The Official Russian Invasion of Ukraine Thread

2,210,329 Views | 13785 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by BearlySane88
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cbbass1 said:

sycasey said:

This pro-Ukraine propagandist (formerly pro-Russia propagandist) has been especially strident about it.

hxxps://x.com/LauraLoomer/status/2079598033130414320


Earlier in July, Scott Ritter returned from his trip to Russia, the Donbass, and Crimea. He reports on the status of the Ukraine War.

Scott Ritter : Russia's Ukraine Strategy

Scott Ritter has been a pro-Russia propagandist for a long time.
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

cbbass1 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

Could not be more well-said



This would be relevant here if the US had actually started the war in Ukraine.


The U.S. did start the war in Ukraine.


No.

Yes.


Of course, you could always support the fight yourself.

Free Wags.
Also Free Dwight Way and ProBonoBear415.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

cbbass1 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

Could not be more well-said



This would be relevant here if the US had actually started the war in Ukraine.


The U.S. did start the war in Ukraine.


No.

Yes.


Of course, you could always support the fight yourself.

I already stated that I am in favor of the US supporting Ukraine with money and supplies, not Americans actually fighting in the war.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

cbbass1 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

Could not be more well-said



This would be relevant here if the US had actually started the war in Ukraine.


The U.S. did start the war in Ukraine.


No.

Yes.


Of course, you could always support the fight yourself.

I already stated that I am in favor of the US supporting Ukraine with money and supplies, not Americans actually fighting in the war.


We are fighting the war, operating cruise missile, drone and HIMARS attacks planned by our intel and satellite reconnaissance for 4 years now, and more recently with targets deeper inside Russia. The Russians have recently returned the favor by providing real time satellite intel to the Iranians, and access to their GPS system. This has markedly improved the accuracy of Iranian attacks.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

cbbass1 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

Could not be more well-said



This would be relevant here if the US had actually started the war in Ukraine.


The U.S. did start the war in Ukraine.


No.

Yes.


Of course, you could always support the fight yourself.

I already stated that I am in favor of the US supporting Ukraine with money and supplies, not Americans actually fighting in the war.


We are fighting the war, operating cruise missile, drone and HIMARS attacks planned by our intel and satellite reconnaissance for 4 years now, and more recently with targets deeper inside Russia.

I think you know this is not what I mean by "Americans fighting in the war."
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

cbbass1 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

Could not be more well-said



This would be relevant here if the US had actually started the war in Ukraine.


The U.S. did start the war in Ukraine.


No.

Yes.


Of course, you could always support the fight yourself.

I already stated that I am in favor of the US supporting Ukraine with money and supplies, not Americans actually fighting in the war.


We are fighting the war, operating cruise missile, drone and HIMARS attacks planned by our intel and satellite reconnaissance for 4 years now, and more recently with targets deeper inside Russia.

I think you know this is not what I mean by "Americans fighting in the war."


We're leading the war, to the last Ukrainian.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

cbbass1 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

Could not be more well-said



This would be relevant here if the US had actually started the war in Ukraine.


The U.S. did start the war in Ukraine.


No.

Yes.


Of course, you could always support the fight yourself.

I already stated that I am in favor of the US supporting Ukraine with money and supplies, not Americans actually fighting in the war.


We are fighting the war, operating cruise missile, drone and HIMARS attacks planned by our intel and satellite reconnaissance for 4 years now, and more recently with targets deeper inside Russia.

I think you know this is not what I mean by "Americans fighting in the war."


We're leading the war, to the last Ukrainian.

The Ukrainians are choosing to fight the war. Not sure why you guys always want to remove their agency here.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

cbbass1 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

Could not be more well-said



This would be relevant here if the US had actually started the war in Ukraine.


The U.S. did start the war in Ukraine.


No.

Yes.


Of course, you could always support the fight yourself.

I already stated that I am in favor of the US supporting Ukraine with money and supplies, not Americans actually fighting in the war.


