The Official Russian Invasion of Ukraine Thread

938,700 Views | 10272 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by Cal88
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
700 acre expansion of the main military cemetery in Kiev:

In Kyiv, the construction of a new military cemetery with an area of 266 hectares has begun. In the spring, on the whole, the construction of a 100-hectare cemetery with a capacity of 250,000 people was completed, and the reburial of the bodies began.

With the construction of a new cemetery, it became possible to bury about 600 thousand more people.

The new cemetery is 7 hectares larger than the historic Arlington military cemetery in the US.
blungld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Timothy Snyder is a brilliant man, much brighter then the X Twitter hacks posting their drivel. He may or may not be correct in his assessment of Ukraine, but the jacksplat talking down to a brilliant American scholar is definitely wrong in his snark and meme-wisdom.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Russia is continuing to laterally redeploy troops to bolster its defense across the front, but that creates opportunities for Ukraine. Many of those troops have been operating without leave for far too long, and that's without getting into the constitution of Russian armed forces itself, lacking strong NCOs, lacking training for much of the force, etc.

Despite the claims of infinite resources, it's pretty obvious that Russia is struggling to defend itself at the front, in Crimea and in Russia itself. Ukraine took out an S400 system in Crimea and Russia obviously is in short supply so is relocating two systems from the Kuril islands. And Ukrainian drones are continuing to strike targets in Russia just about every day.





Couple of interesting reminders below about why Ukraine is skeptical of a negotiated agreement with Russia, even a favorable one, working out long-term.













movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The corruption continues:

[Via Zero Hedge} […] "Defense chief Oleksiy Reznikov has overseen a series of embarrassing military corruption scandals at a time Kiev is trying to tout its democratic and corruption reform credentials. He could be dismissed from the top post as early as next week and given a new role as ambassador to the United Kingdom."
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Prominent American neo-nazi thug/leader Kent 'Boneface' McLellan fought with the Azov Battalion and the Right Sector (the two largest and most prominent Ukrainian military squads) in the Donbass war ,and went back to Ukraine last year to fight the Russians.


Quote:

"In case the world wonders what happened to all the real skinheads, they all went to Ukraine,"McLellan said.

BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?


In 2019, ADL condemned the Azov Battalion as "neo-Nazi" and "white supremacist extremists." Now they won't say anything because the Biden Admin is arming Azov:
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He is a handsome fella.

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearHunter said:



In 2019, ADL condemned the Azov Battalion as "neo-Nazi" and "white supremacist extremists." Now they won't say anything because the Biden Admin is arming Azov:

Doesn't it get tough for you people sometimes... the utter back-and-forth confusion about how you're supposed to feel about Jews? Or do they just send you the talking points every day and you mindlessly parrot them?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe I'm kind of weird that way, but I find nazis to be particularly repulsive...

But seriously, isn't the confusion here really about the nature of the type of Ukrainian nationalism that has been pushed in that country?

This goes back to the post-war era, when Ukrainian nazi leaders were not only protected, but their movement funded and promoted by NATO (operation code name "Aerodynamic"). The 2014 Maidan Coup was the crowning point of that long-running political project.

https://mronline.org/2022/09/14/ukraine


Quote:

Mykola Kyrylovych Lebed was a Ukrainian nationalist political activist and guerrilla fighter. As a leader of OUN-B, he was responsible for the massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia.

In 1940, during the internal conflict that erupted within the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) he supported Stepan Bandera, and, in 1941, became his assistant.

Lebed assumed control of Bandera's faction of the OUN in western Ukraine, which would come to dominate the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) until 1943. As leader of OUN-B, Lebed was responsible for the ethnic cleansing of around 100,000 Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia, including giving orders to carry out the killings

In 1949 he emigrated to the United States and lived in New York. Through Prolog Research Corporation, his CIA funded organization, he gathered intelligence on the Soviet Union as late as into the late 1960s. The CIA project name for the operation was AERODYNAMIC.

