The Official Russian Invasion of Ukraine Thread

945,313 Views | 10318 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by 5 Days Until No Joe
BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
At some point without them noticing, libs were told by their cult leaders to love war and they obeyed.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Then why did he agree to concessions in April 2022 peace talks with PM Zelensky and Bennett, including withdrawing from Ukraine, which the US shot down?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Russian economy continues to implode.

Russian companies reporting in the first quarter of this year the biggest shortage of personnel since data collection began in 1998, according to the Russian Central Bank.

The loss of human capital is a disaster for their economy.


That's a pretty contorted way of saying Russia has no unemployment, lulz!

The Russian economy is the best it's been since the early 1900s, they have low inflation, no unemployment and no debt, with very large and growing primary and secondary industrial sectors.

No other country in Europe has this kind of positive economic situation, most countries would kill to have Russia's problem of a labor shortage, something which hasn't happened in Europe since the 1960s.

Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Goldener Bar said:



Here's the problem with your argument

Absent the threat of NATO, Russia has no reason to feel threatened by Ukraine.

Russia faced no threat from Ukraine anyway.

Those are some of the main threats Russia faced from Ukraine:

- A Banderist regime that is fanatically anti-Russian
- A Banderist regime that has stated its intent to develop a nuclear weapons program
- A Banderist regime that wants to reconquer Crimea against the will of Crimeans, and that openly stated that they would ethnically cleanse Crimea, just like they've tried to ethnically cleanse the Donbass.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

DiabloWags said:

Russian economy continues to implode.

Russian companies reporting in the first quarter of this year the biggest shortage of personnel since data collection began in 1998, according to the Russian Central Bank.

The loss of human capital is a disaster for their economy.


That's a pretty contorted way of saying Russia has no unemployment, lulz!

The Russian economy is the best it's been since the early 1900s, they have low inflation, no unemployment and no debt, with very large and growing primary and secondary industrial sectors.

No other country in Europe has this kind of positive economic situation, most countries would kill to have Russia's problem of a labor shortage, something which hasn't happened in Europe since the 1960s.




Pretty bad when your favorite countries economic bragging point is Russia in the early 1900s. A period marked by riots, discontent, and revolution.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Goldener Bar said:



Here's the problem with your argument

Absent the threat of NATO, Russia has no reason to feel threatened by Ukraine.

Russia faced no threat from Ukraine anyway.

Those are some of the main threats Russia faced from Ukraine:

- A Banderist regime that is fanatically anti-Russian
- A Banderist regime that has stated its intent to develop a nuclear weapons program
- A Banderist regime that wants to reconquer Crimea against the will of Crimeans, and that openly stated that they would ethnically cleanse Crimea, just like they've tried to ethnically cleanse the Donbass.

Wow, Zelenskyy promised to do all that before the war?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Goldener Bar said:



Here's the problem with your argument

Absent the threat of NATO, Russia has no reason to feel threatened by Ukraine.

Russia faced no threat from Ukraine anyway.

Those are some of the main threats Russia faced from Ukraine:

- A Banderist regime that is fanatically anti-Russian
- A Banderist regime that has stated its intent to develop a nuclear weapons program
- A Banderist regime that wants to reconquer Crimea against the will of Crimeans, and that openly stated that they would ethnically cleanse Crimea, just like they've tried to ethnically cleanse the Donbass.

Wow, Zelenskyy promised to do all that before the war?

1- The Kiev regime is permeated with a fundamentally white supremacist, neo-nazi ideology that regards Russians and other minorities (Hungarians) as racially inferior 2nd class citizens. Nazi SS leader Bandera is widely regarded as the father of their twisted nation.




2- Zelensky and other Kiev officials like deputy foreign minister Melnik have openly stated that they intend to acquire nuclear weapons:

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/4/16/ukraine-may-seek-nuclear-weapons-if-left-out-of-nato-diplomat

https://www.indianarrative.com/world-news/ukraines-president-zelensky-hints-at-developing-nuclear-weapons-after-nato-declares-it-will-not-confront-russia-32759.html

They have the material and know-how to build nuclear bombs.

3- High level Kiev officials have stated that after they reconquer Crimea, they will ethnically cleanse its Russian majority/ Here is a recent video of the head of Kievian military intelligence, Kirill Budanov, stating that he will "physically eliminate" Russian Crimean after his forces conquer Crimea:



Ironically, it is Budanov that might have been physically eliminated two weeks ago by a Russian missile that went right through the window of an office right next to his in the headquarters of Ukrainian military intelligence.



Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:


If you would just listen to the propaganda Russia wants you to hear you would see everything is going great in Russia. Their manufacturing sector is taking off and they now make the most advanced small FPV drones in the world.

Ooops



I've just showed you a collage of about $500,000 worth of Lancet drones destroying $400,000,000 worth of NATO/Ukrainian military equipment, undisputable physical proof of the devastating power of that drone system, which is being proven on the battlefield as the best in the world today.

Here it is again:


You come back with stories about a trade show told by a deep state/US MIC tool about how Russian drones are a sham. That guy, Sam Bendett, a lawyer with a bachelors of arts and zero technical expertise, is the prototypical MIC talking head who makes a mid-six figure salary by lying to a gullible public.


