blungld said:

---

Does he have any tears for the people he killed?

Does he have any honest regrets for the bad decisions he made?

Does he have any words to say guns are instruments of death and that he is not a hero--that when you kill someone you die too?

Does he have the interest of others at heart and beg people to leave the guns behind and learn to understand one another and this whole thing is a tragedy?

...or will he go on FOX and peacock with pride, do appearances at gun shows, and be a poster boy for more violence? Defending this boy because he is aligned against Libs and 'on your team" is just another step into the moral decay that is the modern GOP.

---

Why the outrage and fixation on Kyle Rittenhouse when there are shootings every day in cities across the country?

BearForce2 said:

---

blungld said:

---

Does he have any tears for the people he killed?

Does he have any honest regrets for the bad decisions he made?

Does he have any words to say guns are instruments of death and that he is not a hero--that when you kill someone you die too?

Does he have the interest of others at heart and beg people to leave the guns behind and learn to understand one another and this whole thing is a tragedy?

...or will he go on FOX and peacock with pride, do appearances at gun shows, and be a poster boy for more violence? Defending this boy because he is aligned against Libs and 'on your team" is just another step into the moral decay that is the modern GOP.

---

Why the outrage and fixation on Kyle Rittenhouse when there are shootings every day in cities across the country?

---

Hmmm. Let's count your idiocy.

1) I do care about all victims of gun violence and abhor American's gun obsession.

2) I am not fixated on Kyle, I commented about his trial ON A THREAD DISCUSSING HIS TRIAL.

3) And discussing Kyle and what he symbolizes and how he is represented in the media is important because he is plastered everywhere and will be used to shape policy. And I care about policy because "I care about all victims of gun violence and abhor American's gun obsession."

See how that works?

Now, go back to your fixation on exonerating violence, demonizing Biden, Hillary's emails and the sundry BS you post without coherence, intellectual honesty, or emotional intelligence.

Rittenhouse represents a segment of American society which is frowned upon: militia.

Q: What is a 17 year old kid doing roaming the streets at night with an AR15??
A: Agitating and shooting people.

It's the same type who stormed the Michigan statehouse, and the US Capitol.

It's also reminiscent, perhaps, of a lynch mob.

Does that help you understand?

Most shootings are suicide, or perpetrated by people who know one another. Rittenhouse is out there in the streets, imposing his stupid mindset upon "us". Perhaps that's key to your question.

blungld said:

---

BearForce2 said:

---

blungld said:

---

Does he have any tears for the people he killed?

Does he have any honest regrets for the bad decisions he made?

Does he have any words to say guns are instruments of death and that he is not a hero--that when you kill someone you die too?

Does he have the interest of others at heart and beg people to leave the guns behind and learn to understand one another and this whole thing is a tragedy?

...or will he go on FOX and peacock with pride, do appearances at gun shows, and be a poster boy for more violence? Defending this boy because he is aligned against Libs and 'on your team" is just another step into the moral decay that is the modern GOP.

---

Why the outrage and fixation on Kyle Rittenhouse when there are shootings every day in cities across the country?

---

Hmmm. Let's count your idiocy.

1) I do care about all victims of gun violence and abhor American's gun obsession.

2) I am not fixated on Kyle, I commented about his trial ON A THREAD DISCUSSING HIS TRIAL.

3) And discussing Kyle and what he symbolizes and how he is represented in the media is important because he is plastered everywhere and will be used to shape policy. And I care about policy because "I care about all victims of gun violence and abhor American's gun obsession."

See how that works?

Now, go back to your fixation on exonerating violence, demonizing Biden, Hillary's emails and the sundry BS you post without coherence, intellectual honesty, or emotional intelligence.

---

concordtom said:

---

Rittenhouse represents a segment of American society which is frowned upon: militia.

Q: What is a 17 year old kid doing roaming the streets at night with an AR15??
A: Agitating and shooting people.

It's the same type who stormed the Michigan statehouse, and the US Capitol.

It's also reminiscent, perhaps, of a lynch mob.

Does that help you understand?

Most shootings are suicide, or perpetrated by people who know one another. Rittenhouse is out there in the streets, imposing his stupid mindset upon "us". Perhaps that's key to your question.