Post-war activities

From 1949, Lebed lived in the United States. During 19521974, he headed the Prolog Research Center in New York; in 198285, he was Deputy Chairman and since 1974 he was a Member of the Board of Directors of the institution. In 1956-91 he was a member of the board of the Ukrainian Society of Foreign Studies in Munich and Toronto, publishing committee "Chronicle of the UPA (1975). Author memories "UPA" (1946, 1987). Thanks to his collaboration with the CIA and their active shielding of him, Lebed was never tried for the war crimes he and his men had committed against Poles and Jews during WWII.

The massacres were exceptionally brutal and affected primarily women and children. The UPA's actions resulted in up to 100,000 deaths. Other victims of the massacres included several hundred Jews, Russians, Czechs, Georgians, and Ukrainians who were part of Polish families or opposed the UPA and sabotaged the massacres by hiding Polish escapees.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mykola_Lebed

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/revealed-how-the-cia-protected-nazi-murderers-2158071.html

https://www.jpost.com/international/cia-report-details-ties-between-us-and-ex-nazis

https://jacobin.com/2022/02/maidan-protests-neo-nazis-russia-nato-crimea
BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

BearHunter said:

In 2019, ADL condemned the Azov Battalion as "neo-Nazi" and "white supremacist extremists." Now they won't say anything because the Biden Admin is arming Azov:

Doesn't it get tough for you people sometimes... the utter back-and-forth confusion about how you're supposed to feel about Jews? Or do they just send you the talking points every day and you mindlessly parrot them?

The talking point you're supposed to parrot was that Trump said Nazis were fine people at Charlottesville. But Trump denounced them and referred to people on both sides of the statue debate as fine people. You guys are the suckers 90% of the time.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

He is a handsome fella.
Big C said:


Doesn't it get tough for you people sometimes... the utter back-and-forth confusion about how you're supposed to feel about Jews? Or do they just send you the talking points every day and you mindlessly parrot them?

I'm assuming by the unignored posts in an island of blanks that in the absence of any positive news from the front, our resident shills have resorted to their tried and true Ukraine-phobia. They can't help but support the genocide that their dear Putin calls for as one among many false justifications for the war-mongering they amplify.



But there is plenty for them to crow about - they should be proud of the Russian innovation that will surely protect their air force when their old fashioned air defenses cannot stop Ukrainian drones



And they have no reason to be concerned about Ukraine's developing drone program.



And despite Russia's self-avowed unlimited supply of artillery, they are getting outshelled in the south. Perhaps because it's hard to shell when you are retreating / redeploying your troops laterally because you don't know what you are doing.



Rather than acknowledge what's really going on, I've seen shills lately resorting to pathetic propaganda - like pretending that Ukraine is originating attacks from NATO baltics and that the make believe originations will cause Russia to escalate against NATO.

Russia has its hands full with Ukraine and limited assistance from NATO, it wants no part of actual NATO. And Ukraine has shown again and again it does perfectly fine launching attacks from within Russia (where Ukraine claims it launched the recent attacks on Pskov) or from Ukraine proper. If Russia doesn't want to face attacks on Russian soil, it should withdraw from Ukraine and offer something that will get Ukraine to stop - perhaps a partial demilitarization would suffice.




bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
….and for the crowd that likes conspiracy theories like Biden stole the 2020 Election and there exists a Deep State, add this to your basket:

Putin may already be DEAD as 'real' despot has not been seen in public for over a year, Ukrainian spy chief claims


https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/23769416/putin-body-double-doppelganger-ukraine-russia-kyrylo-budanov/



Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Russia-Ukraine war: List of key events, day 558 | Russia-Ukraine war News | Al Jazeera


https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/9/4/russia-ukraine-war-list-of-key-events-day-558

The United Kingdom's military intelligence said Moscow was recruiting from at least 6 million migrants from Central Asia and neighbouring countries, who are living in Russia, to fight in Ukraine. "Exploiting foreign nationals allows the Kremlin to acquire additional personnel for its war effort in the face of increasing losses," the UK's defence ministry said in its latest update.