Quote:

Quote:

But you can tell by what's really going on that Putin has moved onto Plan B in Ukraine which was always his ultimate aim - destroy Ukraine and ensure there is no economic competition. That's why Russia blew up the dam and is using its artillery not for military gain but to wreak as much havoc as possible across Ukraine. A destroyed Ukraine has always been the end game. Just like Ellsberg showed that "bombing the ****" out of Vietnam didn't endear us to Vietnamese, Russia's destruction of Ukraine is not intended to benefit the Russian minority he pretends to care about. Adding Ukraine to Russian territory would have been a feather in his cap, but Putin will be perfectly happy to just eliminate Ukraine altogether.




The bulk of your ideologically-driven, irrational low-grade wartime propaganda consists of projection, and this here is a prime example. It is not the Russians that are using depleted uranium shells, it is the US and UK that are supplying these dirty bombs that will poison the region for centuries. The reason they are doing this is that they now know that Russia will reabsorb these regions.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You're confusing him with facts. The dirty munitions... not a UN violation? Where is the noble West?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

DiabloWags said:

Russian economy continues to implode.

Russian companies reporting in the first quarter of this year the biggest shortage of personnel since data collection began in 1998, according to the Russian Central Bank.

The loss of human capital is a disaster for their economy.


That's a pretty contorted way of saying Russia has no unemployment, lulz!

The Russian economy is the best it's been since the early 1900s, they have low inflation, no unemployment and no debt, with very large and growing primary and secondary industrial sectors.

No other country in Europe has this kind of positive economic situation, most countries would kill to have Russia's problem of a labor shortage, something which hasn't happened in Europe since the 1960s.


Pretty bad when your favorite countries economic bragging point is Russia in the early 1900s. A period marked by riots, discontent, and revolution.

Russia was a rising economic power in the pre-WW1 era. Much like Germany, which industrialized well after Britain only to surpass it, Russia industrialized even later, and started to reach its potential, which was even higher than Germany's. By 1900, Russia dominated the world agricultural market, accounting for about 1/3 of global wheat exports, which dispels the notion of Russians masses starving.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0014498398907069

Quote:

Abstract

Russian grain trade, production, and consumption during the Tsarist period (18611914) is empirically evaluated. Russia was the world's largest wheat exporter during this period. Tsarist Russian agriculture is often characterized in the literature as having been "backward" and not well-integrated with international markets. In contrast to this view, this analysis finds that the Russian grain trade was significantly influenced by international prices and was well-integrated with the international commercial wheat trade. Our results indicate that after 1880 regional wheat markets in Russia were linked and that a strong connection had been established between Russian ports and cities at the center of the world wheat trade.


Russia also was at the forefront of scientific research, with scientists like Mendeleyev, Chebychev, Stoletov etc

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Russian_scientists

The social disturbances that Russia experienced in the 1900 are very similar to those that France experienced in the late 1960s with the color revolution of May 68. Back then France was the 3rd largest world economy and industrial power, producing the best airplanes, trains, nuclear powerplants in the world, with no debt or unemployment.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

You're confusing him with facts. The dirty munitions... not a UN violation? Where is the noble West?


Russia actually has a huge stockpile of depleted uranium shells they've built during the late soviet era and the 90s. They decided to mothball that stockpile after it became clear in Yugoslavia and Iraq that this ammunition is extremely toxic, resulting in high rates of cancers and unimaginably horrific birth defects. That's the legacy NATO and the US have left in those countries. And now they are pushing these toxic weapons in Ukraine...

"Doctors are regularly encountering anomalies in babies that are so gruesome they cannot even find precedents for them."
https://theintercept.com/2019/11/25/iraq-children-birth-defects-military/

sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Goldener Bar said:



Here's the problem with your argument

Absent the threat of NATO, Russia has no reason to feel threatened by Ukraine.

Russia faced no threat from Ukraine anyway.

Those are some of the main threats Russia faced from Ukraine:

- A Banderist regime that is fanatically anti-Russian
- A Banderist regime that has stated its intent to develop a nuclear weapons program
- A Banderist regime that wants to reconquer Crimea against the will of Crimeans, and that openly stated that they would ethnically cleanse Crimea, just like they've tried to ethnically cleanse the Donbass.

Wow, Zelenskyy promised to do all that before the war?

1- The Kiev regime is permeated with a fundamentally white supremacist, neo-nazi ideology that regards Russians and other minorities (Hungarians) as racially inferior 2nd class citizens. Nazi SS leader Bandera is widely regarded as the father of their twisted nation.




2- Zelensky and other Kiev officials like deputy foreign minister Melnik have openly stated that they intend to acquire nuclear weapons:

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/4/16/ukraine-may-seek-nuclear-weapons-if-left-out-of-nato-diplomat

https://www.indianarrative.com/world-news/ukraines-president-zelensky-hints-at-developing-nuclear-weapons-after-nato-declares-it-will-not-confront-russia-32759.html

They have the material and know-how to build nuclear bombs.
Thank you for confirming that the Ukrainian government ONLY started talking about developing nuclear weapons or reconquering Crimea AFTER the Russian invasion of the mainland. Yet another example of Russia creating its own problems and then retroactively blaming everyone else.

As for the neo-nazi parties in Ukraine, they won zero seats in the parliament during Zelenskyy's last election and were little more than a fringe political element there (not dissimilar from other European countries who all have their own far-right nationalist elements). Again, if anything it's Russia's invasion that has strengthened their hand, as their militias have been seen as necessary for the fight.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

DiabloWags said:

Russian economy continues to implode.