---

To be fair, I thought he was with a group of LOCAL people defending their LOCAL gas station / car lot from being burned down by lawless rioters, mostly from out of town. Does your characterization purposely omit this or are you ignorant of the facts? Does this change your viewpoint at all?

oski003 said:

---

To be fair, I thought he was with a group of LOCAL people defending their LOCAL gas station / car lot from being burned down by lawless rioters, mostly from out of town. Does your characterization purposely omit this or are you ignorant of the facts? Does this change your viewpoint at all?

---

Uh, are you referring to my use of word "militia"? If so, no. I equate militia as the same as you have described here: Local people defending their local stuff.

So far as I know, militias are like "clubs", with no official legal role.

concordtom said:

---

oski003 said:

---

To be fair, I thought he was with a group of LOCAL people defending their LOCAL gas station / car lot from being burned down by lawless rioters, mostly from out of town. Does your characterization purposely omit this or are you ignorant of the facts? Does this change your viewpoint at all?

---

Uh, are you referring to my use of word "militia"? If so, no. I equate militia as the same as you have described here: Local people defending their local stuff.

So far as I know, militias are like "clubs", with no official legal role.

---

I am referring to you characterizing him merely as a 17 year old kid roaming the streets at night with an AR15 who was agitating and shooting people.

That's a one-sided characterization that shows pure bias or ignorance.

blungld said:

---

BearForce2 said:

---

blungld said:

---

Does he have any tears for the people he killed?

Does he have any honest regrets for the bad decisions he made?

Does he have any words to say guns are instruments of death and that he is not a hero--that when you kill someone you die too?

Does he have the interest of others at heart and beg people to leave the guns behind and learn to understand one another and this whole thing is a tragedy?

...or will he go on FOX and peacock with pride, do appearances at gun shows, and be a poster boy for more violence? Defending this boy because he is aligned against Libs and 'on your team" is just another step into the moral decay that is the modern GOP.

---

Why the outrage and fixation on Kyle Rittenhouse when there are shootings every day in cities across the country?

---

Hmmm. Let's count your idiocy.

1) I do care about all victims of gun violence and abhor American's gun obsession.

2) I am not fixated on Kyle, I commented about his trial ON A THREAD DISCUSSING HIS TRIAL.

3) And discussing Kyle and what he symbolizes and how he is represented in the media is important because he is plastered everywhere and will be used to shape policy. And I care about policy because "I care about all victims of gun violence and abhor American's gun obsession."

See how that works?

Now, go back to your fixation on exonerating violence, demonizing Biden, Hillary's emails and the sundry BS you post without coherence, intellectual honesty, or emotional intelligence.

---

Dear sweetheart:

1) Democrats are buying guns in record numbers to protect themselves from.....other Democrats. But if we say the guns are doing the actual violence, no one will know who's doing the actual shooting.

2) You are fixated on Kyle because he's a white person with a gun who wasn't with the BLM rioters. You aren't that interested in the trial itself because....

3) Your self-reflection questions for Rittenhouse in your previous post were silly in light of the events that occurred as Grosskeruetz pointed his own 9mm handgun at Rittenhouse's head. You can see in the video evidence that Rittenhouse was repeatedly yelling if anyone needed medical attention before he was attacked.

You say you care about gun violence and gun obsession but just admit it, you care more about demonizing Rittenhouse as a crazy white supremacist like your dear leader, Joe Biden just did.

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

Rittenhouse represents a segment of American society which is frowned upon: militia.

Q: What is a 17 year old kid doing roaming the streets at night with an AR15??
A: Agitating and shooting people.

It's the same type who stormed the Michigan statehouse, and the US Capitol.

It's also reminiscent, perhaps, of a lynch mob.

Does that help you understand?

Most shootings are suicide, or perpetrated by people who know one another. Rittenhouse is out there in the streets, imposing his stupid mindset upon "us". Perhaps that's key to your question.

---

To be fair, I thought he was with a group of LOCAL people defending their LOCAL gas station / car lot from being burned down by lawless rioters, mostly from out of town. Does your characterization purposely omit this or are you ignorant of the facts? Does this change your viewpoint at all?

---

You probably thought that because that's what he and his lawyer have said. According to this article, the business owner didn't ask for or need their help.

His original lawyer* (who has become a radicalized right wing lawyer) said that Rittenhouse took a rifle because "Kenosha had become a war zone. Any sensible person would take that." Seems like his lawyer thought he knew what he was doing.

If you are a 17 year old kid, the last place you should be is in the middle of a "war zone" with an assault rifle. Of course having untrained and irresponsible people wielding guns in contentious situations will lead to homicides and this whole affair will only heighten the right wing love affair with vigilante anti protester "justice."