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
^ Put this meat grinder side by side with one that is 7-8 times larger, and you will get a true picture of what has really been going on as far as the relative losses - the kind of picture that the British War Department and its affiliates will not divulge.

Since this counteroffensiive started exactly 90 days ago, the KIA ratio has gotten even more lopsided, the Russians have been sitting back from heavily fortified positions and pounding away at the armored columns and human waves that have kept coming at them for the last 3 months, concentrating into "fire pockets".

Those Ukrainian tactics, forced upon them by NATO, which wants tangible results that could justify continuing their massive investment, have played into Russian hands.

NATO and Ukrainian authorities figure they can still keep taking heavy losses as long as their propaganda war is unabated. It's OK if 45,000-50,000 Ukrainian soldiers die the last 3 months, as long as you can blow up the occasional drone hit on Russia into some kind of a gamechanging victory.

The parallels between current-day Ukraine and late-stage WW2 Germany are striking, Germany also used weapons like the V2 to occasionally hit random targets behind enemy lines in order to maintain morale at home. It wasn't until the last few months of the war that the reality started to sink in at home.
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

BearHunter said:



In 2019, ADL condemned the Azov Battalion as "neo-Nazi" and "white supremacist extremists." Now they won't say anything because the Biden Admin is arming Azov:

Doesn't it get tough for you people sometimes... the utter back-and-forth confusion about how you're supposed to feel about Jews? Or do they just send you the talking points every day and you mindlessly parrot them?

The only confusion is for the warmonger left and their straw man arguments. If every conservative is responsible for the bigotry of neo-Nazis, then every liberal is responsible for Stalin, Mao, Antifa, and most of all, southern Democrats from whom they directly trace their lineage.

It's abundantly clear who the real Nazis are in this war. Holocaust mass murderers are celebrated TO THIS VERY DAY in Ukraine. Unlike the left, I don't assume their side believes in the goals of Nazism even though their uncritical support of actual Nazis would suggest that this is the case.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I had a client in the 1980's that was a fighter pilot in WWII. He told me in the final year of the war the Germans had a few jets in the sky (Messerschmitt Me 262) and that the first time he and his buddies saw one fly by them they said, "What the f@uck was that?"

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yes the Me262 was a decade ahead of its time, first plane with swept wings, much better design than the British Gloster Meteor that they developped a year after. Thankfully the Me262 was held back by Hitler who wanted to turn it into a fighter-bomber to the dismay of German Luftwaffe leaders like ace Adolf Galland. The Germans were also severely hampered in the late stages of the war by their shortages in fuel and high-end alloys which severely curtailed the operating life and performance of the Me262 Jumo engines.

Furthermore the Germans wasted their meager resources on weapons like the V1 ("V" for vengeance), which were imprecise jet-powered cruise missiles, and the V1, which was the first ballistic missile, also imprecise. Had they channeled their efforts into building up a large force of Me262 and cheaper Heinkel 162 earlier in the war, they could have easily held back US bombing operations over Germany. Hitler insisted on expanding the V programs with 30,000 V1s and 3,000 V2s built, an incredible waste of their resources.

Hitler favored the V1/V2 because it assuaged his personal lust for vengeance, and because footage of burned up buildings in London or Birmingham helped his propaganda war. These bombings had a near zero impact on the war itself, the V missiles had a very limited military impact. That is the parallel with the Ukrainian drone attacks on Crimea and Moscow, it's mostly a psychological tool.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Germans also made one of the first assault rifles during WWII, the StG 44.

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
El Pais: Under the bombs in the Kupiansk bastion: Russia unleashes artillery while amassing infantry

Lots of detail.

https://english.elpais.com/international/2023-09-04/under-the-bombs-in-the-kupiansk-bastion-russia-unleashes-artillery-while-amassing-infantry.html
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How far away, typically, do they fire artillery. 30KM, 50KM?
BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?


