the one and done NBA rule. so much has been said about this, I won't elaborate.

The second is the lenient transfer rules. Cal is not the only school going through this. And I'm not sure the rules should be changed. If the player doesn't like the school, he probably should not be there. People change jobs air the time. Students transfer schools all the time. Why should players be different, and from a coach's perspective, why do I want someone on the team that doesn't want to be there? And the schools can level the playing field by saying to a player that put his name in the portal, you lose your scholia at the end of the quarter.

Finally, some of this appears to be Cal driven, and you can read Greg's comments for that.

No consultant is going to help with any of this.
wifeisafurd
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yogi Bear said:

OaktownBear said:

oski003 said:

OaktownBear said:

oski003 said:

"Instead, Cal received a slapdash, hurried process that was dominated by a search agency with ulterior motives."

Please explain this statement. What were the ulterior motives of the search agency? What evidence do you have to support this assertion.
I would recommend you do some internet searches on Todd Turner, his record in sports administration, his search firm's record, and what people think of them. I'd also consider how things have gone for Cal athletics since they brought his firm in.


Can you give me further guidance than that? I might need some googling help. I tried "Todd Turner" "College Sports Associates" and "Search Firm Record" but did not find evidence that they have an ulterior motive. Can you give me the exact Google terms to use to lead to an unbiased conclusion that they had an ulterior motive on this search?


Let me be clear. I was saying you'd find a lot of people who claim that Turner and CSA both suck. Look at the Twitter comments when Evan Daniels broke the news that we were using them. People from several teams commenting in the negative.

If there was "hard evidence" that they had ulterior motives, they wouldn't be in business. They do have a reputation for pushing retread coaches from their list when schools are too lazy to do their own damned work
Maybe the firms would put forth better candidates if they weren't guaranteed of getting paid after the hire is made.
Business 101. In fact, in any firm I was associated with, this is standard practice. I'm sure there must be reason colleges do it differently, but I don't know what it is. Anyone?
Bear19
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wifeisafurd said:

Business 101. In fact, in any firm I was associated with, this is standard practice. I'm sure there must be reason colleges do it differently, but I don't know what it is. Anyone?
Knowlton using a search firm is evidence that he did not have a ready Rolodex of D1 MBB coaches he could call upon to bring in himself. He simply got played by the search firm, and was/is unaware that this is what happened. The whole episode is a major black mark against him imo.

A D1 hire of a MBB or football HC is similar to a company hiring a CEO. Usually high end search firm, at the direction of the Board of Directors, is used to test the waters regarding prime candidate(s) willingness & price tag to take over a company. That way the targeted candidate(s) & the BOD can keep the discussions confidential.

The difference here is that Knowlton had no prior association with Fox. He did not use the search firm to see if DeGuire or anyone else was open to coming to Cal. The search firm likely gave him a list of losers & Fox to interview, and Knowlton fell for that ploy like a country bumkin at the ring toss carny tent. Very disappointing.

On the other hand, it means that Knowlton will keep Wilcox as happy as possible for as long as Willcox wants to stay at Cal. For better or worse I'm betting Knowlton has no football HC waiting in the wings as "his guy."

oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OaktownBear said:

oski003 said:

OaktownBear said:

oski003 said:

"Instead, Cal received a slapdash, hurried process that was dominated by a search agency with ulterior motives."

Please explain this statement. What were the ulterior motives of the search agency? What evidence do you have to support this assertion.
I would recommend you do some internet searches on Todd Turner, his record in sports administration, his search firm's record, and what people think of them. I'd also consider how things have gone for Cal athletics since they brought his firm in.


Can you give me further guidance than that? I might need some googling help. I tried "Todd Turner" "College Sports Associates" and "Search Firm Record" but did not find evidence that they have an ulterior motive. Can you give me the exact Google terms to use to lead to an unbiased conclusion that they had an ulterior motive on this search?


Let me be clear. I was saying you'd find a lot of people who claim that Turner and CSA both suck. Look at the Twitter comments when Evan Daniels broke the news that we were using them. People from several teams commenting in the negative.

If there was "hard evidence" that they had ulterior motives, they wouldn't be in business. They do have a reputation for pushing retread coaches from their list when schools are too lazy to do their own damned work


I read the Twitter replies and found about a dozen people criticizing CSA, half of them being Cal fans critical of search firms. Based on those comments, I was able to discover that UW fans are bitter because Turner supported Ty Willingham when he was AD there circa 2006-7. There was a reference to a terrible hire at Pitt and Vanderbilt, which are ranked as two of the worst hires of the past ten years. I also discovered he placed Buzz Williams at VA Tech who just revived their program and made them relevant. He also placed Rick Barnes at Tennessee, who had a deep NCAA run AZ a 2 seed. Those were ranked as two of the best hires of the last ten years. I struggled to find any Twitter posts from VT or TN saying positive things about CSA or Turner, but that's the nature of the internet.
71Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wifeisafurd said:

sluggo said:

wifeisafurd said:

Yogi Bear said:

KoreAmBear said:

Yogi Bear said:

KoreAmBear said:

7
No way we have these transfers with Decuire, as classy and respectable person as you can get.
How can you possibly know that?