Russian companies reporting in the first quarter of this year the biggest shortage of personnel since data collection began in 1998, according to the Russian Central Bank.

The loss of human capital is a disaster for their economy.


That's a pretty contorted way of saying Russia has no unemployment, lulz!

The Russian economy is the best it's been since the early 1900s, they have low inflation, no unemployment and no debt, with very large and growing primary and secondary industrial sectors.

No other country in Europe has this kind of positive economic situation, most countries would kill to have Russia's problem of a labor shortage, something which hasn't happened in Europe since the 1960s.


Pretty bad when your favorite countries economic bragging point is Russia in the early 1900s. A period marked by riots, discontent, and revolution.

Russia was a rising economic power in the pre-WW1 era. Much like Germany, which industrialized well after Britain only to surpass it, Russia industrialized even later, and started to reach its potential, which was even higher than Germany's. By 1900, Russia dominated the world agricultural market, accounting for about 1/3 of global wheat exports, which dispels the notion of Russians masses starving.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0014498398907069

Quote:

Abstract

Russian grain trade, production, and consumption during the Tsarist period (18611914) is empirically evaluated. Russia was the world's largest wheat exporter during this period. Tsarist Russian agriculture is often characterized in the literature as having been "backward" and not well-integrated with international markets. In contrast to this view, this analysis finds that the Russian grain trade was significantly influenced by international prices and was well-integrated with the international commercial wheat trade. Our results indicate that after 1880 regional wheat markets in Russia were linked and that a strong connection had been established between Russian ports and cities at the center of the world wheat trade.


Russia also was at the forefront of scientific research, with scientists like Mendeleyev, Chebychev, Stoletov etc

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Russian_scientists

The social disturbances that Russia experienced in the 1900 are very similar to those that France experienced in the late 1960s with the color revolution of May 68. Back then France was the 3rd largest world economy and industrial power, producing the best airplanes, trains, nuclear powerplants in the world, with no debt or unemployment.


Famine was common because the Tsar taxed peasant grain production for export to prop up his costly regime. With its industrialization, pre WWI Russia should have been a success. But, as typical for Russia, it's backward authoritarian government made it fail.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Russia has great natural resources, abundant energy, an educated population, and now a growing relationship with China. It seems one Achilles heel is their low birth rate.

It looks like they've altered that trajectory some. I've wondered why they don't implement a major family initiative to get TFR above 2.1 (replacement level). Given their large land holdings, they could provide aggressively discounted homes for families with 3 children, and add even more perks for 4 or more children. A month paid vacation, free family vacation, etc.

If (when) they secure Eastern Ukraine, that will require significant investment, as will continued military expenditures.

What is their stance on immigration? They could lure Latinos - who share a similiar religion. Then there are increasing ties to India and China. They could also move to take some of the high-end industrial manufacturing that will leave Germany due to Green New Deal
policies.

Are the Russian mafias still strong?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearHunter said:

At some point without them noticing, libs were told by their cult leaders to love war and they obeyed.


You love a TRAITOR who tried to defy the U.S. Constitution and incited a riot on our Capitol on January 6th.

That's who YOU are.




Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

DiabloWags said:

Russian economy continues to implode.

Russian companies reporting in the first quarter of this year the biggest shortage of personnel since data collection began in 1998, according to the Russian Central Bank.

The loss of human capital is a disaster for their economy.


That's a pretty contorted way of saying Russia has no unemployment, lulz!

The Russian economy is the best it's been since the early 1900s, they have low inflation, no unemployment and no debt, with very large and growing primary and secondary industrial sectors.

No other country in Europe has this kind of positive economic situation, most countries would kill to have Russia's problem of a labor shortage, something which hasn't happened in Europe since the 1960s.


Pretty bad when your favorite countries economic bragging point is Russia in the early 1900s. A period marked by riots, discontent, and revolution.

Russia was a rising economic power in the pre-WW1 era. Much like Germany, which industrialized well after Britain only to surpass it, Russia industrialized even later, and started to reach its potential, which was even higher than Germany's. By 1900, Russia dominated the world agricultural market, accounting for about 1/3 of global wheat exports, which dispels the notion of Russians masses starving.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0014498398907069

Quote:

Abstract

Russian grain trade, production, and consumption during the Tsarist period (18611914) is empirically evaluated. Russia was the world's largest wheat exporter during this period. Tsarist Russian agriculture is often characterized in the literature as having been "backward" and not well-integrated with international markets. In contrast to this view, this analysis finds that the Russian grain trade was significantly influenced by international prices and was well-integrated with the international commercial wheat trade. Our results indicate that after 1880 regional wheat markets in Russia were linked and that a strong connection had been established between Russian ports and cities at the center of the world wheat trade.


Russia also was at the forefront of scientific research, with scientists like Mendeleyev, Chebychev, Stoletov etc

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Russian_scientists

The social disturbances that Russia experienced in the 1900 are very similar to those that France experienced in the late 1960s with the color revolution of May 68. Back then France was the 3rd largest world economy and industrial power, producing the best airplanes, trains, nuclear powerplants in the world, with no debt or unemployment.


Famine was common because the Tsar taxed peasant grain production for export to prop up his costly regime. With its industrialization, pre WWI Russia should have been a success. But, as typical for Russia, it's backward authoritarian government made it fail.

