So let's get past this dumb conversation of whether or not Democrats support "open borders." They don't, and a true "open borders" policy is not on the table in any realistic way. I will concede that Democrats are much more likely to support increased immigration than Republicans and that their policies reflect that. Okay?
My question to conservatives is: Why is this bad? Why is it bad to support more immigration?
You would claim that Democrats only support this because they think it will help them electorally (the way Hispanic and Asian-American voting has fluctuated up and down over the decades suggests that this is not guaranteed to be true, by the way). By the same token, wouldn't Republicans only OPPOSE immigration because they think it will HURT them electorally? So what? Politicians are self-serving, what a news flash.
There are other reasons to support it, though. I support more immigration because:
1. On general principle, I think people should have personal freedom to move where they choose. Yes, I recognize that there are practical reasons why we can't just do this immediately (can't just let in criminals/terrorists/etc.). But fundamentally, we should strive to give people the opportunities to live where they want.
2. As far as I can tell, the bulk of the studies show that immigration is generally a net benefit to the country that allows it, economically and culturally. They also don't reduce wages for existing American workers, except maybe in small, specific sectors of the population. So why wouldn't we want to do that?
Given all of that, why would anyone bother entertaining such a thing as "replacement theory," even the watered-down version that Tucker Carlson offers? What policy-based reason is there for opposing a more open immigration policy?
My question to conservatives is: Why is this bad? Why is it bad to support more immigration?
You would claim that Democrats only support this because they think it will help them electorally (the way Hispanic and Asian-American voting has fluctuated up and down over the decades suggests that this is not guaranteed to be true, by the way). By the same token, wouldn't Republicans only OPPOSE immigration because they think it will HURT them electorally? So what? Politicians are self-serving, what a news flash.
There are other reasons to support it, though. I support more immigration because:
1. On general principle, I think people should have personal freedom to move where they choose. Yes, I recognize that there are practical reasons why we can't just do this immediately (can't just let in criminals/terrorists/etc.). But fundamentally, we should strive to give people the opportunities to live where they want.
2. As far as I can tell, the bulk of the studies show that immigration is generally a net benefit to the country that allows it, economically and culturally. They also don't reduce wages for existing American workers, except maybe in small, specific sectors of the population. So why wouldn't we want to do that?
Given all of that, why would anyone bother entertaining such a thing as "replacement theory," even the watered-down version that Tucker Carlson offers? What policy-based reason is there for opposing a more open immigration policy?