Yes it's not possible to predict the future, but you have the ability to reason Yogi and determine probabilities and likelihoods.

Decuire is an easy going but firm African American coach who carries himself like a very respectable parental figure you can trust. I thought that when he was here. This is in stark contrast to Fox who came in like the new sheriff in town telling them he's going to correct their bad habits. Hmm which sounds better?

I firmly believe the players would have bought in. At least there would not be an exodus. At a minimum, get some feedback. Ugh.
Maybe they don't like the university. Maybe they don't like playing for a bad team. Maybe they don't like Fox. I don't know what their reasons are unless they tell us. But there's no way to know that Decuire would have kept them here. That's just a bitter fan who didn't get the coach he wanted hired assuming that everything would've been sun and roses with that guy.

I don't even want Fox as the coach. I don't know if Decuire was the best available guy (I doubt it, but I'd have preferred him to Fox). But I don't know how someone projects that a guy with no established relationships with anyone on the team is going to come in and convince everybody that they'll be happy sticking with him. There's no probability, reasoning, or anything else going on here other than wishcasting.

And at any point, it's pointless at this point. We got who we got and all we can hope is that he gets some good transfers to replace all the guys he's losing and rights this ship quickly.
I'm not sure what the f____everyone expected. This is the worst team in school history, the fans and university are unsupportive, and besides a losing environment, you actually have to attend a hard school. There were going to be a ton of transfers regardless of coach. Guys were going to leave because they could. Guys were and are going to be moved out because they don't fit (recall last year?). Sure Vanover look like future Pac 12 talent, but let's be serious, why should he stay for a long rebuild with a coaching staff most fans don't even like, when he can he can go to school known for producing big men (Gonzaga comes to mind)? This is a few year process, and probably starts with transfers like Nevada, trying to keep a few good players that fit, while we recruiting foreign talent that actually wants to stay around for a degree. Anybody thinking this was a quick turn around from the worst team in history clearly doesn't understand how limited in number are the game changing players that want an academic school, and the undesirably of the Pac as a basketball conference with its poor visibility and refs that don't allow physical NBA style play even for those few who do think about academics.
Is there a college basketball consulting firm that can help figure out solutions to these problems?

Sluggo
I see two problems that are not going to be cured soon. The first is the one and done NBA rule. so much has been said about this, I won't elaborate.

The second is the lenient transfer rules. Cal is not the only school going through this. And I'm not sure the rules should be changed. If the player doesn't like the school, he probably should not be there. People change jobs air the time. Students transfer schools all the time. Why should players be different, and from a coach's perspective, why do I want someone on the team that doesn't want to be there? And the schools can level the playing field by saying to a player that put his name in the portal, you lose your scholia at the end of the quarter.

Finally, some of this appears to be Cal driven, and you can read Greg's comments for that.

No consultant is going to help with any of this.
One and done will be eliminated as part of the next NBA CBA.

I have no problem with players transferring. Heck, I am an advocate of a completely unfettered transfer policy.

My complaint is simple - Knowlton did a pisspoor job of finding a replacement for Jones. The entire process was mishandled. Would a more effective search have led to another candidate? Probably. Would that candidate been a better choice? Given Fox's track record, probably. The only thing we do know for certain is that Cal hired an AD who is totally overmatched at this level of college athletics.

Genocide Joe 58
How long do you want to ignore this user?
71Bear said:

wifeisafurd said:


I see two problems that are not going to be cured soon. The first is the one and done NBA rule. so much has been said about this, I won't elaborate.

The second is the lenient transfer rules. Cal is not the only school going through this. And I'm not sure the rules should be changed. If the player doesn't like the school, he probably should not be there. People change jobs air the time. Students transfer schools all the time. Why should players be different, and from a coach's perspective, why do I want someone on the team that doesn't want to be there? And the schools can level the playing field by saying to a player that put his name in the portal, you lose your scholia at the end of the quarter.

Finally, some of this appears to be Cal driven, and you can read Greg's comments for that.

No consultant is going to help with any of this.
One and done will be eliminated as part of the next NBA CBA.
Maybe. It's up to the players to give in on that.
71Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yogi Bear said:

71Bear said:

wifeisafurd said:


I see two problems that are not going to be cured soon. The first is the one and done NBA rule. so much has been said about this, I won't elaborate.

The second is the lenient transfer rules. Cal is not the only school going through this. And I'm not sure the rules should be changed. If the player doesn't like the school, he probably should not be there. People change jobs air the time. Students transfer schools all the time. Why should players be different, and from a coach's perspective, why do I want someone on the team that doesn't want to be there? And the schools can level the playing field by saying to a player that put his name in the portal, you lose your scholia at the end of the quarter.

Finally, some of this appears to be Cal driven, and you can read Greg's comments for that.