Starving pre-war Russian peasants is a popular image conveyed by western propaganda going way back two centuries ago, part of the economic rivalry between the global sea power (UK until WW1 then US) and the main land powers (Germany, Russia and now China).

Russia could not dominate the world wheat market in the 1900s without a modern infrastructure (rail, silos, ports, fleet etc). The Soviets whose symbol was the hammer and sickle ironically severely curtailed both Russian agricultural and industrial outputs, having culled their learned class and kulaks by the millions, using starvation as a domestic weapon against their people. It is not until Putin rebuilt their infrastructure and modernized their domestic harvesting equipment in the late 90s that Russia again became the dominant force in the world wheat market, much like it was in 1900.

dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

DiabloWags said:

Russian economy continues to implode.

Russian companies reporting in the first quarter of this year the biggest shortage of personnel since data collection began in 1998, according to the Russian Central Bank.

The loss of human capital is a disaster for their economy.


That's a pretty contorted way of saying Russia has no unemployment, lulz!

The Russian economy is the best it's been since the early 1900s, they have low inflation, no unemployment and no debt, with very large and growing primary and secondary industrial sectors.

No other country in Europe has this kind of positive economic situation, most countries would kill to have Russia's problem of a labor shortage, something which hasn't happened in Europe since the 1960s.


Pretty bad when your favorite countries economic bragging point is Russia in the early 1900s. A period marked by riots, discontent, and revolution.

Russia was a rising economic power in the pre-WW1 era. Much like Germany, which industrialized well after Britain only to surpass it, Russia industrialized even later, and started to reach its potential, which was even higher than Germany's. By 1900, Russia dominated the world agricultural market, accounting for about 1/3 of global wheat exports, which dispels the notion of Russians masses starving.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0014498398907069

Quote:

Abstract

Russian grain trade, production, and consumption during the Tsarist period (18611914) is empirically evaluated. Russia was the world's largest wheat exporter during this period. Tsarist Russian agriculture is often characterized in the literature as having been "backward" and not well-integrated with international markets. In contrast to this view, this analysis finds that the Russian grain trade was significantly influenced by international prices and was well-integrated with the international commercial wheat trade. Our results indicate that after 1880 regional wheat markets in Russia were linked and that a strong connection had been established between Russian ports and cities at the center of the world wheat trade.


Russia also was at the forefront of scientific research, with scientists like Mendeleyev, Chebychev, Stoletov etc

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Russian_scientists

The social disturbances that Russia experienced in the 1900 are very similar to those that France experienced in the late 1960s with the color revolution of May 68. Back then France was the 3rd largest world economy and industrial power, producing the best airplanes, trains, nuclear powerplants in the world, with no debt or unemployment.


Famine was common because the Tsar taxed peasant grain production for export to prop up his costly regime. With its industrialization, pre WWI Russia should have been a success. But, as typical for Russia, it's backward authoritarian government made it fail.

Starving pre-war Russian peasants is a popular image conveyed by western propaganda going way back two centuries ago, part of the economic rivalry between the global sea power (UK until WW1 then US) and the main land powers (Germany, Russia and now China).

Russia could not dominate the world wheat market in the 1900s without a modern infrastructure (rail, silos, ports, fleet etc). The Soviets whose symbol was the hammer and sickle ironically severely curtailed both Russian agricultural and industrial outputs, having culled their learned class and kulaks by the millions, using starvation as a domestic weapon against their people. It is not until Putin rebuilt their infrastructure and modernized their domestic harvesting equipment in the late 90s that Russia again became the dominant force in the world wheat market, much like it was in 1900.




There is a reason why starving pre war peasants is a popular image
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:



Wow, Zelenskyy promised to do all that before the war?

1- The Kiev regime is permeated with a fundamentally white supremacist, neo-nazi ideology that regards Russians and other minorities (Hungarians) as racially inferior 2nd class citizens. Nazi SS leader Bandera is widely regarded as the father of their twisted nation.

2- Zelensky and other Kiev officials like deputy foreign minister Melnik have openly stated that they intend to acquire nuclear weapons:

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/4/16/ukraine-may-seek-nuclear-weapons-if-left-out-of-nato-diplomat

https://www.indianarrative.com/world-news/ukraines-president-zelensky-hints-at-developing-nuclear-weapons-after-nato-declares-it-will-not-confront-russia-32759.html

They have the material and know-how to build nuclear bombs.
Thank you for confirming that the Ukrainian government ONLY started talking about developing nuclear weapons or reconquering Crimea AFTER the Russian invasion of the mainland. Yet another example of Russia creating its own problems and then retroactively blaming everyone else.

As for the neo-nazi parties in Ukraine, they won zero seats in the parliament during Zelenskyy's last election and were little more than a fringe political element there (not dissimilar from other European countries who all have their own far-right nationalist elements). Again, if anything it's Russia's invasion that has strengthened their hand, as their militias have been seen as necessary for the fight.

The first link above about Zelensky stating they want nukes is from April 2021, 10 months before the Russian invasion.

I guess you haven't had your coffee yet.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:




Starving pre-war Russian peasants is a popular image conveyed by western propaganda going way back two centuries ago, part of the economic rivalry between the global sea power (UK until WW1 then US) and the main land powers (Germany, Russia and now China).