*I don't know the history but it's possible he switched lawyers when his first one was hospitalized with a bad case of COVID because …. Anti-vaxxer.

Unit2Sucks said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

Rittenhouse represents a segment of American society which is frowned upon: militia.

Q: What is a 17 year old kid doing roaming the streets at night with an AR15??
A: Agitating and shooting people.

It's the same type who stormed the Michigan statehouse, and the US Capitol.

It's also reminiscent, perhaps, of a lynch mob.

Does that help you understand?

Most shootings are suicide, or perpetrated by people who know one another. Rittenhouse is out there in the streets, imposing his stupid mindset upon "us". Perhaps that's key to your question.

---

To be fair, I thought he was with a group of LOCAL people defending their LOCAL gas station / car lot from being burned down by lawless rioters, mostly from out of town. Does your characterization purposely omit this or are you ignorant of the facts? Does this change your viewpoint at all?

---

If you are a 17 year old kid, the last place you should be is in the middle of a "war zone" with an assault rifle. Of course having untrained and irresponsible people wielding guns in contentious situations will lead to homicides and this whole affair will only heighten the right wing love affair with vigilante anti protester "justice."

---

The kids a hero. He got off his azz instead of watching the city burn. We need more people like him. He was obviously trained very well because his trigger discipline was excellent. He did everything a person can do to extract himself from a situation before his life was in danger. 3 Felons decided they wanted to test him and lost.

Unit2Sucks said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

Rittenhouse represents a segment of American society which is frowned upon: militia.

Q: What is a 17 year old kid doing roaming the streets at night with an AR15??
A: Agitating and shooting people.

It's the same type who stormed the Michigan statehouse, and the US Capitol.

It's also reminiscent, perhaps, of a lynch mob.

Does that help you understand?

Most shootings are suicide, or perpetrated by people who know one another. Rittenhouse is out there in the streets, imposing his stupid mindset upon "us". Perhaps that's key to your question.

---

To be fair, I thought he was with a group of LOCAL people defending their LOCAL gas station / car lot from being burned down by lawless rioters, mostly from out of town. Does your characterization purposely omit this or are you ignorant of the facts? Does this change your viewpoint at all?

---

You probably thought that because that's what he and his lawyer have said. According to this article, the business owner didn't ask for or need their help.

His original lawyer* (who has become a radicalized right wing lawyer) said that Rittenhouse took a rifle because "Kenosha had become a war zone. Any sensible person would take that." Seems like his lawyer thought he knew what he was doing.

If you are a 17 year old kid, the last place you should be is in the middle of a "war zone" with an assault rifle. Of course having untrained and irresponsible people wielding guns in contentious situations will lead to homicides and this whole affair will only heighten the right wing love affair with vigilante anti protester "justice."


*I don't know the history but it's possible he switched lawyers when his first one was hospitalized with a bad case of COVID because …. Anti-vaxxer.

---

The owner of the car lot personally didn't personally ask the gunmen guarding his business to do so. Looks like you've cracked the case. Sarcasm.

Nice job managing to throw in an anti-vax accusation here. You are a true woke missionary.

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

Rittenhouse represents a segment of American society which is frowned upon: militia.

Q: What is a 17 year old kid doing roaming the streets at night with an AR15??
A: Agitating and shooting people.

It's the same type who stormed the Michigan statehouse, and the US Capitol.

It's also reminiscent, perhaps, of a lynch mob.

Does that help you understand?

Most shootings are suicide, or perpetrated by people who know one another. Rittenhouse is out there in the streets, imposing his stupid mindset upon "us". Perhaps that's key to your question.

---

To be fair, I thought he was with a group of LOCAL people defending their LOCAL gas station / car lot from being burned down by lawless rioters, mostly from out of town. Does your characterization purposely omit this or are you ignorant of the facts? Does this change your viewpoint at all?

---

If you are a 17 year old kid, the last place you should be is in the middle of a "war zone" with an assault rifle. Of course having untrained and irresponsible people wielding guns in contentious situations will lead to homicides and this whole affair will only heighten the right wing love affair with vigilante anti protester "justice."

---

The kids a hero. He got off his azz instead of watching the city burn. We need more people like him. He was obviously trained very well because his trigger discipline was excellent. He did everything a person can do to extract himself from a situation before his life was in danger. 3 Felons decided they wanted to test him and lost.