No consultant is going to help with any of this.
One and done will be eliminated as part of the next NBA CBA.
Maybe. It's up to the players to give in on that.
https://www.si.com/nba/2019/04/10/nba-players-union-discuss-lower-draft-age-limit-end-one-and-done
BeachedBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wifeisafurd said:

Yogi Bear said:

OaktownBear said:

oski003 said:

OaktownBear said:

oski003 said:

"Instead, Cal received a slapdash, hurried process that was dominated by a search agency with ulterior motives."

Please explain this statement. What were the ulterior motives of the search agency? What evidence do you have to support this assertion.
I would recommend you do some internet searches on Todd Turner, his record in sports administration, his search firm's record, and what people think of them. I'd also consider how things have gone for Cal athletics since they brought his firm in.


Can you give me further guidance than that? I might need some googling help. I tried "Todd Turner" "College Sports Associates" and "Search Firm Record" but did not find evidence that they have an ulterior motive. Can you give me the exact Google terms to use to lead to an unbiased conclusion that they had an ulterior motive on this search?


Let me be clear. I was saying you'd find a lot of people who claim that Turner and CSA both suck. Look at the Twitter comments when Evan Daniels broke the news that we were using them. People from several teams commenting in the negative.

If there was "hard evidence" that they had ulterior motives, they wouldn't be in business. They do have a reputation for pushing retread coaches from their list when schools are too lazy to do their own damned work
Maybe the firms would put forth better candidates if they weren't guaranteed of getting paid after the hire is made.
Business 101. In fact, in any firm I was associated with, this is standard practice. I'm sure there must be reason colleges do it differently, but I don't know what it is. Anyone?
Having close friends who work with some colleges (and having done so a bit myself), I have learned that most colleges do almost everything differently than modern households or businesses. Indeed, there are a number of areas, where they are DECADES behind. Strong tradition, maybe? As a fan, I've also learned that Cal is different than most colleges. Some of it due to public vs private. Some of it due to size and region. Some of it, just because Cal.
BearlyCareAnymore
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

OaktownBear said:

oski003 said:

OaktownBear said:

oski003 said:

"Instead, Cal received a slapdash, hurried process that was dominated by a search agency with ulterior motives."

Please explain this statement. What were the ulterior motives of the search agency? What evidence do you have to support this assertion.
I would recommend you do some internet searches on Todd Turner, his record in sports administration, his search firm's record, and what people think of them. I'd also consider how things have gone for Cal athletics since they brought his firm in.


Can you give me further guidance than that? I might need some googling help. I tried "Todd Turner" "College Sports Associates" and "Search Firm Record" but did not find evidence that they have an ulterior motive. Can you give me the exact Google terms to use to lead to an unbiased conclusion that they had an ulterior motive on this search?


Let me be clear. I was saying you'd find a lot of people who claim that Turner and CSA both suck. Look at the Twitter comments when Evan Daniels broke the news that we were using them. People from several teams commenting in the negative.

If there was "hard evidence" that they had ulterior motives, they wouldn't be in business. They do have a reputation for pushing retread coaches from their list when schools are too lazy to do their own damned work


I read the Twitter replies and found about a dozen people criticizing CSA, half of them being Cal fans critical of search firms. Based on those comments, I was able to discover that UW fans are bitter because Turner supported Ty Willingham when he was AD there circa 2006-7. There was a reference to a terrible hire at Pitt and Vanderbilt, which are ranked as two of the worst hires of the past ten years. I also discovered he placed Buzz Williams at VA Tech who just revived their program and made them relevant. He also placed Rick Barnes at Tennessee, who had a deep NCAA run AZ a 2 seed. Those were ranked as two of the best hires of the last ten years. I struggled to find any Twitter posts from VT or TN saying positive things about CSA or Turner, but that's the nature of the internet.
There was more than that, but fine.

When Fox was hired it was very much mocked around the college basketball world. Some of that mocking pointed at the fact that it was typical of CSA. There is a lot of criticism of that search firm from a lot of non-Cal sources. It is not my responsibility to spoon feed it to you. I have no more responsibility to prove they suck than you have to prove they are good. You are free to do your own research. Suffice it to say, Turner is not exactly seen favorably by the fans of schools where he served as athletic director. Maybe one should wonder about a guy who was AD at 4 different schools and after "resigning" from the last one has had to open a consulting business.

I swear some of you want to just want to sit there and just read the Cal release and dive out of the way of any information that might make you question anything Cal does.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheSouseFamily said:

stu said:

In the long run a redshirt year will probably help Vanover develop his body. And it might help Harris-Dyson develop his game.

I'm wondering how Fox approached the team as this many defections following a coaching change seems unusually high. I wouldn't have expected this with DeCuire.



While not a good look for the new regime, I actually think it' says more about the current status of college basketball and guys having a lot of options than it says specifically about Fox. Look at Oregon. They just had most of their entire starting lineup (Pritchard, Bol, Wooten, King) declare early for the draft. A few may return (even after hiring an agent) because a) they can and b) the draft isn't a better option. But the same is true about the portal. There's no downside of putting yourself into the portal and hearing from other coaches about what your other options are.
Sorry, but is this Portal concept new?
TheSouseFamily
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yes, the new rules along with the portal concept launched in October of last year.