Russia could not dominate the world wheat market in the 1900s without a modern infrastructure (rail, silos, ports, fleet etc). The Soviets whose symbol was the hammer and sickle ironically severely curtailed both Russian agricultural and industrial outputs, having culled their learned class and kulaks by the millions, using starvation as a domestic weapon against their people. It is not until Putin rebuilt their infrastructure and modernized their domestic harvesting equipment in the late 90s that Russia again became the dominant force in the world wheat market, much like it was in 1900.




There is a reason why starving pre war peasants is a popular image

And that reason is mainly based on propaganda, from the same folks that popularized the image of German Huns bayonetting babies in Belgium to prompt British and US participation in WW1.



A century later, Ukraine has produced very similar material, the same level of low-grade wartime propaganda, with one of their officials concocting stories of mass rapes of children and babies by Russian troops. She was so over the top with her baby rape stories that she had to resign:



https://babel.ua/en/news/80573-ue-investigation-former-ombudswoman-lyudmila-denisova-told-fictional-stories-about-rape-to-help-ukraine
Quote:

Quote:
UE investigation: Former ombudswoman Lyudmila Denisova told fictional stories about rape to "help Ukraine"
Date:11:38, 27 june 2022

Former Verkhovna Rada Commissioner for Human Rights Lyudmila Denisova, while in office, made up scary stories about the rape of children by the Russian occupiers.
This conclusion was reached by Ukrayinska Pravda during its own investigation, which was published on June 27. The publication told the non-public side of Denisovas release.

...During the interrogation, as Ukrainian Pravda found out, Denisova admitted to the police that she had heard stories from her daughter, and she told that she told them to her mother "over a cup of tea", and Denisova allegedly explained that she told terrible stories because she wanted to win for Ukraine.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Reminder that Russian propaganda is only fooling fools. Obviously this will be met with a fury of (ignored) propaganda but you guys are either smart enough to decide for yourself what to trust or you are super dumb and believe the low-grade Russian propaganda which I would assume the usual suspects continue to flood the zone with.



The internal fight between Prigozhin and Shoigu continues. Apparently Prigozhin delivered a contract to subordinate the Russian military to Wagner. It's hilarious but also would likely actually help Russia. The vast majority of Russian progress has been delivered by Wagner. Apart from the initial surge (which was largely a debacle), Russia has done virtually nothing over the last 16 months that wasn't driven by Wagner.



More info on the continuing situation in Belgorod, and Russia's propaganda first strategy.



Of course, rather than actually helping Russian citizens, they are just taking over their homes and looting them. We haven't had much use for the third amendment in this country, but it looks like Russian citizens sure could benefit from it, I mean if Putin actually cared about the rule of law.



Apparently Russia's destruction of the KHPP dam has continued to erode the perception of this dumb war on municipal leaders within Russia.



Russian sources acknowledging that Ukraine's electronic warfare is having an impact.



Ukraine has anti-mine robots in the field now.



More evidence that Russia's primary goal is really to destroy Ukraine and make it uninhabitable. They're not doing anything to protect ethnic Russians, that's just a fantasy they spread to fool fools.



Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Russia has great natural resources, abundant energy, an educated population, and now a growing relationship with China. It seems one Achilles heel is their low birth rate.

It looks like they've altered that trajectory some. I've wondered why they don't implement a major family initiative to get TFR above 2.1 (replacement level). Given their large land holdings, they could provide aggressively discounted homes for families with 3 children, and add even more perks for 4 or more children. A month paid vacation, free family vacation, etc.

If (when) they secure Eastern Ukraine, that will require significant investment, as will continued military expenditures.

What is their stance on immigration? They could lure Latinos - who share a similiar religion. Then there are increasing ties to India and China. They could also move to take some of the high-end industrial manufacturing that will leave Germany due to Green New Deal
policies.

Are the Russian mafias still strong?

The Russians have had some success addressing their demographic issues, both through economic incentives, but also through a skillful PR campaign targeted at young women, using local female influencers and popular media to portray family life and raising kids as highly rewarding and enjoyable pursuits, the opposite messaging as that aimed at young western women.

The reason why demographies are collapsing in much of the West and industrialized world is twofold, cultural and economic. Cultural because young women are told that their career is what really defines them, and family life is a burden towards career goals, and that mating is for sexual gratification rather than building a family. Sex Ed teaches them about orgasms and G-spots, but they don't learn basic reproduction facts like that by age 30 they will have used up 90% of their eggs. The cubicle warrior corporate career woman is glorified, while homemakers are denigrated.

The other main reason for the demographic collapse is economic, households today need two incomes to provide the basic necessities that one income did for a family up to a few decades ago. Part of the reason for this is that women flooding the labor market starting in the 1970s/80s ended up deflating salaries.

There is a "local" immigration flow in Russia from central Asian former Soviet republics, though that flow is far smaller than that in Europe or the US.

The mafias in Russia has been largely defanged, along with the political power of oligarchs. Homicide rates have plummeted. You're less likely to get mugged in Moscow or St Petersburg today than in NYC, SF, London, Stockholm or Paris.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:




Starving pre-war Russian peasants is a popular image conveyed by western propaganda going way back two centuries ago, part of the economic rivalry between the global sea power (UK until WW1 then US) and the main land powers (Germany, Russia and now China).

