The Official Russian Invasion of Ukraine Thread

915,723 Views | 10121 Replies | Last: 51 min ago by bear2034
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

By all accounts (except Russians and people who amplify Kremlin propaganda), Ukraine has made strong progress in their offensive. When will the losses on Russian forces be too much for Putin to bear? LOL we all know he couldn't give a sh%t about his people dying.

Article here discusses the progress.

Twitter thread here from Mike Martin (former british sholdier who is a visiting fellow in war studies at Kings College.





I go to Yahoo for two things:
1) News on Ukraine; and
2) Fantasy Football
You should be careful - I heard someone from Pfizer is married to a person that used to work at Yahoo. Probably best to stick to children's healthcare defense.

But don't take my word for it, feel free to look at any reputable news source that isn't parroting Russian propaganda and you will find something similar. We don't know how it's going to end with this offensive, but we do know that Ukraine has had some success and Russia is taking heavy losses as well.

oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

oski003 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

By all accounts (except Russians and people who amplify Kremlin propaganda), Ukraine has made strong progress in their offensive. When will the losses on Russian forces be too much for Putin to bear? LOL we all know he couldn't give a sh%t about his people dying.

Article here discusses the progress.

Twitter thread here from Mike Martin (former british sholdier who is a visiting fellow in war studies at Kings College.





I go to Yahoo for two things:
1) News on Ukraine; and
2) Fantasy Football
You should be careful - I heard someone from Pfizer is married to a person that used to work at Yahoo. Probably best to stick to children's healthcare defense.

But don't take my word for it, feel free to look at any reputable news source that isn't parroting Russian propaganda and you will find something similar. We don't know how it's going to end with this offensive, but we do know that Ukraine has had some success and Russia is taking heavy losses as well.




Wow, you truly are some kind of special. Objectivity evades you. It is cute that you found a source supporting your feelings. Normally, you are the one bashing sources because they don't support your feelings.

In other news...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/09/07/ukraine-kherson-offensive-casualties-ammunition/
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

oski003 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

By all accounts (except Russians and people who amplify Kremlin propaganda), Ukraine has made strong progress in their offensive. When will the losses on Russian forces be too much for Putin to bear? LOL we all know he couldn't give a sh%t about his people dying.

Article here discusses the progress.

Twitter thread here from Mike Martin (former british sholdier who is a visiting fellow in war studies at Kings College.





I go to Yahoo for two things:
1) News on Ukraine; and
2) Fantasy Football
You should be careful - I heard someone from Pfizer is married to a person that used to work at Yahoo. Probably best to stick to children's healthcare defense.

But don't take my word for it, feel free to look at any reputable news source that isn't parroting Russian propaganda and you will find something similar. We don't know how it's going to end with this offensive, but we do know that Ukraine has had some success and Russia is taking heavy losses as well.




Wow, you truly are some kind of special. Objectivity evades you. It is cute that you found a source supporting your feelings. Normally, you are the one bashing sources because they don't support your feelings.

In other news...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/09/07/ukraine-kherson-offensive-casualties-ammunition/
There's a pay wall unfortunately so I can't read that article but I've never pretended that Ukraine wasn't taking losses in this offensive. That doesn't mean it hasn't been a productive use of force. Russians are sustaining heavy losses as well and they have nothing to fight for.
golden sloth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

oski003 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

oski003 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

By all accounts (except Russians and people who amplify Kremlin propaganda), Ukraine has made strong progress in their offensive. When will the losses on Russian forces be too much for Putin to bear? LOL we all know he couldn't give a sh%t about his people dying.

Article here discusses the progress.

Twitter thread here from Mike Martin (former british sholdier who is a visiting fellow in war studies at Kings College.





I go to Yahoo for two things:
1) News on Ukraine; and
2) Fantasy Football
You should be careful - I heard someone from Pfizer is married to a person that used to work at Yahoo. Probably best to stick to children's healthcare defense.

But don't take my word for it, feel free to look at any reputable news source that isn't parroting Russian propaganda and you will find something similar. We don't know how it's going to end with this offensive, but we do know that Ukraine has had some success and Russia is taking heavy losses as well.