It's not just an issue in the men's game. The portal for women's basketball has over 400 names currently too.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thanks!


Just as Justin Fields did before transferring from Georgia to Ohio State, Tate Martell has reportedly put his name in the NCAA transfer portal.
Martell's decision to insert himself into the portal does not ensure he will transfer, but allows other schools to contact him. He is able to withdraw from the portal if he decides to remain at Ohio State.
Some answers to the questions you might have on how the transfer portal works:

IS THE TRANSFER PORTAL NEW? HOW LONG HAS IT BEEN IN EXISTENCE?
The transfer portal is just a couple months old. It came into existence on Oct. 15 after being originally announced in June as a platform that allowed athletes to transfer and talk to other schools without asking their current school for permission. The current school would know that the player inputted his name in the portal, but would not have the ability to stop them from doing so. Previously, athletes had to ask their current school for permission to contact or be contacted by other schools, if they were interested in considering a transfer. Thus, schools were effectively able to block players from transferring to certain schools.

DID MARTELL HAVE TO TELL OHIO STATE TO PUT HIM IN THE PORTAL? DID OHIO STATE HAVE TO APPROVE IT?
Yes, Martell had to tell Ohio State that he wanted to be in the transfer portal. No, Ohio State did not have to the ability to approve or not approve his request.

HOW DOES A PLAYER GET INSERTED INTO THE TRANSFER PORTAL?
A player talks to a coach or administrator to inform them of his or her intention to transfer. Within two business days, the school's compliance officer must put the player's name in the transfer database. The player does not have to receive permission from a coach or administrator and must be put into the portal upon their request.
WHO HAS ACCESS TO THE PORTAL?

Coaches can access the portal in order to contact potential transfers.
CAN EVERY SCHOOL CONTACT PLAYERS IN THE PORTAL?

Any school can contact players in the portal. However, some conferences have rules hindering certain transfers. For example, a player from a Big Ten school is unable to transfer to another in-conference program until they complete one full academic year of residence at their current school.

HOW DO SCHOOLS CONTACT PLAYERS IN THE PORTAL AND WHEN CAN THEY BEGIN DOING SO?
Once a player's name is in the portal, schools can immediately contact them. The player's email address is listed on the portal, allowing coaches elsewhere to contact them whenever they want.

IS THERE A TIMELINE ON TRANSFERS BEING IN THE PORTAL? CAN THEY STAY AS LONG AS THEY WANT?
No, there is no timeline. So, players could hypothetically remain in the portal as long as they want. However, schools are able to reduce or cancel scholarships or financial aid for any current players in the portal at the end of the academic term. Also, if a player submits his name to the transfer portal during a break in the academic calendar (such as winter break or summer break), a school can immediately reduce or terminate financial aid or scholarships.

CAN AN ATHLETE REMOVE HIMSELF FROM THE TRANSFER PORTAL? IF SO, ARE THERE CONSEQUENCES TO REMOVING YOURSELF FROM THE PORTAL?
Yes, an athlete can remove himself or herself from the portal. However, once an athlete puts his or her name in the portal, their current school is not obligated to take them back if they decide not to transfer. It is up to the school to accept the athlete back on the team. If a player decided not to transfer after putting their name in the portal, their scholarship or financial aid could be pulled after the end of the academic term.
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"truly horrible" basketball thread?? no, much horribler is joss whedon's 2008 emmy-winning friends and family-made short, DrHorriblesSingalongBlog, available free from better public libraries everywhere.



see siggy as well.
muting more than 300 handles, turnaround is fair play
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OaktownBear said:

oski003 said:

OaktownBear said:

oski003 said:

OaktownBear said:

oski003 said:

"Instead, Cal received a slapdash, hurried process that was dominated by a search agency with ulterior motives."

Please explain this statement. What were the ulterior motives of the search agency? What evidence do you have to support this assertion.
I would recommend you do some internet searches on Todd Turner, his record in sports administration, his search firm's record, and what people think of them. I'd also consider how things have gone for Cal athletics since they brought his firm in.


Can you give me further guidance than that? I might need some googling help. I tried "Todd Turner" "College Sports Associates" and "Search Firm Record" but did not find evidence that they have an ulterior motive. Can you give me the exact Google terms to use to lead to an unbiased conclusion that they had an ulterior motive on this search?


Let me be clear. I was saying you'd find a lot of people who claim that Turner and CSA both suck. Look at the Twitter comments when Evan Daniels broke the news that we were using them. People from several teams commenting in the negative.

If there was "hard evidence" that they had ulterior motives, they wouldn't be in business. They do have a reputation for pushing retread coaches from their list when schools are too lazy to do their own damned work


I read the Twitter replies and found about a dozen people criticizing CSA, half of them being Cal fans critical of search firms. Based on those comments, I was able to discover that UW fans are bitter because Turner supported Ty Willingham when he was AD there circa 2006-7. There was a reference to a terrible hire at Pitt and Vanderbilt, which are ranked as two of the worst hires of the past ten years. I also discovered he placed Buzz Williams at VA Tech who just revived their program and made them relevant. He also placed Rick Barnes at Tennessee, who had a deep NCAA run AZ a 2 seed. Those were ranked as two of the best hires of the last ten years. I struggled to find any Twitter posts from VT or TN saying positive things about CSA or Turner, but that's the nature of the internet.
There was more than that, but fine.