J6 riot Nazis. One of them was affiliated with the Ukraine Azov Battalion.
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearHunter said:



J6 riot Nazis. One of them was affiliated with the Ukraine Azov Battalion.
I can honestly say that my support of our efforts in Ukraine is not about Ukrainians.

It is about our own interest, protecting the existing world order, and not allowing one of our biggest detractors to gain more land and power through aggression.

If it were about lives of the innocent, we would not look the other way in all of the conflicts in Africa or Middle East while we gleefully purchase conflict minerals. oil and diamonds. Now, if Xi invaded Africa, with both Russia and China looking to displace us in the world order, we would care (other than those who would rather promote our enemies).

All of this back and forth on this thread about who is worthy and who is not is just theatrical. The only debate we should be having is what protects our short-term and long-term interest the most.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:


I can honestly say that my support of our efforts in Ukraine is not about Ukrainians.

It is about our own interest, protecting the existing world order, and not allowing one of our biggest detractors to gain more land and power through aggression.

If it were about lives of the innocent, we would not look the other way in all of the conflicts in Africa or Middle East while we gleefully purchase conflict minerals. oil and diamonds. Now, if Xi invaded Africa, with both Russia and China looking to displace us in the world order, we would care (other than those who would rather promote our enemies).

All of this back and forth on this thread about who is worthy and who is not is just theatrical. The only debate we should be having is what protects our short-term and long-term interest the most.



I don't believe there has been much of that type of discussion in this thread. Some people are pretending that any criticism of Putin's invasion amounts to "Russiaphobia." I don't think any one supporting Ukraine (as I do) is pretending tht Ukraine is a Utopia populated by unicorns - just that they shouldn't have to suffer a genocide brought on by Putin's corrupt revanchism.

But your version of realism will be met by stiff propaganda claiming that all we've done is made Russia stronger lol.

Here are some examples of that Russian strength that we've contributed to:










In reality, Russia's true strength lies in its, well, lies. As you can see in this thread if you don't have people on ignore, the amplification of Russia's laughably false propaganda has become a dominant feature in much of the Western discourse.



Meanwhile, for less than 3% of our military budget we have learned more in the last 18 months about modern warfare with "peer" nations than we have in decades. We could probably reduce our military spend by 10% with what we've learned and be far more effective for it. We now know that cheap commodity drones (including waxed paper ones!) can be extremely effective against "state of the art" weapons systems that we and Russia have been developing for decades. We know that Russia's hypersonic missiles are easily defeated.

We now know where our weaknesses would be vs an aggressor like Russia and where our priorities should be. And however this dumb war ends, Russia will take a very long time to recover, if ever, its prior military might.

There are a lot of people pretending to support "realism" but what they really mean is that they support Russia doing whatever Putin decides to do. Your version of realism is from an American perspective which makes sense since you are an American. I would much prefer that Putin never invaded Ukraine and that he withdraw his forces and contribute to the rebuilding of a sovereign Ukraine without interference but we do not control Putin or his decisions.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

calbear93 said:


I can honestly say that my support of our efforts in Ukraine is not about Ukrainians.

It is about our own interest, protecting the existing world order, and not allowing one of our biggest detractors to gain more land and power through aggression.

If it were about lives of the innocent, we would not look the other way in all of the conflicts in Africa or Middle East while we gleefully purchase conflict minerals. oil and diamonds. Now, if Xi invaded Africa, with both Russia and China looking to displace us in the world order, we would care (other than those who would rather promote our enemies).

All of this back and forth on this thread about who is worthy and who is not is just theatrical. The only debate we should be having is what protects our short-term and long-term interest the most.