Russia could not dominate the world wheat market in the 1900s without a modern infrastructure (rail, silos, ports, fleet etc). The Soviets whose symbol was the hammer and sickle ironically severely curtailed both Russian agricultural and industrial outputs, having culled their learned class and kulaks by the millions, using starvation as a domestic weapon against their people. It is not until Putin rebuilt their infrastructure and modernized their domestic harvesting equipment in the late 90s that Russia again became the dominant force in the world wheat market, much like it was in 1900.




There is a reason why starving pre war peasants is a popular image

And that reason is mainly based on propaganda, from the same folks that popularized the image of German Huns bayonetting babies in Belgium to prompt British and US participation in WW1.



A century later, Ukraine has produced very similar material, the same level of low-grade wartime propaganda, with one of their officials concocting stories of mass rapes of children and babies by Russian troops. She was so over the top with her baby rape stories that she had to resign:



https://babel.ua/en/news/80573-ue-investigation-former-ombudswoman-lyudmila-denisova-told-fictional-stories-about-rape-to-help-ukraine
Quote:

Quote:
UE investigation: Former ombudswoman Lyudmila Denisova told fictional stories about rape to "help Ukraine"
Date:11:38, 27 june 2022

Former Verkhovna Rada Commissioner for Human Rights Lyudmila Denisova, while in office, made up scary stories about the rape of children by the Russian occupiers.
This conclusion was reached by Ukrayinska Pravda during its own investigation, which was published on June 27. The publication told the non-public side of Denisovas release.

...During the interrogation, as Ukrainian Pravda found out, Denisova admitted to the police that she had heard stories from her daughter, and she told that she told them to her mother "over a cup of tea", and Denisova allegedly explained that she told terrible stories because she wanted to win for Ukraine.



You're propaganda isn't even worth responding to. You're a joke.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:



There is a reason why starving pre war peasants is a popular image

And that reason is mainly based on propaganda, from the same folks that popularized the image of German Huns bayonetting babies in Belgium to prompt British and US participation in WW1.



A century later, Ukraine has produced very similar material, the same level of low-grade wartime propaganda, with one of their officials concocting stories of mass rapes of children and babies by Russian troops. She was so over the top with her baby rape stories that she had to resign:



https://babel.ua/en/news/80573-ue-investigation-former-ombudswoman-lyudmila-denisova-told-fictional-stories-about-rape-to-help-ukraine
Quote:

Quote:
UE investigation: Former ombudswoman Lyudmila Denisova told fictional stories about rape to "help Ukraine"
Date:11:38, 27 june 2022

Former Verkhovna Rada Commissioner for Human Rights Lyudmila Denisova, while in office, made up scary stories about the rape of children by the Russian occupiers.
This conclusion was reached by Ukrayinska Pravda during its own investigation, which was published on June 27. The publication told the non-public side of Denisovas release.

...During the interrogation, as Ukrainian Pravda found out, Denisova admitted to the police that she had heard stories from her daughter, and she told that she told them to her mother "over a cup of tea", and Denisova allegedly explained that she told terrible stories because she wanted to win for Ukraine.



You're propaganda isn't even worth responding to. You're a joke.

I've provided clear answers supported by documents and facts, like how Denisova, the official Ukrainian congress human right commissioner was fired not for making up stories, but for those stories being too over the top and thus hurting the credibility of the Ukraine narrative, to which you have no answers.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Apparently up to one million Tajiks a year are immigrating to Russia, but then there is also an outflow.

Young American women also saw Hollywood stars in their 30s and 40s having children, so think this is normal. They're uneducated on basic fertility, not knowing many of these women had surrogates, or spent tens of thousands on fertility treatments. 60 Minutes had a segment on this decades ago, and Ivy League coeds were Clueless.

Dr. Jordan Peterson has highlighted this - how women quickly learn that the corporate jungle isn't as rewarding as family life.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:

Cal88 said:

dajo9 said:



There is a reason why starving pre war peasants is a popular image

And that reason is mainly based on propaganda, from the same folks that popularized the image of German Huns bayonetting babies in Belgium to prompt British and US participation in WW1.



A century later, Ukraine has produced very similar material, the same level of low-grade wartime propaganda, with one of their officials concocting stories of mass rapes of children and babies by Russian troops. She was so over the top with her baby rape stories that she had to resign:



https://babel.ua/en/news/80573-ue-investigation-former-ombudswoman-lyudmila-denisova-told-fictional-stories-about-rape-to-help-ukraine
Quote:

Quote:
UE investigation: Former ombudswoman Lyudmila Denisova told fictional stories about rape to "help Ukraine"
Date:11:38, 27 june 2022

Former Verkhovna Rada Commissioner for Human Rights Lyudmila Denisova, while in office, made up scary stories about the rape of children by the Russian occupiers.
This conclusion was reached by Ukrayinska Pravda during its own investigation, which was published on June 27. The publication told the non-public side of Denisovas release.

...During the interrogation, as Ukrainian Pravda found out, Denisova admitted to the police that she had heard stories from her daughter, and she told that she told them to her mother "over a cup of tea", and Denisova allegedly explained that she told terrible stories because she wanted to win for Ukraine.



You're propaganda isn't even worth responding to. You're a joke.

I've provided clear answers supported by documents and facts, like how Denisova, the official Ukrainian congress human right commissioner was fired not for making up stories, but for those stories being too over the top and thus hurting the credibility of the Ukraine narrative, to which you have no answers.