When Fox was hired it was very much mocked around the college basketball world. Some of that mocking pointed at the fact that it was typical of CSA. There is a lot of criticism of that search firm from a lot of non-Cal sources. It is not my responsibility to spoon feed it to you. I have no more responsibility to prove they suck than you have to prove they are good. You are free to do your own research. Suffice it to say, Turner is not exactly seen favorably by the fans of schools where he served as athletic director. Maybe one should wonder about a guy who was AD at 4 different schools and after "resigning" from the last one has had to open a consulting business.

I swear some of you want to just want to sit there and just read the Cal release and dive out of the way of any information that might make you question anything Cal does.


He was an AD of 4 schools from 1987 to 2008, a 21 year period. Not alarming. It is easy to find negative information on ex ADs and coaches, etc... if that is what your are looking for. CSA is a mixed bag. They're hardly the evil entity that you make them out to be. I think you are just lashing out because you do not like the hire.
GBear4Life
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Blaming the search firm makes no sense.

The AD gives them the criteria they want in a candidate, and CSA gives them a list that matches. The AD goes through them, asks questions, shortens the list to a group for interviews and is the autonomous decision maker in all of that.

If an AD say yes to a bad candidate because of a poor list from a search firm, that's on the AD to take additional steps to find the right one. An AD has to know what he's looking for and be able to identify it.

Fox fits all the safe boxes that is typical of a Cal athletic hiring manager: squeaky clean reputation; solid graduation rates, and in Knowlton's case someone with success as a HC (Nevada). It was the safe hire with a high floor and low ceiling, in theory.

I'm not as down on the hire as most, but I acknowledge the optimism naturally is greater with a lower level HC with a track record of only success and no failure (or a P6 reputable assistant) than a HC whose most recent record at a low profile P6 school is a failure.
glutton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
According to Connor's mom, he has not made a definite decision yet. I sure hope he decides to stay. https://collegesportsmaven.io/cal/basketball/cal-basketball-mom-says-connor-vanover-hasn-t-made-any-decisions-pYMIVxnwdUWtksOpcZpLYw/
71Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GBear4Life said:

Blaming the search firm makes no sense.

The AD gives them the criteria they want in a candidate, and CSA gives them a list that matches. The AD goes through them, asks questions, shortens the list to a group for interviews and is the autonomous decision maker in all of that.

If an AD say yes to a bad candidate because of a poor list from a search firm, that's on the AD to take additional steps to find the right one. An AD has to know what he's looking for and be able to identify it.

Fox fits all the safe boxes that is typical of a Cal athletic hiring manager: squeaky clean reputation; solid graduation rates, and in Knowlton's case someone with success as a HC (Nevada). It was the safe hire with a high floor and low ceiling, in theory.

I'm not as down on the hire as most, but I acknowledge the optimism naturally is greater with a lower level HC with a track record of only success and no failure (or a P6 reputable assistant) than a HC whose most recent record at a low profile P6 school is a failure.
The key phrase in your commentary is: "...and CSA gives them a list that matches".

Smart AD's have their own lists. These lists are developed over the years by continually communicating with counterparts and others who possess information not generally available. Not-so-smart AD's rely on outside services with a bias towards particular candidates.

Using a search group to hire coaches is a losing proposition.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

OaktownBear said:

oski003 said:

OaktownBear said:

oski003 said:

OaktownBear said:

oski003 said:

"Instead, Cal received a slapdash, hurried process that was dominated by a search agency with ulterior motives."

Please explain this statement. What were the ulterior motives of the search agency? What evidence do you have to support this assertion.
I would recommend you do some internet searches on Todd Turner, his record in sports administration, his search firm's record, and what people think of them. I'd also consider how things have gone for Cal athletics since they brought his firm in.


Can you give me further guidance than that? I might need some googling help. I tried "Todd Turner" "College Sports Associates" and "Search Firm Record" but did not find evidence that they have an ulterior motive. Can you give me the exact Google terms to use to lead to an unbiased conclusion that they had an ulterior motive on this search?


Let me be clear. I was saying you'd find a lot of people who claim that Turner and CSA both suck. Look at the Twitter comments when Evan Daniels broke the news that we were using them. People from several teams commenting in the negative.