Wow, you truly are some kind of special. Objectivity evades you. It is cute that you found a source supporting your feelings. Normally, you are the one bashing sources because they don't support your feelings.

In other news...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/09/07/ukraine-kherson-offensive-casualties-ammunition/
There's a pay wall unfortunately so I can't read that article but I've never pretended that Ukraine wasn't taking losses in this offensive. That doesn't mean it hasn't been a productive use of force. Russians are sustaining heavy losses as well and they have nothing to fight for.


In June I had binge watched a series of panels and conferences on the Ukraine war and when asked what to look for, the panelists all said, dont dwell too much on the daily news reports (and there were about 15 different people being interviewed all saying this). They said 'fog of war' is real, there is truth bending propaganda on both sides, the actual events on the battlefield arent even fully known by the commanders in charge, and the daily ups and downs pale in comparison to the long term trends.
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

oski003 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

oski003 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

By all accounts (except Russians and people who amplify Kremlin propaganda), Ukraine has made strong progress in their offensive. When will the losses on Russian forces be too much for Putin to bear? LOL we all know he couldn't give a sh%t about his people dying.

Article here discusses the progress.

Twitter thread here from Mike Martin (former british sholdier who is a visiting fellow in war studies at Kings College.





I go to Yahoo for two things:
1) News on Ukraine; and
2) Fantasy Football
You should be careful - I heard someone from Pfizer is married to a person that used to work at Yahoo. Probably best to stick to children's healthcare defense.

But don't take my word for it, feel free to look at any reputable news source that isn't parroting Russian propaganda and you will find something similar. We don't know how it's going to end with this offensive, but we do know that Ukraine has had some success and Russia is taking heavy losses as well.




Wow, you truly are some kind of special. Objectivity evades you. It is cute that you found a source supporting your feelings. Normally, you are the one bashing sources because they don't support your feelings.

In other news...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/09/07/ukraine-kherson-offensive-casualties-ammunition/
There's a pay wall unfortunately so I can't read that article but I've never pretended that Ukraine wasn't taking losses in this offensive. That doesn't mean it hasn't been a productive use of force. Russians are sustaining heavy losses as well and they have nothing to fight for.

The purpose of the offensive isn't to take and hold land. In fact, Ukraine doesn't want its troops advancing far beyond the front where supply chain becomes an issue.

The purpose is to make Russia commit soldiers in the south and also to disrupt Russia's own supply chain. Russia had been under the assumption that this area was conquered and complacent, so much so that they were going to hold elections to ask the citizens if they wanted to join Russia. The offensive is designed to disrupt the relative peace and remind Russia and the local citizenry that there is still a war going on.





Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dimitrig said:

Unit2Sucks said:

oski003 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

oski003 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

By all accounts (except Russians and people who amplify Kremlin propaganda), Ukraine has made strong progress in their offensive. When will the losses on Russian forces be too much for Putin to bear? LOL we all know he couldn't give a sh%t about his people dying.

Article here discusses the progress.

Twitter thread here from Mike Martin (former british sholdier who is a visiting fellow in war studies at Kings College.





I go to Yahoo for two things:
1) News on Ukraine; and
2) Fantasy Football
You should be careful - I heard someone from Pfizer is married to a person that used to work at Yahoo. Probably best to stick to children's healthcare defense.

But don't take my word for it, feel free to look at any reputable news source that isn't parroting Russian propaganda and you will find something similar. We don't know how it's going to end with this offensive, but we do know that Ukraine has had some success and Russia is taking heavy losses as well.




Wow, you truly are some kind of special. Objectivity evades you. It is cute that you found a source supporting your feelings. Normally, you are the one bashing sources because they don't support your feelings.

In other news...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/09/07/ukraine-kherson-offensive-casualties-ammunition/
There's a pay wall unfortunately so I can't read that article but I've never pretended that Ukraine wasn't taking losses in this offensive. That doesn't mean it hasn't been a productive use of force. Russians are sustaining heavy losses as well and they have nothing to fight for.

The purpose of the offensive isn't to take and hold land. In fact, Ukraine doesn't want its troops advancing far beyond the front where supply chain becomes an issue.