The conversation we are having is about early 1900s Russia. The rest is a conversation you are having with yourself. Early 1900s Russia was so prosperous they had 2 attempted revolutions - 1 of them successful. Famines are documented by Russians and non Russians alike all over the internet. But you want to play pretend that the feckless Tsar was busy building the next Germany.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

Reminder that Russian propaganda is only fooling fools. Obviously this will be met with a fury of (ignored) propaganda but you guys are either smart enough to decide for yourself what to trust or you are super dumb and believe the low-grade Russian propaganda which I would assume the usual suspects continue to flood the zone with.

The internal fight between Prigozhin and Shoigu continues. Apparently Prigozhin delivered a contract to subordinate the Russian military to Wagner. It's hilarious but also would likely actually help Russia. The vast majority of Russian progress has been delivered by Wagner. Apart from the initial surge (which was largely a debacle), Russia has done virtually nothing over the last 16 months that wasn't driven by Wagner.

More info on the continuing situation in Belgorod, and Russia's propaganda first strategy.

Of course, rather than actually helping Russian citizens, they are just taking over their homes and looting them. We haven't had much use for the third amendment in this country, but it looks like Russian citizens sure could benefit from it, I mean if Putin actually cared about the rule of law.

Apparently Russia's destruction of the KHPP dam has continued to erode the perception of this dumb war on municipal leaders within Russia.

Russian sources acknowledging that Ukraine's electronic warfare is having an impact.

Ukraine has anti-mine robots in the field now.

More evidence that Russia's primary goal is really to destroy Ukraine and make it uninhabitable. They're not doing anything to protect ethnic Russians, that's just a fantasy they spread to fool fools.


Projection is the name of your game, not just within the content you post, but also in your posting pattern, you're the one here who is "flooding the zone" here. taking up a lot of debate real estate, posting expansive piecemeal disjointed tweets on disparate topics.

Here's a quick takedown of your weak points above:

-Ukraine is GETTING ABSOLUTELY CRUSHED this month, on every front. Their much ballyhooed Spring Counter-Offensive has been an abject failure so far, that's why we've been hearing very little about this offensive lately...

Ukraine has lost nearly 8,000 troops in the first 2 weeks of this offensive, and somewhere between a quarter to a third of their much touted new NATO equipment, including Leopard A26s. All this without making a dent into the 4 layer-deep Russian defensive fortifications.

Between the drones picking off tanks, SAM batteries etc 50km deep into Ukrainian lines, KA-52 attack helicopters picking off columns of advancing APVs and tanks from 8km-10km out, and the ever-present large scale artillery, the Russians have had no problem eviscerating all Ukrainian incursion attempts so far.



And it is not Wagner that is destroying Ukrainian forces now, it is the regular Russian army. Wagner's role so far has been largely confined to conducting urban warfare, where they are specialists. Look for them to lead the upcoming battles of Sloviansk-Kramatorsk later this year, the last remaining urban centers in the Donbass front.

- The Belgorod infiltrations have been conducted by a mix of Russian neo-nazi exiles (even the NYT and other MSM agree with the assessment, I will simply refer you to the ADL file on their leader Nikitin) and NATO mercs who somehow don't mind fighting alongside bona fide neo-nazis. While these incursions have been limited in scope, their PR impact within Russia has fortified popular support for the war. And it is the renegade neo-nazi NATO proxies who have been doing the looting and indiscriminate killing of civilians there, not the Russian soldiers.

- The areas flooded by the dam are mostly on the lower-lying Russian left bank, and the destruction of the dam jeopardizes Crimea's water supply. But you know, Russians are like this, they love bombing their own infrastructure for ****s and giggles.

-The Russians have used a sophisticated long-range remote mining system dubbed "Agriculture" to seed areas behind Ukrainian tank and APV columns with mines, cutting off their retreat. That's one of the reason they've managed to destroy these columns.



Quote:

Russian forces have been observed using the ISDM Zemledeliye (which in Russian means "Agriculture") mine-laying system in Ukraine, marking the system's combat debut. Video circulating on social media since 27 March, shows two Zemledeliye mine-laying MLRS allegedly being deployed in Kharkiv Oblast. It can be used in defense and offense. In defense to block the enemy's advance and in offense to block retreat and/or channel the enemy into the desired killing zone. The mines launched by this system are programmable, meaning they can be deactivated or self-destructed in the future with the cessation of hostilities.
https://militaryleak.com/2022/03/31/russian-isdm-zemledeliye-mine-laying-system-makes-combat-debut-in-ukraine/

- Ukraine's electronic warfare system are mostly leftover Soviet systems that the Russians have had no problem containing or destroying via drones. Part of the reason the power turns off after every salvo of Russian missiles. Russian EW on the other hand is now recognized as the best in the world.