If there was "hard evidence" that they had ulterior motives, they wouldn't be in business. They do have a reputation for pushing retread coaches from their list when schools are too lazy to do their own damned work


I read the Twitter replies and found about a dozen people criticizing CSA, half of them being Cal fans critical of search firms. Based on those comments, I was able to discover that UW fans are bitter because Turner supported Ty Willingham when he was AD there circa 2006-7. There was a reference to a terrible hire at Pitt and Vanderbilt, which are ranked as two of the worst hires of the past ten years. I also discovered he placed Buzz Williams at VA Tech who just revived their program and made them relevant. He also placed Rick Barnes at Tennessee, who had a deep NCAA run AZ a 2 seed. Those were ranked as two of the best hires of the last ten years. I struggled to find any Twitter posts from VT or TN saying positive things about CSA or Turner, but that's the nature of the internet.
There was more than that, but fine.

When Fox was hired it was very much mocked around the college basketball world. Some of that mocking pointed at the fact that it was typical of CSA. There is a lot of criticism of that search firm from a lot of non-Cal sources. It is not my responsibility to spoon feed it to you. I have no more responsibility to prove they suck than you have to prove they are good. You are free to do your own research. Suffice it to say, Turner is not exactly seen favorably by the fans of schools where he served as athletic director. Maybe one should wonder about a guy who was AD at 4 different schools and after "resigning" from the last one has had to open a consulting business.

I swear some of you want to just want to sit there and just read the Cal release and dive out of the way of any information that might make you question anything Cal does.


He was an AD of 4 schools from 1987 to 2008, a 21 year period. Not alarming. It is easy to find negative information on ex ADs and coaches, etc... if that is what your are looking for. CSA is a mixed bag. They're hardly the evil entity that you make them out to be. I think you are just lashing out because you do not like the hire.
Saying the search firm is "evil", or "blaming them" is like saying a rattle snake that bites you is evil. The search firm does what it does. It exists to make a profit. Maybe it performs a valuable service for its clients, in the process. I just believe that our AD over-relied on the search firm to do things that he should've been able to do himself, since our guy should be the one that is acting 100% in our interests.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Virginia Tech or Tennessee would disagree. LOL at your comment about using Search Firms.
GBear4Life
How long do you want to ignore this user?
71Bear said:

GBear4Life said:

Blaming the search firm makes no sense.

The AD gives them the criteria they want in a candidate, and CSA gives them a list that matches. The AD goes through them, asks questions, shortens the list to a group for interviews and is the autonomous decision maker in all of that.

If an AD say yes to a bad candidate because of a poor list from a search firm, that's on the AD to take additional steps to find the right one. An AD has to know what he's looking for and be able to identify it.

Fox fits all the safe boxes that is typical of a Cal athletic hiring manager: squeaky clean reputation; solid graduation rates, and in Knowlton's case someone with success as a HC (Nevada). It was the safe hire with a high floor and low ceiling, in theory.

I'm not as down on the hire as most, but I acknowledge the optimism naturally is greater with a lower level HC with a track record of only success and no failure (or a P6 reputable assistant) than a HC whose most recent record at a low profile P6 school is a failure.
The key phrase in your commentary is: "...and CSA gives them a list that matches".

Smart AD's have their own lists. These lists are developed over the years by continually communicating with counterparts and others who possess information not generally available. Not-so-smart AD's rely on outside services with a bias towards particular candidates.

Using a search group to hire coaches is a losing proposition.
Yes, but look at where Knowlton has been. He wouldn't have many opportunities to develo personal relationships with P6 HC candidates.

Also, per Knowlton himself, he uses search firm to expedite process. I don't see any problem with, no matter what level experience as an AD you have, to use a search firm to comb as many possible viable candidates to vet and look over thoroughly.

We agree this is on Knowlton 100%, but we disagree that Knowlton shouldn't have to rely on a search firm because every AD should have a rolodex of prospects.
Genocide Joe 58
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OaktownBear said:


I swear some of you want to just want to sit there and just read the Cal release and dive out of the way of any information that might make you question anything Cal does.
Hmmmm, reminds me of something. I wonder what it is.
BearlyCareAnymore
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

OaktownBear said:

oski003 said:

OaktownBear said:

oski003 said:

OaktownBear said:

oski003 said:

"Instead, Cal received a slapdash, hurried process that was dominated by a search agency with ulterior motives."

Please explain this statement. What were the ulterior motives of the search agency? What evidence do you have to support this assertion.
I would recommend you do some internet searches on Todd Turner, his record in sports administration, his search firm's record, and what people think of them. I'd also consider how things have gone for Cal athletics since they brought his firm in.


Can you give me further guidance than that? I might need some googling help. I tried "Todd Turner" "College Sports Associates" and "Search Firm Record" but did not find evidence that they have an ulterior motive. Can you give me the exact Google terms to use to lead to an unbiased conclusion that they had an ulterior motive on this search?


Let me be clear. I was saying you'd find a lot of people who claim that Turner and CSA both suck. Look at the Twitter comments when Evan Daniels broke the news that we were using them. People from several teams commenting in the negative.