---

If he hadn't been there with an AR-15 he wouldn't have been in any danger. No one fired a gun at him and he willingly put himself in danger for no reason. But that was nothing new for the kid. He previously punched a girl in the back of the head in Kenosha in an encounter that he had no reason to be involved in and spent time hanging out with the local proud boys chapter.

The more you read about him the more you realize he's just a poor kid from a bad broken home who has bought into all of the right wing BS in this country. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that walking around with an AR-15 didn't save Rittenhouse that night, but staying home in Illinois would have.


The fact that he is a hero says a lot about the radical white wing in this country. This story is an example of how our country is failing our youth and how extremists are taking advantage of it. We are creating our own right wing American Taliban and people like MSB think it's great.

Unit2Sucks said:

---

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

Rittenhouse represents a segment of American society which is frowned upon: militia.

Q: What is a 17 year old kid doing roaming the streets at night with an AR15??
A: Agitating and shooting people.

It's the same type who stormed the Michigan statehouse, and the US Capitol.

It's also reminiscent, perhaps, of a lynch mob.

Does that help you understand?

Most shootings are suicide, or perpetrated by people who know one another. Rittenhouse is out there in the streets, imposing his stupid mindset upon "us". Perhaps that's key to your question.

---

To be fair, I thought he was with a group of LOCAL people defending their LOCAL gas station / car lot from being burned down by lawless rioters, mostly from out of town. Does your characterization purposely omit this or are you ignorant of the facts? Does this change your viewpoint at all?

---

If you are a 17 year old kid, the last place you should be is in the middle of a "war zone" with an assault rifle. Of course having untrained and irresponsible people wielding guns in contentious situations will lead to homicides and this whole affair will only heighten the right wing love affair with vigilante anti protester "justice."

---

The kids a hero. He got off his azz instead of watching the city burn. We need more people like him. He was obviously trained very well because his trigger discipline was excellent. He did everything a person can do to extract himself from a situation before his life was in danger. 3 Felons decided they wanted to test him and lost.

---

If he hadn't been there with an AR-15 he wouldn't have been in any danger. No one fired a gun at him and he willingly put himself in danger for no reason.

---

If 3 felons didn't show up from out of town to come to Kenosha and set fires and riot, then attack an armed man, they would be alive.

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

Rittenhouse represents a segment of American society which is frowned upon: militia.

Q: What is a 17 year old kid doing roaming the streets at night with an AR15??
A: Agitating and shooting people.

It's the same type who stormed the Michigan statehouse, and the US Capitol.

It's also reminiscent, perhaps, of a lynch mob.

Does that help you understand?

Most shootings are suicide, or perpetrated by people who know one another. Rittenhouse is out there in the streets, imposing his stupid mindset upon "us". Perhaps that's key to your question.

---

To be fair, I thought he was with a group of LOCAL people defending their LOCAL gas station / car lot from being burned down by lawless rioters, mostly from out of town. Does your characterization purposely omit this or are you ignorant of the facts? Does this change your viewpoint at all?

---

If you are a 17 year old kid, the last place you should be is in the middle of a "war zone" with an assault rifle. Of course having untrained and irresponsible people wielding guns in contentious situations will lead to homicides and this whole affair will only heighten the right wing love affair with vigilante anti protester "justice."

---

The kids a hero. He got off his azz instead of watching the city burn. We need more people like him. He was obviously trained very well because his trigger discipline was excellent. He did everything a person can do to extract himself from a situation before his life was in danger. 3 Felons decided they wanted to test him and lost.

---

If he hadn't been there with an AR-15 he wouldn't have been in any danger. No one fired a gun at him and he willingly put himself in danger for no reason.

---

If 3 felons didn't show up from out of town to come to Kenosha and set fires and riot, then attack an armed man, they would be alive.

---

But Rittenhouse was at a bar after midnight wearing a short skirt. He was asking for trouble.

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

Rittenhouse represents a segment of American society which is frowned upon: militia.

Q: What is a 17 year old kid doing roaming the streets at night with an AR15??
A: Agitating and shooting people.

It's the same type who stormed the Michigan statehouse, and the US Capitol.

It's also reminiscent, perhaps, of a lynch mob.

Does that help you understand?

Most shootings are suicide, or perpetrated by people who know one another. Rittenhouse is out there in the streets, imposing his stupid mindset upon "us". Perhaps that's key to your question.