We are fighting the war, operating cruise missile, drone and HIMARS attacks planned by our intel and satellite reconnaissance for 4 years now, and more recently with targets deeper inside Russia.

I think you know this is not what I mean by "Americans fighting in the war."


We're leading the war, to the last Ukrainian.

The Ukrainians are choosing to fight the war. Not sure why you guys always want to remove their agency here.


Are you sure about that.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

cbbass1 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

Could not be more well-said



This would be relevant here if the US had actually started the war in Ukraine.


The U.S. did start the war in Ukraine.


No.

Yes.


Of course, you could always support the fight yourself.

I already stated that I am in favor of the US supporting Ukraine with money and supplies, not Americans actually fighting in the war.


We are fighting the war, operating cruise missile, drone and HIMARS attacks planned by our intel and satellite reconnaissance for 4 years now, and more recently with targets deeper inside Russia.

I think you know this is not what I mean by "Americans fighting in the war."


We're leading the war, to the last Ukrainian.

The Ukrainians are choosing to fight the war. Not sure why you guys always want to remove their agency here.


Are you sure about that.

Yes. I've seen it when the US tries to push a country towards a war they don't want to fight. Doesn't usually last very long. Ukraine is different.
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

cbbass1 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

Could not be more well-said



This would be relevant here if the US had actually started the war in Ukraine.


The U.S. did start the war in Ukraine.


No.

Yes.


Of course, you could always support the fight yourself.

I already stated that I am in favor of the US supporting Ukraine with money and supplies, not Americans actually fighting in the war.


We are fighting the war, operating cruise missile, drone and HIMARS attacks planned by our intel and satellite reconnaissance for 4 years now, and more recently with targets deeper inside Russia.

I think you know this is not what I mean by "Americans fighting in the war."


We're leading the war, to the last Ukrainian.

The Ukrainians are choosing to fight the war. Not sure why you guys always want to remove their agency here.

They're so excited about defending their homeland that their government literally kidnaps people off the street to forcibly conscript them into the army, but continue with your neverending fiction.
Free Wags.
Also Free Dwight Way and ProBonoBear415.
cbbass1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

cbbass1 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

Could not be more well-said



This would be relevant here if the US had actually started the war in Ukraine.


The U.S. did start the war in Ukraine.


No.

Yes.


Of course, you could always support the fight yourself.

I already stated that I am in favor of the US supporting Ukraine with money and supplies, not Americans actually fighting in the war.


We are fighting the war, operating cruise missile, drone and HIMARS attacks planned by our intel and satellite reconnaissance for 4 years now, and more recently with targets deeper inside Russia.

I think you know this is not what I mean by "Americans fighting in the war."


We're leading the war, to the last Ukrainian.

The Ukrainians are choosing to fight the war. Not sure why you guys always want to remove their agency here.

The Ukrainian People are done with this war.

Dictator Zelenskyy, his corrupt generals, Blackrock, & the LNG & rare-earth mineral investors, and the EU/NATO Russophobes are the ones who insist on keeping the war going. They don't suffer when the bombs explode. They aren't impacted when Ukrainians die.

dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

cbbass1 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

Could not be more well-said



This would be relevant here if the US had actually started the war in Ukraine.


The U.S. did start the war in Ukraine.


No.

Yes.


Of course, you could always support the fight yourself.

I already stated that I am in favor of the US supporting Ukraine with money and supplies, not Americans actually fighting in the war.


We are fighting the war, operating cruise missile, drone and HIMARS attacks planned by our intel and satellite reconnaissance for 4 years now, and more recently with targets deeper inside Russia.

I think you know this is not what I mean by "Americans fighting in the war."


We're leading the war, to the last Ukrainian.

The Ukrainians are choosing to fight the war. Not sure why you guys always want to remove their agency here.

They're so excited about defending their homeland that their government literally kidnaps people off the street to forcibly conscript them into the army, but continue with your neverending fiction.


New York had anti-draft riots during the Civil War so I guess the takeaway is the North didn't want to fight but Lincoln and some mysterious power forced them to.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

cbbass1 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

Could not be more well-said



This would be relevant here if the US had actually started the war in Ukraine.