I don't believe there has been much of that type of discussion in this thread. Some people are pretending that any criticism of Putin's invasion amounts to "Russiaphobia." I don't think any one supporting Ukraine (as I do) is pretending tht Ukraine is a Utopia populated by unicorns - just that they shouldn't have to suffer a genocide brought on by Putin's corrupt revanchism.

But your version of realism will be met by stiff propaganda claiming that all we've done is made Russia stronger lol.

Here are some examples of that Russian strength that we've contributed to:










In reality, Russia's true strength lies in its, well, lies. As you can see in this thread if you don't have people on ignore, the amplification of Russia's laughably false propaganda has become a dominant feature in much of the Western discourse.



Meanwhile, for less than 3% of our military budget we have learned more in the last 18 months about modern warfare with "peer" nations than we have in decades. We could probably reduce our military spend by 10% with what we've learned and be far more effective for it. We now know that cheap commodity drones (including waxed paper ones!) can be extremely effective against "state of the art" weapons systems that we and Russia have been developing for decades. We know that Russia's hypersonic missiles are easily defeated.

We now know where our weaknesses would be vs an aggressor like Russia and where our priorities should be. And however this dumb war ends, Russia will take a very long time to recover, if ever, its prior military might.

There are a lot of people pretending to support "realism" but what they really mean is that they support Russia doing whatever Putin decides to do. Your version of realism is from an American perspective which makes sense since you are an American. I would much prefer that Putin never invaded Ukraine and that he withdraw his forces and contribute to the rebuilding of a sovereign Ukraine without interference but we do not control Putin or his decisions.


Nobody here is pretending that any criticism of Putin's invasion amounts to "Russiaphobia." I didn't read the rest since you were immediately accusatory and lied.
Lets Go Brandon 16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

calbear93 said:


I can honestly say that my support of our efforts in Ukraine is not about Ukrainians.

It is about our own interest, protecting the existing world order, and not allowing one of our biggest detractors to gain more land and power through aggression.

If it were about lives of the innocent, we would not look the other way in all of the conflicts in Africa or Middle East while we gleefully purchase conflict minerals. oil and diamonds. Now, if Xi invaded Africa, with both Russia and China looking to displace us in the world order, we would care (other than those who would rather promote our enemies).

All of this back and forth on this thread about who is worthy and who is not is just theatrical. The only debate we should be having is what protects our short-term and long-term interest the most.



I don't believe there has been much of that type of discussion in this thread. Some people are pretending that any criticism of Putin's invasion amounts to "Russiaphobia." I don't think any one supporting Ukraine (as I do) is pretending tht Ukraine is a Utopia populated by unicorns - just that they shouldn't have to suffer a genocide brought on by Putin's corrupt revanchism.

But your version of realism will be met by stiff propaganda claiming that all we've done is made Russia stronger lol.

Here are some examples of that Russian strength that we've contributed to:

(U.S. propaganda snipped)





Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

BearHunter said:



J6 riot Nazis. One of them was affiliated with the Ukraine Azov Battalion.
I can honestly say that my support of our efforts in Ukraine is not about Ukrainians.

It is about our own interest, protecting the existing world order, and not allowing one of our biggest detractors to gain more land and power through aggression.

If it were about lives of the innocent, we would not look the other way in all of the conflicts in Africa or Middle East while we gleefully purchase conflict minerals. oil and diamonds. Now, if Xi invaded Africa, with both Russia and China looking to displace us in the world order, we would care (other than those who would rather promote our enemies).

All of this back and forth on this thread about who is worthy and who is not is just theatrical. The only debate we should be having is what protects our short-term and long-term interest the most.


Agreed. Well put.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:



There are a lot of people pretending to support "realism" but what they really mean is that they support Russia doing whatever Putin decides to do.
Almost forgot to mention Putin's latest attempt to dehumanize Ukrainians while also spreading anti-semitic rhetoric. And we're supposed to pretend like he's trying to rid Ukraine of nazis.