---

To be fair, I thought he was with a group of LOCAL people defending their LOCAL gas station / car lot from being burned down by lawless rioters, mostly from out of town. Does your characterization purposely omit this or are you ignorant of the facts? Does this change your viewpoint at all?

---

If you are a 17 year old kid, the last place you should be is in the middle of a "war zone" with an assault rifle. Of course having untrained and irresponsible people wielding guns in contentious situations will lead to homicides and this whole affair will only heighten the right wing love affair with vigilante anti protester "justice."

---

The kids a hero. He got off his azz instead of watching the city burn. We need more people like him. He was obviously trained very well because his trigger discipline was excellent. He did everything a person can do to extract himself from a situation before his life was in danger. 3 Felons decided they wanted to test him and lost.

---

If he hadn't been there with an AR-15 he wouldn't have been in any danger. No one fired a gun at him and he willingly put himself in danger for no reason.

---

If 3 felons didn't show up from out of town to come to Kenosha and set fires and riot, then attack an armed man, they would be alive.

---

2 of those victims attacked an armed gunman who had already killed someone that minute. They were heroes who died doing what you are pretending Rittenhouse was there to do. He killed because he was a scared little kid in over his head. They died trying to protect other people from him.

Rittenhouse is an emblem of the radical white wing. Terrified, hateful, delusional and misguided. He should make you sad but he makes you proud. It's pathetic.

Unit2Sucks said:

---

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

Rittenhouse represents a segment of American society which is frowned upon: militia.

Q: What is a 17 year old kid doing roaming the streets at night with an AR15??
A: Agitating and shooting people.

It's the same type who stormed the Michigan statehouse, and the US Capitol.

It's also reminiscent, perhaps, of a lynch mob.

Does that help you understand?

Most shootings are suicide, or perpetrated by people who know one another. Rittenhouse is out there in the streets, imposing his stupid mindset upon "us". Perhaps that's key to your question.

---

To be fair, I thought he was with a group of LOCAL people defending their LOCAL gas station / car lot from being burned down by lawless rioters, mostly from out of town. Does your characterization purposely omit this or are you ignorant of the facts? Does this change your viewpoint at all?

---

If you are a 17 year old kid, the last place you should be is in the middle of a "war zone" with an assault rifle. Of course having untrained and irresponsible people wielding guns in contentious situations will lead to homicides and this whole affair will only heighten the right wing love affair with vigilante anti protester "justice."

---

The kids a hero. He got off his azz instead of watching the city burn. We need more people like him. He was obviously trained very well because his trigger discipline was excellent. He did everything a person can do to extract himself from a situation before his life was in danger. 3 Felons decided they wanted to test him and lost.

---

If he hadn't been there with an AR-15 he wouldn't have been in any danger. No one fired a gun at him and he willingly put himself in danger for no reason.

---

If 3 felons didn't show up from out of town to come to Kenosha and set fires and riot, then attack an armed man, they would be alive.

---

2 of those victims attacked an armed gunman who had already killed someone that minute. They were heroes who died doing what you are pretending Rittenhouse was there to do. He killed because he was a scared little kid in over his head. They died trying to protect other people from him.

Rittenhouse is an emblem of the radical white wing. Terrified, hateful, delusional and misguided. He should make you sad but he makes you proud. It's pathetic.

---

If your version of the facts is true (which it isn't because it's a woke fantasy), then he should be convicted by the Justice system. Or, is the justice system like VAERS and shouldn't be taken seriously?

Kenosha was a war zone for four days. The National Guard was mobilized. A House of Corrections was burned down, the courthouse was assaulted with firebombs, there was up to 50 million dollars in property damage. The area that was burned was and is mostly African American; a year later and it is still boarded up. Who would do this to their own community? The answer may be not people who lived there.

The police and military were unsuccessful in quelling this insurrection. Kyle Rittenhouse and others believe they can come to the aid of the police and save Kenosha. Here is one of many screw ups by the authorities. These militias are not agents of the state but are given credence by the police as agents of the state( accordingly the " revolutionaries" are also going to recognize them as agents of the state,

One Rittenhouse enters the area he is not a protected " medic" he is a combatant in a war zone facing other combatants with guns, chains, fire bombs, etc. The rules of self defense apply to both sides- kill or be kill. It's amazing more people didn't die; obviously Rittenhouse was no terrorist or dozens would have died.