The U.S. did start the war in Ukraine.


No.

Yes.


Of course, you could always support the fight yourself.

I already stated that I am in favor of the US supporting Ukraine with money and supplies, not Americans actually fighting in the war.


We are fighting the war, operating cruise missile, drone and HIMARS attacks planned by our intel and satellite reconnaissance for 4 years now, and more recently with targets deeper inside Russia.

I think you know this is not what I mean by "Americans fighting in the war."


We're leading the war, to the last Ukrainian.

The Ukrainians are choosing to fight the war. Not sure why you guys always want to remove their agency here.

They're so excited about defending their homeland that their government literally kidnaps people off the street to forcibly conscript them into the army, but continue with your neverending fiction.


New York had anti-draft riots during the Civil War so I guess the takeaway is the North didn't want to fight but Lincoln and some mysterious power forced them to.


Sure because Zelensky is like a Lincoln, Churchill and Luke Skywalker combined...

The "mysterious power" in the Ukraine war are goon squads that have been kidnapping thousands of hapless, random Ukrainian men on city streets for years now.






Zelensky was elected president on a platform of peace and reconciliation with the Donbas rebels, he presented himself as a Russian speaker who campaigned on getting along with the Russian minority.

Once he got in, he did a 180. No elections since 2019, while polls show overwhelming support in Ukraine for a negotiated settlement and an end to the war.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/693203/ukrainian-support-war-effort-collapses.aspx

Quote:

More than three years into the war, Ukrainians' support for continuing to fight until victory has hit a new low. In Gallup's most recent poll of Ukraine conducted in early July 69% say they favor a negotiated end to the war as soon as possible, compared with 24% who support continuing to fight until victory.

This marks a nearly complete reversal from public opinion in 2022, when 73% favored Ukraine fighting until victory and 22% preferred that Ukraine seek a negotiated end as soon as possible.

This poll was from last year, the antiwar support in Ukraine today is even higher than 69%.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zelensky is incredibly impressive and if he succeeds he will go down in history as a Churchill or Lincoln like figure. An ending that Putin has no hope for.

Also, polls about a "negotiated" end to the war are very vague. I'm surprised everybody doesn't support a "negotiated" end to the war. It reminds me of the Obama days when polls showed extremely high support for immigration "reform". Both the left and the right supported "reform" they just disagreed on what that meant.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

cbbass1 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

Could not be more well-said



This would be relevant here if the US had actually started the war in Ukraine.


The U.S. did start the war in Ukraine.


No.

Yes.


Of course, you could always support the fight yourself.

I already stated that I am in favor of the US supporting Ukraine with money and supplies, not Americans actually fighting in the war.


We are fighting the war, operating cruise missile, drone and HIMARS attacks planned by our intel and satellite reconnaissance for 4 years now, and more recently with targets deeper inside Russia.

I think you know this is not what I mean by "Americans fighting in the war."


We're leading the war, to the last Ukrainian.

The Ukrainians are choosing to fight the war. Not sure why you guys always want to remove their agency here.

They're so excited about defending their homeland that their government literally kidnaps people off the street to forcibly conscript them into the army, but continue with your neverending fiction.

You have been taken in by propaganda accounts that only show you one side of things. We've seen what it looks like when the Ukrainians actually want a change in leadership, on a mass scale.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Zelensky is incredibly impressive and if he succeeds he will go down in history as a Churchill or Lincoln like figure. An ending that Putin has no hope for.


Z is a salesman, a professional actor who has practiced for the role of president and sold that image via a TV sitcom. He's also a corrupt politician sitting atop the most corrupt country in Europe, he has skimmed hundreds of millions from the unaudited hundreds of billions in war funds.

Quote:

Also, polls about a "negotiated" end to the war are very vague. I'm surprised everybody doesn't support a "negotiated" end to the war. It reminds me of the Obama days when polls showed extremely high support for immigration "reform". Both the left and the right supported "reform" they just disagreed on what that meant.