If there was "hard evidence" that they had ulterior motives, they wouldn't be in business. They do have a reputation for pushing retread coaches from their list when schools are too lazy to do their own damned work


I read the Twitter replies and found about a dozen people criticizing CSA, half of them being Cal fans critical of search firms. Based on those comments, I was able to discover that UW fans are bitter because Turner supported Ty Willingham when he was AD there circa 2006-7. There was a reference to a terrible hire at Pitt and Vanderbilt, which are ranked as two of the worst hires of the past ten years. I also discovered he placed Buzz Williams at VA Tech who just revived their program and made them relevant. He also placed Rick Barnes at Tennessee, who had a deep NCAA run AZ a 2 seed. Those were ranked as two of the best hires of the last ten years. I struggled to find any Twitter posts from VT or TN saying positive things about CSA or Turner, but that's the nature of the internet.
There was more than that, but fine.

When Fox was hired it was very much mocked around the college basketball world. Some of that mocking pointed at the fact that it was typical of CSA. There is a lot of criticism of that search firm from a lot of non-Cal sources. It is not my responsibility to spoon feed it to you. I have no more responsibility to prove they suck than you have to prove they are good. You are free to do your own research. Suffice it to say, Turner is not exactly seen favorably by the fans of schools where he served as athletic director. Maybe one should wonder about a guy who was AD at 4 different schools and after "resigning" from the last one has had to open a consulting business.

I swear some of you want to just want to sit there and just read the Cal release and dive out of the way of any information that might make you question anything Cal does.


He was an AD of 4 schools from 1987 to 2008, a 21 year period. Not alarming. It is easy to find negative information on ex ADs and coaches, etc... if that is what your are looking for. CSA is a mixed bag. They're hardly the evil entity that you make them out to be. I think you are just lashing out because you do not like the hire.
And I think you just don't want to do any research and just want to take pot shots at information other people find.

Why was Todd Turner's search firm deemed qualified to run Cal's basketball coach search?

Here are some facts on Turner, the guy who lead Cal's coaching search:

Turner was AD at 4 different universities. Turner "resigned" at his last two jobs due to philosophical differences with the university presidents.

The overall record of football coaches that Turner hired in his capacity of athletic director at the school he hired them for is 96 183.

The conference record of these football coaches is 48-147

The overall record of basketball coaches that Turner hired in his capacity of athletic director at the school he hired them for is 602-450.


The conference record of these basketball coaches is 238-296.

He hired 4 football coaches and 3 basketball coaches. ALL OF THEM FINISHED THEIR TENURES WITH A LOSING RECORD IN CONFERENCE.

Why Pitt fans hate Todd Turner:

Pitt hired CSA for their coaching search. The outcome was Kevin Stallings getting the job. Stallings had a prior relationship with Turner, Turner having hired him at Vanderbilt and worked with him for several years. The fans were extremely unhappy with the hire as a result of his mediocre record and overall losing record in conference over many years at his prior job (sound familiar?). Pitt went to the NCAA tournament the year before. Despite returning 6 of the top 7 players from the previous year (including 2 eventual NBA players), Pitt finished the 201617 season with their first losing record in 17 years. (16-17 overall, 4-14 in conference). His second year he went 8-24 overall and 0-18 in conference Stallings finished his tenure at Pitt with the worst winning percentage of any coach in Pitt history.

Why UW fans hate Turner:

He hired Ty Willingham. Another retread who had been fired from his last job. Willingham went 11-37 overall and 6-29 in conference. Turner refused to fire him after his third season even though he was 11-25 overall and 6-20 in conference. Turner was then asked to resign. While the UW President said the Willingham decision did not factor in, Turner said "For me it did. It was just was enlightening about where our society, culture and support group has gone in their expectations of what constitutes a quality program on a campus of higher education." He also said "the message that our students hear, that our coaches hear, that our leadership hears from the general run-of-the-mill fan is that the only thing we really care about is how many games they win. And I have to look at that after 32 years of doing this and say 'wow, is that really what we are all about? Have I been that naive all this period of time? I have been spending all my time on the student-athlete experience and trying to create better lives for people and the proper place in higher education when all I should have been worrying about is how many games we've won.' Why didn't I go to the NFL if that's all it's about" Again, this is in context of deciding not to fire a coach who was 11-25 and 6-20. Because of his decision not to fire Willingham, UW suffered their worst ever season at 0-12, 0-9. (Hmmm. A pattern) Next AD fired Willingham. Turner was also noted for being poor at getting alumni donations and mismanaging the Husky Stadium project.

Why NC State fans hate him:

And boy do they hate him. They call him the ******Helmet (knowing this site, that might get censored. It starts with a D and ends in a "ouche"). It seems in addition to being credited with running their revenue sports into the ground he was considered arrogant and bad with the alums (and thus fundraising)

In basketball, NC State had an 8 year streak of NCAA tournaments including a sweet sixteen, 2 elite eights, and a National Championship. One year later they hired Todd Turner as their athletic director. He hired a coach who went 78-98 and 28-66 in conference. In football, the coach hired by the prior AD went 52-29-3 and 31-18-1. His last two years he finished 2nd in conference. Turner hired his replacement who went 41-40 and 26-30. In baseball, NC State had a great coach who was an NC State Alum. They had a horrible stadium facility that would not allow them to host a regional. For instance, the bleachers were condemned. As a result, NC State earned a 1 seed in a regional and had to travel to Oklahoma. With Turner unable and unwilling to improve the facility, their coach realized he couldn't win there. He went to South Carolina. He won 2 national championships and one runner up and was national coach of the year 3 times

Cal used Turner's firm to do a full scale review of athletic department finances and also to determine how to fulfill Prong I of Title IX. Why?