The purpose is to make Russia commit soldiers in the south and also to disrupt Russia's own supply chain. Russia had been under the assumption that this area was conquered and complacent, so much so that they were going to hold elections to ask the citizens if they wanted to join Russia. The offensive is designed to disrupt the relative peace and remind Russia and the local citizenry that there is still a war going on.
I think you are vastly underselling what Ukraine hopes to do.

Will they be ultimately successful? Odds are long but Russia is really bad at war and is beginning to rely on ancient soviet munitions they are purchasing from NK. Right now both sides are taking heavy losses but it sounds like Ukraine is making solid progress against the short-term objectives it sought to achieve. This is all bad news for Russia, despite the Kremlin's pathetic attempts to pretend otherwise. Fortunately for Putin, he maintains an autocratic kleptocracy and can continue to send out young men (and now older conscripts, as they are running out of young people willing to die for a pittance) to sacrifice at the alter of his revanchist dreams.

This was isn't ending any time soon.
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

dimitrig said:

Unit2Sucks said:

oski003 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

oski003 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

By all accounts (except Russians and people who amplify Kremlin propaganda), Ukraine has made strong progress in their offensive. When will the losses on Russian forces be too much for Putin to bear? LOL we all know he couldn't give a sh%t about his people dying.

Article here discusses the progress.

Twitter thread here from Mike Martin (former british sholdier who is a visiting fellow in war studies at Kings College.





I go to Yahoo for two things:
1) News on Ukraine; and
2) Fantasy Football
You should be careful - I heard someone from Pfizer is married to a person that used to work at Yahoo. Probably best to stick to children's healthcare defense.

But don't take my word for it, feel free to look at any reputable news source that isn't parroting Russian propaganda and you will find something similar. We don't know how it's going to end with this offensive, but we do know that Ukraine has had some success and Russia is taking heavy losses as well.




Wow, you truly are some kind of special. Objectivity evades you. It is cute that you found a source supporting your feelings. Normally, you are the one bashing sources because they don't support your feelings.

In other news...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/09/07/ukraine-kherson-offensive-casualties-ammunition/
There's a pay wall unfortunately so I can't read that article but I've never pretended that Ukraine wasn't taking losses in this offensive. That doesn't mean it hasn't been a productive use of force. Russians are sustaining heavy losses as well and they have nothing to fight for.

The purpose of the offensive isn't to take and hold land. In fact, Ukraine doesn't want its troops advancing far beyond the front where supply chain becomes an issue.

The purpose is to make Russia commit soldiers in the south and also to disrupt Russia's own supply chain. Russia had been under the assumption that this area was conquered and complacent, so much so that they were going to hold elections to ask the citizens if they wanted to join Russia. The offensive is designed to disrupt the relative peace and remind Russia and the local citizenry that there is still a war going on.
I think you are vastly underselling what Ukraine hopes to do.

Will they be ultimately successful? Odds are long but Russia is really bad at war and is beginning to rely on ancient soviet munitions they are purchasing from NK. Right now both sides are taking heavy losses but it sounds like Ukraine is making solid progress against the short-term objectives it sought to achieve. This is all bad news for Russia, despite the Kremlin's pathetic attempts to pretend otherwise. Fortunately for Putin, he maintains an autocratic kleptocracy and can continue to send out young men (and now older conscripts, as they are running out of young people willing to die for a pittance) to sacrifice at the alter of his revanchist dreams.

This was isn't ending any time soon.

Not really.

From the article you linked:

"The US has observed Ukrainian forces achieve some success in attacking Russian supply lines, with the intention of cutting off and isolating Russian troops currently deployed west of the Dnipro River, according to a senior US official."

Do they have stretch goals?

Yes, but this offensive is specifically designed to attack Russia's supply lines and stretch Russia's troops thin more than it is to reoccupy Kherson. On that front, I think that they are accomplishing their goals.





Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dimitrig said:

Unit2Sucks said:

dimitrig said:

Unit2Sucks said:

oski003 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

oski003 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

By all accounts (except Russians and people who amplify Kremlin propaganda), Ukraine has made strong progress in their offensive. When will the losses on Russian forces be too much for Putin to bear? LOL we all know he couldn't give a sh%t about his people dying.