Quote:

"Western curators have put a person at the head of modern Ukraine - an ethnic Jew, with Jewish roots, with Jewish origins. And thus, in my opinion, they seem to be covering up an anti-human essence that is the foundation ... of the modern Ukrainian state," Putin said.
And I forgot to list this recent evidence of success. Russia's war is so successful that they are resorting to conning Cubans to go to the front lines for $2200 and promises of Russian passports.




And one more for lols.


dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?

This thing with tires on the planes has been repeated before, but what hasn't been said is how exactly tires would protect the planes. The fuselage isn't covered in tires. A drone can still damage a plane even with tires on it. What role are the tires supposed to play?
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calbear93 said:

BearHunter said:



J6 riot Nazis. One of them was affiliated with the Ukraine Azov Battalion.
I can honestly say that my support of our efforts in Ukraine is not about Ukrainians.

It is about our own interest, protecting the existing world order, and not allowing one of our biggest detractors to gain more land and power through aggression.

If it were about lives of the innocent, we would not look the other way in all of the conflicts in Africa or Middle East while we gleefully purchase conflict minerals. oil and diamonds. Now, if Xi invaded Africa, with both Russia and China looking to displace us in the world order, we would care (other than those who would rather promote our enemies).

All of this back and forth on this thread about who is worthy and who is not is just theatrical. The only debate we should be having is what protects our short-term and long-term interest the most.


All very true. Our interests (and the broader interests of liberal democracy) are served and it isn't costing us that much to do it.

(And before we get the usual retort that we are "sacrificing Ukrainian lives" for our interests . . . it's quite clear that we can't make foreign peoples fight if they don't want to fight. This aligns with their interests too.)
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

calbear93 said:

BearHunter said:



J6 riot Nazis. One of them was affiliated with the Ukraine Azov Battalion.
I can honestly say that my support of our efforts in Ukraine is not about Ukrainians.

It is about our own interest, protecting the existing world order, and not allowing one of our biggest detractors to gain more land and power through aggression.

If it were about lives of the innocent, we would not look the other way in all of the conflicts in Africa or Middle East while we gleefully purchase conflict minerals. oil and diamonds. Now, if Xi invaded Africa, with both Russia and China looking to displace us in the world order, we would care (other than those who would rather promote our enemies).

All of this back and forth on this thread about who is worthy and who is not is just theatrical. The only debate we should be having is what protects our short-term and long-term interest the most.


All very true. Our interests (and the broader interests of liberal democracy) are served and it isn't costing us that much to do it.

(And before we get the usual retort that we are "sacrificing Ukrainian lives" for our interests . . . it's quite clear that we can't make foreign peoples fight if they don't want to fight. This aligns with their interests too.)

That's bullcrap, we can, and have set up regimes that will chase after 60 year olds and forcibly conscript them. We have also pushed the worst kind of nationalism in that country, their heritage from western Ukrainian OUN/UPA fascism, funding them and putting them in Kiev through the Maidan Coup.




The Kiev regime has gone through well close to a million men, with nearly 400,000KIAs and at least as many wounded (including 50,000 confirmed amputees) they are now trying to forcibly consrcipt their diaspora in Poland, Slovakia, Romania etc.




Quote:

All of this back and forth on this thread about who is worthy and who is not is just theatrical. The only debate we should be having is what protects our short-term and long-term interest the most.

We're destroying Ukraine, using them as a wedge against Russia. However, it turns out that this scheme has not benefitted US interests, it has only served to accelerate global dedolarization and the strengthening of the BRICS block, not sealing the Russian alliance with China but also bringing India in the fold and integrating much of OPEC+ including Saudi Arabia into their alliance. Russia is emerging stronger economically, militarily and diplomatically.
calbear93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

calbear93 said:

BearHunter said:



J6 riot Nazis. One of them was affiliated with the Ukraine Azov Battalion.
I can honestly say that my support of our efforts in Ukraine is not about Ukrainians.