Cal used Turner's firm to hire Mark Fox. Really. Seriously. Why?

One thing I have noticed is that Turner makes a lot of statements that in my opinion make him out to be Mr. High Moral Ground Integrity in a world run amok. (see Udub quotes above). Frankly, I don't know where his nickname from NC State fans came from, but you see enough quotes and you get a pretty good guess. He also does like to zing schools with his holier than thou attitude as he walks (or is thrown) out the door. Honestly, I'd be afraid his comments would play well with the Cal administration and they might offer him the AD job, but I think it is easier for him to judge everyone else and sit in a job where he makes his money with no accountability for his decisions. Think about this. What a great gig. You completely fail to hire any quality coaches as an athletic director. You get ripped to shreds by fans because of it. You get fired by two schools (sorry, resign due to philosophical differences). What do you do? Open up a consulting firm for athletic directors too lazy to do their own damned job. When you blow it, s/he takes all the blame and maybe ultimately gets fired. But your consulting fee is already in the bank. (and I know one school paid $60K for this service).

But my question is whether Cal even looked at his record before hiring his firm. I do not see that anything this guy has done has qualified him to go anywhere near a coaching search.

So, your turn. Give me some good reasons why.
BearlyCareAnymore
How long do you want to ignore this user?

BearlyCareAnymore
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GBear4Life said:

Blaming the search firm makes no sense.

The AD gives them the criteria they want in a candidate, and CSA gives them a list that matches. The AD goes through them, asks questions, shortens the list to a group for interviews and is the autonomous decision maker in all of that.

If an AD say yes to a bad candidate because of a poor list from a search firm, that's on the AD to take additional steps to find the right one. An AD has to know what he's looking for and be able to identify it.

Fox fits all the safe boxes that is typical of a Cal athletic hiring manager: squeaky clean reputation; solid graduation rates, and in Knowlton's case someone with success as a HC (Nevada). It was the safe hire with a high floor and low ceiling, in theory.

I'm not as down on the hire as most, but I acknowledge the optimism naturally is greater with a lower level HC with a track record of only success and no failure (or a P6 reputable assistant) than a HC whose most recent record at a low profile P6 school is a failure.
I'm not blaming the search firm. I'm blaming the guy that paid a search firm that is unqualified.

I disagree that the AD shouldn't have a list. He has all the alums, former players, former coaches from the school who can help. There are not that many names to sort through. It is a very small pool. I don't know how much Cal paid for the service, but one school paid $60K, so I doubt we got off cheaper. Monty would have come up with a better list in one phone call and probably would do it for free.
Genocide Joe 58
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OaktownBear said:


So, your turn. Give me some good reasons why.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If I'm an AD I would talk to a lot of people, but one I would particularly listen to is Monty.

He's a trusted advisor that knows Cal, knows our team and know coaches in the west and elsewhere

Oh, and he knows basketball

I think he's also a straight shooter and will tell you what you need to know whether you like it or not

So who did Monty recommend?
Genocide Joe 58
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

If I'm an AD I would talk to a lot of people, but one I would particularly listen to is Monty.

He's a trusted advisor that knows Cal, knows our team and know coaches in the west and elsewhere

Oh, and he knows basketball

I think he's also a straight shooter and will tell you what you need to know whether you like it or not

So who did Monty recommend?
I don't know. Who do you think he recommended?
71Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OaktownBear said:

GBear4Life said:

71Bear Blaming the search firm makes no sense.

The AD gives them the criteria they want in a candidate, and CSA gives them a list that matches. The AD goes through them, asks questions, shortens the list to a group for interviews and is the autonomous decision maker in all of that.

If an AD say yes to a bad candidate because of a poor list from a search firm, that's on the AD to take additional steps to find the right one. An AD has to know what he's looking for and be able to identify it.

Fox fits all the safe boxes that is typical of a Cal athletic hiring manager: squeaky clean reputation; solid graduation rates, and in Knowlton's case someone with success as a HC (Nevada). It was the safe hire with a high floor and low ceiling, in theory.

I'm not as down on the hire as most, but I acknowledge the optimism naturally is greater with a lower level HC with a track record of only success and no failure (or a P6 reputable assistant) than a HC whose most recent record at a low profile P6 school is a failure.
I'm not blaming the search firm. I'm blaming the guy that paid a search firm that is unqualified.

I disagree that the AD shouldn't have a list. He has all the alums, former players, former coaches from the school who can help. There are not that many names to sort through. It is a very small pool. I don't know how much Cal paid for the service, but one school paid $60K, so I doubt we got off cheaper. Monty would have come up with a better list in one phone call and probably would do it for free.
Yep. Consider this discussion closed. The search firm hoodwinked Knowlton. Barnum was right......
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.