Article here discusses the progress.

Twitter thread here from Mike Martin (former british sholdier who is a visiting fellow in war studies at Kings College.





I go to Yahoo for two things:
1) News on Ukraine; and
2) Fantasy Football
You should be careful - I heard someone from Pfizer is married to a person that used to work at Yahoo. Probably best to stick to children's healthcare defense.

But don't take my word for it, feel free to look at any reputable news source that isn't parroting Russian propaganda and you will find something similar. We don't know how it's going to end with this offensive, but we do know that Ukraine has had some success and Russia is taking heavy losses as well.




Wow, you truly are some kind of special. Objectivity evades you. It is cute that you found a source supporting your feelings. Normally, you are the one bashing sources because they don't support your feelings.

In other news...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/09/07/ukraine-kherson-offensive-casualties-ammunition/
There's a pay wall unfortunately so I can't read that article but I've never pretended that Ukraine wasn't taking losses in this offensive. That doesn't mean it hasn't been a productive use of force. Russians are sustaining heavy losses as well and they have nothing to fight for.

The purpose of the offensive isn't to take and hold land. In fact, Ukraine doesn't want its troops advancing far beyond the front where supply chain becomes an issue.

The purpose is to make Russia commit soldiers in the south and also to disrupt Russia's own supply chain. Russia had been under the assumption that this area was conquered and complacent, so much so that they were going to hold elections to ask the citizens if they wanted to join Russia. The offensive is designed to disrupt the relative peace and remind Russia and the local citizenry that there is still a war going on.
I think you are vastly underselling what Ukraine hopes to do.

Will they be ultimately successful? Odds are long but Russia is really bad at war and is beginning to rely on ancient soviet munitions they are purchasing from NK. Right now both sides are taking heavy losses but it sounds like Ukraine is making solid progress against the short-term objectives it sought to achieve. This is all bad news for Russia, despite the Kremlin's pathetic attempts to pretend otherwise. Fortunately for Putin, he maintains an autocratic kleptocracy and can continue to send out young men (and now older conscripts, as they are running out of young people willing to die for a pittance) to sacrifice at the alter of his revanchist dreams.

This was isn't ending any time soon.

Not really.

From the article you linked:

"The US has observed Ukrainian forces achieve some success in attacking Russian supply lines, with the intention of cutting off and isolating Russian troops currently deployed west of the Dnipro River, according to a senior US official."

Do they have stretch goals?

Yes, but this offensive is specifically designed to attack Russia's supply lines and stretch Russia's troops thin more than it is to reoccupy Kherson. On that front, I think that they are accomplishing their goals.


I was more objecting to your last sentence which makes this seem like an attempt at a moral victory. There is a military strategy behind what they are doing. They also have retaken a few villages so it's not entirely accurate to say they aren't aiming to take any land. Ukraine is claiming they've retaken 270 square miles which is ... not nothing. Obviously the Kremlin isn't the only combatant engaged in information warfare, Ukraine has done it plenty, but there does appear to have been some gains made.





dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

dimitrig said:

Unit2Sucks said:

dimitrig said:

Unit2Sucks said:

oski003 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

oski003 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

By all accounts (except Russians and people who amplify Kremlin propaganda), Ukraine has made strong progress in their offensive. When will the losses on Russian forces be too much for Putin to bear? LOL we all know he couldn't give a sh%t about his people dying.

Article here discusses the progress.

Twitter thread here from Mike Martin (former british sholdier who is a visiting fellow in war studies at Kings College.





I go to Yahoo for two things:
1) News on Ukraine; and
2) Fantasy Football
You should be careful - I heard someone from Pfizer is married to a person that used to work at Yahoo. Probably best to stick to children's healthcare defense.

But don't take my word for it, feel free to look at any reputable news source that isn't parroting Russian propaganda and you will find something similar. We don't know how it's going to end with this offensive, but we do know that Ukraine has had some success and Russia is taking heavy losses as well.