Clearly not, look at that article again, the two options were:
- Ukraine should continue fighting until it wins the war
- Ukraine should seek to negotiate an ending to the war as soon as possible

And the responders agreeing with ending the war as soon as possible went from 22% in 2022 to 69% in 25, and it's probably well in the 70s today, while the pro-war faction went from 72% to 25% in that time span.



UKRAINIANS DON'T SUPPORT THIS WAR.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm sure many Ukrainians would like the war to be over but that doesn't mean they want Zelenskyy to just accept any terms Russia demands.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

I'm sure many Ukrainians would like the war to be over but that doesn't mean they want Zelenskyy to just accept any terms Russia demands.

Too bad it is so difficult to get a reliable poll of Russians
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another thing that really contradicts the idea that this war was started by the US is that if you go back to 2022, the US government was saying that they expected Kyiv to fall "within days." Originally we didn't think this was a winning fight either!

It was only because Ukraine showed they could repel the Russians that we decided to help. Meanwhile, most of the people the Russia stans here love citing were still predicting that Putin would not invade. These guys keep being wrong about the war, and yet we keep hearing from them.

Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

cbbass1 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

Could not be more well-said



This would be relevant here if the US had actually started the war in Ukraine.


The U.S. did start the war in Ukraine.


No.

Yes.


Of course, you could always support the fight yourself.

I already stated that I am in favor of the US supporting Ukraine with money and supplies, not Americans actually fighting in the war.


We are fighting the war, operating cruise missile, drone and HIMARS attacks planned by our intel and satellite reconnaissance for 4 years now, and more recently with targets deeper inside Russia.

I think you know this is not what I mean by "Americans fighting in the war."


We're leading the war, to the last Ukrainian.

The Ukrainians are choosing to fight the war. Not sure why you guys always want to remove their agency here.

They're so excited about defending their homeland that their government literally kidnaps people off the street to forcibly conscript them into the army, but continue with your neverending fiction.

You have been taken in by propaganda accounts that only show you one side of things. We've seen what it looks like when the Ukrainians actually want a change in leadership, on a mass scale.

I didn't realize Victoria Nuland and John McCain had dual citizenship.
Free Wags.
Also Free Dwight Way and ProBonoBear415.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

cbbass1 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

Could not be more well-said



This would be relevant here if the US had actually started the war in Ukraine.


The U.S. did start the war in Ukraine.


No.

Yes.


Of course, you could always support the fight yourself.

I already stated that I am in favor of the US supporting Ukraine with money and supplies, not Americans actually fighting in the war.


We are fighting the war, operating cruise missile, drone and HIMARS attacks planned by our intel and satellite reconnaissance for 4 years now, and more recently with targets deeper inside Russia.

I think you know this is not what I mean by "Americans fighting in the war."


We're leading the war, to the last Ukrainian.

The Ukrainians are choosing to fight the war. Not sure why you guys always want to remove their agency here.

They're so excited about defending their homeland that their government literally kidnaps people off the street to forcibly conscript them into the army, but continue with your neverending fiction.

You have been taken in by propaganda accounts that only show you one side of things. We've seen what it looks like when the Ukrainians actually want a change in leadership, on a mass scale.

I didn't realize Victoria Nuland and John McCain had dual citizenship.

Pinning that whole thing on them is also taking the Ukrainians' agency away. They encouraged the Maidan revolution; they didn't create it.
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good old American media war hypocrisy in action

Free Wags.
Also Free Dwight Way and ProBonoBear415.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

sycasey said:

cbbass1 said:

sycasey said:

Aunburdened said:

Could not be more well-said



This would be relevant here if the US had actually started the war in Ukraine.


The U.S. did start the war in Ukraine.


No.

Yes.


Of course, you could always support the fight yourself.

I already stated that I am in favor of the US supporting Ukraine with money and supplies, not Americans actually fighting in the war.


We are fighting the war, operating cruise missile, drone and HIMARS attacks planned by our intel and satellite reconnaissance for 4 years now, and more recently with targets deeper inside Russia.