It's not a story of terrorist or hero. It was life in Dodge Ciry. He should be acquitted.

To me the biggest lesson from all of this is that it would be better if neither the protesters nor Rittenhouse were allowed to carry guns.

sycasey said:

---

To me the biggest lesson from all of this is that it would be better if neither the protesters nor Rittenhouse were allowed to carry guns.

---

Good thing we have a constitution.

oski003 said:

---

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

Rittenhouse represents a segment of American society which is frowned upon: militia.

Q: What is a 17 year old kid doing roaming the streets at night with an AR15??
A: Agitating and shooting people.

It's the same type who stormed the Michigan statehouse, and the US Capitol.

It's also reminiscent, perhaps, of a lynch mob.

Does that help you understand?

Most shootings are suicide, or perpetrated by people who know one another. Rittenhouse is out there in the streets, imposing his stupid mindset upon "us". Perhaps that's key to your question.

---

To be fair, I thought he was with a group of LOCAL people defending their LOCAL gas station / car lot from being burned down by lawless rioters, mostly from out of town. Does your characterization purposely omit this or are you ignorant of the facts? Does this change your viewpoint at all?

---

If you are a 17 year old kid, the last place you should be is in the middle of a "war zone" with an assault rifle. Of course having untrained and irresponsible people wielding guns in contentious situations will lead to homicides and this whole affair will only heighten the right wing love affair with vigilante anti protester "justice."

---

The kids a hero. He got off his azz instead of watching the city burn. We need more people like him. He was obviously trained very well because his trigger discipline was excellent. He did everything a person can do to extract himself from a situation before his life was in danger. 3 Felons decided they wanted to test him and lost.

---

If he hadn't been there with an AR-15 he wouldn't have been in any danger. No one fired a gun at him and he willingly put himself in danger for no reason.

---

If 3 felons didn't show up from out of town to come to Kenosha and set fires and riot, then attack an armed man, they would be alive.

---

But Rittenhouse was at a bar after midnight wearing a short skirt. He was asking for trouble.

---

Right argument, wrong person. The kid is the rapist in your analogy; not the victim. The people like you who have lionized the kid spend all your time attacking the victims.

None of them should have been there. But as far as I can tell only one person killed people that night. No one would have died that night if Rittenhouse hadn't decided to play white wing vigilante. But he got what he wanted - attention from grownups and social media credibility. And pathetic white wingers got what they wanted too.

The public is being goaded into a fight. It might work. https://t.co/N9s9DrcMxA

— Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) November 13, 2021

This has nothing to do with guns, this is about something else.

Is he lying? If yes how does he benefit?

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZM8VxLDYS/

Unit2Sucks said:

---

oski003 said:

---

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

Rittenhouse represents a segment of American society which is frowned upon: militia.

Q: What is a 17 year old kid doing roaming the streets at night with an AR15??
A: Agitating and shooting people.

It's the same type who stormed the Michigan statehouse, and the US Capitol.

It's also reminiscent, perhaps, of a lynch mob.

Does that help you understand?

Most shootings are suicide, or perpetrated by people who know one another. Rittenhouse is out there in the streets, imposing his stupid mindset upon "us". Perhaps that's key to your question.

---

To be fair, I thought he was with a group of LOCAL people defending their LOCAL gas station / car lot from being burned down by lawless rioters, mostly from out of town. Does your characterization purposely omit this or are you ignorant of the facts? Does this change your viewpoint at all?

---

If you are a 17 year old kid, the last place you should be is in the middle of a "war zone" with an assault rifle. Of course having untrained and irresponsible people wielding guns in contentious situations will lead to homicides and this whole affair will only heighten the right wing love affair with vigilante anti protester "justice."

---

The kids a hero. He got off his azz instead of watching the city burn. We need more people like him. He was obviously trained very well because his trigger discipline was excellent. He did everything a person can do to extract himself from a situation before his life was in danger. 3 Felons decided they wanted to test him and lost.

---

If he hadn't been there with an AR-15 he wouldn't have been in any danger. No one fired a gun at him and he willingly put himself in danger for no reason.

---

If 3 felons didn't show up from out of town to come to Kenosha and set fires and riot, then attack an armed man, they would be alive.

---

But Rittenhouse was at a bar after midnight wearing a short skirt. He was asking for trouble.

---

Right argument, wrong person. The kid is the rapist in your analogy; not the victim. The people like you who have lionized the kid spend all your time attacking the victims.