Wow, you truly are some kind of special. Objectivity evades you. It is cute that you found a source supporting your feelings. Normally, you are the one bashing sources because they don't support your feelings.

In other news...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/09/07/ukraine-kherson-offensive-casualties-ammunition/
There's a pay wall unfortunately so I can't read that article but I've never pretended that Ukraine wasn't taking losses in this offensive. That doesn't mean it hasn't been a productive use of force. Russians are sustaining heavy losses as well and they have nothing to fight for.

The purpose of the offensive isn't to take and hold land. In fact, Ukraine doesn't want its troops advancing far beyond the front where supply chain becomes an issue.

The purpose is to make Russia commit soldiers in the south and also to disrupt Russia's own supply chain. Russia had been under the assumption that this area was conquered and complacent, so much so that they were going to hold elections to ask the citizens if they wanted to join Russia. The offensive is designed to disrupt the relative peace and remind Russia and the local citizenry that there is still a war going on.
I think you are vastly underselling what Ukraine hopes to do.

Will they be ultimately successful? Odds are long but Russia is really bad at war and is beginning to rely on ancient soviet munitions they are purchasing from NK. Right now both sides are taking heavy losses but it sounds like Ukraine is making solid progress against the short-term objectives it sought to achieve. This is all bad news for Russia, despite the Kremlin's pathetic attempts to pretend otherwise. Fortunately for Putin, he maintains an autocratic kleptocracy and can continue to send out young men (and now older conscripts, as they are running out of young people willing to die for a pittance) to sacrifice at the alter of his revanchist dreams.

This was isn't ending any time soon.

Not really.

From the article you linked:

"The US has observed Ukrainian forces achieve some success in attacking Russian supply lines, with the intention of cutting off and isolating Russian troops currently deployed west of the Dnipro River, according to a senior US official."

Do they have stretch goals?

Yes, but this offensive is specifically designed to attack Russia's supply lines and stretch Russia's troops thin more than it is to reoccupy Kherson. On that front, I think that they are accomplishing their goals.


I was more objecting to your last sentence which makes this seem like an attempt at a moral victory. There is a military strategy behind what they are doing. They also have retaken a few villages so it's not entirely accurate to say they aren't aiming to take any land. Ukraine is claiming they've retaken 270 square miles which is ... not nothing. Obviously the Kremlin isn't the only combatant engaged in information warfare, Ukraine has done it plenty, but there does appear to have been some gains made.






I didn't mean to imply that it is just an attempt at a moral victory, but to frame its success (or lack thereof) in the context of the goals. The term counteroffensive has a certain connotation. The villages that were taken were taken almost incidentally and I doubt Ukraine would try to hold them if Russia sent troops and armor to reclaim them.

From CNN:

On Saturday, a report from the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) said that according to Ukrainian officials, the offensive was "an intentionally methodical operation to degrade Russian forces and logistics, rather than one aimed at immediately recapturing large swathes of territory."

I say this because Russian propaganda will claim (has claimed) that almost no territory has been retaken. True, but that is not an immediate goal of this campaign.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dimitrig said:

Unit2Sucks said:

dimitrig said:

Unit2Sucks said:

dimitrig said:

Unit2Sucks said:

oski003 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

oski003 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

By all accounts (except Russians and people who amplify Kremlin propaganda), Ukraine has made strong progress in their offensive. When will the losses on Russian forces be too much for Putin to bear? LOL we all know he couldn't give a sh%t about his people dying.

Article here discusses the progress.

Twitter thread here from Mike Martin (former british sholdier who is a visiting fellow in war studies at Kings College.





I go to Yahoo for two things:
1) News on Ukraine; and
2) Fantasy Football
You should be careful - I heard someone from Pfizer is married to a person that used to work at Yahoo. Probably best to stick to children's healthcare defense.

But don't take my word for it, feel free to look at any reputable news source that isn't parroting Russian propaganda and you will find something similar. We don't know how it's going to end with this offensive, but we do know that Ukraine has had some success and Russia is taking heavy losses as well.




Wow, you truly are some kind of special. Objectivity evades you. It is cute that you found a source supporting your feelings. Normally, you are the one bashing sources because they don't support your feelings.