It is about our own interest, protecting the existing world order, and not allowing one of our biggest detractors to gain more land and power through aggression.

If it were about lives of the innocent, we would not look the other way in all of the conflicts in Africa or Middle East while we gleefully purchase conflict minerals. oil and diamonds. Now, if Xi invaded Africa, with both Russia and China looking to displace us in the world order, we would care (other than those who would rather promote our enemies).

All of this back and forth on this thread about who is worthy and who is not is just theatrical. The only debate we should be having is what protects our short-term and long-term interest the most.


All very true. Our interests (and the broader interests of liberal democracy) are served and it isn't costing us that much to do it.

(And before we get the usual retort that we are "sacrificing Ukrainian lives" for our interests . . . it's quite clear that we can't make foreign peoples fight if they don't want to fight. This aligns with their interests too.)

That's bullcrap, we can, and have set up regimes that will chase after 60 year olds and forcibly conscript them. We have also pushed the worst kind of nationalism in that country, their heritage from western Ukrainian OUN/UPA fascism, funding them and putting them in Kiev through the Maidan Coup.




The Kiev regime has gone through well close to a million men, with nearly 400,000KIAs and at least as many wounded (including 50,000 confirmed amputees) they are now trying to forcibly consrcipt their diaspora in Poland, Slovakia, Romania etc.




Quote:

All of this back and forth on this thread about who is worthy and who is not is just theatrical. The only debate we should be having is what protects our short-term and long-term interest the most.

We're destroying Ukraine, using them as a wedge against Russia. However, it turns out that this scheme has not benefitted US interests, it has only served to accelerate global dedolarization and the strengthening of the BRICS block, not sealing the Russian alliance with China but also bringing India in the fold and integrating much of OPEC+ including Saudi Arabia into their alliance. Russia is emerging stronger economically, militarily and diplomatically.


Yet it seems strange that Russia is encouraging us to stay out when they are benefitting so much from our participation. It would seem like they would welcome it.

And India and Saudis are not siding with Russia. They are leveraging this opportunity to make more money on oil. The last thing India can do is make us their enemy when so much of their hyper growth is dependent on us. The bottom line is that we did mot want Russia to invade but once they did, we could not be like the liberal DAs and say come commit more crimes violating national sovereignty against nations that are siding with us over Russia. And China, as I am sure you know, has always viewed their destiny as replacing us as the leading world power. They will side with any country that challenges the current world order that promotes Western supremacy and democracy. Let's not pretend that had we given Russia a free pass to invade Ukraine that China would have become our friend to never invade Taiwan, would have created new alliances with us to keep our standing, etc. That's nonsense. The long term play was to show our allirs and our enemies that there will be consequences to those looking to displace us by invading countries that favor us.
Zippergate
How long do you want to ignore this user?

We're destroying Ukraine, using them as a wedge against Russia. However, it turns out that this scheme has not benefitted US interests, it has only served to accelerate global dedolarization and the strengthening of the BRICS block, not sealing the Russian alliance with China but also bringing India in the fold and integrating much of OPEC+ including Saudi Arabia into their alliance. Russia is emerging stronger economically, militarily and diplomatically.


100%. Biden neocons weaponized economic sanctions to a degree that has never been done before. Every country in the world is viewing the virulence of this economic attack and thinking, what if we are next? US dollars used to be the safest form of reserves. That is no longer the case. Then there is the fact that at the very least, the US sanctioned the attack on the pipeline of our ally, Germany. Bat**** crazy stuff, all in the name of power.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Russia is destroying Ukraine, by sending their military in and blowing stuff up. Not sure why people are confusing that for the United States.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zippergate said:


US dollars used to be the safest form of reserves. That is no longer the case.


Good take. What is now the safest form of reserves?
BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Russia is destroying Ukraine, by sending their military in and blowing stuff up. Not sure why people are confusing that for the United States.

So much for the Ukraine is winning narrative.
First Page Last Page
Page 188 of 294
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.