None of them should have been there. But as far as I can tell only one person killed people that night. No one would have died that night if Rittenhouse hadn't decided to play white wing vigilante. But he got what he wanted - attention from grownups and social media credibility. And pathetic white wingers got what they wanted too.

---

Wokester, he pulled a gun out of his purse and killed the rapist. If Wittenhouse indeed escalated the situation, such as being the first to shoot, he should be convicted.

BearForce2 said:

---

The public is being goaded into a fight. It might work. https://t.co/N9s9DrcMxA

— Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) November 13, 2021

This has nothing to do with guns, this is about something else.

---

Well I hope they do t burn down Kenosha again. Actually I think the pandemic resulted in escalating and abnormal fury. I'd be surprised if there was anything-other than AOC bursting into tears

Anarchistbear said:

---

Well I hope they do t burn down Kenosha again. Actually I think the pandemic resulted in escalating and abnormal fury. I'd be surprised if there was anything-other than AOC bursting into tears

---

If they do try and burn Kenosha down again, we might see more 17 year old kids with AR-15 rifles come out of the woodwork.

Anarchistbear said:

---

BearForce2 said:

---

The public is being goaded into a fight. It might work. https://t.co/N9s9DrcMxA

— Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) November 13, 2021

This has nothing to do with guns, this is about something else.

---

Well I hope they do t burn down Kenosha again. Actually I think the pandemic resulted in escalating and abnormal fury. I'd be surprised if there was anything-other than AOC bursting into tears

---

Why Are Conservative Men So Obsessed with AOC? - Vogue https://t.co/zEjJGUapwW

— Monica Cates (@monicasloves) November 12, 2021

oski003 said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

oski003 said:

---

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

Rittenhouse represents a segment of American society which is frowned upon: militia.

Q: What is a 17 year old kid doing roaming the streets at night with an AR15??
A: Agitating and shooting people.

It's the same type who stormed the Michigan statehouse, and the US Capitol.

It's also reminiscent, perhaps, of a lynch mob.

Does that help you understand?

Most shootings are suicide, or perpetrated by people who know one another. Rittenhouse is out there in the streets, imposing his stupid mindset upon "us". Perhaps that's key to your question.

---

To be fair, I thought he was with a group of LOCAL people defending their LOCAL gas station / car lot from being burned down by lawless rioters, mostly from out of town. Does your characterization purposely omit this or are you ignorant of the facts? Does this change your viewpoint at all?

---

If you are a 17 year old kid, the last place you should be is in the middle of a "war zone" with an assault rifle. Of course having untrained and irresponsible people wielding guns in contentious situations will lead to homicides and this whole affair will only heighten the right wing love affair with vigilante anti protester "justice."

---

The kids a hero. He got off his azz instead of watching the city burn. We need more people like him. He was obviously trained very well because his trigger discipline was excellent. He did everything a person can do to extract himself from a situation before his life was in danger. 3 Felons decided they wanted to test him and lost.

---

If he hadn't been there with an AR-15 he wouldn't have been in any danger. No one fired a gun at him and he willingly put himself in danger for no reason.

---

If 3 felons didn't show up from out of town to come to Kenosha and set fires and riot, then attack an armed man, they would be alive.

---

But Rittenhouse was at a bar after midnight wearing a short skirt. He was asking for trouble.

---

Right argument, wrong person. The kid is the rapist in your analogy; not the victim. The people like you who have lionized the kid spend all your time attacking the victims.

None of them should have been there. But as far as I can tell only one person killed people that night. No one would have died that night if Rittenhouse hadn't decided to play white wing vigilante. But he got what he wanted - attention from grownups and social media credibility. And pathetic white wingers got what they wanted too.

---

Wokester, he pulled a gun out of his purse and killed the rapist. If Wittenhouse indeed escalated the situation, such as being the first to shoot, he should be convicted.

---

You obviously don't know what you are talking about because he was indeed the first to shoot, he did escalate the situation and he still may have a valid self-defense under Wisconsin law.

But at least your posting here is less dangerous than your anti-vaxx disinformation.

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZM8VXv9R8/

I finally got a hold of some Irn-Bru at #COP26! 🤗🥤

— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) November 10, 2021

BearForce2 said:

---

I finally got a hold of some Irn-Bru at #COP26! 🤗🥤

— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) November 10, 2021

---

Why Are Conservative Men So Obsessed with AOC? - Vogue https://t.co/zEjJGUapwW

— Monica Cates (@monicasloves) November 12, 2021

Unit2Sucks said:

---

oski003 said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

oski003 said:

---

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Unit2Sucks said:

---

oski003 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

Rittenhouse represents a segment of American society which is frowned upon: militia.