In other news...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/09/07/ukraine-kherson-offensive-casualties-ammunition/
There's a pay wall unfortunately so I can't read that article but I've never pretended that Ukraine wasn't taking losses in this offensive. That doesn't mean it hasn't been a productive use of force. Russians are sustaining heavy losses as well and they have nothing to fight for.

The purpose of the offensive isn't to take and hold land. In fact, Ukraine doesn't want its troops advancing far beyond the front where supply chain becomes an issue.

The purpose is to make Russia commit soldiers in the south and also to disrupt Russia's own supply chain. Russia had been under the assumption that this area was conquered and complacent, so much so that they were going to hold elections to ask the citizens if they wanted to join Russia. The offensive is designed to disrupt the relative peace and remind Russia and the local citizenry that there is still a war going on.
I think you are vastly underselling what Ukraine hopes to do.

Will they be ultimately successful? Odds are long but Russia is really bad at war and is beginning to rely on ancient soviet munitions they are purchasing from NK. Right now both sides are taking heavy losses but it sounds like Ukraine is making solid progress against the short-term objectives it sought to achieve. This is all bad news for Russia, despite the Kremlin's pathetic attempts to pretend otherwise. Fortunately for Putin, he maintains an autocratic kleptocracy and can continue to send out young men (and now older conscripts, as they are running out of young people willing to die for a pittance) to sacrifice at the alter of his revanchist dreams.

This was isn't ending any time soon.

Not really.

From the article you linked:

"The US has observed Ukrainian forces achieve some success in attacking Russian supply lines, with the intention of cutting off and isolating Russian troops currently deployed west of the Dnipro River, according to a senior US official."

Do they have stretch goals?

Yes, but this offensive is specifically designed to attack Russia's supply lines and stretch Russia's troops thin more than it is to reoccupy Kherson. On that front, I think that they are accomplishing their goals.


I was more objecting to your last sentence which makes this seem like an attempt at a moral victory. There is a military strategy behind what they are doing. They also have retaken a few villages so it's not entirely accurate to say they aren't aiming to take any land. Ukraine is claiming they've retaken 270 square miles which is ... not nothing. Obviously the Kremlin isn't the only combatant engaged in information warfare, Ukraine has done it plenty, but there does appear to have been some gains made.






I didn't mean to imply that it is just an attempt at a moral victory, but to frame its success (or lack thereof) in the context of the goals. The term counteroffensive has a certain connotation. The villages that were taken were taken almost incidentally and I doubt Ukraine would try to hold them if Russia sent troops and armor to reclaim them.

From CNN:

On Saturday, a report from the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) said that according to Ukrainian officials, the offensive was "an intentionally methodical operation to degrade Russian forces and logistics, rather than one aimed at immediately recapturing large swathes of territory."

I say this because Russian propaganda will claim (has claimed) that almost no territory has been retaken. True, but that is not an immediate goal of this campaign.

Yes, we agree there. This is the early stages of a broader-scale attempt to recapture land. And it appears to be working from that perspective, unfortunately exacting a large toll on both sides (Ukrainians dying to defend a sovereignty that should never been under attack and Russians dying for Putin's pointless unprovoked aggression). We shouldn't have to live in a world where people are forced to fight stupid wars like this, but Putin is a revanchist d(ck who doesn't care about murdering his own people of making them commit war crimes.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The recent deep incursion to Balakliya is indeed a solid military win for Ukraine, it was a well-planned and executed operation, targeting a poorly-defended and strategic area on the northern front. It's the first successful display of maneuver, "big arrow" military movement by Ukraine since late Spring.

bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ukraine news LIVE: US official claims war is at 'PIVOTAL moment' as Zelensky's military continues to counter Putin | The US Sun


https://www.the-sun.com/news/5935189/news-ukraine-war-russia-latest-queen-putin/
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Ukraine news LIVE: US official claims war is at 'PIVOTAL moment' as Zelensky's military continues to counter Putin | The US Sun


https://www.the-sun.com/news/5935189/news-ukraine-war-russia-latest-queen-putin/
Russia is bad at war.