I think you know this is not what I mean by "Americans fighting in the war."


We're leading the war, to the last Ukrainian.

The Ukrainians are choosing to fight the war. Not sure why you guys always want to remove their agency here.

They're so excited about defending their homeland that their government literally kidnaps people off the street to forcibly conscript them into the army, but continue with your neverending fiction.

You have been taken in by propaganda accounts that only show you one side of things. We've seen what it looks like when the Ukrainians actually want a change in leadership, on a mass scale.

I didn't realize Victoria Nuland and John McCain had dual citizenship.

Pinning that whole thing on them is also taking the Ukrainians' agency away. They encouraged the Maidan revolution; they didn't create it.


A multi billion dollar, multi year "encouragement".
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ukrainian agent sneaks IED bomb in a terrorist bombing operation of a crowded Moscow restaurant.

Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The war is not going well for Ukraine, contrary to what a lot of the MSM has been reporting lately.

This is the assessment of a pro-Ukrainian source :



" Over the last few weeks, the situation for Ukraine on the frontline has rapidly deteriorated in an unprecedented manner not seen since early 2025.

In the northeastern corner Kharkiv Oblast, Russia has achieved two localised breakthroughs, threatening to encircle more than 360 km of Ukrainian-controlled territory.

In the Dobropillya direction, one of the most formidable Ukrainian strongholds which has stood for over a year has been breached, with Russian forces now flooding Ukrainian positions in the urban agglomeration between Pokrovsk and Dobropillya.

In the Kramatorsk/Slovyansk direction, Ukraine has been unable to slow down Russian advances, with Russia now coming within 4.7 km of both Slovyansk and Kramatorsk, and coming close to fully capturing the crucial tactical ridgeline east of these two final Donbas cities.

In the Kostyantynivka direction, Russia has captured Chasiv Yar after 840 days of battles, and has almost completed the capture of Kostyantynivka. The salient west of Chasiv Yar is falling apart day by day as Ukraine withdraws.

In the Druzhkivka direction, Russia achieved a localised breakthrough of up to 6 km, capturing 3 villages and entering 3 others, coming within 5.1 km of Druzhkivka, and threatening the Ukrainian salient west of Kostyantynivka with encirclement.

In the Omelnyk direction, Russia has finally captured the Ukrainian stronghold town of Zaliznychne after over 7 months of battles, and are making new advances west of the Haichur River towards Vozdyvzhivka.

In the Stepnohirsk direction, Russia has halted the Ukrainian counterattacks and have begun retaking previously lost ground, advancing northeast of Kamyanske and north from Mali Shcherbaky.

In the Kupyansk direction, the crucial Ukrainian bridgehead east of the Oskil River continues to shrink day by day, with Russian forces expanding their zone of control in the area of Novosynove, Kivsharivka, Pishchane, Petropavlivka, and Kupyansk itself.

Ukraine is losing incredibly important defensive positions necessary for holding the frontline in the future, especially the areas south of Dobropillya which should not be falling this quickly. However, they are seemingly intent on concentrating their assault forces in counterattacks north of Lyman, west of Komar, and south of Novopavlivka, which have questionable (at best) strategic reasoning for the heavy cost being endured.

The new Ukrainian Commander-in-Chief Mykhailo Drapatyi has inherited a situation that is getting worse by the day, and will have to make some serious and difficult decisions in order to try stabilise it towards the end of Summer."
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

The war is not going well for Ukraine, contrary to what a lot of the MSM has been reporting lately.

No it isn't.

Free Wags.
Also Free Dwight Way and ProBonoBear415.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ukraine just droned beachgoers in southern Russia and a college campus in the Russian city of Belgorod.


Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This has been happening thousands of times every month in Ukraine.

One common feature in these videos is that the crowd is invariably upset and disgusted at the act of kidnapping


bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
After reading about Trump screaming at Hegseth at Camp David for running out of gear, I decided to look into this subject. Shouldn't we be hiring some of these Ukranian fellers and signing them to max contracts?