Q: What is a 17 year old kid doing roaming the streets at night with an AR15??
A: Agitating and shooting people.

It's the same type who stormed the Michigan statehouse, and the US Capitol.

It's also reminiscent, perhaps, of a lynch mob.

Does that help you understand?

Most shootings are suicide, or perpetrated by people who know one another. Rittenhouse is out there in the streets, imposing his stupid mindset upon "us". Perhaps that's key to your question.

---

To be fair, I thought he was with a group of LOCAL people defending their LOCAL gas station / car lot from being burned down by lawless rioters, mostly from out of town. Does your characterization purposely omit this or are you ignorant of the facts? Does this change your viewpoint at all?

---

If you are a 17 year old kid, the last place you should be is in the middle of a "war zone" with an assault rifle. Of course having untrained and irresponsible people wielding guns in contentious situations will lead to homicides and this whole affair will only heighten the right wing love affair with vigilante anti protester "justice."

---

The kids a hero. He got off his azz instead of watching the city burn. We need more people like him. He was obviously trained very well because his trigger discipline was excellent. He did everything a person can do to extract himself from a situation before his life was in danger. 3 Felons decided they wanted to test him and lost.

---

If he hadn't been there with an AR-15 he wouldn't have been in any danger. No one fired a gun at him and he willingly put himself in danger for no reason.

---

If 3 felons didn't show up from out of town to come to Kenosha and set fires and riot, then attack an armed man, they would be alive.

---

But Rittenhouse was at a bar after midnight wearing a short skirt. He was asking for trouble.

---

Right argument, wrong person. The kid is the rapist in your analogy; not the victim. The people like you who have lionized the kid spend all your time attacking the victims.

None of them should have been there. But as far as I can tell only one person killed people that night. No one would have died that night if Rittenhouse hadn't decided to play white wing vigilante. But he got what he wanted - attention from grownups and social media credibility. And pathetic white wingers got what they wanted too.

---

Wokester, he pulled a gun out of his purse and killed the rapist. If Wittenhouse indeed escalated the situation, such as being the first to shoot, he should be convicted.

---

You obviously don't know what you are talking about because he was indeed the first to shoot, he did escalate the situation and he still may have a valid self-defense under Wisconsin law.

But at least your posting here is less dangerous than your anti-vaxx disinformation.

---

This generally corroborates what I said. I don't see anything here indicating he dangerously escalated the situation. Please try to focus on the words I actually say, as opposed to extrapolating stuff that isn't there.

Toodles.

https://apnews.com/article/kyle-rittenhouse-wisconsin-shootings-george-floyd-homicide-5c1dc71757928bd0850959bcf4ec5f1d

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZM8VVxoej/

Is he lying ?

Smh

And unicorns exist
JFK JR is coming back to be trumps VP
There is no systemic racism
Chattel slave labor didn't build this country
What else …

The unmitigated gall of white Supremacy

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZM8VVvYXW/

BearForce2 said:

---

Dear sweetheart:

1) Democrats are buying guns in record numbers to protect themselves from.....other Democrats. But if we say the guns are doing the actual violence, no one will know who's doing the actual shooting.

2) You are fixated on Kyle because he's a white person with a gun who wasn't with the BLM rioters. You aren't that interested in the trial itself because....

3) Your self-reflection questions for Rittenhouse in your previous post were silly in light of the events that occurred as Grosskeruetz pointed his own 9mm handgun at Rittenhouse's head. You can see in the video evidence that Rittenhouse was repeatedly yelling if anyone needed medical attention before he was attacked.

You say you care about gun violence and gun obsession but just admit it, you care more about demonizing Rittenhouse as a crazy white supremacist like your dear leader, Joe Biden just did.

---

You are so far down your rabbit hole that you refuse to believe other people when they tell you exactly what they think and why. You just keep deciding what it is they believe despite the information they directly give you. I don't even recognize your characterization of my thinking or beliefs. Truly, it's a way of thinking that is not on my radar or ever crossed my mind. I can only assume that your sources of information tell you that this is what Liberals think and so you argue against these straw men.

None of your rebuttals or points really refute me or engage in any honest discussion.