EDIT: even better lol. Great manipulation of the playing field and use of information warfare by Ukraine throughout the war. Russia primarily uses misinformation to project false strength to misinform it's citizens and superfans. It has virtually no impact on Ukraine which relies on much better intelligence.

bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Isn't the guy in the blue uniform Lester McCorkle, the doorman at the Belaggio?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looks like Russia is getting smoked by this counter offensive.









Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?

^^^ Yay! Can you somehow get the word out to the Russian people, so they can dissent from within? ^^^
blungld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

The recent deep incursion to Balakliya is indeed a solid military win for Ukraine, it was a well-planned and executed operation, targeting a poorly-defended and strategic area on the northern front. It's the first successful display of maneuver, "big arrow" military movement by Ukraine since late Spring.




TRANSLATION: I was wrong…again.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can Cal88 confirm?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looks like a solid win for Ukraine in the north, and a loss in the south. Overall though, it's been the best week for Ukrainian armed forces since Spring, it's a big boost for their morale.

If you want a solid, neutral and up to date picture of frontline movements, this is a good channel, run by a military geek from Singapore:

https://www.youtube.com/c/DefensePoliticsAsia
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

Looks like a solid win for Ukraine in the north, and a loss in the south. Overall though, it's been the best week for Ukrainian armed forces since Spring, it's a big boost for their morale.

If you want a solid, neutral and up to date picture of frontline movements, this is a good channel, run by a military geek from Singapore:

https://www.youtube.com/c/DefensePoliticsAsia



This is Cal88 tipping us off that Russia is about to be humiliated in the south also
blungld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

Looks like a solid win for Ukraine in the north, and a loss in the south. Overall though, it's been the best week for Ukrainian armed forces since Spring, it's a big boost for their morale.

If you want a solid, neutral and up to date picture of frontline movements, this is a good channel, run by a military geek from Singapore:

https://www.youtube.com/c/DefensePoliticsAsia



Are these the same sources you were parroting about the total disaster of the Ukrainian counter or was that your own expertise on the area?
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just more evidence that Russia has incredibly poor military leadership - starting at the top - and is no threat to NATO in a conventional war. I'm sure once they get those 40 year old weapons from NK, Russia will figure it all out lol.









DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Plant is in big trouble.

Down to only one reactor, and they dont even have enough alternative power sources to support auxillary power to keep it and the facility running, let alone enough staff to operate it.
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
golden sloth
How long do you want to ignore this user?




Some geopolitical experts thoughts on the war.
1. Ukraine just captured more russian weapons than they have received from nato.
2. Dont count the Russians out.
3. Be wary of Russia escalating their energy battle with Europe.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lots of interesting info coming out of Ukraine.

First, it looks like pro-Ukrainian sentiment is on the rise in Crimea. The Russian ruler there is looking to go Handmaids Tale style on the population because they no longer feel like they need to pretend to love Mother Russia.



Quote:

Source: Sergey Aksyonov, head of the Russian occupation government in Crimea, on Telegram

Quote from Aksyonov: "Footage from public gatherings that have recently begun to be shared online shows people chanting pro-Ukrainian slogans and singing nationalist songs.
I believe that both the organisers and the participants of such gatherings have to be held responsible and fired; other appropriate law enforcement measures should also be taken.
It would be more rational and logical for those who support the Ukrainian regime to leave [Crimea] for the country that they love so much."

Details: In his video address, Aksyonov clarified that he meant holding people criminally responsible for such actions. He said that residents of Russian-occupied Crimea will be identified based on the footage of the events and fired; their business will be shut down.




Goldman seems to think Europe has solved its natural gas crisis without Russia. Not exactly good news for a kleptocrat petro-state. Maybe that's why so many prominent Russians have been defenestrated of late.


oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

Lots of interesting info coming out of Ukraine.

First, it looks like pro-Ukrainian sentiment is on the rise in Crimea. The Russian ruler there is looking to go Handmaids Tale style on the population because they no longer feel like they need to pretend to love Mother Russia.