Ukraine became a global superpower in drone and robot warfare through existential necessity, hyper-rapid innovation cycles, a vast decentralized commercial tech ecosystem, and heavy integration of artificial intelligence (AI).

1. The Ultra-Fast "Feedback Loop"
The defining advantage of Ukraine's drone industry is its unprecedentedly fast development cycle.

Real-time adaptation: Software developers, engineers, and frontline operators talk directly to one another.

Rapid fixes: Modifications to bypass new Russian electronic jamming are often coded, tested, and deployed to the front lines within days or weeks.

Networked operations: Instead of relying on one "perfect" drone, Ukraine deploys networked "families" of systems, reconnaissance, relay, interceptor, and strike drones working in tandem.

2. A Massive, Decentralized Private Tech Ecosystem

Unlike traditional Western defense models that rely on a few massive, slow-moving military contractors, Ukraine decentralized its production.

Brave1 Hub: The government created platforms like the Brave1 defense tech cluster to fast-track state registration, funding, and testing for private startups.

Garage-to-Frontline Pipeline: Hundreds of small commercial companies, student groups, and tech startups pivot directly to defense production.

Explosive catalog growth: Ukraine has integrated over 200 domestically developed aerial drone systems and more than 40 uncrewed ground vehicle (UGV) platforms into its military since 2022.

3. Overcoming Electronic Warfare via AI Autonomy

As Russia heavily deployed electronic warfare (EW) to jam radio frequencies and sever the link between human pilots and drones, Ukraine adapted by removing the human pilot from the final phase of attack.

Terminal Autonomy: Drones are equipped with cheap microchips running computer vision and machine learning. Once an operator identifies a target from afar, the AI takes over tracking. Even if Russia completely jams the radio signal, the drone locks on and strikes autonomously.

Automated Air Defense: Ukraine fields mass-produced interceptor drones (like Skyfall's P1 Sunjet Killer) that utilize AI-assisted targeting modules to track and crash into high-speed Russian attack drones.

4. Expansion into the "Robot Army" (UGVs & Naval Drones)

Uncrewed Ground Vehicles (UGVs): Ground robots (like the Rattel M and Rattel H) perform thousands of dangerous missions, including casualty evacuations, mine-laying, and autonomous supply logistics through heavily shelled areas.

Robotic Amphibious Landing Operations: Ukrainian forces have advanced to complex "marsupial" tactics, such as utilizing naval drones to beach on enemy shores and successfully deploy tracked, machine-gun-wielding ground robots to seize positions.

5. Drastic Cost Asymmetry

Ukraine learned to counter incredibly expensive weapons using ultra-cheap commercial components. For instance, rather than exhausting scarce, multi-million-dollar air defense missiles against Russian Shahed drones, Ukraine scaled up "Mala PPO" (small-scale air defense). This relies on thousands of mobile fire units and cheap First-Person View (FPV) interceptor drones manufactured daily for a fraction of the cost.

“Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside”
—Jim Morrison

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"After reading about Trump screaming at Hegseth at Camp David for running out of gear, I decided to look into this subject."

Lmao this didn't happen. The story was shopped around to a bunch of outlets, none could verify yet one chose to still run it.


bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's more likely true than not and everyone knows it. No one with knowledge of their track records for credibility believes any statement Trump, Hegseth or Levitt make about the status of the Iran War.
Trump actually had a Freudian slip when he said he was going to hunt down "leakers" of this information and imprison them. A "leaker" discloses facts not lies. Oops! They call that steppin' on the ole bockwurst.

“Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside”
—Jim Morrison

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He used quotes around the word leaker intentionally.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So it never happened, because... Trump's press secretary says it never happened.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

So it never happened, because... Trump's press secretary says it never happened.


Well done, you got it.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

He used quotes around the word leaker intentionally.


So quotation marks around the word "leakers" changes the meaning of that word to: the purveyors of false information/fake news?

“Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside”
—Jim Morrison

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
First Page
Page 394 of 395
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.