"Russia's Electronic-Warfare Troops Knocked Out 90 Percent Of Ukraine's Drones" - FORBES
https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2022/12/24/russia-electronic-warfare-troops-knocked-out-90-percent-of-ukraines-drones/?sh=32117e30575c

"Efficiency of Russian electronic warfare complicating Ukraine's counteroffensive ISW"
https://news.yahoo.com/efficiency-russian-electronic-warfare-complicating-024255882.html
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We are seeing in real time the difference between MIC propagandists like General Patreus, who boldly predicted that the Russian defenses would unravel and get rolled due to the Ukrainains' superior 2 month NATO training and NATO equipment like the Leopards and Bradleys, versus the predictions made by military experts like Colonel MacGregor, who predicted that the Ukrainian columns in the open field would get crushed by Russian air power, artillery and drone attacks:



Quote:

3 Jun 202305.26 EDT The Guardian
Ukraine's counteroffensive will be 'very impressive' - Gen Petraeus
Gen David Petraeus has said Ukraine's counteroffensive is "very impressive" and can succeed, adding that the Ukrainians are "determined to liberate their country".

Petraeus, who was director of the CIA and led international forces in Iraq and Afghanistan before that, has been in Kyiv recently, meeting President Zelenskiy and others.

David Petraeus spoke about the situation in Ukraine to BBC Radio 4's Today programme.
On the counteroffensive, he said:
Quote:

I think that this counteroffensive is going to be very impressive.
My sense is that they will achieve combined arms effects in other words, they will successfully carry out combined arms operations where you have engineers that are breaching the obstacles and diffusing the minefields and so forth; armour following right on through protected by infantry against anti-tank missiles; air defence keeping the Russians aircraft off them; electronic warfare jamming their radio networks; logistics right up behind them; artillery and mortars right out in front of them.
And most important of all … is that as the lead elements inevitably culminate after 72-96 hours, physically that's about as far as you can go, and they'll have taken losses … you have follow-on units that will push right on through and capitalise on the progress and maintain the momentum and I think that can get the entire Russian defence in that area moving, then I think you have other opportunities that will open up on the flanks as well.




movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Betraeus, who gave classified documents to his young mistress.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Betraeus, who gave classified documents to his young mistress.


The moniker General Betray Us was made famous by liberal group moveon.org. Conservatives and Republicans alike attacked the use of the phrase. But here's a great quote from liberal Eli Pariser, Executive Director of moveon.org that foretold the future.

"The reason moderate Republicans will eventually abandon Bush on the war is that they'll have no choice. Voters will either vote them out or they'll abandon ship on the war."
https://www.npr.org/2007/09/22/14623512/anger-over-betray-us-ad-simmers-on-hill

In response to the use of the phrase General Betray Us, Trump ally, Rudy Giuliani took out a full page ad in the NY Times saying, "the Democrats orchestrated attack on General Petraeus ".
https://www.salon.com/2007/09/14/giuliani_5/

After leading the nation out of Iraq, Democrats followed up by getting us out of Afghanistan. Both wars we got into during Republican Administrations. I wonder how it feels to always be on the wrong side of history.
Goldener Bar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

Reminder that Russian propaganda is only fooling fools. Obviously this will be met with a fury of (ignored) propaganda but you guys are either smart enough to decide for yourself what to trust or you are super dumb and believe the low-grade Russian propaganda which I would assume the usual suspects continue to flood the zone with.



The internal fight between Prigozhin and Shoigu continues. Apparently Prigozhin delivered a contract to subordinate the Russian military to Wagner. It's hilarious but also would likely actually help Russia. The vast majority of Russian progress has been delivered by Wagner. Apart from the initial surge (which was largely a debacle), Russia has done virtually nothing over the last 16 months that wasn't driven by Wagner.



More info on the continuing situation in Belgorod, and Russia's propaganda first strategy.



Of course, rather than actually helping Russian citizens, they are just taking over their homes and looting them. We haven't had much use for the third amendment in this country, but it looks like Russian citizens sure could benefit from it, I mean if Putin actually cared about the rule of law.



Apparently Russia's destruction of the KHPP dam has continued to erode the perception of this dumb war on municipal leaders within Russia.



Russian sources acknowledging that Ukraine's electronic warfare is having an impact.



Ukraine has anti-mine robots in the field now.



More evidence that Russia's primary goal is really to destroy Ukraine and make it uninhabitable. They're not doing anything to protect ethnic Russians, that's just a fantasy they spread to fool fools.


Firehose of falsehoods
Goldener Bar
How long do you want to ignore this user?

BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

How Russia is winning the war - the Lancet drone:

The Lancet is a homemade loitering drone program which the Russians perfected during the war. It is the most efficient drone system in the world today, with a range of up to 70km and capable of destroying fast-moving vehicles. It is mass-produced in a giant plant with a unit cost around $10k - $15k.

In the 9min compilation above, the Russians destroyed nearly half a billion dollars' worth of equipment at a cost of less than a million $'s worth of Lancets. This weapon system is one of the reasons Russia is winning the war of attrition.

Are there any defenses against the Russian Lancet drone? Doesn't Ukraine have similar capabilities against Russian assets on the ground? I don't see a future in tank warfare with these things flying around in the air. Poland is buying hundreds of tanks and howitzers from South Korea after donating their own equipment to Ukraine.
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Kremlin decides that goal to "demilitarise" Ukraine has largely been achieved

Link:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/kremlin-decides-goal-demilitarise-ukraine-194912196.html




Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So are you of the opinion that they still have a few hundred thousands more to go until they get to the last Ukrainian?
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

So are you of the opinion that they still have a few hundred thousands more to go until they get to the last Ukrainian?


The Ukrainians will decide what they want to do

Why do you hate Ukraine?

First Page Last Page
Page 156 of 295
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.