Quote:

Source: Sergey Aksyonov, head of the Russian occupation government in Crimea, on Telegram

Quote from Aksyonov: "Footage from public gatherings that have recently begun to be shared online shows people chanting pro-Ukrainian slogans and singing nationalist songs.
I believe that both the organisers and the participants of such gatherings have to be held responsible and fired; other appropriate law enforcement measures should also be taken.
It would be more rational and logical for those who support the Ukrainian regime to leave [Crimea] for the country that they love so much."

Details: In his video address, Aksyonov clarified that he meant holding people criminally responsible for such actions. He said that residents of Russian-occupied Crimea will be identified based on the footage of the events and fired; their business will be shut down.




Goldman seems to think Europe has solved its natural gas crisis without Russia. Not exactly good news for a kleptocrat petro-state. Maybe that's why so many prominent Russians have been defenestrated of late.





Looks like they are predicting that high natural gas prices are transitory. Was there a gas price reduction act?
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just saw this. Crazy if true and honestly can't imagine how many people are going to fall out of windows in the next few days if so. I wonder if Putin is going to launch a nuke to show Ukraine and the Russiaphones there how much he really cares about them and wants to welcome them into the warm embrace of the new Russia.

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's a pretty bold call by Goldman on the NG market.
Last time I checked, 85% storage levels (this month) equates to 2.5 months of supply during the Winter.

I will believe it when I see it . . . in March.
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
golden sloth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another storyline to follow is the Azerbaijan - Armenia conflict. Russia is usually the defender of Armenia, but with them preoccupied, the nearby petro-state of Azerbaijan invaded Armenia briefly and sparked fighting.

That said, I hope fighting ceases and Azerbaijan does not commit to a full blown invasion.
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why does the tweet below remind me of the logic used,by Trump and his sychophants? Anyway, you can't make this stuff up.

bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ukraine's Astronomers Say There Are Tons of UFOs Over Kyiv


https://www.vice.com/en/article/pkg3nb/ukraines-astronomers-say-there-are-tons-of-ufos-over-kyiv

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chazzed said:

Why does the tweet below remind me of the logic used,by Trump and his sychophants? Anyway, you can't make this stuff up.



"When we invaded their country, they started taking some of it back! Then they stole some of the weapons we left behind!"
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Russian State TV Pundit Says 'Impossible' to Beat Ukraine, Calls for Peace


https://www.newsweek.com/russia-state-tv-peace-talks-ukraine-war-conflict-retreat-counter-offensive-1741956

* When the guys on state tv no longer fear him, it is time for Putin to hire a new food taster.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Russians getting their arse kicked and Ukraine displaying Russian tanks that they've seized for all to see!
Some of the weaponry is being refurbished, repainted with Ukrainian colors and sent back out into the battlefield.



In the aftermath of Ukraine's successful Kharkiv offensive over the past week, fleets of Russian armored vehicles were left abandoned on the battlefield, left behind by Russian troops as they desperately tried to escape the Ukrainian advance. Footage uploaded to social media by victorious Ukrainian troops showed rows of BMP infantry fighting vehicles, neatly parked in the liberated city of Izium, seemingly in near-perfect condition, while T-80U tanks from Russia's elite Fourth Guards Tank Regiment were left abandoned at a maintenance station, in various states of repair.

According to the independent monitor Oryx, which uses publicly available footage to visually confirm Russian and Ukrainian equipment losses, the Ukrainians have captured a minimum of 1,841 pieces of heavy Russian military equipment since the start of the war, including 356 tanks, 606 armored fighting vehicles, and 363 trucks and jeeps. As Oryx only includes equipment that has been visually confirmed as captured, the true total is probably much higher.

"During the early days of the war, a lot of Russian vehicles totally ran out of gas and were abandoned in perfect condition," said Yuri Matsarsky, a soldier in Ukraine's Territorial Defense Forces (TDF), the nation's military reserve. "That's happening less in the last few months. But after Kharkiv, it's picked up again."


Ukrainian soldiers are refurbishing abandoned Russian tanks and trucks (yahoo.com)
"Cults don't end well. They really don't."
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tell someone you love them and try to have a good day
First Page Last Page
Page 51 of 290
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.